User Panel
Wait so when talking about fags can you still say fags? It's important since fag month is coming up
What about blacks? |
|
Quoted: Good question. GD wants to run over cyclists, kill their children and rape the wives, and staff jokes along with them. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Is hate for CA people and cyclists still ok? Good question. GD wants to run over cyclists, kill their children and rape the wives, and staff jokes along with them. Cyclists are communists. |
|
Quoted: Well, for one thing, Ukraine is in an actual shooting war, with uniformed combatants. If You honestly can't tell the difference, then You are one of the mxxxxxc people who I dare not name, at this present time. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I understand the new rules. While I may disagree with them, whatever. We have a 4,000 long thread that frequently uses the word "orc" or "drunk" to describe Russians. Is this allowed or will people get warnings for derogatory words used towards Russians? It's used to describe the murderous Russian invaders who are trying to conquer Ukraine. Why are you White Knighting them? What affinity do you have for them? But then why can't we use codewords to describe the murderous sav****, am***, and din*** that are trying to conquer our cities? Well, for one thing, Ukraine is in an actual shooting war, with uniformed combatants. If You honestly can't tell the difference, then You are one of the mxxxxxc people who I dare not name, at this present time. |
|
How about white people? I assume any racist remarks about caucasian’s are still universally acceptable?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Awesome, well deserved……but we also banned the sound a flashlight makes when impacting someone’s cranium. The sound is made regardless of the ethnicity of the one being hit. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Ahhh yes, the ARFCOM slippery slope. Won’t be long until any and ALL comments of a disparaging nature, no matter what the subject or content will be deemed offensive and result in disciplinary action. Prove me wrong. I have literally banned a bunch of people in the past year who directly compared black people to monkeys. Awesome, well deserved……but we also banned the sound a flashlight makes when impacting someone’s cranium. The sound is made regardless of the ethnicity of the one being hit. The use of the word "tonk" was only prohibited when edgelords.decided to.start using it to refer to Hispanics/illegals. Literally, people would post stuff like "so I saw a bunch of tonks hanging out at the gas station ..." THAT'S when we prohibited it, when it became another "code word" for people who wanted to post wetb### or whatever, just like "dindu" or "Amish" seems to have become the edge lord term to refer to black people. |
|
Quoted: They aren't people so technically it doesn't count View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
I think people tend to assume comments are racist when in reality they are not, it is the person who is reading the post's own internal racism which looks for something that isn't there.
For example, If somebody posts that 32 people were shot over the weekend in chicago, and another person replies with "bunch of damn savages", I think a number of people here, probably come arfcom mods included, probably think that is directed as a racist comment aimed at blacks. Well in reality no, it was meant to portray chicagoans (off all races) in general as savages for letting this happen every damn weekend and not changing the laws and or electing someone to a position of power who would actually fix things instead of liberal mayor after liberal mayor. But for whatever reason certain people on this forum would have a knee jerk reaction and behave as though the comment were referring to blacks. Why is this I wonder? Should not the benefit of doubt belong to the person who made the post? What does that say about these knee jerk persons own internal biases that they see racism everywhere, even where none exists and give the commenter a warning when they did nothing wrong? Perhaps when you point a finger at someone, the other 3 fingers point back at you. In a situation where something ambiguous was said I was thinking maybe it would be better to ask the poster for clarification before issuing warning and bans. I guess this is one more reason I don't purchase forum membership here. I'll use the site and click through the ads but I don't feel comfortable paying for a membership to a place that censors as much as here. With that said, and turning a complete 180, I would like to thank the mods for the job they do. It's a thankless job and I think these guys do a far better job then most forums I have visited where rules are vague or none existant and you get banned with no explination. We've all seen forums like that. And these mods here seem to be more transparent then most too. So yeah, thanks. But you haven't earned my money yet. If this place ever went full on 1st Amendment and allowed maximum free speech allowed by the law in the USA then I would donate. You know, freedom of speech with certain exceptions. (I know it'll never happen) |
|
Quoted: Oh okay, I see. Next time I hear a burst from a Glock switch in my neighborhood I'll feel much safer. Thanks! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I understand the new rules. While I may disagree with them, whatever. We have a 4,000 long thread that frequently uses the word "orc" or "drunk" to describe Russians. Is this allowed or will people get warnings for derogatory words used towards Russians? It's used to describe the murderous Russian invaders who are trying to conquer Ukraine. Why are you White Knighting them? What affinity do you have for them? But then why can't we use codewords to describe the murderous sav****, am***, and din*** that are trying to conquer our cities? Well, for one thing, Ukraine is in an actual shooting war, with uniformed combatants. If You honestly can't tell the difference, then You are one of the mxxxxxc people who I dare not name, at this present time. Lolz. Yeah, yer practically living in Bahkmut! God Speed. Thank you for yer Cervix. |
|
Quoted: Tue use of the word "tonk" was only prohibited when edgelords.decided to.start using it to refer to Hispanics/illegals. Literally, people would post stuff like "so I saw a bunch of tonks hanging out at the gas station ..." THAT'S when we prohibited it, when it became another "code word" for people who wanted to post wetb### or whatever, just like "dindu" or "Amish" seems to have become the edge lord term to refer to black people. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Ahhh yes, the ARFCOM slippery slope. Won’t be long until any and ALL comments of a disparaging nature, no matter what the subject or content will be deemed offensive and result in disciplinary action. Prove me wrong. I have literally banned a bunch of people in the past year who directly compared black people to monkeys. Awesome, well deserved……but we also banned the sound a flashlight makes when impacting someone’s cranium. The sound is made regardless of the ethnicity of the one being hit. Tue use of the word "tonk" was only prohibited when edgelords.decided to.start using it to refer to Hispanics/illegals. Literally, people would post stuff like "so I saw a bunch of tonks hanging out at the gas station ..." THAT'S when we prohibited it, when it became another "code word" for people who wanted to post wetb### or whatever, just like "dindu" or "Amish" seems to have become the edge lord term to refer to black people. Yes…ILLEGALS We get illegals from damn near every nation on this planet crossing our border here and the term is used for any and all. You’d have a pretty hard time listening to a Border Patrol meeting without banning the agents. |
|
Quoted: Yes…ILLEGALS We get illegals from damn near every nation on this planet crossing our border here and the term is used for any and all. You’d have a pretty hard time listening to a Border Patrol meeting without banning the agents. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Ahhh yes, the ARFCOM slippery slope. Won’t be long until any and ALL comments of a disparaging nature, no matter what the subject or content will be deemed offensive and result in disciplinary action. Prove me wrong. I have literally banned a bunch of people in the past year who directly compared black people to monkeys. Awesome, well deserved……but we also banned the sound a flashlight makes when impacting someone’s cranium. The sound is made regardless of the ethnicity of the one being hit. Tue use of the word "tonk" was only prohibited when edgelords.decided to.start using it to refer to Hispanics/illegals. Literally, people would post stuff like "so I saw a bunch of tonks hanging out at the gas station ..." THAT'S when we prohibited it, when it became another "code word" for people who wanted to post wetb### or whatever, just like "dindu" or "Amish" seems to have become the edge lord term to refer to black people. Yes…ILLEGALS We get illegals from damn near every nation on this planet crossing our border here and the term is used for any and all. You’d have a pretty hard time listening to a Border Patrol meeting without banning the agents. Snort! |
|
Quoted: IBTL But seriously, the new "rules" are stupid. Why not just enforce the rules we already have? And if that argument sounds familiar, it should. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: IBTL But seriously, the new "rules" are stupid. Why not just enforce the rules we already have? And if that argument sounds familiar, it should. The "new" rules are stupid? Which one(s)? This was the guidance: 1) Feel free to discuss and criticize people involved in a posted story 2) Feel free to discuss disproportionate representation of race in crime statistics 3) Don't use racial slurs 4) Don't attack or insult all members of a race, stating they are animals, subhuman, feral, or making other broad brush negative comments applied to every single person of that race So tell me, which one of these not new rules is stupid? Which one can't you live with? Quoted: I've always interpreted the safati binocular pic to imply that a small group of people in the poated video or article were acting like animals, not an entire race or culture. I loved the black guy version of the meme when a bunch of white idiots were brawling at Disney. Really? You see that image used often in threads about a crime involving a white perpetrator, do you? Let's not be disingenuous. There are at least a dozen threads a day where someone posts a news story (perhaps years old) involving a black person that immediately turns into a dogpile of people posting broad brush negative stereotypes about all black people. And we usually don't make it to page 2 before someone compares blacks to animals. Not sometimes. Every day. Every. Single. Day. |
|
Everyone is Marclar.
Marklar by Kyle - South Park - Starvin' Marvin in Space |
|
The term illegals can mean literally any one who is here unlawfully, including that white chap from canada who put the hammer down on paul pelosi. So at least in my eyes ILLEGALS is not racist. But I'm not a mod and what I think does not really count on this site.
|
|
Quoted: The use of the word "tonk" was only prohibited when edgelords.decided to.start using it to refer to Hispanics/illegals. Literally, people would post stuff like "so I saw a bunch of tonks hanging out at the gas station ..." THAT'S when we prohibited it, when it became another "code word" for people who wanted to post wetb### or whatever, just like "dindu" or "Amish" seems to have become the edge lord term to refer to black people. View Quote I have lived on or near the border most of my life and I have never heard the word “tonk” used in reference to Hispanic. When did that word come about? |
|
normally racial epithets arent defined in public, they are merely passed along under hushed breath. here we have an instance of racial slurs being used, defined and taunted against the site's CoC. (even though russians arent necessarily a race)
woohoo |
|
Quoted: Yes…ILLEGALS We get illegals from damn near every nation on this planet crossing our border here and the term is used for any and all. You’d have a pretty hard time listening to a Border Patrol meeting without banning the agents. View Quote Have to agree, we used that term to refer to all illegals/EWIs, not just one specific country of origin. |
|
What about pedos? Can we say that all the pedos should be rounded up and lit afire?
|
|
Quoted: Have to agree, we used that term to refer to all illegals/EWIs, not just one specific country of origin. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Yes…ILLEGALS We get illegals from damn near every nation on this planet crossing our border here and the term is used for any and all. You’d have a pretty hard time listening to a Border Patrol meeting without banning the agents. Have to agree, we used that term to refer to all illegals/EWIs, not just one specific country of origin. Exactly but you think that matters ? |
|
|
Quoted: And what about the word “Thug” ? What’s the ruling on that ? View Quote Do you want a 200 page CoC? . The more rules we create, the more grey area there is for the edge lords to push into. Ultimately, it's contextual. If a liberal calls Clarence Thomas a "ghetto thug," is it racist? I'd say yes. If you call a black guy in Cabrini Green in Chicago who kills three children in a drug-fueled drive-by shooting a "ghetto thug," is it racist? I'd say no. |
|
Since the Prof is in the house, a serious question please: All of us well employed pure skins had a fair bit of fun with the “dirty Inky” crusade, but has this also been stamped out?
In all honestly, I do see some parallels. Ie. It sows division, and hatred, is insulting to a group of people who cannot help themselves, etc. The “Fatties” or “Fat bodies” or “Ham Planets” or “MayoTankers” or “HamBeasts” are another group frequently maligned without repercussion. Can they still be named, insulted, etc? We need to know, ahead of time. It’s the uncertainty which makes people crazy. In all honestly, I’ve wondered if I can make Midcap jokes, for example. I can see a day where people start getting slapped down for that. |
|
Quoted: I have lived on or near the border most of my life and I have never heard the word “tonk” used in reference to Hispanic. When did that word come about? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The use of the word "tonk" was only prohibited when edgelords.decided to.start using it to refer to Hispanics/illegals. Literally, people would post stuff like "so I saw a bunch of tonks hanging out at the gas station ..." THAT'S when we prohibited it, when it became another "code word" for people who wanted to post wetb### or whatever, just like "dindu" or "Amish" seems to have become the edge lord term to refer to black people. I have lived on or near the border most of my life and I have never heard the word “tonk” used in reference to Hispanic. When did that word come about? It was a dumb arfcom thing, not an IRL thing. |
|
And what about the Irish?? We have been disparaged for our spousal abuse and drunkenness for centuries. Where are our reparations??!! Wait, what...
|
|
Quoted: You see, when a man and a woman love each other very much....... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Where do babies come from? You see, when a man and a woman love each other very much....... |
|
|
Quoted: Do you want a 200 page CoC? . The more rules we create, the more grey area there is for the edge lords to push into. Ultimately, it's contextual. If a liberal calls Clarence Thomas a "ghetto thug," is it racist? I'd say yes. If you call a black guy in Cabrini Green in Chicago who kills three children in a drug-fueled drive-by shooting a "ghetto thug," is it racist? I'd say no. View Quote Always respect you. This is just simply silly. Who gets to define the final context? People committee for public safety? Will they have Guillotines? |
|
|
Quoted: It was a dumb arfcom thing, not an IRL thing. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: The use of the word "tonk" was only prohibited when edgelords.decided to.start using it to refer to Hispanics/illegals. Literally, people would post stuff like "so I saw a bunch of tonks hanging out at the gas station ..." THAT'S when we prohibited it, when it became another "code word" for people who wanted to post wetb### or whatever, just like "dindu" or "Amish" seems to have become the edge lord term to refer to black people. I have lived on or near the border most of my life and I have never heard the word “tonk” used in reference to Hispanic. When did that word come about? It was a dumb arfcom thing, not an IRL thing. Thank you |
|
Quoted: Always respect you. This is just simply silly. Who gets to define the final context? People committee for public safety? Will they have Guillotines? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Do you want a 200 page CoC? . The more rules we create, the more grey area there is for the edge lords to push into. Ultimately, it's contextual. If a liberal calls Clarence Thomas a "ghetto thug," is it racist? I'd say yes. If you call a black guy in Cabrini Green in Chicago who kills three children in a drug-fueled drive-by shooting a "ghetto thug," is it racist? I'd say no. Always respect you. This is just simply silly. Who gets to define the final context? People committee for public safety? Will they have Guillotines? Should I NOT be banning people who compare black people to monkeys? If you agree that we do not want people like that posting on the site, then you agree there needs to be line. Where should the line be? |
|
I offer up continued abuse of Boulder and its residents as an alternative. I believe it's a good solution for a number of reasons:
1. We already like doing that. So there's no training required. 2. Boulder went 91% for Clinton, and it's only gotten worse. 3. Big Tech lives here, along with all their ponytailed nonbinary employees. 4. So unbelievably woke. 5. People "currently experiencing homelessness." 6-to-one-zillion. All the things. |
|
I could have sworn I heard "Tonk" used by a Border Patrol officer in a movie recently - the officer was played by that guy from "The Shield". |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Do you want a 200 page CoC? . The more rules we create, the more grey area there is for the edge lords to push into. Ultimately, it's contextual. If a liberal calls Clarence Thomas a "ghetto thug," is it racist? I'd say yes. If you call a black guy in Cabrini Green in Chicago who kills three children in a drug-fueled drive-by shooting a "ghetto thug," is it racist? I'd say no. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: And what about the word “Thug” ? What’s the ruling on that ? Do you want a 200 page CoC? . The more rules we create, the more grey area there is for the edge lords to push into. Ultimately, it's contextual. If a liberal calls Clarence Thomas a "ghetto thug," is it racist? I'd say yes. If you call a black guy in Cabrini Green in Chicago who kills three children in a drug-fueled drive-by shooting a "ghetto thug," is it racist? I'd say no. Ahhhh, now we get to the meat of the problem. Your explanation is perfectly reasonable but some other “mod” may not see it the same way and shoot from the hip. The rules are subjective and enforced based on how one person interprets the term or word and not by the letter of the law. |
|
It's all so tiresome.
Seriously...can't we all just get along? Maybe watch Coming to America and Blazing Saddles? |
|
Quoted: Always respect you. This is just simply silly. Who gets to define the final context? People committee for public safety? Will they have Guillotines? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Do you want a 200 page CoC? . The more rules we create, the more grey area there is for the edge lords to push into. Ultimately, it's contextual. If a liberal calls Clarence Thomas a "ghetto thug," is it racist? I'd say yes. If you call a black guy in Cabrini Green in Chicago who kills three children in a drug-fueled drive-by shooting a "ghetto thug," is it racist? I'd say no. Always respect you. This is just simply silly. Who gets to define the final context? People committee for public safety? Will they have Guillotines? Ghetto is defined by race? |
|
Quoted: Gypsies is a slur against the Romanian and Hungarian peoples. The G word should not be allowed View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: What about Gypsies Has anyone thought about them Gypsies is a slur against the Romanian and Hungarian peoples. The G word should not be allowed Are we banning Cher songs as well? That's my line in the sand. Cher - Gypsies, Tramps & Thieves (Official Video) [From The Sonny & Cher Comedy Hour] |
|
Quoted: Should I NOT be banning people who compare black people to monkeys? If you agree that we do not want people like that posting on the site, then you agree there needs to be line. Where should the line be? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Do you want a 200 page CoC? . The more rules we create, the more grey area there is for the edge lords to push into. Ultimately, it's contextual. If a liberal calls Clarence Thomas a "ghetto thug," is it racist? I'd say yes. If you call a black guy in Cabrini Green in Chicago who kills three children in a drug-fueled drive-by shooting a "ghetto thug," is it racist? I'd say no. Always respect you. This is just simply silly. Who gets to define the final context? People committee for public safety? Will they have Guillotines? Should I NOT be banning people who compare black people to monkeys? If you agree that we do not want people like that posting on the site, then you agree there needs to be line. Where should the line be? The Bannings for that sort of thing, were being dealt out prolifically for as long as I can remember. What brought about this latest crackdown? |
|
Quoted: Should I NOT be banning people who compare black people to monkeys? If you agree that we do not want people like that posting on the site, then you agree there needs to be line. Where should the line be? View Quote You proposed a question, I gave an opinion. The line needs to include equality, equity, and diversity....Not just POC. Your site your rules. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.