User Panel
Posted: 3/1/2021 3:35:46 PM EDT
I am glad to see that the collaboration between our countries about military industry and military technology keeps being one of the strongest in the world. After we adopted the F35 fighter (which we are now producing in Italy, i think under license), last april the US navy confirmed it will buy a variant of the italian FREMM frigate, produced by Fincantieri.
As i understood we are talking about a 5,6 billion contact. This will help my country in these dark times and i am sure the new frigates will serve the US navy well. As a sidenote, i think the frigates will sport also OTO-Melara 76 mm automatic cannons: with guided projectiles and 120 rpm they are real beasts. Now we should buy some A-10's and you should buy some Centauro II's or Freccia's. Newsflash: US Navy will buy up to $5.6 billion worth of Italian frigates (and will make them uglier) |
|
Are they going to be built in Italian yards or licensed to American yards?
There is a yard up in the Great Lakes that is owned by an Italian company. |
|
And please also export some of your hot womenz and I don't mean the Jersey Shore type
|
|
|
Quoted: Are they going to be built in Italian yards or licensed to American yards? There is a yard up in the Great Lakes that is owned by an Italian company. View Quote Several. Fincantieri Marine Group builds one of the LCS variants in Marinette, Wisconsin Across the bay in Sturgeon Bay is another FMG owned yard. They had a facility in Green Bay that built Coast Guard aluminum boats last I knew. ETA: looks like the new frigate will be built in Marinette as well. https://www.maritime-executive.com/corporate/fincantieri-marinette-marine-welcomes-l3harris-to-frigate-team |
|
|
|
Quoted: More or less. I just discovered It because our news are full of pandemic shit all the time View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
I'm waiting for NAVSEA to weigh in with thousands of "required" design changes which will add tens of billions to the cost and years to the schedule.
For NAVSEA to accept the Italian frigates without "customization", would mean NAVSEA isn't needed and could be de-funded. This is something a swamp full of .gov bureaucrats will never allow. |
|
After reading all the problems with the LPD San Antonio, maybe we should let someone else take a crack at it.
|
|
Quoted: I'm waiting for NAVSEA to weigh in with thousands of required design changes which will add tens of billions to the cost and years to the schedule. For NAVSEA to accept the Italian frigates without "customization", would mean NAVSEA isn't needed and could be de-funded. This is something a swamp full of .gov bureaucrats will never allow. View Quote |
|
|
IIRC they are going with 57mm main gun instead of the 76 since the gun's primary purpose will be anti air/drone/missile. Antiship capability will be various missiles.
|
|
Ok so we will have the Guido Navy ships? Nice..
Failed To Load Title |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: 120 RPM on a 76mm?! Damn that's pretty good firepower. View Quote |
|
Quoted: They should have gone with the Dutch Absalon-class ships. View Quote I think buying good proven foreign designs is a fantastic idea for the Navy. It sure beats the snafu we have been mucking around with the Ford, Spruance, and the LCS. |
|
|
Quoted: They should have gone with the Dutch Absalon-class ships. View Quote Not since DeRuyter has the Dutch Navy been very good. Look at Doorman during ABDA in the Pacific. . Now, Regia Marina de Roma knew how to crew their ships: Ben-Hur (1959) - Rowing of the Galley Slaves HD |
|
|
I can't see why the ONLY super power Navy would be using ships designed by what only be described as the naval equivalent of bench warmers.
There is nothing other navies do better than we do , pretty sure that has been proven continually since WWII . The British at this point do not rule the seas and have not in 80 plus years. |
|
Quoted: Out of production, goofy design compromises for multi mission flex deck. Maersk only built two. I think buying good proven foreign designs is a fantastic idea for the Navy. It sure beats the snafu we have been mucking around with the Ford, Spruance, and the LCS. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: They should have gone with the Dutch Absalon-class ships. I think buying good proven foreign designs is a fantastic idea for the Navy. It sure beats the snafu we have been mucking around with the Ford, Spruance, and the LCS. Maersk only built two because they all the Danish navy wanted. They didn’t stop production because of some serious problem, but just because the navy is so underfunded (and tiny) that was all they got. You are absolutely correct that it’s not a “pure” frigate design - but I think the flexibility and modularity of the design is exactly the kind of thing that he US Navy claims they want. Of course, with the budgets of the US Navy, that kind of flexibility may ultimately be unecessary, and it probably makes sense to go with a more pure design. |
|
|
|
Are they gonna have poppers, cheese sticks, and pizza night EVERY NIGHT?
|
|
Quoted: I can't see why the ONLY super power Navy would be using ships designed by what only be described as the naval equivalent of bench warmers. There is nothing other navies do better than we do , pretty sure that has been proven continually since WWII . The British at this point do not rule the seas and have not in 80 plus years. View Quote Apparently other navies design good vessels at affordable prices better than we do. |
|
Oh yay, just what our military needs. More globalization. Don't want to use American workers to make American ships in American dockyards. Nope. Gotta use third worlders and sub par materials in foreign yards on a foreign design. Disgusting.
|
|
Quoted: Apparently other navies design good vessels at affordable prices better than we do. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I can't see why the ONLY super power Navy would be using ships designed by what only be described as the naval equivalent of bench warmers. There is nothing other navies do better than we do , pretty sure that has been proven continually since WWII . The British at this point do not rule the seas and have not in 80 plus years. Apparently other navies design good vessels at affordable prices better than we do. It’s because they need to. |
|
Quoted: Apparently other navies design good vessels at affordable prices better than we do. View Quote OK if you say so.... ... That is why we are so far behind all the other "naval powers" I do not like our military relying on foreign countries for our equipment needs. Everything we field should be designed here and made here . |
|
Quoted: I can't see why the ONLY super power Navy would be using ships designed by what only be described as the naval equivalent of bench warmers. There is nothing other navies do better than we do , pretty sure that has been proven continually since WWII . The British at this point do not rule the seas and have not in 80 plus years. View Quote The newest non-carrier surface vessel procured by the US Navy is the LCS classes, and one of those is a dysfunctional piece of Lockheed shit. So for non-carrier surface combatants, the Italians designs are far superior to anything adopted by the US navy lately. |
|
Quoted: I can't see why the ONLY super power Navy would be using ships designed by what only be described as the naval equivalent of bench warmers. There is nothing other navies do better than we do , pretty sure that has been proven continually since WWII . The British at this point do not rule the seas and have not in 80 plus years. View Quote These bench warmers build excellent warships since the first punic war straight to the Maritime Republics |
|
Quoted: Oh yay, just what our military needs. More globalization. Don't want to use American workers to make American ships in American dockyards. Nope. Gotta use third worlders and sub par materials in foreign yards on a foreign design. Disgusting. View Quote It’s being built in Wisconsin. |
|
|
Quoted: OK if you say so.... ... That is why we are so far behind all the other "naval powers" I do not like our military relying on foreign countries for our equipment needs. Everything we field should be designed here and made here . View Quote The Constellation class are being built in the US, by US dock workers, using a design that already exists. |
|
Quoted: Oh yay, just what our military needs. More globalization. Don't want to use American workers to make American ships in American dockyards. Nope. Gotta use third worlders and sub par materials in foreign yards on a foreign design. Disgusting. View Quote Ships Will be built in the US as far as i understood. And Europe is not third world by the way for now |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Oh yay, just what our military needs. More globalization. Don't want to use American workers to make American ships in American dockyards. Nope. Gotta use third worlders and sub par materials in foreign yards on a foreign design. Disgusting. It’s being built in Wisconsin. That looks like a troll account. |
|
Quoted: Oh yay, just what our military needs. More globalization. Don't want to use American workers to make American ships in American dockyards. Nope. Gotta use third worlders and sub par materials in foreign yards on a foreign design. Disgusting. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Oh yay, just what our military needs. More globalization. Don't want to use American workers to make American ships in American dockyards. Nope. Gotta use third worlders and sub par materials in foreign yards on a foreign design. Disgusting. Italy isn’t a third world nation. Don’t be absurd. Quoted: It’s because they need to. Ironically, so do we. Quoted: OK if you say so.... ... That is why we are so far behind all the other "naval powers" I do not like our military relying on foreign countries for our equipment needs. Everything we field should be designed here and made here . I think everyone would prefer it but US industry has struggled to pull its head from its ass and make what needs to be made. The Euros are pushing their shit in on many weapons systems. They need to get it together. |
|
|
Quoted: I can't see why the ONLY super power Navy would be using ships designed by what only be described as the naval equivalent of bench warmers. There is nothing other navies do better than we do , pretty sure that has been proven continually since WWII . The British at this point do not rule the seas and have not in 80 plus years. View Quote You Are Attached File |
|
Italy is the opposite of the US. The hotties are in the suburbs. They can’t afford to live where the tourists live, because they aren’t old.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.