User Panel
View Quote I bet they try to launch it before the election so the Democrats can brag about the great success of NASA under Democrat leadership. |
|
Quoted: I bet they try to launch it before the election so the Democrats can brag about the great success of NASA under Democrat leadership. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: I bet they try to launch it before the election so the Democrats can brag about the great success of NASA under Democrat leadership. and harris will go down there again to get more screen time |
|
Quoted: and harris will go down there again to get more screen time View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I bet they try to launch it before the election so the Democrats can brag about the great success of NASA under Democrat leadership. and harris will go down there again to get more screen time Good luck profiting from that, SLS is so over budget and has been delayed so long, Spacex's starship superheavy is going to quickly take the spotlight from them, especially when it comes to the moon missions. in fact, by 2024, SLS vs starship will be a great cudgel to beat democrats over with. |
|
Quoted: I've noticed in the past few weeks articles now referring to SLS/Artemis as "The most powerful rocket NASA has ever launched" Poor Nasa's going to have to edit lots of video and propaganda at KSC. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: It looks like the SLS and Starship race to first launch is going to get interesting again with reporters saying the SLS' most likely next launch attempt won't be until the Nov 14-27 window. While I want to see Artemis 1 fly, I think it would be fitting for NASA to have to refer to it as the second most powerful rocket in the world if Space X can pull it off first. I've noticed in the past few weeks articles now referring to SLS/Artemis as "The most powerful rocket NASA has ever launched" Poor Nasa's going to have to edit lots of video and propaganda at KSC. The shitposting from Musk is going to be glorious. Kharn |
|
It's outside the VAB, CAA moved back in towards the vehicle.
Waiting for final movement back into the VAB |
|
|
|
Based on the livecam, everything is back to normal and the door is closing. So it seems like it was probably pretty minor.
|
|
Listen, lad. I built this
|
|
|
Press conference with NASA right now on the rollback. One question was if they were going to try to launch in October and the representative said nothing is off the table but it would be very difficult for it to launch in October as they have other things they need to work around. Mid-November would be more likely. Apparently there are batteries and other limited life items that need to be monitored and replaced. To make an October launch they might not have time to replace some of the limited life components and other checks would be rushed. Cubesats would need to be recharged now as there levels have dropped due to all the delays. It's a 7-8 day process from when they decide to go for a launch to get the SLS rolled back out, connected, and everything prepped and reviewed for a launch.
As to the fire it was a 40 volt electrical panel on the wall of high bay 3. They are unsure of the cause. |
|
Quoted: Listen, lad. I built this View Quote Dammit! I can't resist anymore. The Mega Moon Rocket of Madness |
|
https://blogs.nasa.gov/artemis/2022/09/30/teams-confirm-no-damage-to-flight-hardware-focus-on-november-for-launch/
Teams Confirm No Damage to Flight Hardware, Focus on November for Launch Teams at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida conducted initial inspections Friday to assess potential impacts from Hurricane Ian. There was no damage to Artemis flight hardware, and facilities are in good shape with only minor water intrusion identified in a few locations. Next, engineers will extend access platforms around the Space Launch System rocket and Orion spacecraft inside the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) to prepare for additional inspections and start preparation for the next launch attempt, including retesting the flight termination system. As teams complete post-storm recovery operations, NASA has determined it will focus Artemis I launch planning efforts on the launch period that opens Nov. 12 and closes Nov. 27. Over the coming days, managers will assess the scope of work to perform while in the VAB and identify a specific date for the next launch attempt. Focusing efforts on the November launch period allows time for employees at Kennedy to address the needs of their families and homes after the storm and for teams to identify additional checkouts needed before returning to the pad for launch. |
|
What a fucking embarrassment this whole program has been for the Country. It's 4-5x more expensive to launch this dumb fucking rocket than it was the SPACE SHUTTLE! You know.... the super expensive thing to launch that everybody complained was way to expensive. This retarded project makes the Space Shuttle look like a bargain, darn near Dollar Tree store value. There is no good excusable reason to cost 2 billion per flight. It's all horribly bad mismanagement from start to finish.
I'm starting to thinking even humanity just becoming a inner solar system civilization is a super pipe dream. If people who run this program are allowed to continue on other projects. |
|
The reason it costs two billion per flight is one copy has to pay the annual costs of the entire standing army.
Plus, it has a bunch of facility expenses hidden in its costs. |
|
Quoted: Plus, it has a bunch of facility expenses hidden in its costs. View Quote Yeah, like paying a contractor a billion dollars to adapt an existing launch tower to SLS ... And then paying another contractor another billion dollars because it wasn't tall enough. Meanwhile, SpaceX is building a tower from scratch at a FRACTION of the cost. |
|
Quoted: Yeah, like paying a contractor a billion dollars to adapt an existing launch tower to SLS ... And then paying another contractor another billion dollars because it wasn't tall enough. Meanwhile, SpaceX is building a tower from scratch at a FRACTION of the cost. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Plus, it has a bunch of facility expenses hidden in its costs. Yeah, like paying a contractor a billion dollars to adapt an existing launch tower to SLS ... And then paying another contractor another billion dollars because it wasn't tall enough. Meanwhile, SpaceX is building a tower from scratch at a FRACTION of the cost. You got SpaceX landing used Stages back to Earth like a decade ago.... yeah that's a sharp gut punch.... because Artemis has none of that. NASA has been talking about wanting to build bases on other planets and the moon. NOT happening with a 2 billion per flight machine. In fact, I bet Artemis is quickly abandoned as a project. It is unsustainable. Either NASA ditches it or the rocket will bring the whole thing down. |
|
Quoted: You got SpaceX landing used Stages back to Earth like a decade ago.... yeah that's a sharp gut punch.... because Artemis has none of that. NASA has been talking about wanting to build bases on other planets and the moon. NOT happening with a 2 billion per flight machine. In fact, I bet Artemis is quickly abandoned as a project. It is unsustainable. Either NASA ditches it or the rocket will bring the whole thing down. View Quote Artemis will live on long after the SLS has taken its place in the dustbin of history. |
|
|
Quoted: I'm starting to thinking even humanity just becoming a inner solar system civilization is a super pipe dream. If people who run this program are allowed to continue on other projects. View Quote Fortunately for the human race, "these people" are not the only ones working on orbital rockets right now. Rocket Lab 2022 Investor Day & Neutron Update These guys inspire far more confidence. |
|
|
|
https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2022-10-20-NASA-Orders-Three-More-Orion-Spacecraft-from-Lockheed-Martin |
|
Quoted:
https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2022-10-20-NASA-Orders-Three-More-Orion-Spacecraft-from-Lockheed-Martin View Quote lol |
|
Quoted: Quoted:
https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2022-10-20-NASA-Orders-Three-More-Orion-Spacecraft-from-Lockheed-Martin lol Seriously we need to table any more SLS/Orion purchases until after Artemis 3. We could be on a different fucking (figurative) planet by the time starship has launched 10 times. Starship Orion probably needs to be a thing. Or starship crew dragon. Idk. I’m partly mad Elon is so insane he has only planned on full reliable quick landing and reuse from the get go and no intermediary disposable second stage. Maybe NASA asked him to not fuck with SLS and that’s why he hasn’t touched that third rail. Because it could and probably should kill SLS/Orion before Artemis 4 |
|
Quoted: I’m partly mad Elon is so insane he has only planned on full reliable quick landing and reuse from the get go and no intermediary disposable second stage. Maybe NASA asked him to not fuck with SLS and that’s why he hasn’t touched that third rail. Because it could and probably should kill SLS/Orion before Artemis 4 View Quote It's been noticed that the upcoming Starship prototypes are being assembled sans heat shield. I think they are considering a disposable second stage... |
|
Quoted: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/16393/9D1CD68B-7EAF-46FF-BEF2-9677F24392C1-2573791.jpg Spacex https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/16393/17BD39A3-6F99-479D-BC07-BE2A35618B52-2573795.jpg Blue Origin Yesterday, KSC/CCAFS, FL View Quote Did you attend the tour de KSC bicycle ride this weekend? |
|
"Nov. 14 with liftoff of the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket carrying the Orion spacecraft planned during a 69-minute launch window that opens at 12:07 a.m. EST"
So... Since it technically becomes the next day at midnight... actually the 13th is when to get ready to watch this. I haven't seen anything about when the rollout will be... anyone got any news for that? |
|
|
|
|
|
NSF coverage stats at 11:30pm
NASA Rolls Out SLS Rocket For Artemis 1 Mission |
|
|
If they do another rollback, they will have to paint a Wal-Mart logo on its side.
|
|
|
|
|
They're just hoping the potential hurricane switches direction and knocks that damn thing over. Then they can get another couple billion to build a new one and drag this thing out longer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
View Quote ok rock and roll |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.