![Bravo Company BCM](/images/2016/banners/sticky/BCM_StickyBarAd_225x40.gif)
![Login](/images/2016/spacer.gif)
Posted: 8/22/2018 6:31:45 AM EDT
In 1988, the Soviet hydrographic research ship Keldysh positioned itself over the wreck of K-219, and found the submarine sitting upright on the sandy bottom. It had broken in two, aft of the conning tower. Several missile silo hatches had been forced open, and the missiles, along with the nuclear warheads they contained, were gone. View Quote |
|
They weren't pried open, the crew purposely ejected them. They're somewhere a few miles back from where they sank and a few miles down from sea level.
|
|
What was that movie with George Clooney, and the repurposed Israeli nuke?
|
|
|
Actually, the sub was missing its espresso machine.
Maybe it was their Sno-Cone maker... Or their water heater? |
|
|
Arfcom group buy?
They must be for sale somewhere, GD would come to a conscience so fast on where to use them. |
|
If true....hopefully the only folks able to do anything like that is US.
I'm sure the USA would gleefully examine the latest Soviet ICMB, even if a little water logged. |
|
|
|
|
Cold War tech, think what is the current state of the art.
![]() https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/the-nearly-forgotten-story-super-secret-us-navy-spy-18595 http://www.hisutton.com/Secret%20Sub%20-%20USS%20Halibut.html |
|
|
Read the linky. It gets more and more interesting. I am beginning to suspect that we did pull a Glomar or maybe a subsurface Glomar like exercise with ROVs. We certainly have the technology. There are plenty of ROVs operating in the gulf at 6000 ft easy.
|
|
|
|
|
18,000 feet of water? Sweet. The next time somebody brings me a sketchy nuclear weapon to refurbish, and it looks like it might have been crushed by water pressure, I'll be a little more leery about latent effects from criticality issues. Thanks for the heads up.
|
|
Quoted:
They weren't pried open, the crew purposely ejected them. They're somewhere a few miles back from where they sank and a few miles down from sea level. View Quote |
|
SO what would you do with a few 1970's era soviet nuke warheads that hadn't been maintained since 1986 and had to be (hypothetically) retrieved from about 18,000ft of saltwater where they sat for at least a few years? Even IF you managed to survive extracting the nuclear materiel despite booby traps and safety's ---at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars--what would you then do with your prize? The implication is that somebody "stole" the missiles and warheads for some sort of nefarious use.
Other than us or the soviets salvaging them -highly doubtful. They are not "missing" nobody has really looked for them. The 219 sailed with one silo disabled due to a previous accident. that leaves 15. One was ejected with 2 warheads at the start of the accident. Other missile tubes were opened to vent gasses by the crew during the accident. More than likely those missiles exploded when their fuel came into contact with seawater--albeit under the ocean and abandoned. those remains are scattered around the wreck somewhere. The ship broke in half behind the conning tower-where the missile tubes are-and those missiles were likely effected also. I doubt if any missiles or warheads are "missing" the soviets and the US kept pretty close eyes on the wreck. Unless you happen to be Ernst Stavro Blofeld or Goldfinger ,in which case it would be cheaper to build your own, no-one has the resources to retrieve the crappy ass and incredibly dangerous prone to explode in seawater 1970's era missiles and shitty soviet era warheads nor would anyone want to. |
|
Quoted:
Read the linky. It gets more and more interesting. I am beginning to suspect that we did pull a Glomar or maybe a subsurface Glomar like exercise with ROVs. We certainly have the technology. There are plenty of ROVs operating in the gulf at 6000 ft easy. View Quote This is why Mars can't have nice things. |
|
We should detonate them out of safety. And live stream the explosion.
|
|
|
|
Or the Russians never had the missiles and were playing a game of hide the ball under a cup and pretending they were armed and stocked well.
|
|
|
One of the cable news channels (not CNN/Fox/MSNBC) scrolled a headline about missing nuclear powered missiles.
|
|
So someone stole some warheads in a sunken soviet sub that the soviets did not have the tech at the time to retrieve.
I think we all can guess who took those warheads. |
|
I’m honestly surprised that more ‘Soviet era warheads’ aren’t missing.
Or maybe they are and we just don’t know about it |
|
Quoted:
SO what would you do with a few 1970's era soviet nuke warheads that hadn't been maintained since 1986 and had to be (hypothetically) retrieved from about 18,000ft of saltwater where they sat for at least a few years? Even IF you managed to survive extracting the nuclear materiel despite booby traps and safety's ---at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars--what would you then do with your prize? The implication is that somebody "stole" the missiles and warheads for some sort of nefarious use. Other than us or the soviets salvaging them -highly doubtful. They are not "missing" nobody has really looked for them. The 219 sailed with one silo disabled due to a previous accident. that leaves 15. One was ejected with 2 warheads at the start of the accident. Other missile tubes were opened to vent gasses by the crew during the accident. More than likely those missiles exploded when their fuel came into contact with seawater--albeit under the ocean and abandoned. those remains are scattered around the wreck somewhere. The ship broke in half behind the conning tower-where the missile tubes are-and those missiles were likely effected also. I doubt if any missiles or warheads are "missing" the soviets and the US kept pretty close eyes on the wreck. Unless you happen to be Ernst Stavro Blofeld or Goldfinger ,in which case it would be cheaper to build your own, no-one has the resources to retrieve the crappy ass and incredibly dangerous prone to explode in seawater 1970's era missiles and shitty soviet era warheads nor would anyone want to. View Quote ![]() ![]() |
|
Quoted:
We got there first with one of our subs and took them. (sorry, I'm in the middle of Blind Mans Bluff). ![]() https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51nYicn7iKL._SX326_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
Would you recommend it? Meaning that book View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
We got there first with one of our subs and took them. (sorry, I'm in the middle of Blind Mans Bluff). ![]() https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51nYicn7iKL._SX326_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg It's certainly old news, but it's very interesting stuff. I was unaware of some of the things we accomplished with submarine espionage, and some of it is fascinating. ETA: Ha...... they just got to this boat in the book: Quoted:
I bet this boat was involved. https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.pinimg.com%2F736x%2Fff%2F27%2Ff2%2Fff27f2ce698659341b78ac094d418432.jpg&f=1 |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
18,000 feet of water? Sweet. The next time somebody brings me a sketchy nuclear weapon to refurbish, and it looks like it might have been crushed by water pressure, I'll be a little more leery about latent effects from criticality issues. Thanks for the heads up. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
SO what would you do with a few 1970's era soviet nuke warheads that hadn't been maintained since 1986 and had to be (hypothetically) retrieved from about 18,000ft of saltwater where they sat for at least a few years? Even IF you managed to survive extracting the nuclear materiel despite booby traps and safety's ---at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars--what would you then do with your prize? The implication is that somebody "stole" the missiles and warheads for some sort of nefarious use. Other than us or the soviets salvaging them -highly doubtful. They are not "missing" nobody has really looked for them. The 219 sailed with one silo disabled due to a previous accident. that leaves 15. One was ejected with 2 warheads at the start of the accident. Other missile tubes were opened to vent gasses by the crew during the accident. More than likely those missiles exploded when their fuel came into contact with seawater--albeit under the ocean and abandoned. those remains are scattered around the wreck somewhere. The ship broke in half behind the conning tower-where the missile tubes are-and those missiles were likely effected also. I doubt if any missiles or warheads are "missing" the soviets and the US kept pretty close eyes on the wreck. Unless you happen to be Ernst Stavro Blofeld or Goldfinger ,in which case it would be cheaper to build your own, no-one has the resources to retrieve the crappy ass and incredibly dangerous prone to explode in seawater 1970's era missiles and shitty soviet era warheads nor would anyone want to. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
18,000 feet of water? Sweet. The next time somebody brings me a sketchy nuclear weapon to refurbish, and it looks like it might have been crushed by water pressure, I'll be a little more leery about latent effects from criticality issues. Thanks for the heads up. |
|
Quoted:
18,000 feet of water? Sweet. The next time somebody brings me a sketchy nuclear weapon to refurbish, and it looks like it might have been crushed by water pressure, I'll be a little more leery about latent effects from criticality issues. Thanks for the heads up. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
We got there first with one of our subs and took them. (sorry, I'm in the middle of Blind Mans Bluff). ![]() https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51nYicn7iKL._SX326_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted:
despite booby traps and safety's View Quote What do they teach kids these days? To flip a coin at the end of any word ending with the letter “s” to determine whether or not to include an apostrophe in the general vicinity? |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.