Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 783
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 5:04:40 PM EST
[#1]
Is twitter acting up for anyone else.  I can't save the link the usual way to post here. It just gives me an embed option which doesn't work here.  This seems to happen from time to time.
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 5:08:07 PM EST
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Or not want to step on them out of disgust instead of respect?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/406377/US-IsraeliFlags_Iran-1238671.jpg
Interesting, but are they respecting the flags or the wet paint?
Or not want to step on them out of disgust instead of respect?
To me and most patriots on the net it looks like the student protesters are avoiding a painted flag in a main walkway that was put here awhile ago. Others on the net see it as freshly painted due to maintenance their allegiance falls to the side of less desirable solutions for any type of peace.
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 5:12:34 PM EST
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Drug legalization, not dead bodies.
View Quote
I'm thinking California dreamers leaving like Locusts and falling into the land of Rocky Mountain High.
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 5:59:09 PM EST
[#4]
Interesting article. States that in court filing, RR stated he released the Strzok-Page texts because he didn't want selective leaks from Congress.

Rod Rosenstein says he authorized release of Strzok-Page texts

Former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said he made the decision to release to the media text messages between two FBI employees who criticized President Trump during the 2016 presidential election.

Rosenstein said in a court filing late Friday that he made the call in part to protect the FBI from selective leaks by Congress.

Both Page and Strzok are suing over the release, saying it invaded their privacy.

Until Friday, it was unclear who had authorized the release of hundreds of their text messages to journalists in December 2017.

Rosenstein said he approved the disclosure because he was set to testify to the House Judiciary Committee the next day and the release of the text messages by members of Congress, who had requested the messages, was inevitable.

“Some congressional members and staff were expected to release them intermittently before, during, and after the hearing, exacerbating the adverse publicity for Mr. Strzok, Ms. Page, and the Department. The disclosure obviously would adversely affect public confidence in the FBI, but providing the most egregious messages in one package would avoid the additional harm of prolonged selective disclosures and minimize the appearance of the Department concealing information that was embarrassing to the FBI,” Rosenstein wrote in a five-page statement signed Friday.

“With the express understanding that it would not violate the Privacy Act and that the text messages would become public by the next day in any event, I authorized [the Department of Justice’s Office of Public Affairs] to disclose to the news media the text messages that were being disclosed to congressional committees,” Rosenstein added.

Ex-special counsel Robert Mueller removed Strzok from his role on the Russia investigation after learning about the text messages in the summer of 2017. Page, who had been involved in the earlier stages of the investigation, was already working on another assignment.

The FBI fired Strzok in 2018, and Page resigned from the bureau. Strzok is also challenging his firing, arguing that he was terminated because of political pressure from Trump.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/rod-rosenstein-says-he-authorized-release-of-strzok-page-texts
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 6:04:46 PM EST
[#5]
To put a bow on the toothbrush...

Over $18k raised for her having to put up with Mr. Snowflake.

Almost not guilty.

Attachment Attached File


Attachment Attached File


Edit:

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 6:11:43 PM EST
[#6]
Some notables for you.



Link Posted: 1/18/2020 6:40:06 PM EST
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I've noted recently that the left has been acting in a somewhat distracted fashion on several fronts. And then, there are pieces like this GD link That of course, is  just another subtle hit piece.

The plot twists and turns in this movie are hard to follow if you are a get to the end "NOW" type. Kind of like reading a book and for whatever reason, reading the ending before you finish. Ruins the book.

The issue with Virginia is that people are expecting that the President can ride out of the sunrise and smote the demoroaches down in one fell-swoop. It is a state's issue alright, and has the Administrations eyes upon it you can guarantee it . Lots of coms to uncover in the meanwhile. The left is going all out on Virginia and their moves are stacked upon a bulwark of leftist moves as we now know.  They are setting us up with their overt moves. Goading us on in the hope that we will give them the violence that they so desire.

The left is very aware that we want our rights back after all of the lefts deprivations over the last 100 or so years.

They are hoping to use that events on Monday to their advantage. And they will regardless of the actual outcome. If we where to show up or not, they have generation-ally engineered the events that will unfold in Virginia on Monday. I am not seeing any reason to be defeatist in any way, shape or form over this possible setback or any for that matter.

We all live for the moment(s) and all of us have a date with death regardless of what we do during our time. We all have to react accordingly to the conditions presented to each one of us a that given point.  Nothing we do or say will change that.

Also, don't let folks demoralize you with defeatist nonsense posts having no substance. Very well said.

The globalist masters are driving their leftist cattle with whips at their heels at this and every moment of the day. They don't rest as the United States has to fall before they can move to their next goal(s).

That the left has seemingly abandoned the principals of the Fabian society and are moving with a speed that they haven't shown during my lifetime is disconcerting in many ways. Though nothing to lose sleep over, nor allow to run my life such as it is.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
I've wondered aloud if all that's going on is engineered to load so much on Trump's back that it severely weakens him.

So that he isn't able to defend himself in the peach mint maximally.

Game over. And the D_S wins.

What's wrong with Trump's tweet re: Va and guns?

It's a state issue at the moment, why would folks criticize his statement???

It was entirely reasonable.

Think!

Also, don't let folks demoralize you with defeatist nonsense posts having no substance.

This movie appears to have suddenly entered a new, dangerous and critical phase, and we must be on alert in all directions and carefully analyze accurately as much as we are able, if we expect to prevail.
I've noted recently that the left has been acting in a somewhat distracted fashion on several fronts. And then, there are pieces like this GD link That of course, is  just another subtle hit piece.

The plot twists and turns in this movie are hard to follow if you are a get to the end "NOW" type. Kind of like reading a book and for whatever reason, reading the ending before you finish. Ruins the book.

The issue with Virginia is that people are expecting that the President can ride out of the sunrise and smote the demoroaches down in one fell-swoop. It is a state's issue alright, and has the Administrations eyes upon it you can guarantee it . Lots of coms to uncover in the meanwhile. The left is going all out on Virginia and their moves are stacked upon a bulwark of leftist moves as we now know.  They are setting us up with their overt moves. Goading us on in the hope that we will give them the violence that they so desire.

The left is very aware that we want our rights back after all of the lefts deprivations over the last 100 or so years.

They are hoping to use that events on Monday to their advantage. And they will regardless of the actual outcome. If we where to show up or not, they have generation-ally engineered the events that will unfold in Virginia on Monday. I am not seeing any reason to be defeatist in any way, shape or form over this possible setback or any for that matter.

We all live for the moment(s) and all of us have a date with death regardless of what we do during our time. We all have to react accordingly to the conditions presented to each one of us a that given point.  Nothing we do or say will change that.

Also, don't let folks demoralize you with defeatist nonsense posts having no substance. Very well said.

The globalist masters are driving their leftist cattle with whips at their heels at this and every moment of the day. They don't rest as the United States has to fall before they can move to their next goal(s).

That the left has seemingly abandoned the principals of the Fabian society and are moving with a speed that they haven't shown during my lifetime is disconcerting in many ways. Though nothing to lose sleep over, nor allow to run my life such as it is.
I disagree.  It's a sign that their previous century's work is being undone at a furious rate, and they are desperately trying to regain control of the narrative, and of the political power they're used to so casually wielding.

Their desperation is palpable, and not at all justified with the items we've seen publicly, with the possible exceptions of the steadily increasing number of child traffickers being arrested and their inability to stop the wall from going up.
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 6:42:07 PM EST
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Or not want to step on them out of disgust instead of respect?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/406377/US-IsraeliFlags_Iran-1238671.jpg
Interesting, but are they respecting the flags or the wet paint?
Or not want to step on them out of disgust instead of respect?
Stepping on a flag has always been a sign of disgust and disrespect.  We've seen many examples in Iran recently of protesters avoiding US flags painted where they were protesting, and only a very few counterprotesters troding on them.
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 7:01:43 PM EST
[#9]
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 7:04:41 PM EST
[#10]
Lokhova / Halper thread unroll:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1218557213066911747.html
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 7:07:16 PM EST
[#11]
I wonder if there’s video...

Bernie’s history with Iran

Bernie’s History With Iran
With Iran back in the spotlight, the Daily Beast reminds us that we–and Bernie Sanders–have been here before:

On April 1, 1979, the theocratic Islamic Republic of Iran was proclaimed. Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, who had returned to Iran from exile to assume command of the revolt, became Supreme Leader in December of that year. His rise was accelerated by the seizure on Nov. 4 of 52 American diplomats and citizens, and citizens of other countries, at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran. The hostage crisis became the means by which the Ayatollah crushed political opponents in Iran. Dealing with the hostage taking became the overwhelming political crisis for President Jimmy Carter. It lasted 444 days.

Virtually all Americans—Democrats, Republicans and independents—united in support of the hostages and the international call for their freedom. One prominent political figure on the 2020 stage, then almost completely unknown, stood apart by joining a Marxist-Leninist party that not only pledged support for the Iranian theocracy, but also justified the hostage taking by insisting the hostages were all likely CIA agents. Who was that person? It was Bernie Sanders.

Sanders was a member of the Trotskyite Socialist Workers’ Party. Not just any member, either; he was the SWP’s presidential elector for Vermont, and he appeared with, and campaigned for, the SWP’s presidential candidate.

When its presidential candidate, Andrew Pulley, came to speak at the University of Vermont in October 1980, Sanders chaired the meeting.
***
In his standard stump speech, Pulley condemned “Carter’s war drive against the Iranian people,” and said that the U.S. “was on the brink of war with Iran,” which would be fought “to protect the oil and banking interests of the Rockefellers and other billionaires.” Americans, he predicted, would soon “pay on the battlefields with our very own lives.” Their criticism of the Ayatollah was intended “to get us ready for war.” And, Pulley charged, the media who criticized those of us who were against “American imperialism” were “declared insane.” As for the hostages, Pulley said “we can be sure that many of them are simply spies… or people assigned to protect the spies.”

Pulley’s words were a direct echo of what the Islamic Society of University Teachers and Students had declared on Nov. 4, 1979 : “We defend the capture of this imperialist embassy, which is a center for espionage.”

Not much has changed since 1980. Sanders is still a blame-America-first crank who had little or nothing to say about the Iranian-led attack on the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad. But he exploded in fury over the killing of arch-terrorist Qassem Soleimani and pledged to “stop a war with Iran,” just as in 1980 his Socialist Workers’ Party had no problem with the mullahs holding 52 Americans hostage for over a year, but hysterically warned that the Carter administration was leading us into war with Iran. Which would have been all our fault.

Sanders was a nasty piece of work then, and he is equally nasty now.
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 7:23:15 PM EST
[#12]
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 7:44:32 PM EST
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
View Quote
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 7:53:51 PM EST
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote
Why would Trump's response be for the articles to be dismissed...if he wants a trial to expose all the bad guys?
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 8:03:15 PM EST
[#15]
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 8:09:25 PM EST
[#16]
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 8:12:20 PM EST
[#17]
Nice to see others finally realizing that Flynn's stuff predates Trump by several years.

After the 302 releases, PopaD vs Mueller/FBI has a huge number of discrepancies (lies). Hard to know who is lying with their respective reputations ALL being in tatters. Suggests PopaD was part of the setup or a total blowhard, LOL.

Link Posted: 1/18/2020 8:13:43 PM EST
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Why would Trump's response be for the articles to be dismissed...if he wants a trial to expose all the bad guys?
View Quote
So that everyone begs for a trial. Reverse psychology has never worked so well on so many by one person.
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 8:19:09 PM EST
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Why would Trump's response be for the articles to be dismissed...if he wants a trial to expose all the bad guys?
View Quote
When did POTUS state he wants a trial to expose all the bad guys?
Is there a link?
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 8:41:20 PM EST
[#20]
Excellent thread on the Rosenstein tweet above,  Trump using disinformation,  how Trump lures the dems into traps, Rosenstein was cleared by ethics to manage the Russian investigation and also be a witness against the plotters

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1218575141355118593.html

Link Posted: 1/18/2020 8:43:40 PM EST
[#21]
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 8:47:40 PM EST
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
"Whatever you do, don't throw me into that bush!"
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Why would Trump's response be for the articles to be dismissed...if he wants a trial to expose all the bad guys?
So that everyone begs for a trial. Reverse psychology has never worked so well on so many by one person.
"Whatever you do, don't throw me into that bush!"
Attachment Attached File


Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 8:53:24 PM EST
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

To me and most patriots on the net it looks like the student protesters are avoiding a painted flag in a main walkway that was put here awhile ago. Others on the net see it as freshly painted due to maintenance their allegiance falls to the side of less desirable solutions for any type of peace.  
View Quote
Paint dries relatively quickly.

It could be some arguments are being made to reflect personal biases.
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 8:59:06 PM EST
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Paint dries relatively quickly.

It could be some arguments are being made to reflect personal biases.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

To me and most patriots on the net it looks like the student protesters are avoiding a painted flag in a main walkway that was put here awhile ago. Others on the net see it as freshly painted due to maintenance their allegiance falls to the side of less desirable solutions for any type of peace.  
Paint dries relatively quickly.

It could be some arguments are being made to reflect personal biases.
It could be unwise to draw conclusions based on a literal snapshot in time.
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 9:02:31 PM EST
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So that everyone begs for a trial. Reverse psychology has never worked so well on so many by one person.
View Quote
Excellent response!
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 9:07:30 PM EST
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Why would Trump's response be for the articles to be dismissed...if he wants a trial to expose all the bad guys?
View Quote
Learn our comms...

What position do those opposed to POTUS take on anything put out by his administration?
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 9:12:18 PM EST
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
When did POTUS state he wants a trial to expose all the bad guys?
Is there a link?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Why would Trump's response be for the articles to be dismissed...if he wants a trial to expose all the bad guys?
When did POTUS state he wants a trial to expose all the bad guys?
Is there a link?
That has been the whole “Q” plan thing as posted by many here.  The trial was supposed to be the way to introduce evidence....not that there aren’t many other ways.
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 9:17:54 PM EST
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
That has been the whole “Q” plan thing as posted by many here.  The trial was supposed to be the way to introduce evidence....not that there aren’t many other ways.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Why would Trump's response be for the articles to be dismissed...if he wants a trial to expose all the bad guys?
When did POTUS state he wants a trial to expose all the bad guys?
Is there a link?
That has been the whole “Q” plan thing as posted by many here.  The trial was supposed to be the way to introduce evidence....not that there aren’t many other ways.
Trump is Q?
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 9:18:15 PM EST
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Paint dries relatively quickly.

It could be some arguments are being made to reflect personal biases.
View Quote
If I was to walk upon that location, I would think someone was still working there.  To me, it looks like paint cans, masking material and other evidence of work in progress.

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 9:23:19 PM EST
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Trump is Q?
View Quote
trump is q+
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 10:01:00 PM EST
[#32]
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 10:05:11 PM EST
[#33]
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 10:10:36 PM EST
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

It's particularly insulting in Islamic countries, remember the reporter throwing his shoe at GWBush?
View Quote
I may be wrong I seem to remember seeing something about that shoe thrower being one of the guys killed in that Iran solimi (sp) thing.
could be I imagined it but I feel like I saw something bout that recently regarding the shoe thrower
for what that’s worth
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 10:13:22 PM EST
[#35]
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 10:14:21 PM EST
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

It could be unwise to draw conclusions based on a literal snapshot in time.
View Quote
I have family members who are in and from Lebanon and another ME country. Just relaying what I'm told by them.
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 10:14:27 PM EST
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Excellent thread on the Rosenstein tweet above,  Trump using disinformation,  how Trump lures the dems into traps, Rosenstein was cleared by ethics to manage the Russian investigation and also be a witness against the plotters

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1218575141355118593.html

View Quote
Damn, that was a good read.

Enlightening.
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 10:14:39 PM EST
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So that everyone begs for a trial. Reverse psychology has never worked so well on so many by one person.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Why would Trump's response be for the articles to be dismissed...if he wants a trial to expose all the bad guys?
So that everyone begs for a trial. Reverse psychology has never worked so well on so many by one person.
This. Same reason he's claiming to use executive privilege to block Bolton from testifying. Trump and the people backing him are either retarded or they have a firm grip on some testicles.
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 10:20:12 PM EST
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
"Whatever you do, don't throw me into that bush!"
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Why would Trump's response be for the articles to be dismissed...if he wants a trial to expose all the bad guys?
So that everyone begs for a trial. Reverse psychology has never worked so well on so many by one person.
"Whatever you do, don't throw me into that bush!"
Patch.
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 10:20:41 PM EST
[#40]
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 10:22:38 PM EST
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

The problem with the tweet is that it was entirely self serving and did little more than shit on Virginians for failing to elect Republican representation despite being behind the eight ball due to court-sanctioned Democratic gerrymandering efforts, sham candidates siphoning away votes, typical voter fraud games, and an absent GOP.  You know, the sort of stuff Q has been telling us for years that they are aware of and addressing?

It wasn't a message of support. That is the problem.
View Quote
Concur.
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 10:47:46 PM EST
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Interesting, but are they respecting the flags or the wet paint?
View Quote
Dude! The Iranian people have never been the problem. They have been held hostage since 1979 by the Theocracy. They tried to escape during FBHO’s reign but he refused to help them. They are trying again and I hope Trump is going around the C_A and helping them.

TC
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 10:51:25 PM EST
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

First I've heard of any upheaval in France in a long time.
View Quote
The Yellow Vests have been rioting every weekend but you haven’t heard squat from the media—even Fox...

TC
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 11:05:37 PM EST
[#45]
'Strong' paper trail has John Durham investigating the months before Mueller appointment
View Quote
John Durham, a U.S. attorney from Connecticut, is zeroing in on the period spanning from January 2017, when Trump took office, to May of that year. A "strong" paper trail, as CBS News senior investigative correspondent Catherine Herridge put it on Friday, has led the investigation into possible misconduct by federal law enforcement and intelligence officials to that time frame.
View Quote
Little else is known about the investigation other than that Durham is exploring whether a crime was committed by Kevin Clinesmith, a former FBI lawyer who was found by the Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz to have altered a document during the FBI's efforts to obtain a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant renewal to continue wiretapping onetime Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

Among those known to be cooperating with Barr is retired Adm. Michael Rogers, the former director of the National Security Agency who has a history of uncovering FISA violations.
View Quote
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/strong-paper-trail-has-john-durham-investigating-the-months-before-mueller-appointment

Good article worth a read covers the Durham investigation and all its known trails
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 11:29:04 PM EST
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Say Q "is" AI, you have placed a human as the intermediary to the internet releases "produced" via statistical analysis of the current events and available information. Q-AI info releases run through the filter of a human virtually eliminates the advantages of using AI by allowing that same human to change, alter, or eliminate any info produced by the Q-AI. Doing so instantaneously changes expected accuracy, so why bother with AI if a human has the final say?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Thats is actually why I think it is AI.  You wouldnt want 'the program' just running wild over the www, so there has to be a human(s) in between the machine and the medium (8chan) / voat, divulging the information according to the AI's instruction.  The AI simply compiles information, grades it, and then offers outcomes based on odds.  Difference here to just some statistics program, is that with AI it a
makes better sense of the information being compiled, which would offer a MUCH higher degree of accuracy.  Especially if you consider the scope and magnitude of potentially available information eluded to by Brass... combine that with mil / gov intel and you have quite a pool.

However, it cant be perfect due to subtile nuances in human understanding / processing of information that no machine AI will ever be able to mimic, information that the machine would not be privvy to (highest levels of secret), and given human interaction, mistakes would be inevitable from time to time.
Say Q "is" AI, you have placed a human as the intermediary to the internet releases "produced" via statistical analysis of the current events and available information. Q-AI info releases run through the filter of a human virtually eliminates the advantages of using AI by allowing that same human to change, alter, or eliminate any info produced by the Q-AI. Doing so instantaneously changes expected accuracy, so why bother with AI if a human has the final say?
Because the information being amassed by our government (MI, DARPA and TIA, whoever) is so massive, multifaceted and diverse.  I have been a 'conspiracy nut' for nearly twenty years and have mainly focused an 'satanic order' / nwo types of topics.  I am a sort of 'jack of all trades'on these sorts of things, and could tell you quite a lot about a lot of things.  But when i sit down and listen to specialized subject matter experts on specific topics, im reminded of how little i really know.  The sheer magnitude of expertice that Q exhibits on so many levels is totally impossible by human standards... unless Q is 1000 years old and has at 'his' disposal the entirety of human knowledge.  Which would also make 'him' something entirely different, and a possibility that i also have not yet discounted.
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 11:42:48 PM EST
[#47]
How five members of Joe Biden’s family got rich through his connections
View Quote
The Biden family’s apparent self-enrichment involves no less than five family members: Joe’s son Hunter, son-in-law Howard, brothers James and Frank, and sister Valerie.
When this subject came up in 2019, Biden declared, “I never talked with my son or my brother or anyone else — even distant family — about their business interests. Period.”

As we will see, this is far from the case…
View Quote
https://nypost.com/2020/01/18/how-five-members-of-joe-bidens-family-got-rich-through-his-connections
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 11:45:29 PM EST
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Concur.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

The problem with the tweet is that it was entirely self serving and did little more than shit on Virginians for failing to elect Republican representation despite being behind the eight ball due to court-sanctioned Democratic gerrymandering efforts, sham candidates siphoning away votes, typical voter fraud games, and an absent GOP.  You know, the sort of stuff Q has been telling us for years that they are aware of and addressing?

It wasn't a message of support. That is the problem.
Concur.
Did these things just now happen? Are you blaming Trump for things that didn't happen based on what you thought was happening based on Q?
Is this not a State issue? If you were aware of these issues please show where you were actually out publicly trying to fix them. Personally, I don't want the federal government involved in whatever our State business is. I don't recall Q ever mentioning State elections as an issue they were concerned with.....
Link Posted: 1/18/2020 11:50:39 PM EST
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Because the information being amassed by our government (MI, DARPA and TIA, whoever) is so massive, multifaceted and diverse.  I have been a 'conspiracy nut' for nearly twenty years and have mainly focused an 'satanic order' / nwo types of topics.  I am a sort of 'jack of all trades'on these sorts of things, and could tell you quite a lot about a lot of things.  But when i sit down and listen to specialized subject matter experts on specific topics, im reminded of how little i really know.  The sheer magnitude of expertice that Q exhibits on so many levels is totally impossible by human standards... unless Q is 1000 years old and has at 'his' disposal the entirety of human knowledge.  Which would also make 'him' something entirely different, and a possibility that i also have not yet discounted.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Thats is actually why I think it is AI.  You wouldnt want 'the program' just running wild over the www, so there has to be a human(s) in between the machine and the medium (8chan) / voat, divulging the information according to the AI's instruction.  The AI simply compiles information, grades it, and then offers outcomes based on odds.  Difference here to just some statistics program, is that with AI it a
makes better sense of the information being compiled, which would offer a MUCH higher degree of accuracy.  Especially if you consider the scope and magnitude of potentially available information eluded to by Brass... combine that with mil / gov intel and you have quite a pool.

However, it cant be perfect due to subtile nuances in human understanding / processing of information that no machine AI will ever be able to mimic, information that the machine would not be privvy to (highest levels of secret), and given human interaction, mistakes would be inevitable from time to time.
Say Q "is" AI, you have placed a human as the intermediary to the internet releases "produced" via statistical analysis of the current events and available information. Q-AI info releases run through the filter of a human virtually eliminates the advantages of using AI by allowing that same human to change, alter, or eliminate any info produced by the Q-AI. Doing so instantaneously changes expected accuracy, so why bother with AI if a human has the final say?
Because the information being amassed by our government (MI, DARPA and TIA, whoever) is so massive, multifaceted and diverse.  I have been a 'conspiracy nut' for nearly twenty years and have mainly focused an 'satanic order' / nwo types of topics.  I am a sort of 'jack of all trades'on these sorts of things, and could tell you quite a lot about a lot of things.  But when i sit down and listen to specialized subject matter experts on specific topics, im reminded of how little i really know.  The sheer magnitude of expertice that Q exhibits on so many levels is totally impossible by human standards... unless Q is 1000 years old and has at 'his' disposal the entirety of human knowledge.  Which would also make 'him' something entirely different, and a possibility that i also have not yet discounted.
That and, just because AI might bring things into light, it doesn't mean they've reached that level of showmanship that humans currently require in order to accept something as the truth.
Link Posted: 1/19/2020 12:08:36 AM EST
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Excellent read, and something everybody should understand completely.

They want you to be worried and fretting.  "Any port in a storm" psychology in practice.  Parts of the above have been spoken of for decades, but it's a conspiracy theory, since it could never happen in the US.

For the most part, nobody in the US has any clue who exactly gets foreign aid or how much. Nobody knows what the "normal" temperature of the Earth 'should be'.  Nobody has a clue about population density.   Nobody knows how laws get made, some assume presidents are dictators.  Yet, those people will run around and scream in terror at "how bad things are" Whenever TheNews Tells Them To.  It's as simple as that.

Anybody seriously fretting about an issue beyond their immediate sphere of awareness (let alone control) needs to read more and watch media less.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Anonymous  01/15/20 (Wed) 14:37:39 a03352 (7)  No.7823816>>7823908 >>7824177 >>7824413 >>7824446
File (hide): bc39865f5373255?.jpg (2.18 MB, 1343x1837, 1343:1837, 1.jpg) (h) (u)

Article Here

Is this a leak which unlocks the real plan of the Global Elite? Read and decide for yourself!
This is a translation from the French of a document compiled by a clique of senior financiers who met in Canada in 1967 and then in 1985. Its a pretty explosive paper which documents a far reaching conspiracy to set up a global government by means of corrupting the people and finances of nation states, and much else besides. I think its extremely interesting but there is no doubt that most people will shake their heads in wonder that a group like this could really exist.
When you go to the linked page, the hyperlink purported to link to the original French is broken. I'd like to read the original French if anyone has a good link.
Monast was the French version of Bill Cooper. It is interesting to read the linked with today's knowledge.

More Serge Monast - Project Blue Beam

What is possible to ask here in front of such a psychology of terror as this? Would any government, corporation or psychiatrist willfully promote such horror today? The answer is quite obviously, "yes".  Government agencies and the corporations that work with them toward New World Order are prepared to promote anything that will help them to achieve their objective of total social control.  


As for the question of 'why?': for one thing, if you terrify the public and make them fear for their safety they will allow you to implement draconian law enforcement practices, disarm them and keep extensive records on them and they only have to tell you, "Well, that's all in order to protect you, of course".  


And secondly, it promotes the decay  of the current form of democratic political system and leads societies to search for alternatives to current political methodology.

Of course, the alternative has already been planned.  It is called New World Order and it won't have your safety or interest at heart. As George Bush. said, "read my lips."

Fear has always been used by powerful elite to control and subjugate the masses.  The old maxim "divide and conquer is being played out to the limit in every corner of the planet to ensure that everybody is frightened for their personal safety and scared or suspicious of those around them.  This too, it is called mind control.

Now, to go a little bit further in that new technology which is at the basis of the NASA Blue Beam project, we have to consider this quote from psychologist Gene V McConnell, which was published in a1970 issue of "Psychology Today".  He said,

"The day has come when we can combine sensory deprivation with drugs, hypnosis and astute manipulation of reward and punishment to gain almost absolute control over an individual's behavior.  
It should be then possible to achieve a very rapid and highly effective type of positive brainwashing that would allow us to make dramatic change in a person's behavior and personality."

Now when we talked before about that kind of rays and the telepathic electronic two-ways communication... the kinds of rays which are fed from the memory of computers which store a lot of data about the human being and the languages; and we said that the people of the earth will be reached by the inside of their brain making  each one to believe that his own 'god' is talking to each one within his own soul, we refer to that kind of technology and that kind of thinking.

That same psychologist said,

"We should reshape society so that we all would be trained from birth to want to do what societies want us to do.  We have the techniques to do it.  No one owns his own personality."

And this quote here is real important because it is also basic teaching from the United Nations, that 'no one owns his own personality'.  The same psychologist adds:

"You have no say about what kind of personality you acquire, and there's no reason to believe you  should have the right to refuse to acquire a new personality if your old one is anti-social."

Which is important in that kind of declaration here, if the NWO will be set up over the old one, that means that the old way of thinking, the way we think right now - our behavior, our religious beliefs - would be considered by those people as old thinking, an old way of living, and they will have -- to change it -- the re-education camps of the United Nations, to make sure that people will have  -- for them an anti-social behavior which is today an actual one -- will be re-educated in a way to have the new behavior to fulfill the needs of the NWO.


Take 5 minutes and reflect on the changes over the last 25 yrs. You're in the camp now.
Excellent read, and something everybody should understand completely.

They want you to be worried and fretting.  "Any port in a storm" psychology in practice.  Parts of the above have been spoken of for decades, but it's a conspiracy theory, since it could never happen in the US.

For the most part, nobody in the US has any clue who exactly gets foreign aid or how much. Nobody knows what the "normal" temperature of the Earth 'should be'.  Nobody has a clue about population density.   Nobody knows how laws get made, some assume presidents are dictators.  Yet, those people will run around and scream in terror at "how bad things are" Whenever TheNews Tells Them To.  It's as simple as that.

Anybody seriously fretting about an issue beyond their immediate sphere of awareness (let alone control) needs to read more and watch media less.
Its been a long time since i read PBB, but i dont know how effective they have actually been in implementing a lot of the things presented.  Electronic manipulation, i think, at least on a grand scale, has only become really effective by constantly bombarding everone with electromagnetic radiation (because we are all constantly bathed and hamnered by it from every angle within our homes and by really high power sources outside) to the point that our brains dont function as well, it has a negitive impact physiologically, and its completely relentless so we never have a chance to 'catch our breath'.  When you couple that with a propaganda box in every home spewing overt and covert programming 24/7 and on demand, people really have, to a great degree, lost the ability to be discerning.  My 'line' for as long as i can remember is "think for yourself, question authority".  Few do that anymore. People have either lost the will, the ability, or would just rather 'go along and get along' so that they have time for football... or whatever your 'circus maximus' of choice is.  Keep them poor, but entertined, and you will have a subjective people ala Juvinal!  But i digress...

Even with Q, so many are so deeply invested into something they know absolutely nothing about.  I get it though... Q speaks directly to what all of us here really want.  But at the end of the day, its dangerous to put so much stock into yet another construct.

Anyway, PBB is rife with solid premises that all should be aware of, youre right.  When you look at the idea of removing God (YHVH and Yahshua / Jesus) from from society, you usher people towards the satanic Crowley mindset of 'do as thou wilt', you are well on your way towards destruction.  You can see this in population reduction schemes like mass abortions and youthinasia, endless global war 'caus, merica!' or 'damn commies' or whatever, (edit to add mass drugging... thats a huge part of it), manipulation of people on the micro and the macro to the point that we are completely divided against ourselves.  Is it all done through highpower electro manipulation? No.  But thats certainly part of it.  In the end, The Bible says, we will all beg the final anti-Christ to save us from ourselves, afterall... so i guess this is to be expected.

Tick toc, right?

So who is your faith in?
Page / 783
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top