I know its not the week's hot topic, but we're running out of 2019.

Any legit proof of life for RBG?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/john-paul-stevens-to-lie-in-repose-at-supreme-court-on-monday/2019/07/21/defed9ba-abf6-11e9-bc5c-e73b603e7f38_story.html

Correct.  That is the problem.

Many "true believers" can't or won't accept that the motivations behind the vast majority of "dems" and "libs" in positions of power is unbridled power over the masses, and only use "liberalism" as a cover.

#BREAKING: #Iraq paramilitary force says US responsible for military base attacks https://t.co/F3UbxDsWDD

— i24NEWS English (@i24NEWS_EN) August 21, 2019

*HOWEVER* just recently an Iraqi MP said the attacks were carried out by #Israel|i aircraft.

Doge  (@IntelDoge) August 21, 2019

Edit:  and now this:

IRAQI PARAMILITARY COMMANDER SAYS GROUPS WILL DEFEND THEMSELVES USING ADVANCED WEAPONS AGAINST ANY THREAT - STATEMENT

First Squawk  (@FirstSquawk) August 21, 2019

Houthi rebels have released what they claim to be photos of the US MQ-9 Reaper drone downed over Dhamar, Yemen pic.twitter.com/WkyuipZjhe

Henry Jones  (@hthjones) August 21, 2019

So question:  Is Iran now supplying it's proxies with even more advanced missiles than previously seen?

She just keeps getting the #ratio. She is stupid enough to actually hashtag “NativeVote” which immediately let’s people know she’s pandering. My gosh. pic.twitter.com/c0G5Wkms4S

Tracy Beanz  (@tracybeanz) August 21, 2019

Timing is key.  Date of flight March 1, 2013.  What was Microsoft doing then?  Fighting the DOJ over an antitrust case.  Antitrust is no-joke.  DOJ can ultimately break up a company like it did to the Bells.

On November 2, 2001, the DOJ reached an agreement with Microsoft to settle the case. The proposed settlement required Microsoft to share its application programming interfaces with third-party companies and appoint a panel of three people who would have full access to Microsoft's systems, records, and source code for five years in order to ensure compliance.  However, the DOJ did not require Microsoft to change any of its code nor prevent Microsoft from tying other software with Windows in the future. On August 5, 2002, Microsoft announced that it would make some concessions towards the proposed final settlement ahead of the judge's verdict. On November 1, 2002, Judge Kollar-Kotelly released a judgment accepting most of the proposed DOJ settlement.  Nine states (California, Connecticut, Iowa, Florida, Kansas, Minnesota, Utah, Virginia and Massachusetts) and the District of Columbia (which had been pursuing the case together with the DOJ) did not agree with the settlement, arguing that it did not go far enough to curb Microsoft's anti-competitive business practices.  On June 30, 2004, the U.S. appeals court unanimously approved the settlement with the Justice Department, rejecting objections that the sanctions were inadequate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft_Corp.

Gates was famously apolitical prior to the anti-trust suit.  I think Gates was told to play ball or be ruined, and he did.  Since the anti-trust suit he's been a loyal leftist.  I wonder what he did on that island?

- For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?

So for the sake of discussion/ possibilities, ect, is he in the same boat as Zuckerburger?  A govt program with a civilian face and a story about a dorm room, or in this case a garage?  Did he get too self important and was he getting reeled in?

Given the timing, and how apolitical he was, I suspect it was a case of "we can't have a guy this rich who doesn't play ball."

Could be.

Thanks to the OLCC, Oregon alone is currently sitting on more than $1Billion in EXCESS weed.....no one wants that shitty Mexi brick bud - Western states US premium is suppling the nation....all in pursuit of national legalization.

Interesting

I wonder if Barry was provided info to "protect the country" in addition to the Office of Net Assessment, or if Team Barry was the only squad on the field?

I wonder if the Office of Net Assessment has vetted the background and eligibility of every major candidate since Nixon? I wonder if they have investigated the backgrounds of every Congressional Committee Chair since Nixon?

I also am beginning to wonder who really controls Eric Schmidt?

I think it was a circular thing.  We want to spy on opposition so can create a narrative. > create fake BS intelligence, > we need an investigation > spy on opposition > see the intelligence we have? > leak to media > look! another source of intelligence/ evidence > rinse and repeat.

Are the two squads in concert? Opposed? Wonder if ONA gen'd a report? Wonder if ONA knew about Team Barry?

From the piece:

My reporting, including interviews with four dozen U.S. officials over the last several months, actually identifies a much larger collection of documents — about a dozen all together — that, when declassified, would show more completely how a routine counterintelligence probe was hijacked to turn the most awesome spy powers in America against a presidential nominee in what was essentially a political dirty trick orchestrated by Democrats.

I've been watching a Ken Burns documentary on Netflix on Prohibition.  Worth a watch as it sort of relates to this.

Lots of people were making lots of money off of prohibition.

What you don't see in OR?

High profile weed busts related to disto in parts elsewhere.

A few low hangers, but a mere sliver of the weight that vanishes.

Trump's presser.
We are the piggy bank, the EU, China.
"I was put here by people, I was put here by people to do a great job."

Where have we heard this before?

Man.  This presser is good so far.
Beat down on Obama and fake news/ MSM.

If you want to go down a deep rabbit hole....

Q spoke of the parent organization of the Nazis, the 'NWO', and "N is not new"- the spiritual roots of the Nazis and Hitlers beliefs are in the book IPOT mentioned:

The Spear of Destiny: The Occult Power Behind the Spear which pierced the side of Christ

by Trevor Ravenscroft  (Author)

You can get it free by asking for it at a public library via inter library loan, but there are used copies online for $2 and up. Amazon also has it as a kindle version.

This isn't for everyone.

Which part?   USA being a piggy bank for the world has been public knowledge since at least WW1.

He's not wrong in the job part and there's only a little over a year left before any gains are potentially all lost.

Here's a rabbit hole...Red Cross?

www.cnbc.com/amp/2015/03/18/who-still-owes-what-for-the-two-world-wars.html

Signed in San Francisco 1951, the 'Treaty of Peace with Japan', meant that "Japan will transfer its assets and those of its nationals in countries which were neutral during the war, or which were at war with any of the Allied Powers, or, at its option, the equivalent of such assets, to the International Committee of the Red Cross which shall liquidate such assets and distribute the resultant fund to appropriate national agencies."

Solomon: If Trump Declassifies These 10 Documents, Democrats Are Doomed

As the Russiagate circus attempts to quietly disappear over the horizon, with Democrats preferring to shift the anti-Trump narrative back to "racist", "white supremacist", "xenophobe", and the mainstream media ready to squawk "recession"; the Trump administration may have a few more cards up its sleeve before anyone claims the higher ground in this farce we call an election campaign.

Source

As The Hill's John Solomon details, in September 2018 that President Trump told my Hill.TV colleague Buck Sexton and me that he would order the release of all classified documents showing what the FBI, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and other U.S. intelligence agencies may have done wrong in the Russia probe.

And while it's been almost a year since then, of feet-dragging and cajoling and deep-state-fighting, we wonder, given Solomon's revelations below, if the president is getting ready to play his 'Trump' card.

Here are the documents that Solomon believes  have the greatest chance of rocking Washington, if declassified:

1.)   Christopher Steele’s confidential human source reports at the FBI. These documents, known in bureau parlance as 1023 reports, show exactly what transpired each time Steele and his FBI handlers met in the summer and fall of 2016 to discuss his anti-Trump dossier. The big reveal, my sources say, could be the first evidence that the FBI shared sensitive information with Steele, such as the existence of the classified Crossfire Hurricane operation targeting the Trump campaign. It would be a huge discovery if the FBI fed Trump-Russia intel to Steele in the midst of an election, especially when his ultimate opposition-research client was Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). The FBI has released only one or two of these reports under FOIA lawsuits and they were 100 percent redacted. The American public deserves better.

2.)   The 53 House Intel interviews. House Intelligence interviewed many key players in the Russia probe and asked the DNI to declassify those interviews nearly a year ago, after sending the transcripts for review last November. There are several big reveals, I’m told, including the first evidence that a lawyer tied to the Democratic National Committee had Russia-related contacts at the CIA.

3.)   The Stefan Halper documents. It has been widely reported that European-based American academic Stefan Halper and a young assistant, Azra Turk, worked as FBI sources. We know for sure that one or both had contact with targeted Trump aides like Carter Page and George Papadopoulos at the end of the election. My sources tell me there may be other documents showing Halper continued working his way to the top of Trump's transition and administration, eventually reaching senior advisers like Peter Navarro inside the White House in summer 2017. These documents would show what intelligence agencies worked with Halper, who directed his activity, how much he was paid and how long his contacts with Trump officials were directed by the U.S. government’s Russia probe.

4.)   The October 2016 FBI email chain. This is a key document identified by Rep. Nunes and his investigators. My sources say it will show exactly what concerns the FBI knew about and discussed with DOJ about using Steele’s dossier and other evidence to support a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant targeting the Trump campaign in October 2016. If those concerns weren’t shared with FISA judges who approved the warrant, there could be major repercussions.

5.)   Page/Papadopoulos exculpatory statements. Another of Nunes’ five buckets, these documents purport to show what the two Trump aides were recorded telling undercover assets or captured in intercepts insisting on their innocence. Papadopoulos told me he told an FBI undercover source in September 2016 that the Trump campaign was not trying to obtain hacked Clinton documents from Russia and considered doing so to be treason. If he made that statement with the FBI monitoring, and it was not disclosed to the FISA court, it could be another case of FBI or DOJ misconduct.

6.)   The 'Gang of Eight' briefing materials. These were a series of classified briefings and briefing books the FBI and DOJ provided key leaders in Congress in the summer of 2018 that identify shortcomings in the Russia collusion narrative. Of all the documents congressional leaders were shown, this is most frequently cited to me in private as having changed the minds of lawmakers who weren’t initially convinced of FISA abuses or FBI irregularities.

7.)   The Steele spreadsheet. I wrote recently that the FBI kept a spreadsheet on the accuracy and reliability of every claim in the Steele dossier. According to my sources, it showed as much as 90 percent of the claims could not be corroborated, were debunked or turned out to be open-source internet rumors. Given Steele’s own effort to leak intel in his dossier to the media before Election Day, the public deserves to see the FBI’s final analysis of his credibility. A document I reviewed recently showed the FBI described Steele’s information as only “minimally corroborated” and the bureau’s confidence in him as “medium.”

8.)   The Steele interview. It has been reported, and confirmed, that the DOJ's inspector general (IG) interviewed the former British intelligence operative for as long as 16 hours about his contacts with the FBI while working with Clinton’s opposition research firm, Fusion GPS. It is clear from documents already forced into the public view by lawsuits that Steele admitted in the fall of 2016 that he was desperate to defeat Trump, had a political deadline to make his dirt public, was working for the DNC/Clinton campaign and was leaking to the news media. If he told that to the FBI and it wasn’t disclosed to the FISA court, there could be serious repercussions.

9.)   The redacted sections of the third FISA renewal application. This was the last of four FISA warrants targeting the Trump campaign; it was renewed in June 2017 after special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe had started, and signed by then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. It is the one FISA application that House Republicans have repeatedly asked to be released, and I’m told the big reveal in the currently redacted sections of the application is that it contained both misleading information and evidence of intrusive tactics used by the U.S. government to infiltrate Trump’s orbit.

10.)  Records of allies’ assistance. Multiple sources have said a handful of U.S. allies overseas – possibly Great Britain, Australia and Italy – were asked to assist FBI efforts to check on Trump connections to Russia. Members of Congress have searched recently for some key contact documents with British intelligence. My sources say these documents might help explain Attorney General Bill Barr’s recent comments that “the use of foreign intelligence capabilities and counterintelligence capabilities against an American political campaign, to me, is unprecedented and it's a serious red line that's been crossed.”

These documents, when declassified, would show more completely how a routine counterintelligence probe was hijacked to turn the most awesome spy powers in America against a presidential nominee in what was essentially a political dirty trick orchestrated by Democrats.

My prediction:

Evidence WILL be released that shows in no uncertain terms that a coup d'etat was orchestrated and facilitated by the obama admin.

It WILL show that Hillary was in on it. It WILL multiple crimes by the DOJ, FBI, DNC, bho, hrc, and many others.

And........after it is all released, the vast majority of liberals and democrats will say, "I don't care".

They will be completely fine with what happened, because it was "for the better".

Similar to how many felt that murdering six million Jews and perhaps twice that many other "undesirables" was ....."for the better".

You cannot reason with irrational people.

You’re not far off.  There is a large group of people in this country that want to kill you because you want to be left alone and leave them alone.

If there are no perp walks, will it be safe for them to walk down the street?  This Q thing can turn ugly, fast, with MSM fanning the flames.
Attached File

20 days...no Q...

Is 9-5-19 still the approximate date for 8chan to be back? Is 4Chan up? I’d guess no Q til the platform is restored. Anyone with knowledge wanna throw out some info RE Chans and status?

I'm thinking the Congress is going to delay that hearing so the 8chan does not get restored soon

What kind of fucked up bullshit is this?  There's no point in even voting if this is allowed! At least in Colorado and states with similar laws.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/aug/21/electoral-college-members-not-bound-popular-vote-c/

DENVER — A U.S. appeals court in Denver said Electoral College members can vote for the presidential candidate of their choice and aren’t bound by the popular vote in their states.

The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday that the Colorado secretary of state violated the Constitution in 2016 when he removed an elector and nullified his vote when the elector refused to cast his ballot for Democrat Hillary Clinton, who won the popular vote.

It was not immediately clear what effect the ruling might have on the Electoral College system, which is established in the Constitution. Voters in each state choose members of the Electoral College, called electors, who are pledged to a presidential candidate. The electors then choose the president.

Most states require electors to vote for the candidate who won the popular vote in that state, but the Denver appeals court said the states do not have that authority.

The Constitution allows electors to cast their votes at their own discretion, the ruling said, “and the state does not possess countervailing authority to remove an elector and to cancel his vote in response to the exercise of that Constitutional right.”

The elector at the center of the case, Micheal Baca, was part of a group known as “Hamilton electors” who tried to convince electors who were pledged to Clinton or Donald Trump to unite behind a consensus candidate to deny Trump the presidency.

After a flurry of filings in state and federal courts, the electors met on Dec. 19, 2016, and Baca crossed out Clinton’s name on his ballot and wrote in John Kasich, the Republican governor of Ohio who also ran for president.

Then-Secretary of State Wayne Williams refused to count the vote and removed Baca as an elector. He replaced him with another elector who voted for Clinton.

Baca’s attorneys said the U.S. Supreme Court will likely hear the case because it conflicts with a decision from Washington state’s Supreme Court. That court said in May that electors could be fined for not casting ballots for the popular vote winner.
More at link

Before Alex Jones was cool...

Yeah, that's the slander that "liberals" have used for decades against people who don't want to be forced to drink water with chemicals that allegedly aren't harmful. Ridicule is the best weapon ever invented.

One of the things Kubrick got on the totalitarian side of. Must be the greatest propaganda since the burning of the Reichstag.

During WWII the separation of Uranium 235 and 238 required fluorine; in NJ, IIRC, the uranium hexafluroide contaminated a large area. To shut the locals up, they announced that fluoride was good for your teeth and began putting it in the drinking water system of cities.

Just brush your teeth, and don't worry about the mercury in your kids' vaccines. Trust us, we are the government.

Aren’t we really being shown a few things?

Trump NYT will go out of business - ‘Paper of record’ owned by Carlos Slim - a mexican pimp controlling a big piece of the boarder - the wall, and cutting off the funding that is ultimately feeding the NYT and other BS.

Market leader and MSNBC parent company GE might just be dog shit wrapped up with a pretty bow

Dan Bongino...really good show, one of his better. He is great at explaining and breaking down points with how they relate to the overall situations.



Bongino's website w/ "show notes" explaining/expounding upon the video info.

https://bongino.com/ep-1049-stunning-new-revelations-about-whats-ahead/

REMEMBER:  The Hill piece by John Solomon
1.)   Christopher Steele’s confidential human source reports at the FBI. These documents, known in bureau parlance as 1023 reports, show exactly what transpired each time Steele and his FBI handlers met in the summer and fall of 2016 to discuss his anti-Trump dossier. The big reveal, my sources say, could be the first evidence that the FBI shared sensitive information with Steele, such as the existence of the classified Crossfire Hurricane operation targeting the Trump campaign. It would be a huge discovery if the FBI fed Trump-Russia intel to Steele in the midst of an election, especially when his ultimate opposition-research client was Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). The FBI has released only one or two of these reports under Freedom of Information Act lawsuits and they were 100 percent redacted. The American public deserves better.

2.)   The 53 House Intel interviews. House Intelligence interviewed many key players in the Russia probe and asked the DNI to declassify those interviews nearly a year ago, after sending the transcripts for review last November. There are several big reveals, I’m told, including the first evidence that a lawyer tied to the Democratic National Committee had Russia-related contacts at the CIA.

3.)   The Stefan Halper documents. It has been widely reported that European-based American academic Stefan Halper and a young assistant, Azra Turk, worked as FBI sources. We know for sure that one or both had contact with targeted Trump aides like Carter Page and George Papadopoulos  at the end of the election. My sources tell me there may be other documents showing Halper continued working his way to the top of Trump's transition and administration, eventually reaching senior advisers like Peter Navarro inside the White House in summer 2017. These documents would show what intelligence agencies worked with Halper, who directed his activity, how much he was paid and how long his contacts with Trump officials were directed by the U.S. government’s Russia probe.

4.)   The October 2016 FBI email chain. This is a key document identified by Rep. Nunes and his investigators. My sources say it will show exactly what concerns the FBI knew about and discussed with DOJ about using Steele’s dossier and other evidence to support a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant targeting the Trump campaign in October 2016. If those concerns weren’t shared with FISA judges who approved the warrant, there could be major repercussions.

5.)   Page/Papadopoulos exculpatory statements. Another of Nunes’s five buckets, these documents purport to show what the two Trump aides were recorded telling undercover assets or captured in intercepts insisting on their innocence. Papadopoulos told me he told an FBI undercover source in September 2016 that the Trump campaign was not trying to obtain hacked Clinton documents from Russia and considered doing so to be treason. If he made that statement with the FBI monitoring, and it was not disclosed to the FISA court, it could be another case of FBI or DOJ misconduct.

6.)   The 'Gang of Eight' briefing materials. These were a series of classified briefings and briefing books the FBI and DOJ provided key leaders in Congress in the summer of 2018 that identify shortcomings in the Russia collusion narrative. Of all the documents congressional leaders were shown, this is most frequently cited to me in private as having changed the minds of lawmakers who weren’t initially convinced of FISA abuses or FBI irregularities.

7.)   The Steele spreadsheet. I wrote recently that the FBI kept a spreadsheet on the accuracy and reliability of every claim in the Steele dossier. According to my sources, it showed as much as 90 percent of the claims could not be corroborated, were debunked or turned out to be open-source internet rumors. Given Steele’s own effort to leak intel in his dossier to the media before Election Day, the public deserves to see the FBI’s final analysis of his credibility. A document I reviewed recently showed the FBI described Steele’s information as only “minimally corroborated” and the bureau’s confidence in him as “medium.”

8.)   The Steele interview. It has been reported, and confirmed, that the DOJ's inspector general interviewed the former British intelligence operative for as long as 16 hours about his contacts with the FBI while working with Clinton’s opposition research firm, Fusion GPS. It is clear from documents already forced into the public view by lawsuits that Steele admitted in the fall of 2016 that he was desperate to defeat Trump, had a political deadline to make his dirt public, was working for the DNC/Clinton campaign and was leaking to the news media. If he told that to the FBI and it wasn’t disclosed to the FISA court, there could be serious repercussions.

9.)   The redacted sections of the third FISA renewal application. This was the last of four FISA warrants targeting the Trump campaign; it was renewed in June 2017 after special counsel Robert Mueller ’s probe had started and signed by then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. It is the one FISA application that House Republicans have repeatedly asked to be released, and I’m told the big reveal in the currently redacted sections of the application is that it contained both misleading information and evidence of intrusive tactics used by the U.S. government to infiltrate Trump’s orbit.

10.)  Records of allies’ assistance. Multiple sources have said a handful of U.S. allies overseas — possibly Great Britain, Australia and Italy — were asked to assist FBI efforts to check on Trump connections to Russia. Members of Congress have searched recently for some key contact documents with British intelligence. My sources say these documents might help explain Attorney General William Barr’s recent comments that “the use of foreign intelligence capabilities and counterintelligence capabilities against an American political campaign, to me, is unprecedented and it's a serious red line that's been crossed.”

This reminds me of the Deep Fake news.

Setting the stage?

Cannibalism is found throughout the animal kingdom—so why is it the ultimate taboo for humans? | Opinion https://t.co/jDXwdCZqEV

Newsweek  (@Newsweek) August 21, 2019

https://www.newsweek.com/cannibalism-animal-kingdom-ultimate-taboo-humans-1455287

Have we had a moment of silence for the GD thread?

Interesting article on some of the history of Disney.

https://www.coreysdigs.com/trafficking/exposing-the-keys-to-disneys-operations-and-agenda/

Gawd it was awful

Cause we’re not f’ing animals!

TC

Ummm I know a lot that are not humans!

This is why the "Q Public Relations Campaign" has been and continues to be...

Extremely important.

That is true.

Possible.

LOL

When you thought you heard it all from @CNN:@ChrisCuomo says @realDonaldTrump ‘is Not Aging’ Because He Doesn’t Care Enough For The Country

Retweet with Comment - What you think?https://t.co/ajxFmAWA87

Sara A. Carter  (@SaraCarterDC) August 21, 2019

Nailing people to crosses is pretty natural as well.  Titus!  Titus where are you!  

Attached File

Inevitable.  
Bracing for the incoming posters who have no self control.

This thread has been on point and a pleasure to follow thus far. Keep up the great digs y'all. Thanks!

Cheers
BeerMe

Sad to say, you’re likely correct.

And they are trying to wait until after 2020 to get any of that released:

Wray FBI wants to stall until well after next presidential election before completing release of emails/texts between corrupt FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.  26 months for 13,000 pages!? @RealDonaldTrump should order @FBI to comply with law and stop the stonewalling. https://t.co/b4NnC6HthX

Tom Fitton  (@TomFitton) August 21, 2019