![Bravo Company BCM](/images/2016/banners/sticky/BCM_StickyBarAd_225x40.gif)
![Login](/images/2016/spacer.gif)
Quoted:
I expected no recommendation for charges but the blatant "She broke the law but so what?" is just unbelievable. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Ho Lee Fuk!!!!!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I'm like most of you....jaw dropped. I suppose I expected it though. I just can't believe this. What do we do now? ![]() ![]() I expected no recommendation for charges but the blatant "She broke the law but so what?" is just unbelievable. I like that part the best. I want every single person in America to hear that . The law does not apply to the chosen class. |
|
After this, I'm going to mercilessly mock the shit out of anyone here in GD who advocates obeying the law simply for the sake of obeying the law.
Rules are clearly for little people. I saw people get tossed in prison for inadvertendly doing less than a 1/1000th of what she did. |
|
Only thing we can hope for is a whistleblower to put their life on the line and leak all the real info.
|
|
Quoted: In fairness, this is not the first time hilldog has committed a felony and gotten away with it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Hillary Rodham Clinton committed a felony and is walking, it is beyond comprehension to me. No intent was needed to violate the law. FUCK THIS CORRUPT ADMINISTRATION In fairness, this is not the first time hilldog has committed a felony and gotten away with it. |
|
Conflict of interest. Needs to be a third party investigation because obviously any agency whose website ends in .gov is going to end up saying exactly what this idiot did. Where is this dude's coothe
|
|
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now."
WHAT. THE. FUCK. |
|
Quoted:
For comparison, here is the Petraeus plea ... http://www.ncwd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/general/Petraeus.pdf View Quote Bump for Page 18. |
|
|
Quoted:
Vote for Hillary. The sooner this fucking train wrecks, the sooner we can get to work on fixing the tracks. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Ho Lee Fuk!!!!!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I'm like most of you....jaw dropped. I suppose I expected it though. I just can't believe this. What do we do now? ![]() ![]() Vote for Hillary. The sooner this fucking train wrecks, the sooner we can get to work on fixing the tracks. Kind of my line of thinking as well. Things need to start getting very bad to force people to get off their ass. I say bring her on. |
|
Quoted: Conflict of interest. Needs to be a third party investigation because obviously any agency whose website ends in .gov is going to end up saying exactly what this idiot did. Where is this dude's coothe View Quote |
|
Quoted:
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now." WHAT. THE. FUCK. View Quote Quoted for truth, this is insanity |
|
Quoted:
No, the FBI said she clearly broke the law and committed several felonies, but that they would not be referring her for prosecution. Stupid people won't bother to grasp that distinction, but I don't imagine you fall in that group. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The FBI has cleared her. No, the FBI said she clearly broke the law and committed several felonies, but that they would not be referring her for prosecution. Stupid people won't bother to grasp that distinction, but I don't imagine you fall in that group. No but it is done. |
|
Quoted:
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now." WHAT. THE. FUCK. View Quote Sanctions like .... revocation of your security clearance. |
|
Quoted:
Vote for Hillary. The sooner this fucking train wrecks, the sooner we can get to work on fixing the tracks. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Ho Lee Fuk!!!!!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I'm like most of you....jaw dropped. I suppose I expected it though. I just can't believe this. What do we do now? ![]() ![]() Vote for Hillary. The sooner this fucking train wrecks, the sooner we can get to work on fixing the tracks. Only problem is after Hillary when the train wrecks....there will be NO tracks left to fix!! |
|
Anyone with a brain knew there was going to be no indictment the day Biden stated he wasn't going to run.
|
|
You can't spell "Comedy" without "Comey"
Only the joke's on us ![]() |
|
|
Quoted:
Sanctions like .... revocation of your security clearance. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now." WHAT. THE. FUCK. Sanctions like .... revocation of your security clearance. He is saying that she fucked up so bad that our own Secretary of State should be kept away from classified information. |
|
Quoted:
Sanctions like .... revocation of your security clearance. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now." WHAT. THE. FUCK. Sanctions like .... revocation of your security clearance. Tough to be POTUS without a security clearance. |
|
Quoted:
Sanctions like .... revocation of your security clearance. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now." WHAT. THE. FUCK. Sanctions like .... revocation of your security clearance. Like the type of sanction that would prevent someone from obtaining a job in federal government, but not running for president? |
|
Quoted:
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now." WHAT. THE. FUCK. View Quote This whole situation is an epic pile to tin pot dictator bullshit. |
|
Quoted:
Like the type of sanction that would prevent someone from obtaining a job in federal government, but not running for president? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now." WHAT. THE. FUCK. Sanctions like .... revocation of your security clearance. Like the type of sanction that would prevent someone from obtaining a job in federal government, but not running for president? nahh the president doesnt deal with classified information or anything |
|
|
Quoted:
He is saying that she fucked up so bad that our own Secretary of State should be kept away from classified information. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now." WHAT. THE. FUCK. Sanctions like .... revocation of your security clearance. He is saying that she fucked up so bad that our own Secretary of State should be kept away from classified information. He pointed out exactly how she violated pertinent sections of U.S. Code, then refused to recommend that she be held accountable. |
|
Quoted:
Like the type of sanction that would prevent someone from obtaining a job in federal government, but not running for president? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now." WHAT. THE. FUCK. Sanctions like .... revocation of your security clearance. Like the type of sanction that would prevent someone from obtaining a job in federal government, but not running for president? A pattern? Lol. ![]() |
|
Quoted:
It's almost like he was saying, "Look ... we know she fucked up ... we can prove she fucked up, but we can't charge her for anything". I swear it's like he was saying they have all the evidence to charge and convict her ... but they can't bring charges. Awfully suspicious ... That's just strange .... View Quote Surreal, isn't it? |
|
Quoted: He pointed out exactly how she violated pertinent sections of U.S. Code, then refused to recommend that she be held accountable. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: "To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now." WHAT. THE. FUCK. Sanctions like .... revocation of your security clearance. He is saying that she fucked up so bad that our own Secretary of State should be kept away from classified information. He pointed out exactly how she violated pertinent sections of U.S. Code, then refused to recommend that she be held accountable. |
|
July 4, 1776 America claims it's independence
July 5, 2016 The republic is lost Most corrupt administration in American history. |
|
Yale law graduate
First Lady Senator from NYS Secretary of State and Mr. FBI thinks there was no intent on her part, yeah like she is some run of the mill moron. I almost feel like I did the night that Obama was re-elected, and the feeling is that I am absolutely stunned. |
|
The highlights:
From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information,... It is also likely that there are other work-related e-mails that they did not produce to State and that we did not find elsewhere, and that are now gone because they deleted all e-mails they did not return to State, and the lawyers cleaned their devices in such a way as to preclude complete forensic recovery. there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information. For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here. To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now. ![]() ![]() |
|
|
In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here. View Quote Some of the email was fucking marked. If you send a marked document on then that is intentional misconduct. You don't even need misconduct by the laws and regulations. To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now. View Quote Fuck you, FBI. ![]() |
|
Quoted:
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now." WHAT. THE. FUCK. View Quote Comey's quote there is sigline material. |
|
Straight shooter Comey my ass!!!! The fix is in Billery the most corrupt bitches ever.
|
|
Quoted:
But Lynch already said she would follow their recommendation. ![]() View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The FBI could have charged her with gross negiligence. ![]() FBI can't charge her, only recommend it's the DoJ job to charge her, and well, we know what's going to happen there ![]() She knew there would be no recommendation. Hence her 30 minute meeting with Bill Clinton to discuss "grandchildren". Our government is corrupt to the core |
|
To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.
As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case. View Quote John Edwards was right. There are two Americas. The America where laws apply to people, and the America where special people live where laws don't apply to people. |
|
Trump had BETTER win this fucking election. If not for the country, to save his own ass.
A President Hillary Clinton will unabashedly, without trying to hide it at all, bring the full weight of the federal government down on Trump for opposing her and make an example out of him. If she wins, he needs to expatriate before she's sworn in. |
|
|
Quoted:
Yale law graduate First Lady Senator from NYS Secretary of State and Mr. FBI thinks there was no intent on her part, yeah like she is some run of the mill moron. I almost feel like I did the night that Obama was re-elected, and the feeling is that I am absolutely stunned. View Quote Comey is treating it as though some peon made a one time, single scope mistake and immediately self-reported. |
|
Quoted:
After this, I'm going to mercilessly mock the shit out of anyone here in GD who advocates obeying the law simply for the sake of obeying the law. Rules are clearly for little people. I saw people get tossed in prison for inadvertendly doing less than a 1/1000th of what she did. View Quote fuck the law |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Conflict of interest. Needs to be a third party investigation because obviously any agency whose website ends in .gov is going to end up saying exactly what this idiot did. Where is this dude's coothe Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? ![]() ? English please |
|
Quoted:
Tough to be POTUS without a security clearance. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now." WHAT. THE. FUCK. Sanctions like .... revocation of your security clearance. Tough to be POTUS without a security clearance. Actually, it's probably a much happier job without one! |
|
Quoted:
Trump had BETTER win this fucking election. If not for the country, to save his own ass. A President Hillary Clinton will unabashedly, without trying to hide it at all, bring the full weight of the federal government down on Trump for opposing her and make an example out of him. If she wins, he needs to expatriate before she's sworn in. View Quote His business assets will somehow become under siege if she wins. I feel it. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.