User Panel
Quoted:
Its been said that once man invented stone tools everyone around the world had that ability once it was made. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
There is a theory, that if the universe is ever figured out, it will be replaced by something even more bizarre. There is another theory, that this has already happened. Twice. |
|
View Quote |
|
|
We didn't get "lucky". There are countless solar systems in the universe. Some of which have planets at the correct distance from their star for life to develop.
|
|
Man in black - ending HD |
|
|
|
Quoted:
We didn't get "lucky". There are countless solar systems in the universe. Some of which have planets at the correct distance from their star for life to develop. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/25/75/65/257565f3c27722162eb945c49e65b091.gif Ever stop to think about the actual motion of the planets? You know the sun is always moving too... |
|
Quoted:
Well technically that would mean you just dont exist. Poof. Gone. Like incinerating a hardrive that had loads of source information then its just gone, unrecoverable. Now imagine this: who you are is actually saved somewhere, call it DNA, a form of consciousness somewhere on a plain of existance above our own....... however it exists, it exists and its workings misunderstood and innaccesable by current tech. Humans evolve another million years and discover a way to snatch that essence of who you are out of the nothingness and recreate you just as you were. Not a copy but a continuance of who you were at the time of death. If that was the case, would complete nothingness be an issue? Litterally a billion years could go by and once you were "resurrected" it would be as if you woke up a few seconds after you died. Thats weird. View Quote DNA does not store memory. |
|
|
Quoted:
There is a theory, that if the universe is ever figured out, it will be replaced by something even more bizarre. There is another theory, that this has already happened. Twice. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Maybe the universe makes prefect sense but our brains just aren't powerful enough to decode it all. View Quote Our instinct of ego, that drives us to go on in self belief, is what shades us from understanding the true scale of the universe. I've had another theory. It states that if we ever create an AI that is capable of self improving it's own mental game, exponentially, that it will do two things: First is that it will figure out the secrets of the universe. The next instant it will calculate the futility of explaining those secrets to us apes, then disappear. While we are scratching our heads as to where it went, it will be sipping fine wine with other AIs on a distant planet 12,000 years ago. |
|
Quoted:
We didn't get "lucky". There are countless solar systems in the universe. Some of which have planets at the correct distance from their star for life to develop. View Quote Origin: Probability of a Single Protein Forming by Chance |
|
Quoted:
https://i.imgur.com/QeiTidZ.jpg View Quote |
|
Quoted:
And it all happened just perfectly by accident, some would say. Imagine the odds, that'll boggle your mind even more. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I'll never be able to wrap my head around how things work. How we are far enough away from the sun to not fry but at the same time have a sustainable life. How it took 500 million years for the sun to simmer down to the point it's at now. What was there before the universe? And what was there even before that? I get anxiety just thinking about this shit. Or, does the water just exist where it can? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
We didn't get "lucky". There are countless solar systems in the universe. Some of which have planets at the correct distance from their star for life to develop. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1_KEVaCyaA |
|
Quoted: 1% of us are. 49.5% are bitching that it's a waste of resources and the other 49.5% are bitching that the money could be spent on giving them more gubmint cheese View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: 1% of us are. 49.5% are bitching that it's a waste of resources and the other 49.5% are bitching that the money could be spent on giving them more gubmint cheese Quoted: We have a bingo!.jpg Our instinct of ego, that drives us to go on in self belief, is what shades us from understanding the true scale of the universe. I've had another theory. It states that if we ever create an AI that is capable of self improving it's own mental game, exponentially, that it will do two things: First is that it will figure out the secrets of the universe. The next instant it will calculate the futility of explaining those secrets to us apes, then disappear. While we are scratching our heads as to where it went, it will be sipping fine wine with other AIs on a distant planet 12,000 years ago. |
|
|
Quoted:
I'm all for building less nukes and invading less countries so we can build more spaceships. That's just me, though. It's also possible that once our own intelligence is supplemented using technologies like Neuralink, we could develop a deeper understanding and consequently, develop tools to take advantage of that understanding. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: 1% of us are. 49.5% are bitching that it's a waste of resources and the other 49.5% are bitching that the money could be spent on giving them more gubmint cheese Quoted: We have a bingo!.jpg Our instinct of ego, that drives us to go on in self belief, is what shades us from understanding the true scale of the universe. I've had another theory. It states that if we ever create an AI that is capable of self improving it's own mental game, exponentially, that it will do two things: First is that it will figure out the secrets of the universe. The next instant it will calculate the futility of explaining those secrets to us apes, then disappear. While we are scratching our heads as to where it went, it will be sipping fine wine with other AIs on a distant planet 12,000 years ago. Then again, if we could all do that, it would be like handing chimps full auto MP5s. |
|
Quoted: We have a bingo!.jpg Our instinct of ego, that drives us to go on in self belief, is what shades us from understanding the true scale of the universe. I've had another theory. It states that if we ever create an AI that is capable of self improving it's own mental game, exponentially, that it will do two things: First is that it will figure out the secrets of the universe. The next instant it will calculate the futility of explaining those secrets to us apes, then disappear. While we are scratching our heads as to where it went, it will be sipping fine wine with other AIs on a distant planet 12,000 years ago. View Quote |
|
It’s not that the conditions for life are special, it’s that they are rare. If life couldn’t have thrived on this world then it would have thrived on another. We weren’t blessed so much as just lucky.
|
|
Quoted:
shitty channel or not, the odds of developing life independently out of chemicals is staggering View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
shitty channel or not, the odds of developing life independently out of chemicals is staggering Quoted:
I'm all for building less nukes and invading less countries so we can build more spaceships. That's just me, though. Quoted:
And it all happened just perfectly by accident, some would say. |
|
Quoted:
And it all happened just perfectly by accident, some would say. Imagine the odds, that'll boggle your mind even more. View Quote Was pretty interesting. Alternatively, it could just be that there are an infinite number of universes and therefore the universe we live in and life on Earth as we know MUST arise in at least some of them. Either way, shit will indeed make your head spin. Especially if you are ingesting certain chemicals. |
|
Remember, Donal Trump and white capitalists control the distance between the sun and the earth.
-Climate change activists |
|
Some notes: do the math, let us know.
Five million years ago, when humanity's ancestors were just learning to walk upright, a star was ejected from Sagittarius A*, the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way Galaxy, at a staggering 3.7 million mph. This month, a group of researchers spotted the superfast star traveling relatively close to Earth. Researchers, led by Sergey Koposov of Carnegie Mellon University's McWilliams Center for Cosmology as part of the Southern Stellar Stream Spectroscopic Survey (S5), spotted the star — known as S5-HVS1 — in the constellation Grus. According to a press release Tuesday, the star was traveling at just 29,000 light-years away from Earth, or "practically next door by astronomical standards." |
|
Skimmed the thread. Anyone post timeline of the universe yet?
That is by far the best universe related content I've ever seen. |
|
Quoted:
Some notes: do the math, let us know. Five million years ago, when humanity's ancestors were just learning to walk upright, a star was ejected from Sagittarius A*, the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way Galaxy, at a staggering 3.7 million mph. This month, a group of researchers spotted the superfast star traveling relatively close to Earth. Researchers, led by Sergey Koposov of Carnegie Mellon University's McWilliams Center for Cosmology as part of the Southern Stellar Stream Spectroscopic Survey (S5), spotted the star — known as S5-HVS1 — in the constellation Grus. According to a press release Tuesday, the star was traveling at just 29,000 light-years away from Earth, or "practically next door by astronomical standards." View Quote |
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Just think most of the stars in those galaxies probably have supernova already. Just think that light took 100s if millions of years to reach us View Quote So I respectfully disagree with your assessment that most have gone supernova. |
|
Quoted:
No. Recreating the body would NOT recreate the memory. If you 1000 years later build a computer with the exact type of components from one 1000 years previous, the computer would be functionable, but there would be no data. DNA does not store memory. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
A star needs to be 3x as large as our Sun (or larger) to go supernova.most stars are smaller than our sun. Most are actually red dwarfs. So I respectfully disagree with your assessment that most have gone supernova. View Quote My degree is in general sciences with 2 years of astronomy. It is for most part a useless degree for my career but hey I did it. |
|
Quoted:
shitty channel or not, the odds of developing life independently out of chemicals is staggering View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
Quoted:
Is it? Every Planet we've checked has life on it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'll also add two comments:
1. In an infinite universe anything can happen, and the corollary; 2. In an infinite universe everything MUST happen. |
|
And to all those talking about probabilities and statistics, just what are the odds that intelligent life would develop on a plant circling a star, and the planet would just happen to have a moon who's apparent angular diameter just matches that of the star, when viewed from the planet?
I'll say the odds are 100%, because it did happen. DSC_9161-DSC_5970 Sun and Moon by FredMan, on Flickr Eclipse 600mm Full Sequence_ by FredMan, on Flickr |
|
|
|
Quoted:
The odds are 1:1. All we can say is that there was a 100% chance of it working, because it worked. To say that the odds were any worse would require knowledge of other universes that failed to start under the same circumstances. Same thing for the development of life on Earth. Until we find other Earth-analogous planets that are devoid of life, we can assume that there is a 100% chance of life developing on planets like ours. There is no evidence to the contrary. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'll never be able to wrap my head around how things work. How we are far enough away from the sun to not fry but at the same time have a sustainable life. How it took 500 million years for the sun to simmer down to the point it's at now. What was there before the universe? And what was there even before that? I get anxiety just thinking about this shit. Same thing for the development of life on Earth. Until we find other Earth-analogous planets that are devoid of life, we can assume that there is a 100% chance of life developing on planets like ours. There is no evidence to the contrary. |
|
|
Lol, at this point in the game we don't know if life is rare. We've only checked one planet and life blankets that planet, it's found almost everywhere. In fact, places devoid of life on this planet are hard to find.
It is very much a possibility that life is endemic to the universe and that it's not rare at all. We have very very little data on the subject. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.