User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 6:19:29 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It doesn't need to be true, Trump just says things and the idiots eat it up. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: (1) Cruz campaign bought the rights to to the GQ cover shoot of Melania and gave them to the superpac (2) There is much more to the mistress story Damn I was actually going to ask if GQ had to realease the photo to be used in a campaign. Where is that proof that his campaign did it? That would be a huge implication. If true, the FEC will rape Cruz and will be looking really hard at that donation to Carly. He will be done in the race within a week between that and the sex scandal allegation. They won't even have to prove the sex scandal. It will be assumed true by many who have not formulated an opinion. It doesn't need to be true, Trump just says things and the idiots eat it up. You mean like Cruz blaming the scandal on Trump and "the idiots eating it up?" The hypocrisy in these threads is THICK. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 6:20:55 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
OK...tell you what, I will give you couple of video's..you wont have to do anything but watch, every fact posted has cite's to prove them .. one for each candidate....I will be surprised if you watch them, but here you go..... Trump...... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw8c2Cq-vpg Cruz.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtL41Pr2d5s And this is a great watch strictly as an outside look at Trump and the "movement" well worth the watch to understand..... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fely6gd2Q-k Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
It's the same spiel you give everytime. It's old and tired. You act like I'm incapable of seeking info from outside the world of arfcom. Newsflash, I'm here for the tech forums and cheeky GD shenanigans, I don't trust you fuckers on politics for more than a second because for as much as GD loves to make fun of people who operate on "feels > Reelz", they're just as guilty of the same. It is what it is. Cruz is not "my guy". Like I've said, he's the best REMAINING candidate. I think Rand Paul would heads and tails better than the rest of these mopes, but the political winds werent blowing his way this year. My opinion is always willing to change based on new, quality information; that just does not happen very often here. Finally, I've not discounted the idea of voting for trump. Would I hate myself for it? Absolutely, but I fucking hate Hillary. It's going to come down to how the polls look in October. OK...tell you what, I will give you couple of video's..you wont have to do anything but watch, every fact posted has cite's to prove them .. one for each candidate....I will be surprised if you watch them, but here you go..... Trump...... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw8c2Cq-vpg Cruz.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtL41Pr2d5s And this is a great watch strictly as an outside look at Trump and the "movement" well worth the watch to understand..... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fely6gd2Q-k Are you even aware that you are posting pro-Trump propaganda videos? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 6:24:06 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You mean like Cruz blaming the scandal on Trump and "the idiots eating it up?" The hypocrisy in these threads is THICK. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Damn I was actually going to ask if GQ had to realease the photo to be used in a campaign. Where is that proof that his campaign did it? That would be a huge implication. If true, the FEC will rape Cruz and will be looking really hard at that donation to Carly. He will be done in the race within a week between that and the sex scandal allegation. They won't even have to prove the sex scandal. It will be assumed true by many who have not formulated an opinion. It doesn't need to be true, Trump just says things and the idiots eat it up. You mean like Cruz blaming the scandal on Trump and "the idiots eating it up?" The hypocrisy in these threads is THICK. Are you really pretending that Trump, his campaign, and his supporters are NOT pushing this story across social media? Look at THIS thead. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 6:26:00 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:]
You mean like Cruz blaming the scandal on Trump and "the idiots eating it up?" The hypocrisy in these threads is THICK. Again, do you believe that Roger Stone is not a Trump operative? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 6:39:55 PM EDT
[#5]
 " />
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 6:41:22 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Amanda Carpenter pic of her children. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BU-SNX_CIAAVb0C.jpg The eyes don't lie https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cec9fuJWEAE5Y1J.jpg Could be just a coincidence, but that little girl does look a lot like Cruz. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 6:41:43 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The start? Trump's marks have been attacking Heidi Cruz for the last couple of months over the CFR. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The creepy Canadian should file a lawsuit. Discovery is a bitch. No worries, the NYC Oompa Loompa would avoid discovery as well. Wouldn't want the world to know about his mob ties or the way he prefers foreign workers to Americans. Shit, file a lawsuit. Simple. It's all part of the game. Trump accuses a non-affiliated PAC of starting the war of wives, Cruz accuses Trump of planting the story with Pecker. Both are probably guilty. The difference being is one was playing conventionally and one used a Nuke. It's a pretty shitty thing to do when you're leading by 300 delegates, but I'm not surprised. Good. She NEEDS attacking for her views. They're un-American and disgusting. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 6:43:55 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Could be just a coincidence, but that little girl does look a lot like Cruz. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Amanda Carpenter pic of her children. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BU-SNX_CIAAVb0C.jpg The eyes don't lie https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cec9fuJWEAE5Y1J.jpg Could be just a coincidence, but that little girl does look a lot like Cruz. Could just be confIrmation bias. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 6:45:16 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Good. She NEEDS attacking for her views. They're un-American and disgusting. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The creepy Canadian should file a lawsuit. Discovery is a bitch. No worries, the NYC Oompa Loompa would avoid discovery as well. Wouldn't want the world to know about his mob ties or the way he prefers foreign workers to Americans. Shit, file a lawsuit. Simple. It's all part of the game. Trump accuses a non-affiliated PAC of starting the war of wives, Cruz accuses Trump of planting the story with Pecker. Both are probably guilty. The difference being is one was playing conventionally and one used a Nuke. It's a pretty shitty thing to do when you're leading by 300 delegates, but I'm not surprised. Good. She NEEDS attacking for her views. They're un-American and disgusting. She's also not running for office. I don't like your views, but you don't see me attacking you, do you? It just kicks back to the whole idea of maintaining some semblance of class. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 6:46:55 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
OK...tell you what, I will give you couple of video's..you wont have to do anything but watch, every fact posted has cite's to prove them .. one for each candidate....I will be surprised if you watch them, but here you go..... Trump...... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw8c2Cq-vpg Cruz.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtL41Pr2d5s And this is a great watch strictly as an outside look at Trump and the "movement" well worth the watch to understand..... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fely6gd2Q-k Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
It's the same spiel you give everytime. It's old and tired. You act like I'm incapable of seeking info from outside the world of arfcom. Newsflash, I'm here for the tech forums and cheeky GD shenanigans, I don't trust you fuckers on politics for more than a second because for as much as GD loves to make fun of people who operate on "feels > Reelz", they're just as guilty of the same. It is what it is. Cruz is not "my guy". Like I've said, he's the best REMAINING candidate. I think Rand Paul would heads and tails better than the rest of these mopes, but the political winds werent blowing his way this year. My opinion is always willing to change based on new, quality information; that just does not happen very often here. Finally, I've not discounted the idea of voting for trump. Would I hate myself for it? Absolutely, but I fucking hate Hillary. It's going to come down to how the polls look in October. OK...tell you what, I will give you couple of video's..you wont have to do anything but watch, every fact posted has cite's to prove them .. one for each candidate....I will be surprised if you watch them, but here you go..... Trump...... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw8c2Cq-vpg Cruz.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtL41Pr2d5s And this is a great watch strictly as an outside look at Trump and the "movement" well worth the watch to understand..... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fely6gd2Q-k I'll check em out tomorrow, you can only get away with so much mobile arfcome on easter 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 6:50:06 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
And yet still no title change from OP. Pretty scummy. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
so still 0 substantive evidence here? And yet still no title change from OP. Pretty scummy. The OP starts with "At least according to the Enquirer. It's obviously a tabloid...." No one is reading that thinking "oh, this is a 100% confirmation that all the allegations are true." |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 6:52:01 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
She's also not running for office. I don't like your views, but you don't see me attacking you, do you? It just kicks back to the whole idea of maintaining some semblance of class. I do not like Trump's statements concerning her emotional issues. However, her CFR positions are fair game for criticism whether or not she's running for office. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 6:53:11 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The OP starts with "At least according to the Enquirer. It's obviously a tabloid...." No one is reading that thinking "oh, this is a 100% confirmation that all the allegations are true." Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
so still 0 substantive evidence here? And yet still no title change from OP. Pretty scummy. The OP starts with "At least according to the Enquirer. It's obviously a tabloid...." No one is reading that thinking "oh, this is a 100% confirmation that all the allegations are true." Cmon dude, a title change at this point is at least reasonable. Nothing further to substantiate the initial claim after three days and the title is pretty biased. The average dude in GD doesn't read the OP, just the title. I sure as shit know I'm guilty of it. I just don't want this website to be in the business of actively perpetuating a myth that could tear down the most pro-gun candidate we've had in a long time. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 6:54:22 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I do not like Trump's statements concerning her emotional issues. However, her CFR positions are fair game for criticism whether or not she's running for office. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
She's also not running for office. I don't like your views, but you don't see me attacking you, do you? It just kicks back to the whole idea of maintaining some semblance of class. I do not like Trump's statements concerning her emotional issues. However, her CFR positions are fair game for criticism whether or not she's running for office. Agreed, a lot of people have their demons and problems to work through, that's a seriously scummy move. I disagree with the remainder of your post, but at least you're reasonable. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 6:55:57 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Get ready for the "so what? and I don't care" from the hard core Cruzbots. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
(1) Cruz campaign bought the rights to to the GQ cover shoot of Melania and gave them to the superpac (2) There is much more to the mistress story The dominoes are falling. Get ready for the "so what? and I don't care" from the hard core Cruzbots. I'm not saying the allegations are true, but if they turn out to be true you can bet that will be the general sentiment from the Cruz zealots. That and blame it all on Trump.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 6:58:21 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It was talked about on FNC this morning, and the consensus was "no". Ties between the National Enquirer, Pecker, and the trump were brought up, however. The story has no legs. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Can one of you guys who isn't absolutely rabid about this either way answer one question for me. Is there any real proof of any of this? Or is this all speculation? It was talked about on FNC this morning, and the consensus was "no". Ties between the National Enquirer, Pecker, and the trump were brought up, however. The story has no legs. He asked for someone who "isn't absolutely rabid about this either way." |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 6:58:34 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Could be just a coincidence, but that little girl does look a lot like Cruz. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Amanda Carpenter pic of her children. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BU-SNX_CIAAVb0C.jpg The eyes don't lie https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cec9fuJWEAE5Y1J.jpg Could be just a coincidence, but that little girl does look a lot like Cruz. Please. You are so full of it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 6:58:55 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm not saying the allegations are true, but if they turn out to be true you can bet that will be the general sentiment from the Cruz zealots. That and blame it all on Trump. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
(1) Cruz campaign bought the rights to to the GQ cover shoot of Melania and gave them to the superpac (2) There is much more to the mistress story The dominoes are falling. Get ready for the "so what? and I don't care" from the hard core Cruzbots. I'm not saying the allegations are true, but if they turn out to be true you can bet that will be the general sentiment from the Cruz zealots. That and blame it all on Trump. If they turned out to be true, I'd seriously reconsider my support for cruz. It would be a campaign killer and I think the general sentiment amongst his supporters would be mild depression, not "so what". I'm not too worried though.. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 6:59:06 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Look at THIS thread. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Let's take another look at the superior intellect and critical thinking skills of so many classy Trump supporters in the Twitter world. On September 24th, 2013 at 4:59 PM Amanda Carpenter tweets: Cruz about to do something very sweet. I may cry. Following the vague accusations of the National Enquirer, this 2.5 year old tweet is blasted with people accusing her of adultery, calling Ted Cruz a cuckold, stating that Cruz fathered her children, asking her if he "put it in her pooper", and of course there is no shortage of general name-calling (e.g., "Lyin' Ted"). http://i1168.photobucket.com/albums/r499/hk45247/cruz1_zpspm9mqv5o.jpg http://i1168.photobucket.com/albums/r499/hk45247/cruz2_zpswiezqwqs.jpg While I'm sure that all seems very reasonable to the mouth-breathing basement dwellers, 4chan trolls, and general simpletons, another explanation could be that she was referring to Cruz's plan to read "Green Eggs and Ham" to his daughters during his Obamacare filibuster. Since she tweeted this shortly before he did exactly that, I think the latter explanation is a little more plausible than her posting a thinly veiled confession of love to the father of her bastard children during his Obamacare filibuster on a public social media platform for the entire world to see. But, what the fuck do I know. Instead of accepting that the negative Twitter comments could have come from Democrat voters, Independents, Kasich voters, or whomever... you automatically blame Trump? Look at THIS thread. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 6:59:45 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Instead of accepting that the negative Twitter comments could have come from Democrat voters, Independents, Kasich voters, or whomever... you automatically blame Trump? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Let's take another look at the superior intellect and critical thinking skills of so many classy Trump supporters in the Twitter world. On September 24th, 2013 at 4:59 PM Amanda Carpenter tweets: Cruz about to do something very sweet. I may cry. Following the vague accusations of the National Enquirer, this 2.5 year old tweet is blasted with people accusing her of adultery, calling Ted Cruz a cuckold, stating that Cruz fathered her children, asking her if he "put it in her pooper", and of course there is no shortage of general name-calling (e.g., "Lyin' Ted"). http://i1168.photobucket.com/albums/r499/hk45247/cruz1_zpspm9mqv5o.jpg http://i1168.photobucket.com/albums/r499/hk45247/cruz2_zpswiezqwqs.jpg While I'm sure that all seems very reasonable to the mouth-breathing basement dwellers, 4chan trolls, and general simpletons, another explanation could be that she was referring to Cruz's plan to read "Green Eggs and Ham" to his daughters during his Obamacare filibuster. Since she tweeted this shortly before he did exactly that, I think the latter explanation is a little more plausible than her posting a thinly veiled confession of love to the father of her bastard children during his Obamacare filibuster on a public social media platform for the entire world to see. But, what the fuck do I know. Instead of accepting that the negative Twitter comments could have come from Democrat voters, Independents, Kasich voters, or whomever... you automatically blame Trump? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:00:04 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm not saying the allegations are true, but if they turn out to be true you can bet that will be the general sentiment from the Cruz zealots. That and blame it all on Trump. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
(1) Cruz campaign bought the rights to to the GQ cover shoot of Melania and gave them to the superpac (2) There is much more to the mistress story The dominoes are falling. Get ready for the "so what? and I don't care" from the hard core Cruzbots. I'm not saying the allegations are true, but if they turn out to be true you can bet that will be the general sentiment from the Cruz zealots. That and blame it all on Trump. What prevents you from saying that the allegations are true? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:00:29 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
(1) Cruz campaign bought the rights to to the GQ cover shoot of Melania and gave them to the superpac (2) There is much more to the mistress story  
It never stops getting better with Trump. No. Cruz didn't buy any rights to a cover shoot from GQ. Seriously, Trump should admit that he just made this all up. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:00:39 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
He asked for someone who "isn't absolutely rabid about this either way." Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Can one of you guys who isn't absolutely rabid about this either way answer one question for me. Is there any real proof of any of this? Or is this all speculation? It was talked about on FNC this morning, and the consensus was "no". Ties between the National Enquirer, Pecker, and the trump were brought up, however. The story has no legs. He asked for someone who "isn't absolutely rabid about this either way." Looking forward to your nomination who fits his request. I know the truth is inconvenient to you. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:01:41 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What prevents you from suggesting that the allegations are true? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
(1) Cruz campaign bought the rights to to the GQ cover shoot of Melania and gave them to the superpac (2) There is much more to the mistress story The dominoes are falling. Get ready for the "so what? and I don't care" from the hard core Cruzbots. I'm not saying the allegations are true, but if they turn out to be true you can bet that will be the general sentiment from the Cruz zealots. That and blame it all on Trump. What prevents you from suggesting that the allegations are true? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:06:41 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The OP starts with "At least according to the Enquirer. It's obviously a tabloid...." No one is reading that thinking "oh, this is a 100% confirmation that all the allegations are true." Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
so still 0 substantive evidence here? And yet still no title change from OP. Pretty scummy. The OP starts with "At least according to the Enquirer. It's obviously a tabloid...." No one is reading that thinking "oh, this is a 100% confirmation that all the allegations are true." Title. Title. Title. You've kept the title because you know exactly what you're doing by keeping it exactly as it is. It is scummy. Period. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:07:14 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What prevents you from saying that the allegations are true? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
(1) Cruz campaign bought the rights to to the GQ cover shoot of Melania and gave them to the superpac (2) There is much more to the mistress story The dominoes are falling. Get ready for the "so what? and I don't care" from the hard core Cruzbots. I'm not saying the allegations are true, but if they turn out to be true you can bet that will be the general sentiment from the Cruz zealots. That and blame it all on Trump. What prevents you from saying that the allegations are true? What causes you to automatically dismiss the allegations as lies? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:12:19 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What causes you to automatically dismiss the allegations as lies? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The dominoes are falling. Get ready for the "so what? and I don't care" from the hard core Cruzbots. I'm not saying the allegations are true, but if they turn out to be true you can bet that will be the general sentiment from the Cruz zealots. That and blame it all on Trump. What prevents you from saying that the allegations are true? What causes you to automatically dismiss the allegations as lies? Zero facts, the slimy and biased nature of the accusers, the fact that those who are insinuated as being involved have denied the accusations, the wording of the story is designed to protect NE from libel, etc, etc. When I see a liar speak, I assume they are lying. When they use weasel words, I am certain of it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:12:51 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Could just be confIrmation bias. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Amanda Carpenter pic of her children. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BU-SNX_CIAAVb0C.jpg The eyes don't lie https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cec9fuJWEAE5Y1J.jpg Could be just a coincidence, but that little girl does look a lot like Cruz. Could just be confIrmation bias. I even went back and added "Could be just a coincidence" and you Cruz zealots still bitch and moan about it. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:13:21 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Title. Title. Title. You've kept the title because you know exactly what you're doing by keeping it exactly as it is. It is scummy. Period. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
so still 0 substantive evidence here? And yet still no title change from OP. Pretty scummy. The OP starts with "At least according to the Enquirer. It's obviously a tabloid...." No one is reading that thinking "oh, this is a 100% confirmation that all the allegations are true." Title. Title. Title. You've kept the title because you know exactly what you're doing by keeping it exactly as it is. It is scummy. Period. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:15:19 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I even went back and added "Could be just a coincidence" and you Cruz zealots still bitch and moan about it.
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Amanda Carpenter pic of her children. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BU-SNX_CIAAVb0C.jpg The eyes don't lie https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cec9fuJWEAE5Y1J.jpg Could be just a coincidence, but that little girl does look a lot like Cruz. Could just be confIrmation bias. I even went back and added "Could be just a coincidence" and you Cruz zealots still bitch and moan about it.
Couldn't add anything to the title though. That would be too difficult.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:19:44 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Zero facts, the slimy and biased nature of the accusers, the fact that those who are insinuated as being involved have denied the accusations, the wording of the story is designed to protect NE from libel, etc, etc. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
What causes you to automatically dismiss the allegations as lies? Zero facts, the slimy and biased nature of the accusers, the fact that those who are insinuated as being involved have denied the accusations, the wording of the story is designed to protect NE from libel, etc, etc. How is it any different from past expose's of sexual scandals? When I see a liar speak, I assume they are lying. When they use weasel words, I am certain of it. Interesting. People see that in Cruz. http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/behavior-experts-ted-cruz-appears-deceptive-in-response-to-sex-scandal/ |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:21:02 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Regardless of the facts? What facts? You've presented zero. Thats rich coming from you..I have never seen you post anything but your opinion..and I sure am not impressed by it either....... |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:21:21 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Cmon dude, a title change at this point is at least reasonable. Nothing further to substantiate the initial claim after three days and the title is pretty biased. The average dude in GD doesn't read the OP, just the title. I sure as shit know I'm guilty of it. I just don't want this website to be in the business of actively perpetuating a myth that could tear down the most pro-gun candidate we've had in a long time. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
so still 0 substantive evidence here? And yet still no title change from OP. Pretty scummy. The OP starts with "At least according to the Enquirer. It's obviously a tabloid...." No one is reading that thinking "oh, this is a 100% confirmation that all the allegations are true." Cmon dude, a title change at this point is at least reasonable. Nothing further to substantiate the initial claim after three days and the title is pretty biased. The average dude in GD doesn't read the OP, just the title. I sure as shit know I'm guilty of it. I just don't want this website to be in the business of actively perpetuating a myth that could tear down the most pro-gun candidate we've had in a long time. Very few people click on a thread and don't at least read the first six words in the OP. The title is based on the Enquirer article and is clearly stated as such with the "At least according to the Enquirer." And just in case people don't know what the Enquirer is a "It's obviously a tabloid" was added as well. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:22:39 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Please. You are so full of it. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Amanda Carpenter pic of her children. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BU-SNX_CIAAVb0C.jpg The eyes don't lie https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cec9fuJWEAE5Y1J.jpg Could be just a coincidence, but that little girl does look a lot like Cruz. Please. You are so full of it. I simply commented that I thought the girl looked a lot like Cruz. Lighten up. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:25:46 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What prevents you from saying that the allegations are true? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
(1) Cruz campaign bought the rights to to the GQ cover shoot of Melania and gave them to the superpac (2) There is much more to the mistress story The dominoes are falling. Get ready for the "so what? and I don't care" from the hard core Cruzbots. I'm not saying the allegations are true, but if they turn out to be true you can bet that will be the general sentiment from the Cruz zealots. That and blame it all on Trump. What prevents you from saying that the allegations are true? Back on page two. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:29:33 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted: And if gun rights are eroded in the process oh well? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: We are looking for someone who puts the nation first over other nations and want the nation to survive and thrive. Someone who wants to deal with immigration, open borders, and so. We are willing to overlook his past moral failing and hope that he is still not up to his old antics. And if gun rights are eroded in the process oh well? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:29:39 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Looking forward to your nomination who fits his request. I know the truth is inconvenient to you. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Can one of you guys who isn't absolutely rabid about this either way answer one question for me. Is there any real proof of any of this? Or is this all speculation? It was talked about on FNC this morning, and the consensus was "no". Ties between the National Enquirer, Pecker, and the trump were brought up, however. The story has no legs. He asked for someone who "isn't absolutely rabid about this either way." Looking forward to your nomination who fits his request. I know the truth is inconvenient to you. I hate to burst your bubble that everyone that disagrees with you is a Trump zealot, but ,as I stated before, I'm a former Cruz supporter that is now a reluctant Trump supporter. At this point I don't even like either of them. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:31:00 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Title. Title. Title. You've kept the title because you know exactly what you're doing by keeping it exactly as it is. It is scummy. Period. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
so still 0 substantive evidence here? And yet still no title change from OP. Pretty scummy. The OP starts with "At least according to the Enquirer. It's obviously a tabloid...." No one is reading that thinking "oh, this is a 100% confirmation that all the allegations are true." Title. Title. Title. You've kept the title because you know exactly what you're doing by keeping it exactly as it is. It is scummy. Period. The title is meant to get people's attention and summarize the article that is the subject of this thread. If some people can't be bothered to read the first six words in the OP, oh well. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:33:00 PM EDT
[#39]
How the fuck is this still a thread? Who gives a fuck about tabloids?
Y'all are a bunch of children. If you don't like the thread don't post. It'll die. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:35:17 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Could be just a coincidence, but that little girl does look a lot like Cruz. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Amanda Carpenter pic of her children. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BU-SNX_CIAAVb0C.jpg The eyes don't lie https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cec9fuJWEAE5Y1J.jpg Could be just a coincidence, but that little girl does look a lot like Cruz. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:37:04 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Couldn't add anything to the title though. That would be too difficult. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Amanda Carpenter pic of her children. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BU-SNX_CIAAVb0C.jpg The eyes don't lie https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cec9fuJWEAE5Y1J.jpg Could be just a coincidence, but that little girl does look a lot like Cruz. Could just be confIrmation bias. I even went back and added "Could be just a coincidence" and you Cruz zealots still bitch and moan about it.
Couldn't add anything to the title though. That would be too difficult. Oh no's! After posting "could be just a coincidence" someone said it was their personal opinion that the girl in a posted pic looked like Ted Cruz! The audacity! 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:38:22 PM EDT
[#42]
If Cruz continues on this path and is seen as spoiler that results on a brokered convention that hands the election to the dems.....I do not see him being reelected to his Senate seat....just my crystal ball talkin
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:39:22 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It was clearly a personal attack directed at tcrpe. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:40:51 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
How the fuck is this still a thread? Who gives a fuck about tabloids? Y'all are a bunch of children. If you don't like the thread don't post. It'll die. Birddog will keep it alive posting dumb images. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:42:10 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If Cruz continues on this path and is seen as spoiler that results on a brokered convention that hands the election to the dems.....I do not see him being reelected to his Senate seat....just my crystal ball talkin I'm not so sure. Trump only has to get 52.6 % of the remaining delegates to reach 1237. Talk of a brokered convention is premature. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:44:18 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I didn't read it that way. I read it as he was saying tcrpe was being the contortionist. Then again, I am not a Trump Davidian with Trump Martyrdom Complex, so . . . Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
It was clearly a personal attack directed at tcrpe. Neither am I. I used to be for Cruz. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:45:15 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The title is meant to get people's attention and summarize the article that is the subject of this thread. If some people can't be bothered to read the first six words in the OP, oh well. Bullshit. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:46:10 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That's a ridiculous demand to make on him. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Did I miss Ted's definitive, clear and concise denial and notice of intent to sue the NE? He did clearly deny it but he hasn't sued them, yet. Hard to do over the weekend. We'll see what happens next week. He vehemently denied it, but I doubt we will see a lawsuit, and it is particularly scummy for people to insist that no lawsuit means he's guilty. Cruz is a lawyer, he knows he is highly unlikely to win a lawsuit based on how the article was worded, and a lawsuit opens you up completely to discovery, which would be suicide in the midst of a campaign. It would be giving the NE the keys to the kingdom. Which they would of course give to Trump. But yeah, name me one major libel lawsuit that was filed in the first 72 hours of the article published over a weekend. That's not how it works. If he doesn't take action next week, he is finished. Issuing denials hasn't worked for any other politician accused in a sex scandal, Cruz will be no different in that respect. If the charges are true, he's done no matter what happens. If they aren't true, he has to take stronger action than just denials. That's a ridiculous demand to make on him. lol stronger action than just denials is "a ridiculous demand" Innocent men who are libeled by tabloids do more than just deny it. He doesn't have to sue, but he can demand a retraction and threaten to sue. He can even sue to apply pressure, then agree to drop the suit if they print a retraction. What he can't do is just deny it and call it tabloid trash. That hasn't worked for any of the politicians who were implicated in a sex scandal. Taking the high road won't work in the modern new cycle. What is ridiculous is thinking he can do nothing but deny it and expect it to go away. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:48:23 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Brilliant  No evidence, nothing to support the allegations, but yea, the onus is on the accused to prove his or her innocence. If he threatens to sue unless the print a retraction, this will go away if it isn't true. If he actually sues this will go away, if it isn't true. He doesn't need to prove anything, he needs for it to be false and he needs to take action to force a retraction. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 7:48:39 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Bullshit. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
The title is meant to get people's attention and summarize the article that is the subject of this thread. If some people can't be bothered to read the first six words in the OP, oh well. Bullshit. 
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
