User Panel
Quoted:
Is the original Saudi Arabian purge thread gone now? When I click the link on the first page labeled "original thread" it just takes me back to page one of this one. was it moved somewhere else? Thanks View Quote https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/-/192-2245437/ |
|
|
|
I am 16 going on 17... I’ll admit it. I watch The Sound of Music every time it happens to be on.
Attached File |
|
Quoted:
Is the original Saudi Arabian purge thread gone now? When I click the link on the first page labeled "original thread" it just takes me back to page one of this one. was it moved somewhere else? Thanks View Quote Original Thread |
|
View Quote |
|
Quoted: It would be nice if either the people behind 4+ year old claims, or those regurgitating them as factual, would show their work. View Quote Info from montage of newspaper headlines. If, of course, any of it is not true, we'd be happy to see your work refuting it. As it is, this is a battle of news sources, and it's not a given that we can trust many of them, especially in then last few years. The Battle Against Fake News needs all the help we can get. We're pulling for ya, we're all in this together. |
|
Quoted:
Click the date and the link comes up: https://twitter.com/SayWhenLA/status/1191135987176484864?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw Info from montage of newspaper headlines. If, of course, any of it is not true, we'd be happy to see your work refuting it. As it is, this is a battle of news sources, and it's not a given that we can trust many of them, especially in then last few years. The Battle Against Fake News needs all the help we can get. We're pulling for ya, we're all in this together. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: It would be nice if either the people behind 4+ year old claims, or those regurgitating them as factual, would show their work. Info from montage of newspaper headlines. If, of course, any of it is not true, we'd be happy to see your work refuting it. As it is, this is a battle of news sources, and it's not a given that we can trust many of them, especially in then last few years. The Battle Against Fake News needs all the help we can get. We're pulling for ya, we're all in this together.
|
|
Quoted:
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4827595/user-clip-israeli-secret-intelligence-service i s i s interesting, mossad, cia/mi6 all deep state mushed together hmmm quote from video I thought it was a reasonable question but the trouble is, you can't pick up the phone book. There's no Langley in Israel that you can look up, you know, CIA or, in our case, the Mossad. We thought we should ask, "What shall we call it in English?" We can translate the Hebrew words, and like I said, Mossad is "institute." But when they write a letter to their friends in the CIA or the British intelligence, what do they call themselves? It took a while. It was a matter of asking the prime minister's spokesman -- the best you could do because officially the Mossad is under the prime minister's office. And I think he sort of wondered, "Why do you want to know?" and all that, so we explained and he came up with the Israeli Secret Intelligence Service. And if it were to have initials it would be ISIS, just simple words like that -- interestingly enough, though, kind of a British model. The British don't really like the names MI5 and MI6 for their foreign service. They prefer SIS, Secret Intelligence Service. View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted: https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/222783/ns1-1149382.jpg https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/222783/ns2-1149384.jpg https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/222783/ns3-1149385.jpg View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Is the original Saudi Arabian purge thread gone now? When I click the link on the first page labeled "original thread" it just takes me back to page one of this one. was it moved somewhere else? Thanks View Quote https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/-/192-2245437/ |
|
CIA Directly Arming Kurds
https://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2014/08/11/cia-kurds-weapons-iraq/ CIA Program in Iraqi Kurdistan https://www.democracynow.org/1996/9/17/cia_program_in_iraqi_kurdistan CIA Agents Were On The Ground Before We Invaded Iraq https://taskandpurpose.com/cia-iraq-invasion "[Kurds] have often been used as a base for intelligence operations for the CIA and Mossad." https://rockthetruth2.blogspot.com/2013/08/kurds-battle-al-cia-duh-in-syria.html |
|
Quoted:
Click the date and the link comes up: https://twitter.com/SayWhenLA/status/1191135987176484864?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw Info from montage of newspaper headlines. If, of course, any of it is not true, we'd be happy to see your work refuting it. As it is, this is a battle of news sources, and it's not a given that we can trust many of them, especially in then last few years. The Battle Against Fake News needs all the help we can get. We're pulling for ya, we're all in this together. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: It would be nice if either the people behind 4+ year old claims, or those regurgitating them as factual, would show their work. Info from montage of newspaper headlines. If, of course, any of it is not true, we'd be happy to see your work refuting it. As it is, this is a battle of news sources, and it's not a given that we can trust many of them, especially in then last few years. The Battle Against Fake News needs all the help we can get. We're pulling for ya, we're all in this together. |
|
Quoted:
CIA Directly Arming Kurds https://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2014/08/11/cia-kurds-weapons-iraq/ CIA Program in Iraqi Kurdistan https://www.democracynow.org/1996/9/17/cia_program_in_iraqi_kurdistan CIA Agents Were On The Ground Before We Invaded Iraq https://taskandpurpose.com/cia-iraq-invasion "[Kurds] have often been used as a base for intelligence operations for the CIA and Mossad." https://rockthetruth2.blogspot.com/2013/08/kurds-battle-al-cia-duh-in-syria.html View Quote https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/turkish-backed-jihadists-filmed-using-cia-supplied-missiles-against-syrian-kurds |
|
Quoted:
Video at link below https://imgur.com/hLLkBe1 View Quote Thanks for that imgur embedded video! How did you get that done? I haven't gotten an easy twitvid grabber. It's really nice to not have to go to another system to see the video. |
|
Quoted:
H getting blood transfusion from a minor. Plausible. Her side kick in some pedo video. Plausible. H & her sidekick wearing a face of a child? My brain isn't ready for that reality. View Quote 80 years later and it’s still hard to fathom. |
|
Quoted:
Thanks for that imgur embedded video! How did you get that done? I haven't gotten an easy twitvid grabber. It's really nice to not have to go to another system to see the video. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Video at link below https://imgur.com/hLLkBe1 Thanks for that imgur embedded video! How did you get that done? I haven't gotten an easy twitvid grabber. It's really nice to not have to go to another system to see the video. I use this - it gives you different size option - than just uploaded to Imgur or some other Hosting Service http://twittervideodownloader.com |
|
That pesky 17 keeps rearing it’s ugly head...
|
|
Not sure how legit this is, but here it is:
ETA:https://georgenasif.com/search-database |
|
|
|
Quoted:
OP should update this thread with a correct linky to the old one. Probably in the founding post. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/309598/C9BDD82D-810C-4D01-B07C-94AEB38B42E3_jpeg-1149430.JPG View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I was on jury duty recently... Half of those folks, more women than men, had near zero ability to focus on simple points of law, ---like "what ONE specific point of the presented evidence do you offer to support your assertion the Defendant is guilty." They couldn't focus on an issue for more than 20 seconds in multiple instances. And these were trained medical professionals, or degreed folks. Most everything to them was Feelz's. Very frustrating and eye opening. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The way I add this up, it's $373,985,383.67 for the D candidates. That's 2.26 times the T$ amount. I keep hoping voters will research candidates and issues instead of voting based on political ad feelz. Half of those folks, more women than men, had near zero ability to focus on simple points of law, ---like "what ONE specific point of the presented evidence do you offer to support your assertion the Defendant is guilty." They couldn't focus on an issue for more than 20 seconds in multiple instances. And these were trained medical professionals, or degreed folks. Most everything to them was Feelz's. Very frustrating and eye opening. I couldn't figure out why the lawyers would pick a jury of mostly white women for a ghetto banger drug dealer's case. Then I saw why. As I told my kids, if you want to see the best actors and story tellers, look at these lawyers...oh and look at what's going on with our country. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Not sure how legit this is, but here it is:
ETA:https://georgenasif.com/search-database View Quote ETA apparently Hannity and Sara has used some of this info and in the comments AG Barr has these documents. If this is the real deal this is the ATOMIC BOOM we've been waiting for! This would also explain Hannity on more than one occasion saying some things would shake this nation to it's core! |
|
Quoted: Twice faked/debunked = plausible? View Quote How many times in past threads did you "debunk" or poo-poo the idea that FISA could be abused or extended based on lies? Pretty sure someone went on and on about how they had so much experience and knowledge on the matter....even joked about some silly handbook. Seems that person, whoever they were, never admitted they were wrong or offered to eat crow. Did you ever make those statements about how impossible or unlikely FISA abuse was? |
|
Epoch Times interview of Lee Smith.
Most likely covers material people in this thread already know, but it ties a lot together. Bit long, but worth it. The Plot Against Trump, From Spygate to the Impeachment Inquiry—Lee Smith | American Thought Leaders |
|
Quoted:
Now it makes sense regarding turd Romney. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/222783/ns1-1149382.jpg https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/222783/ns2-1149384.jpg https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/222783/ns3-1149385.jpg That's the Washington way. As I've said before, screw with someone's drug territory and they do a drive by on you. Screw with the bureaucratic and political elite's piggy bank and they start a coup against you. Also note that the now removed from the DOJ lawyer Tash Gauhar went to work for Boeing. Super swamp defense contractor safe space. |
|
Quoted:
It was covered in SAP 1.0. Maybe if people weren't prone to ignoring contrary opinions... This was the source of the image purported to be Frazzledrip 1.0. I'm not digging through the archives looking for the second. http://www.hushsupperclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/01.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Twice faked/debunked = plausible? it might be helpful? This was the source of the image purported to be Frazzledrip 1.0. I'm not digging through the archives looking for the second. http://www.hushsupperclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/01.jpg I've said repeatedly in the original SAP thread that even half of what you posted was as good as the 1 post in 10 that contains useful information I wouldn't have you on Ignore. I guessing the same goes for most other folks. We get it, you don't want to believe. Well I don't want you to believe for believing's sake. But I surely do wish you'd confine your posting to useful information instead of twisting what other people say and just generic naysaying. Please note that my comments are addressing the content of your posts and are not intended as, nor should they be taken as, personal attacks by any reasonable person. The good news is, you are single reason I renewed my membership when I did because I couldn't follow the original SAP thread w/o Ignore. And back on ignore you go. Hopefully people will selectively quote the useful nuggets you do post. |
|
Quoted:
Epoch Times interview of Lee Smith. Most likely covers material people in this thread already know, but it ties a lot together. Bit long, but worth it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvkmJsTk9RQ View Quote Lee's articles from a few years ago on the downfall of the media and why Obama's administration manipulated them so easily have been fascinating. His support of Jay Solomon (NOT John) who authored the Iran Wars book and was then accused of inking a business deal with an Iranian black market weapons dealer (no evidence he did anything, all IC made up bullshit) is telling. Jay Solomon was ousted from the Wall Street Journal over the simple accusation more than likely because he hit a major nerve in the late Obama administration time and like we've seen with many of these cases "sources familiar with the matter" were saying things to get this guy out of here because he was exposing what really happened. |
|
Quoted:
Thanks. A few days or weeks after 8chan was killed I remember You posted a pic of a scene from some other movie or source that mirrored the image I posted the day they took 8 Chan off line in August. At the time I was hoping it was legit and that's why they took 8 Chan down. In general, I think it would be helpful if everyone posted their sources supporting or disputing claims. View Quote |
|
Grassley Seeks Details for Deliberate Mishandling of Classified Information on Clinton Server
Attached File Attached File Attached File |
|
|
|
Quoted:
You left out the part where the individual that made the claim later admitted that he was not close with her father and did not have personal knowledge of his associations. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: It would be nice if either the people behind 4+ year old claims, or those regurgitating them as factual, would show their work. Info from montage of newspaper headlines. If, of course, any of it is not true, we'd be happy to see your work refuting it. As it is, this is a battle of news sources, and it's not a given that we can trust many of them, especially in then last few years. The Battle Against Fake News needs all the help we can get. We're pulling for ya, we're all in this together. I'll ask the same as other members have asked: Having a different point of view is a good thing for the thread, and you've occasionally provided that. However, the contrarian koans of late aren't very insightful. Please include links and sources when you state "that isn't correct"/"left this out"/"lol", etc., so we can learn why. It would help everybody out to know more details, as the number of sources that haven't caved to 'Them' is pretty minuscule. You spent over a year asking for sources on hundreds of statements made in this thread (and previous incarnations of same), it's only fair for you to show the same courtesy when you are claiming false, especially while quoting information which is sourced. I'm sure there is "a source" or "an article" that goes against everything we've been reading, just like a Whistleblower around every corner when needed. If there is a valid problem, we can modify the hypothesis accordingly. ———————————————————————————— To everybody else, don't argue the point directly at a member - discuss the topic instead. Please simply ignore posts which may create problems depending on the reply style. Hit report button if something is out of rule boundaries instead of replying to point it out. Don't sidetrack the thread over one post, we should have learned to do that by now. This is NOT GD. I apologize for the bump in thread. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Thanks Are the images loading for anyone? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: All methods re relatively slow. Craploads, metric ones even, of desired traffic are hitting it, in addition to a ton of undesired traffic from people with huge bandwidth who don't want that site to exist. Should settle down a little bit, later at night is easier to get some, but still takes a while to load. Hearkens back to early Internet days where a page load took 2 minutes or more. Spoiled by instant, we are (well me, for sure). Are the images loading for anyone? |
|
Quoted:
@dmnoid77 I'll ask the same as other members have asked: Having a different point of view is a good thing for the thread, and you've occasionally provided that. However, the contrarian koans of late aren't very insightful. Please include links and sources when you state "that isn't correct"/"left this out"/"lol", etc., so we can learn why. It would help everybody out to know more details, as the number of sources that haven't caved to 'Them' is pretty minuscule. You spent over a year asking for sources on hundreds of statements made in this thread (and previous incarnations of same), it's only fair for you to show the same courtesy when you are claiming false, especially while quoting information which is sourced. I'm sure there is "a source" or "an article" that goes against everything we've been reading, just like a Whistleblower around every corner when needed. If there is a valid problem, we can modify the hypothesis accordingly. ———————————————————————————— To everybody else, don't argue the point directly at a member - discuss the topic instead. Please simply ignore posts which may create problems depending on the reply style. Hit report button if something is out of rule boundaries instead of replying to point it out. Don't sidetrack the thread over one post, we should have learned to do that by now. This is NOT GD. I apologize for the bump in thread. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: It would be nice if either the people behind 4+ year old claims, or those regurgitating them as factual, would show their work. Info from montage of newspaper headlines. If, of course, any of it is not true, we'd be happy to see your work refuting it. As it is, this is a battle of news sources, and it's not a given that we can trust many of them, especially in then last few years. The Battle Against Fake News needs all the help we can get. We're pulling for ya, we're all in this together. I'll ask the same as other members have asked: Having a different point of view is a good thing for the thread, and you've occasionally provided that. However, the contrarian koans of late aren't very insightful. Please include links and sources when you state "that isn't correct"/"left this out"/"lol", etc., so we can learn why. It would help everybody out to know more details, as the number of sources that haven't caved to 'Them' is pretty minuscule. You spent over a year asking for sources on hundreds of statements made in this thread (and previous incarnations of same), it's only fair for you to show the same courtesy when you are claiming false, especially while quoting information which is sourced. I'm sure there is "a source" or "an article" that goes against everything we've been reading, just like a Whistleblower around every corner when needed. If there is a valid problem, we can modify the hypothesis accordingly. ———————————————————————————— To everybody else, don't argue the point directly at a member - discuss the topic instead. Please simply ignore posts which may create problems depending on the reply style. Hit report button if something is out of rule boundaries instead of replying to point it out. Don't sidetrack the thread over one post, we should have learned to do that by now. This is NOT GD. I apologize for the bump in thread. Archive of the FOIA which Philip Crawford used in his book which was later cited in the Bitterqueen blog which is the only source for the claims repeated by tirod. https://archive.org/stream/ThomasDalesandroJr./Thomas%20Dalesandro%20Jr.%2002_djvu.txt Peter C. Galiano, Baltimore, Maryland, advised
during the current investigation that his previous statements were based only on rumor and hearsay. He stated that he could not recall who gave him this information or whether or not there was any truth to the allegations. Be further explained that he was nev^r well acquainted with any of the men he had mentioned" and had no personal knowledge of their affairs. |
|
Quoted:
So is this stuff real? ETA apparently Hannity and Sara has used some of this info and in the comments AG Barr has these documents. If this is the real deal this is the ATOMIC BOOM we've been waiting for! This would also explain Hannity on more than one occasion saying some things would shake this nation to it's core! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Not sure how legit this is, but here it is:
ETA:https://georgenasif.com/search-database ETA apparently Hannity and Sara has used some of this info and in the comments AG Barr has these documents. If this is the real deal this is the ATOMIC BOOM we've been waiting for! This would also explain Hannity on more than one occasion saying some things would shake this nation to it's core! Attached File |
|
Quoted:
ETA:https://georgenasif.com/search-database View Quote |
|
Interdasting: https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/en/news-page/news-nation/something-has-apparently-happened-emergency-action-message-of-242-characters
Tl;DR: JETMFU QJTWXLYUFOKAYSLYNLCILIEYWFZRJ2DSRURXXSXXMYYYYEUVSYXUYY7VZVPJH?HHKKKKDVSOUREF44FTJJNALXTTTTW6Y3GXHGFHAXFFU7FSFFFF3CUDUMSQZUZ?EL2RLKVAH4XQJEJ3X5234L2YYYABYIIIUY7777DBYP47337H6XCBBCBBPPPPJ?6CNSBGEEW7A4M4RR4BBBBANRC6RI36ILKEWGKRWGMMMMLDA76HJN7 View Quote JE FF EP ST IE ND ID NT KI LL HI MS EL F. If we just had the key to a matrix decode it would all make sense. |
|
Fhrc with a mask Attached File
|
|
|
Quoted:
OP should update this thread with a correct linky to the old one. Probably in the founding post. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
|
|
Quoted: You left out the part where the individual that made the claim later admitted that he was not close with her father and did not have personal knowledge of his associations. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/309598/C9BDD82D-810C-4D01-B07C-94AEB38B42E3_jpeg-1149430.JPG View Quote needed a fun laugh |
|
|
|
Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/152525/tmp-cam-8278063785099883713_jpg-1149668.JPG The original will not load. Only the screenshot......... Hmmmmm View Quote https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-photo-shows-obama-firing-shotgun/2013/02/02/4d7a96ec-6d8b-11e2-ada0-5ca5fa7ebe79_story.html |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.