User Panel
|
Quoted:
and low grade trash from the south that came looking for work. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Michigan is full of contradictions. and low grade trash from the south that came looking for work. Oh, now you've done it. During the early-mid 20th Century there were large neighborhoods in Detroit where the predominant dialect and accent was from Kentucky. |
|
|
Quoted:
It's a damn shame that the British decided to get their cotton from India. And it's a damn shame all these carpetbaggers continue to flow into the South. Every time I see one of those "Empire State" licence plates or a NJ licence plate, I want to puke because I know they probably want to change Georgia into the utopian shithole they are used to. They sell their shitty 400 sqft apartments in NYC for 800k and then buy a 10,000 sqft home down here. It's one thing if you're coming to get away from all your northeastern bullshit, but it's another thing if you come here and then attempt to change this state with your votes. Even some arfcommers from the northeast spout the dumbest liberal talking points about things like minimum wage and welfare. View Quote You don't like it buy up all the houses so no one from the North can come down. Otherwise you are going to have to deal with the free market, people like a certain place and want to live there if they have the money so be it. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
CSA was not in favor of men owning guns so they could fight back against an oppressive government. How so? All freemen, even blacks, could own guns and even cannons in the South before the war. Not true. You are quite incorrect. In pre-war south, a freedman had the same rights as anyone else. There were black men who even owned slaves and plantations. |
|
Quoted:
Their right to bear arms was indeed written in their constitution identically to ours. Art I. Sec 9. (13) A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Of course, that same document made a few... modifications. Art I. Sec 8. (4) No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law denying or impairing the right of property in negro slaves shall be passed. Art IV. Sec. 2. (I) The citizens of each State shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States; and shall have the right of transit and sojourn in any State of this Confederacy, with their slaves and other property; and the right of property in said slaves shall not be thereby impaired. There were certain "states rights" that had to be nipped in the bud - lest they interfere with the institution of slavery. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
CSA was not in favor of men owning guns so they could fight back against an oppressive government. How so? All freemen, even blacks, could own guns and even cannons in the South before the war. Their right to bear arms was indeed written in their constitution identically to ours. Art I. Sec 9. (13) A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Of course, that same document made a few... modifications. Art I. Sec 8. (4) No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law denying or impairing the right of property in negro slaves shall be passed. Art IV. Sec. 2. (I) The citizens of each State shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States; and shall have the right of transit and sojourn in any State of this Confederacy, with their slaves and other property; and the right of property in said slaves shall not be thereby impaired. There were certain "states rights" that had to be nipped in the bud - lest they interfere with the institution of slavery. The "good faith clause" in the US constitution says about the same thing. Besides, that was not the original statement that was refuted, was it? |
|
Quoted:
You are quite incorrect. In pre-war south, a freedman had the same rights as anyone else. There were black men who even owned slaves and plantations. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
CSA was not in favor of men owning guns so they could fight back against an oppressive government. How so? All freemen, even blacks, could own guns and even cannons in the South before the war. Not true. You are quite incorrect. In pre-war south, a freedman had the same rights as anyone else. There were black men who even owned slaves and plantations. Not everywhere in the South. |
|
Quoted:
The "good faith clause" in the US constitution says about the same thing. Besides, that was not the original statement that was refuted, was it? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
CSA was not in favor of men owning guns so they could fight back against an oppressive government. How so? All freemen, even blacks, could own guns and even cannons in the South before the war. Their right to bear arms was indeed written in their constitution identically to ours. Art I. Sec 9. (13) A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Of course, that same document made a few... modifications. Art I. Sec 8. (4) No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law denying or impairing the right of property in negro slaves shall be passed. Art IV. Sec. 2. (I) The citizens of each State shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States; and shall have the right of transit and sojourn in any State of this Confederacy, with their slaves and other property; and the right of property in said slaves shall not be thereby impaired. There were certain "states rights" that had to be nipped in the bud - lest they interfere with the institution of slavery. The "good faith clause" in the US constitution says about the same thing. Besides, that was not the original statement that was refuted, was it? "about" the same thing? The changes are key. The changes tell the story, as that clause was at the heart of the debate on that matter that was at the core of the issue - that of human slavery. |
|
Quoted:
Next thing you know, you'll start to question the parallel existence of the whole "Democrats are the true racists since it was them who built the Jim Crow south and resisted the Civil Rights movement" meme, side by side with the "the forces opposed to the Jim Crow south and the Civil Rights movement were all Communists and the country was better off before their influence" meme. GD conventional wisdom is a walking contradiction, partly truth... and partly fiction. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If yankee soldiers could see the mess they are resposible for wih inner city crime, rape, robbery, murder, gun crimes flash mobs whatever, they would be spinning in their graves. So, what are you trying to say here? I fail to see how Yankee soldiers are in any way responsible for these things unless you are attempting to say that somehow they would not have occurred had the South been able to secede and retain slavery. Next thing you know, you'll start to question the parallel existence of the whole "Democrats are the true racists since it was them who built the Jim Crow south and resisted the Civil Rights movement" meme, side by side with the "the forces opposed to the Jim Crow south and the Civil Rights movement were all Communists and the country was better off before their influence" meme. GD conventional wisdom is a walking contradiction, partly truth... and partly fiction. No, the Democrats are the true racists because they see race in EVERYTHING and use race and racism as political weapons |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
CSA was not in favor of men owning guns so they could fight back against an oppressive government. How so? All freemen, even blacks, could own guns and even cannons in the South before the war. Not true. You are quite incorrect. In pre-war south, a freedman had the same rights as anyone else. There were black men who even owned slaves and plantations. Not everywhere in the South. The law of the land was as the good doc said it was. Locally, you are correct. Gun control had racist roots. Still does. Do you think poor blacks can afford the $200 tax to effectively defend the home with an SBR? No. The NFA descriminates against the poor and minorities. The two of you are probably smarter than I am, and certainly better read, but I would submit to you both the Wilmington, NC rebellion, and the history of the NC purchase permits for your reading. |
|
Quoted:
No, the Democrats are the true racists because they see race in EVERYTHING and use race and racism as political weapons View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If yankee soldiers could see the mess they are resposible for wih inner city crime, rape, robbery, murder, gun crimes flash mobs whatever, they would be spinning in their graves. So, what are you trying to say here? I fail to see how Yankee soldiers are in any way responsible for these things unless you are attempting to say that somehow they would not have occurred had the South been able to secede and retain slavery. Next thing you know, you'll start to question the parallel existence of the whole "Democrats are the true racists since it was them who built the Jim Crow south and resisted the Civil Rights movement" meme, side by side with the "the forces opposed to the Jim Crow south and the Civil Rights movement were all Communists and the country was better off before their influence" meme. GD conventional wisdom is a walking contradiction, partly truth... and partly fiction. No, the Democrats are the true racists because they see race in EVERYTHING and use race and racism as political weapons Agreed. |
|
Quoted:
You don't like it buy up all the houses so no one from the North can come down. Otherwise you are going to have to deal with the free market, people like a certain place and want to live there if they have the money so be it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
It's a damn shame that the British decided to get their cotton from India. And it's a damn shame all these carpetbaggers continue to flow into the South. Every time I see one of those "Empire State" licence plates or a NJ licence plate, I want to puke because I know they probably want to change Georgia into the utopian shithole they are used to. They sell their shitty 400 sqft apartments in NYC for 800k and then buy a 10,000 sqft home down here. It's one thing if you're coming to get away from all your northeastern bullshit, but it's another thing if you come here and then attempt to change this state with your votes. Even some arfcommers from the northeast spout the dumbest liberal talking points about things like minimum wage and welfare. You don't like it buy up all the houses so no one from the North can come down. Otherwise you are going to have to deal with the free market, people like a certain place and want to live there if they have the money so be it. I'm mad about them moving here and trying to vote away the free market and my other rights. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
CSA was not in favor of men owning guns so they could fight back against an oppressive government. How so? All freemen, even blacks, could own guns and even cannons in the South before the war. Not true. You are quite incorrect. In pre-war south, a freedman had the same rights as anyone else. There were black men who even owned slaves and plantations. Not everywhere in the South. Please point out a law in the pre-war south where black freedmen were denied firearms. |
|
Not everyone in the northeast is leftwing pinko commie looking to spread liberal bullshit like the disease that it is. When I see a confederate flag on the back of someone's truck I don't have a problem with it. My problem is with subversive leftist organizations like cnn who are really just the media outreach arm of the communist democrap party. The fact is, that today, most of the resistance to the treasonous left comes from the south. I'm not into rehashing old battles-the one we are in now is what concerns me.
|
|
Quoted:
I'm mad about them moving here and trying to vote away the free market and my other rights. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It's a damn shame that the British decided to get their cotton from India. And it's a damn shame all these carpetbaggers continue to flow into the South. Every time I see one of those "Empire State" licence plates or a NJ licence plate, I want to puke because I know they probably want to change Georgia into the utopian shithole they are used to. They sell their shitty 400 sqft apartments in NYC for 800k and then buy a 10,000 sqft home down here. It's one thing if you're coming to get away from all your northeastern bullshit, but it's another thing if you come here and then attempt to change this state with your votes. Even some arfcommers from the northeast spout the dumbest liberal talking points about things like minimum wage and welfare. You don't like it buy up all the houses so no one from the North can come down. Otherwise you are going to have to deal with the free market, people like a certain place and want to live there if they have the money so be it. I'm mad about them moving here and trying to vote away the free market and my other rights. You're time is wasted on JIP. He's part of the problem. |
|
Quoted:
No, the Democrats are the true racists because they see race in EVERYTHING and use race and racism as political weapons View Quote that's really meaningful posted on a site with many folks that spend half their lives seeking out and/or latching on to news stories along the lines of 'horde of black youths (or, pardon me, "yutes" as the term is used here) rape innocent white children and take their candy.' that shit is as embarrassing as the trayvonites, and it's indicative of a similar level of cognitive and emotional development. |
|
Quoted:
Not everyone in the northeast is leftwing pinko commie looking to spread liberal bullshit like the disease that it is. When I see a confederate flag on the back of someone's truck I don't have a problem with it. My problem is with subversive leftist organizations like cnn who are really just the media outreach arm of the communist democrap party. The fact is, that today, most of the resistance to the treasonous left comes from the south. I'm not into rehashing old battles-the one we are in now is what concerns me. View Quote Agreed. |
|
Quoted:
I'm mad about them moving here and trying to vote away the free market and my other rights. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It's a damn shame that the British decided to get their cotton from India. And it's a damn shame all these carpetbaggers continue to flow into the South. Every time I see one of those "Empire State" licence plates or a NJ licence plate, I want to puke because I know they probably want to change Georgia into the utopian shithole they are used to. They sell their shitty 400 sqft apartments in NYC for 800k and then buy a 10,000 sqft home down here. It's one thing if you're coming to get away from all your northeastern bullshit, but it's another thing if you come here and then attempt to change this state with your votes. Even some arfcommers from the northeast spout the dumbest liberal talking points about things like minimum wage and welfare. You don't like it buy up all the houses so no one from the North can come down. Otherwise you are going to have to deal with the free market, people like a certain place and want to live there if they have the money so be it. I'm mad about them moving here and trying to vote away the free market and my other rights. So again if you do not like the political bent of people moving into your area buy up all the houses and only let people who agree with you buy them. Until you do that the market decides who buys them and the locals decide the politics. |
|
Quoted:
that's really meaningful posted on a site with many folks that spend half their lives seeking out and/or latching on to news stories along the lines of 'horde of black youths (or, pardon me, "yutes" as the term is used here) rape innocent white children and take their candy.' that shit is as embarrassing as the trayvonites, and it's indicative of a similar level of cognitive and emotional development. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
No, the Democrats are the true racists because they see race in EVERYTHING and use race and racism as political weapons that's really meaningful posted on a site with many folks that spend half their lives seeking out and/or latching on to news stories along the lines of 'horde of black youths (or, pardon me, "yutes" as the term is used here) rape innocent white children and take their candy.' that shit is as embarrassing as the trayvonites, and it's indicative of a similar level of cognitive and emotional development. Conversely, one could suggest that is simply a response to a PC MSM and politicions that either completely ignores a situation or blasts it on the front page endlessly or has marches and protests or pushes laws depending on the demographics. If you hate all of us "racist" ARFCOMMERS, why are you here? DU has a gun forum. |
|
Quoted:
that's really meaningful posted on a site with many folks that spend half their lives seeking out and/or latching on to news stories along the lines of 'horde of black youths (or, pardon me, "yutes" as the term is used here) rape innocent white children and take their candy.' that shit is as embarrassing as the trayvonites, and it's indicative of a similar level of cognitive and emotional development. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
No, the Democrats are the true racists because they see race in EVERYTHING and use race and racism as political weapons that's really meaningful posted on a site with many folks that spend half their lives seeking out and/or latching on to news stories along the lines of 'horde of black youths (or, pardon me, "yutes" as the term is used here) rape innocent white children and take their candy.' that shit is as embarrassing as the trayvonites, and it's indicative of a similar level of cognitive and emotional development. Yeah. Because saying that black people do those things is unfounded racisim. Avoiding the topic due to the race of the people committing the crime is racist. You are a racist. |
|
Quoted:
So again if you do not like the political bent of people moving into your area buy up all the houses and only let people who agree with you buy them. Until you do that the market decides who buys them and the locals decide the politics. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It's a damn shame that the British decided to get their cotton from India. And it's a damn shame all these carpetbaggers continue to flow into the South. Every time I see one of those "Empire State" licence plates or a NJ licence plate, I want to puke because I know they probably want to change Georgia into the utopian shithole they are used to. They sell their shitty 400 sqft apartments in NYC for 800k and then buy a 10,000 sqft home down here. It's one thing if you're coming to get away from all your northeastern bullshit, but it's another thing if you come here and then attempt to change this state with your votes. Even some arfcommers from the northeast spout the dumbest liberal talking points about things like minimum wage and welfare. You don't like it buy up all the houses so no one from the North can come down. Otherwise you are going to have to deal with the free market, people like a certain place and want to live there if they have the money so be it. I'm mad about them moving here and trying to vote away the free market and my other rights. So again if you do not like the political bent of people moving into your area buy up all the houses and only let people who agree with you buy them. Until you do that the market decides who buys them and the locals decide the politics. I think he was commenting on the Hypocricy of people who make a mess of their own state, moving elsewhere, and the voting for the same crap that made their home state unlivable. I know many a New Yorker who retired here because taxes were too high and then vote to raise local taxes "for the children." |
|
Quoted:
I think he was commenting on the Hypocricy of people who make a mess of their own state, moving elsewhere, and the voting for the same crap that made their home state unlivable. I know many a New Yorker who retired here because taxes were too high and then vote to raise local taxes "for the children." View Quote Indoctrinated bitches be spreading that shit, yo. |
|
Quoted:
Conversely, one could suggest that is simply a response to a PC MSM and politicions that either completely ignores a situation or blasts it on the front page endlessly or has marches and protests or pushes laws depending on the demographics. If you hate all of us "racist" ARFCOMMERS, why are you here? DU has a gun forum. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
No, the Democrats are the true racists because they see race in EVERYTHING and use race and racism as political weapons that's really meaningful posted on a site with many folks that spend half their lives seeking out and/or latching on to news stories along the lines of 'horde of black youths (or, pardon me, "yutes" as the term is used here) rape innocent white children and take their candy.' that shit is as embarrassing as the trayvonites, and it's indicative of a similar level of cognitive and emotional development. Conversely, one could suggest that is simply a response to a PC MSM and politicions that either completely ignores a situation or blasts it on the front page endlessly or has marches and protests or pushes laws depending on the demographics. If you hate all of us "racist" ARFCOMMERS, why are you here? DU has a gun forum. "all of us" LOL yeah that's what i said. wow nice trayvonite-like response. by "many" i meant a few dozen. now if you would like to compare a few dozen to the thousands of members... nah, just keep bleeting. remember, you are the victim here. |
|
Quoted:
"all of us" LOL yeah that's what i said. wow nice trayvonite-like response. by "many" i meant a few dozen. now if you would like to compare a few dozen to the thousands of members... nah, just keep bleeting. remember, you are the victim here. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
No, the Democrats are the true racists because they see race in EVERYTHING and use race and racism as political weapons that's really meaningful posted on a site with many folks that spend half their lives seeking out and/or latching on to news stories along the lines of 'horde of black youths (or, pardon me, "yutes" as the term is used here) rape innocent white children and take their candy.' that shit is as embarrassing as the trayvonites, and it's indicative of a similar level of cognitive and emotional development. Conversely, one could suggest that is simply a response to a PC MSM and politicions that either completely ignores a situation or blasts it on the front page endlessly or has marches and protests or pushes laws depending on the demographics. If you hate all of us "racist" ARFCOMMERS, why are you here? DU has a gun forum. "all of us" LOL yeah that's what i said. wow nice trayvonite-like response. by "many" i meant a few dozen. now if you would like to compare a few dozen to the thousands of members... nah, just keep bleeting. remember, you are the victim here. Racist. |
|
Quoted:
that's really meaningful posted on a site with many folks that spend half their lives seeking out and/or latching on to news stories along the lines of 'horde of black youths (or, pardon me, "yutes" as the term is used here) rape innocent white children and take their candy.' that shit is as embarrassing as the trayvonites, and it's indicative of a similar level of cognitive and emotional development. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
No, the Democrats are the true racists because they see race in EVERYTHING and use race and racism as political weapons that's really meaningful posted on a site with many folks that spend half their lives seeking out and/or latching on to news stories along the lines of 'horde of black youths (or, pardon me, "yutes" as the term is used here) rape innocent white children and take their candy.' that shit is as embarrassing as the trayvonites, and it's indicative of a similar level of cognitive and emotional development. You're missing something. Those news stories that "many folks" latch on to are........news stories of events that took place. Commenting on these events is not racism. Trying to downplay them is racist, and is indicative of a mind that cannot handle the truth. You should examine your own level of cognitive and emotional development before you question that of others. |
|
Quoted:
You're missing something. Those news stories that "many folks" latch on to are........news stories of events that took place. Commenting on these events is not racism. Trying to downplay them is racist, and is indicative of a mind that cannot handle the truth. You should examine your own level of cognitive and emotional development before you question that of others. View Quote you're not going to convince many reasonable people that the folks that are obviously obsessed with finding and reproducing stories of 'negroes on a crime spree' are anything other than petty dipshits. |
|
|
Quoted:
you're not going to convince many reasonable people that the folks that are obviously obsessed with finding and reproducing stories of 'negroes on a crime spree' are anything other than petty dipshits. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
You're missing something. Those news stories that "many folks" latch on to are........news stories of events that took place. Commenting on these events is not racism. Trying to downplay them is racist, and is indicative of a mind that cannot handle the truth. You should examine your own level of cognitive and emotional development before you question that of others. you're not going to convince many reasonable people that the folks that are obviously obsessed with finding and reproducing stories of 'negroes on a crime spree' are anything other than petty dipshits. More racist shit. |
|
Why am I a car wash attendant? Because I'm black? Black people can't be in the military?
Racist. |
|
Quoted:
"all of us" LOL yeah that's what i said. wow nice trayvonite-like response. by "many" i meant a few dozen. now if you would like to compare a few dozen to the thousands of members... nah, just keep bleeting. remember, you are the victim here. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
No, the Democrats are the true racists because they see race in EVERYTHING and use race and racism as political weapons that's really meaningful posted on a site with many folks that spend half their lives seeking out and/or latching on to news stories along the lines of 'horde of black youths (or, pardon me, "yutes" as the term is used here) rape innocent white children and take their candy.' that shit is as embarrassing as the trayvonites, and it's indicative of a similar level of cognitive and emotional development. Conversely, one could suggest that is simply a response to a PC MSM and politicions that either completely ignores a situation or blasts it on the front page endlessly or has marches and protests or pushes laws depending on the demographics. If you hate all of us "racist" ARFCOMMERS, why are you here? DU has a gun forum. "all of us" LOL yeah that's what i said. wow nice trayvonite-like response. by "many" i meant a few dozen. now if you would like to compare a few dozen to the thousands of members... nah, just keep bleeting. remember, you are the victim here. I see you complete ignored the meat of my post--probably because it was too logical and thought out. I'll leave you to your "trayvonite" racial stereotyping now. |
|
|
Quoted:
This CNN comedian/political hack claims that the confederate flag was a flag of traitors and racist and makes a small connection to the Tea Party. I really can't stand the government sponsored media. link View Quote Connecting it to the Tea Party is idiotic, but hey, it's a progaganda outlet - what do you expect? The Confederacy broke off over concerns of states' rights and federalism, yes. But the right in question was to own people as property. No amount of rhetorical maneuvering will get around that point. The south, as a society, didn't get even half of what it had coming for that. |
|
|
Quoted:
Connecting it to the Tea Party is idiotic, but hey, it's a progaganda outlet - what do you expect? The Confederacy broke off over concerns of states' rights and federalism, yes. But the right in question was to own people as property. No amount of rhetorical maneuvering will get around that point. The south, as a society, didn't get even half of what it had coming for that. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
This CNN comedian/political hack claims that the confederate flag was a flag of traitors and racist and makes a small connection to the Tea Party. I really can't stand the government sponsored media. link Connecting it to the Tea Party is idiotic, but hey, it's a progaganda outlet - what do you expect? The Confederacy broke off over concerns of states' rights and federalism, yes. But the right in question was to own people as property. No amount of rhetorical maneuvering will get around that point. The south, as a society, didn't get even half of what it had coming for that. It's important to note, the north owned slaves as well, and the EP only freed the slaves in the states in rebellion. I guess the north had it coming as well. Slavery of a human is a disgusting and low practice. It still exist in many of the countries we give aid to. Perhaps we should go to war with them. |
|
|
Quoted:
I see you complete ignored the meat of my post--probably because it was too logical and thought out. I'll leave you to your "trayvonite" racial stereotyping now. View Quote you mean the "it's unfair" type of whining about the PC media? that's pretty much standard MO for pro-level victims, and was incorporated into my response. if want to come off like that it is your choice. i just don't find it particularly dignifying, for the individual or the 'side' they are on. so that means those of us who don't buy into the victim bullshit see little difference between 'your type' and, say, al sharpton. |
|
Quoted:
So again if you do not like the political bent of people moving into your area buy up all the houses and only let people who agree with you buy them. Until you do that the market decides who buys them and the locals decide the politics. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It's a damn shame that the British decided to get their cotton from India. And it's a damn shame all these carpetbaggers continue to flow into the South. Every time I see one of those "Empire State" licence plates or a NJ licence plate, I want to puke because I know they probably want to change Georgia into the utopian shithole they are used to. They sell their shitty 400 sqft apartments in NYC for 800k and then buy a 10,000 sqft home down here. It's one thing if you're coming to get away from all your northeastern bullshit, but it's another thing if you come here and then attempt to change this state with your votes. Even some arfcommers from the northeast spout the dumbest liberal talking points about things like minimum wage and welfare. You don't like it buy up all the houses so no one from the North can come down. Otherwise you are going to have to deal with the free market, people like a certain place and want to live there if they have the money so be it. I'm mad about them moving here and trying to vote away the free market and my other rights. So again if you do not like the political bent of people moving into your area buy up all the houses and only let people who agree with you buy them. Until you do that the market decides who buys them and the locals decide the politics. Unfortunately I don't have the money to buy up all those houses and keep them out. And even if I did, there would be demand for more houses, so more would be built. The end result is that the morons will inevitably fuck up this state like the plaque of locusts that they are. Does that make you happy? |
|
Quoted:
It's all he's got. He's a racist. He also tries to put black people on ignore. Racist. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I see you complete ignored the meat of my post--probably because it was too logical and thought out. I'll leave you to your "trayvonite" racial stereotyping now. It's all he's got. He's a racist. He also tries to put black people on ignore. Racist. are you on crack? (wait, is that raciss?) |
|
Quoted:
are you on crack? (wait, is that raciss?) View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I see you complete ignored the meat of my post--probably because it was too logical and thought out. I'll leave you to your "trayvonite" racial stereotyping now. It's all he's got. He's a racist. He also tries to put black people on ignore. Racist. are you on crack? (wait, is that raciss?) See? Now he says I'm on crack. Because in his guilty little white head (don't take that in the shorts, white guy) he thinks all black people are on crack. Racist. |
|
|
Quoted:
View Quote What's funny is when you're talking to a black dude, you stop talking. You can't make your points to me. Your racisim won't let you. You fence your argument based on my skin tone. Which, is pretty much the definition of being racist. Let me guess...Black people can't obey the law or fend for themselves. They need more over watch, more financial help, preference over others when being considered for a job, ect. Because I'm black. You can't tell me that. But you'll single me out when you vote or post on the internet. You. Racist. |
|
|
They turned the Communist News Network and MS-PMS over to angry black marxists. What do you expect?
|
|
Quoted:
What's funny is when you're talking to a black dude, you stop talking. You can't make your points to me. Your racisim won't let you. You fence your argument based on my skin tone. Which, is pretty much the definition of being racist. Let me guess...Black people can't obey the law or fend for themselves. They need more over watch, more financial help, preference over others when being considered for a job, ect. Because I'm black. You can't tell me that. But you'll single me out when you vote or post on the internet. You. Racist. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
What's funny is when you're talking to a black dude, you stop talking. You can't make your points to me. Your racisim won't let you. You fence your argument based on my skin tone. Which, is pretty much the definition of being racist. Let me guess...Black people can't obey the law or fend for themselves. They need more over watch, more financial help, preference over others when being considered for a job, ect. Because I'm black. You can't tell me that. But you'll single me out when you vote or post on the internet. You. Racist. it's that i've simply assumed your posts in this thread are parody since they're incoherent. what would you like me to talk about, with you? wait, this isn't some gay thing is it? |
|
Traitors, nope. I still believe a state has the right to leave the union.
|
|
Quoted:
What's funny is when you're talking to a black dude, you stop talking. You can't make your points to me. Your racisim won't let you. You fence your argument based on my skin tone. Which, is pretty much the definition of being racist. Let me guess...Black people can't obey the law or fend for themselves. They need more over watch, more financial help, preference over others when being considered for a job, ect. Because I'm black. You can't tell me that. But you'll single me out when you vote or post on the internet. You. Racist. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
What's funny is when you're talking to a black dude, you stop talking. You can't make your points to me. Your racisim won't let you. You fence your argument based on my skin tone. Which, is pretty much the definition of being racist. Let me guess...Black people can't obey the law or fend for themselves. They need more over watch, more financial help, preference over others when being considered for a job, ect. Because I'm black. You can't tell me that. But you'll single me out when you vote or post on the internet. You. Racist. I'm confused, isn't that what the government does? |
|
Quoted:
you mean the "it's unfair" type of whining about the PC media? that's pretty much standard MO for pro-level victims, and was incorporated into my response. if want to come off like that it is your choice. i just don't find it particularly dignifying, for the individual or the 'side' they are on. so that means those of us who don't buy into the victim bullshit see little difference between 'your type' and, say, al sharpton. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I see you complete ignored the meat of my post--probably because it was too logical and thought out. I'll leave you to your "trayvonite" racial stereotyping now. you mean the "it's unfair" type of whining about the PC media? that's pretty much standard MO for pro-level victims, and was incorporated into my response. if want to come off like that it is your choice. i just don't find it particularly dignifying, for the individual or the 'side' they are on. so that means those of us who don't buy into the victim bullshit see little difference between 'your type' and, say, al sharpton. WTF are you talking about? I simply pointed out an alternative possibility to your premise other than the much overused "dey is racist" crap and you are getting your little girl panties in a wad. If you can't accept opposing or differing viewpoints like an adult, go back to kindergarten. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.