User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 7:41:20 PM EDT
[#1]
https://knewz.com/meghan-markle-and-prince-harry-may-be-eyeing-big-banks-billions-as-his-cousins-divorce-rocks-the-royal-family/
Meghan and Harry (former British royalty) could earn a billion dollars in speaking fees They are in talks to be guest speakers at Goldman Sachs. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 7:44:52 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Any significance to the knife? ETA: Beat! Thread moving faster than me today. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 7:45:14 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Not that it means anything, but his boots are brand new. It looks as though he just put them on. My boots were all beat to hell. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 7:52:46 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Are you sure it’s not his parents address and bus money? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: One left boot looks to be missing the shoe laces, the other, he has something tucked under the laces like a note, or money??? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 7:53:41 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Rainbow Warrior? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
What's up with the knife ? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 7:58:33 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Not sure if relevant re: evergreen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evergreen_International_Airlines Lots of CIA shell companies listed within Quote HistoryQuoted:
Not sure if relevant re: evergreen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evergreen_International_Airlines Evergreen International Airlines was a charter and cargo airline based in McMinnville, Oregon, United States with longstanding ties to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). It operated contract freight services, offering charters and scheduled flights, as well as wet lease services. It operated services for the U.S. military and the United States Postal Service, as well as ad hoc charter flights. Its crew base was at John F. Kennedy International Airport, New York.[2]
Evergreen also maintained a large aircraft maintenance and storage facility at the Pinal Air Park in Marana, Arizona that the company acquired from the CIA's Air America fleet.[3][4][5] |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 8:00:02 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Not sure if relevant re: evergreen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evergreen_International_Airlines Lots of CIA shell companies listed within Quote HistoryQuoted:
Not sure if relevant re: evergreen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evergreen_International_Airlines Evergreen International Airlines was a charter and cargo airline based in McMinnville, Oregon, United States with longstanding ties to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). It operated contract freight services, offering charters and scheduled flights, as well as wet lease services. It operated services for the U.S. military and the United States Postal Service, as well as ad hoc charter flights. Its crew base was at John F. Kennedy International Airport, New York.[2]
Evergreen also maintained a large aircraft maintenance and storage facility at the Pinal Air Park in Marana, Arizona that the company acquired from the CIA's Air America fleet.[3][4][5] Also saw this Twitter thread How Cleveland’s cooperatives are giving ex-offenders a fresh start There are three Evergreen Cooperatives so far, which each employ around 120 workers from Cleveland’s low-income University Circle area. Many of the employees have previous convictions which bar them from other jobs. In 2016, the cooperatives boasted a combined revenue of $6.3 million. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 8:00:24 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: One left boot looks to be missing the shoe laces, the other, he has something tucked under the laces like a note, or money??? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 8:10:49 PM EDT
[#9]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 8:14:16 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 8:21:14 PM EDT
[#11]
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/02/12/unfortunately-a-corrupt-group-of-politically-focused-doj-lawyers-isnt-the-only-issue/#more-183439
Overlooked in yesterday's story of the four Mueller Attorneys quitting is the fact that 40 FBI agents continued to work for the Special Counsel AFTER the entire SC Team realized in January 2017 that there was no evidence of Russian Collusion. >A significant issue is in the part of the story most have skipped past without recognizing,… because, well, simply we have become immune to the insanity of it.… 40 FBI Agents worked on the Special Counsel? >Think about it. For three years… Doing what exactly? "Forty FBI agents, spent three years on a mission to investigate /eliminate the candidacy and presidency of Donald Trump" "Forty FBI Agents spent three years trying to aid a transparently political effort to remove a president" >If you give them the benefit of being sound-minded, we had Forty FBI agents who transparently had to know this was a ridiculously weaponized political operation against the opposing political party of their FBI and DOJ leadership… and they went along with it. FFS, 40 FBI agents was greater than the combined total of agents J. Edgar Hoover secretly assigned to surveil JFK, RFK and MLK hoping to get blackmail intel to use against them. What were these 80 idle hands up to after they all knew that their primary mission fell apart. This story has to be told. These aren't East German Stasi agents. They are American FBI agents who knew that they were acting like East German Stasi agents. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 8:27:45 PM EDT
[#12]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 8:30:46 PM EDT
[#13]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 8:33:47 PM EDT
[#14]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 9:03:02 PM EDT
[#15]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 9:04:53 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 9:11:32 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Well Bye!! |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 9:22:53 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Wouldn't it be better for us if she were to stay in the race?????????????????? SC seems to be more of a Biden, Klobuchar or maybe Steyer type of state, not Warren, Butt-edge-edge, or Bernie. That's my guess anyway. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 9:39:36 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Wouldn't it be better for us if she were to stay in the race?????????????????? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: Well Bye!! T$ has this one in the bag, & she makes me ill.... I can't stand that bitch. Nails on a chalkboard. This one is all about me
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 9:39:50 PM EDT
[#20]
Watching Tucker and they are talking about the Barr, Trump. Roger Stone thing. One thing that caught my attention was Tucker's comments about the Judge in the Roger Stone case and her strong leanings toward Progressive/ democrat politics. (Obama appointee if I recall?) The new government position has been described in the press as dumping the sentencing on the judge. Maybe that is what DOJ now want to do. Maybe they want to see if she will keep the original extra legal excessive sentencing guidelines or she will do something else more appropriate? Trap for the judge?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 9:44:30 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Watching Tucker and they are talking about the Barr, Trump. Roger Stone thing. One thing that caught my attention was Tucker's comments about the Judge in the Roger Stone case and her strong leanings toward Progressive/ democrat politics. (Obama appointee if I recall?) The new government position has been described in the press as dumping the sentencing on the judge. Maybe that is what DOJ now want to do. Maybe they want to see if she will keep the original extra legal excessive sentencing guidelines or she will do something else more appropriate? Trap for the judge? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 9:47:20 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Watching Tucker and they are talking about the Barr, Trump. Roger Stone thing. One thing that caught my attention was Tucker's comments about the Judge in the Roger Stone case and her strong leanings toward Progressive/ democrat politics. (Obama appointee if I recall?) The new government position has been described in the press as dumping the sentencing on the judge. Maybe that is what DOJ now want to do. Maybe they want to see if she will keep the original extra legal excessive sentencing guidelines or she will do something else more appropriate? Trap for the judge? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 9:53:43 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYyfV_IZc00
WILL YOU PARDON ROGER STONE: Trump ANSWERS Questions from Press at Oval office Meeting 807 views•Feb 12, 2020 (@ around 1 1/2 minutes in) Golden State Times President Trump answers questions about Roger Stone and the Economy at meeting with Ecuador in the Oval Office President calling out the unfair way Roger Stone was treated vs how others crimes were dealt a slap on the wrist. POTUS says he doesn't want to say yet, on whether he will pardon Roger, but that nobody even knows what he did, it's a discrace. Calls out 4 people (Mueller's people), says Mueller probe was a scam, Mueller destroyed innocent people's lives. Asks where's McCabe, Comey, Stzrok, Page and calls them out as a discrace. Says not even drug dealers get 9 years. He thanks the Justice Dept.. Says Roger getting 9 years based on a tweet! He hopes everyone will be treated fairly. I’m proud of our President. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 9:55:34 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Not sure T$ has this one in the bag, & she makes me ill.... I can't stand that bitch. Nails on a chalkboard. This one is all about me Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Well Bye!! T$ has this one in the bag, & she makes me ill.... I can't stand that bitch. Nails on a chalkboard. This one is all about me |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 9:57:59 PM EDT
[#25]
Better get to digging on buttchug....cause he'll be the Dem candidate to run against Trump. And if he is a SEE EYE AYE plant, he's not to be taken lightly
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 10:00:44 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Its a Dog tag Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: One left boot looks to be missing the shoe laces, the other, he has something tucked under the laces like a note, or money??? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 10:05:36 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I think the most important part of Q’s long post is the ending phrase. Dictionary: clear and present danger The standard set by the Supreme Court for judging when freedom of speech may lawfully be limited. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., illustrated the point by arguing that no one has a constitutional right to shout “Fire!” in a crowded theater when no fire is present, for such action would pose a “clear and present danger” to public safety. Wiki: Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. delivered the classic statement of the clear and present danger test in Schenck v. United States (1919): “The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight, and that no court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right.” "Imminent lawless action" test supplants "clear and present danger" test. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. redrafted the per curiam opinion, substituting for clear and present danger a new standard (Schwartz 1995: 27): “The constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.” The imminent lawless action test has largely supplanted the clear and present danger test. The clear and present danger remains, however, the standard for assessing constitutional protection for speech in the military courts. ————— What comes next? Q: Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic? “... did [D]’s and media corps jumpstart a [coordinated & planned] divisive blitz ...” “... violent [masked] terror orgs such as Antifa immediately created/funded... “ They want you divided. ... Divided you pose no threat to their control. What action might POTUS take re: the media collusion/ “lawless action”? Don’t think nuclear. Quote HistoryQuoted:
I think the most important part of Q’s long post is the ending phrase. Dictionary: clear and present danger The standard set by the Supreme Court for judging when freedom of speech may lawfully be limited. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., illustrated the point by arguing that no one has a constitutional right to shout “Fire!” in a crowded theater when no fire is present, for such action would pose a “clear and present danger” to public safety. Wiki: Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. delivered the classic statement of the clear and present danger test in Schenck v. United States (1919): “The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight, and that no court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right.” "Imminent lawless action" test supplants "clear and present danger" test. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. redrafted the per curiam opinion, substituting for clear and present danger a new standard (Schwartz 1995: 27): “The constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.” The imminent lawless action test has largely supplanted the clear and present danger test. The clear and present danger remains, however, the standard for assessing constitutional protection for speech in the military courts. ————— What comes next? Q: Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic? “... did [D]’s and media corps jumpstart a [coordinated & planned] divisive blitz ...” “... violent [masked] terror orgs such as Antifa immediately created/funded... “ They want you divided. ... Divided you pose no threat to their control. What action might POTUS take re: the media collusion/ “lawless action”? Don’t think nuclear. The outline matches the "16 year plan" in places, parts we see still pressed today. It might be off on some, but the general idea of what the left/glboalists are pushing for is present, so correct concept, details might not be exact due to disruptions (elections). This is a summary of what Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development / Biodiversity is seeking to impose: • An end to national sovereignty • State planning and management of all land resources, ecosystems, deserts, forests, mountains, oceans and fresh water; agriculture; rural development; biotechnology; and ensuring ‘equity’ (equal slavery) • The State to ‘define the role’ of business and financial resources • Abolition of private property (it’s not ‘sustainable’) • ‘Restructuring’ the family unit • Children raised by the State • People told what their job will be • Major restrictions on movement • Creation of ‘human settlement zones’ • Mass resettlement as people are forced to vacate land where they currently live • Dumbing down education (achieved) • Mass global depopulation in pursuit of all the above |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 10:14:54 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Was my thought as well but admittedly I cannot see it very well. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 10:22:59 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
This was linked for an "Evergreen" option. Agenda 21 The outline matches the "16 year plan" in places, parts we see still pressed today. It might be off on some, but the general idea of what the left/glboalists are pushing for is present, so correct concept, details might not be exact due to disruptions (elections). Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I think the most important part of Q’s long post is the ending phrase. Dictionary: clear and present danger The standard set by the Supreme Court for judging when freedom of speech may lawfully be limited. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., illustrated the point by arguing that no one has a constitutional right to shout “Fire!” in a crowded theater when no fire is present, for such action would pose a “clear and present danger” to public safety. Wiki: Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. delivered the classic statement of the clear and present danger test in Schenck v. United States (1919): “The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight, and that no court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right.” "Imminent lawless action" test supplants "clear and present danger" test. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. redrafted the per curiam opinion, substituting for clear and present danger a new standard (Schwartz 1995: 27): “The constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.” The imminent lawless action test has largely supplanted the clear and present danger test. The clear and present danger remains, however, the standard for assessing constitutional protection for speech in the military courts. ————— What comes next? Q: Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic? “... did [D]’s and media corps jumpstart a [coordinated & planned] divisive blitz ...” “... violent [masked] terror orgs such as Antifa immediately created/funded... “ They want you divided. ... Divided you pose no threat to their control. What action might POTUS take re: the media collusion/ “lawless action”? Don’t think nuclear. The outline matches the "16 year plan" in places, parts we see still pressed today. It might be off on some, but the general idea of what the left/glboalists are pushing for is present, so correct concept, details might not be exact due to disruptions (elections). This is a summary of what Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development / Biodiversity is seeking to impose: • An end to national sovereignty • State planning and management of all land resources, ecosystems, deserts, forests, mountains, oceans and fresh water; agriculture; rural development; biotechnology; and ensuring ‘equity’ (equal slavery) • The State to ‘define the role’ of business and financial resources • Abolition of private property (it’s not ‘sustainable’) • ‘Restructuring’ the family unit • Children raised by the State • People told what their job will be • Major restrictions on movement • Creation of ‘human settlement zones’ • Mass resettlement as people are forced to vacate land where they currently live • Dumbing down education (achieved) • Mass global depopulation in pursuit of all the above  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 10:26:39 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Not that it means anything to me but it does not seem to be a dog tag. Not uniformed in shape when I zoomed up on it. Maybe a desiccant packet? Might be why the other boot doesn't have laces because they are new? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 10:34:33 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Not that it means anything to me but it does not seem to be a dog tag. Not uniformed in shape when I zoomed up on it. Maybe a desiccant packet? Might be why the other boot doesn't have laces because they are new? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: Was my thought as well but admittedly I cannot see it very well. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 10:41:03 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Wouldn't it be better for us if she were to stay in the race?????????????????? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 10:43:44 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Not being rude at all.....but it's a dog tag. Very common practice in the .mil |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 10:47:11 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You should add that's is a common practice that's common to "grunts" and others that do it often are often trying to be cool. He was a REMF in every sense of the word. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 10:56:50 PM EDT
[#35]
All of the cockroaches are coming out into the light to tell us their opinions on RAID.
 Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 11:00:17 PM EDT
[#36]
Hussein’s most non-veiled attack to date.
 Attached FileEnhance...  Attached FileEnhance...  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 11:02:39 PM EDT
[#37]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 11:14:42 PM EDT
[#38]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 11:16:10 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
She'll be dropping out soon. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 11:43:37 PM EDT
[#40]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 11:55:08 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Sounds like she decided to keep the campaign contributions she has. She'll be dropping out soon. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2020 11:57:31 PM EDT
[#42]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2020 12:16:37 AM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2020 12:20:22 AM EDT
[#44]
Fully aware this may be absolutely nothing but gibberish and sensationalism.
Ricky Gervais video supposedly "calling out" hollywoods sexual deviants. Making fun of Natalie Portman. I dont know the backstory. Ricky Gervais (@rickygervais) February 12, 2020Screen shots I was able to grab (names of people, ones a groper, another a pedo, etc.) (yes thats Ricky's nipple)  Attached File Attached File Attached FileKnowing him hes probably laughing his ass off over people examining his nipples looking for clues. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2020 12:53:27 AM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2020 1:18:21 AM EDT
[#46]
TRUST SESSIONS!?
Quote HistoryQuoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/152525/b44852d857283cf4fff3a9427fc5ebacafd9bc19-1273543.JPG |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2020 2:15:18 AM EDT
[#47]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2020 2:23:05 AM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Can some explain this funky backwards ordnance. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/84273/Screenshot_20200212-221247_2_png-1274213.JPG From this https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/84273/A737870E-D507-4DB4-9774-89EF20A6C3DF_jpe-1274214.JPG  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2020 2:38:58 AM EDT
[#49]
Does anyone else remember when the judge placed Roger Stone under a "gag order" re his case/trial? I am quite sure we now know exactly why. It's very obvious Judge Berman ran the underground railroading of Roger Stone in conjunction with crooked, biased DOJ lawyers.
ICYMI, one biased juror, Tomeka Hart, is an activist democrat who ran for congress in 2012.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2020 3:55:27 AM EDT
[#50]
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
Attached File
Attached File
Attached File