User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 8/17/2023 5:51:18 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Only a smooth brain doesn't understand that . Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: You do you man. Most the folks on this board support Ukraine's right to protect their territorial integrity but anyone with a brain understands what's actually going on with the $$$ behind the scenes This is another Afghanistan, Iraq, you name it. . . it's a cash grab. Democrats are sending billions of dollars overseas (with no oversight) which is going to everything from private villas for corrupt Ukrainian officials all the way to the war chests for future democratic candidates. But you know, you're honored I'm sure Only a smooth brain doesn't understand that . I guess I can slide my own thread if I want so... Imagine being such a brainlet that you think there's no oversight of Ukraine despite having the entire world of information at your finger tips! Talk about next level! Right?
US auditors arrive in Ukraine to ensure ‘no aid or weapons are diverted.’ - January 26,2023 https://www.dodig.mil/Ukraine/ https://oig.usaid.gov/our-work/ukraine-oversight https://www.stateoig.gov/ukraine-response-oversight Including a complete Congressional hearing where the current progress of oversight was presented: https://armedservices.house.gov/sites/republicans.armedservices.house.gov/files/02.28.23%20Storch%20Statement.pdf Hey, sorry about the "wall of text" though. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2023 5:51:43 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryHis face says it all: just more talk about two losers. Libs don't have to do anything. Drama Queen Trump and Vapor Brain DeSantis can each lose an election on their own without any help. The best way to win the coming election is to dump the losers and get a competent person who can get it done. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2023 6:03:45 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Look at all the liberals posing as RINOs working against Trump on this site.  " />
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2023 6:06:32 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: OP = Won't you PLEASE agree with me,  (while beating the tard drum)  " />
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2023 6:06:36 PM EDT
[#5]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2023 6:29:44 PM EDT
[#6]
Not news but thanks for posting. Trump has been working with liberals forever and during his whole term as president: gay rights, foriegn aid, gun control and doing zero for the 2A, dangerous vaccine pusher and hid quinine and ivermectin from millions, dozens of leftists picked and approved as "best people", whose who of leftists pardon list, etc., etc.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2023 6:56:10 PM EDT
[#7]
Whether it's in-person or online, Trump's most vocal supporters are some of the most vapid, shallow, vindictive, obnoxious retards you will ever see.
My goal is to get DeSantis as the nominee and hopefully as President. If Trump's my only option when next November rolls around, I'll vote for him, as unpalatable as that might be. If you state that your goal is not to have "your guy" as the nominee but rather to torpedo the most popular and conservative candidate in the race, in what way do you differ from the other side? Yes, I understand that people like Brenden Dildo and Laura Loomer are mouth-breathing retards not representative of normal humans, but if you embrace these people and their actions as yours then you accept responsibility for them. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2023 7:13:17 PM EDT
[#8]
Uh huh. Another "unconfirmed source" -- that is a very strange way to "confirm" a rumor. I thought only liberals did that -- guess not.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2023 7:39:05 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: problem for desantis is he has already blown the loyalty part and now comes the consequences I disagree about "the problem". I think "the problem" is a certain set of voters making excuses for leftist policy and requiring fealty to it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2023 7:39:27 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You consider two paragraphs a "wall of text"? Damn, if ever there was proof government schools needed defunding. You know who's pro school choice? Ron DeSantis.  ^I'd LOVE to see a picture of this gem of TDS victim/sufferer. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2023 8:07:17 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Uh huh. Another "unconfirmed source" -- that is a very strange way to "confirm" a rumor. I thought only liberals did that -- guess not. Did you even read the the article or even just the thread before replying? The person who, at the very least, is very closely associated with the Trump campaign to the point she has one on one meetings with him, tweeted out the article she is quoted in saying she was working with the lib activist to make sure DeSantis in never President. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2023 8:10:42 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: ^I'd LOVE to see a picture of this gem of TDS victim/sufferer. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: You consider two paragraphs a "wall of text"? Damn, if ever there was proof government schools needed defunding. You know who's pro school choice? Ron DeSantis. ^I'd LOVE to see a picture of this gem of TDS victim/sufferer. Sorry, you'll have to stick to cranking it to your Trump waifu MyPillow.  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2023 8:31:56 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Did you even read the the article or even just the thread before replying? The person who, at the very least, is very closely associated with the Trump campaign to the point she has one on one meetings with him, tweeted out the article she is quoted in saying she was working with the lib activist to make sure DeSantis in never President. THIS guy? The avowed democrat and Reagan hater? THAT piece of trash is your source??? "Now, he is on a personal mission to tear down Reagan’s party and prevent Trump, or a Republican like him, from becoming president again." Yeah, HIS gossip (yes, gossip) about what another person says is rock solid. Not biased AT ALL. Shame on you. Go back to DU. Or stay here and continue to debase yourself as a shill for the Democrats. We know what you are. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2023 9:49:42 PM EDT
[#14]
Was this country not better off when trump was in? Yes it was
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2023 11:08:22 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: THIS guy? The avowed democrat and Reagan hater? THAT piece of trash is your source??? "Now, he is on a personal mission to tear down Reagan’s party and prevent Trump, or a Republican like him, from becoming president again." Yeah, HIS gossip (yes, gossip) about what another person says is rock solid. Not biased AT ALL. Shame on you. Go back to DU. Or stay here and continue to debase yourself as a shill for the Democrats. We know what you are. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Did you even read the the article or even just the thread before replying? The person who, at the very least, is very closely associated with the Trump campaign to the point she has one on one meetings with him, tweeted out the article she is quoted in saying she was working with the lib activist to make sure DeSantis in never President. THIS guy? The avowed democrat and Reagan hater? THAT piece of trash is your source??? "Now, he is on a personal mission to tear down Reagan’s party and prevent Trump, or a Republican like him, from becoming president again." Yeah, HIS gossip (yes, gossip) about what another person says is rock solid. Not biased AT ALL. Shame on you. Go back to DU. Or stay here and continue to debase yourself as a shill for the Democrats. We know what you are. FFS, are you being purposely obtuse?   Attached FileLaura Loomer is the individual making that statement in the article she tweeted. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 12:08:06 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: FFS, are you being purposely obtuse? https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/102941/2023-08-17_12-22-39_jpg-2922763.JPG Laura Loomer is the individual making that statement in the article she tweeted. I apologize, I forgot you were there. You may go now. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 12:24:34 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I apologize, I forgot you were there. You may go now. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: FFS, are you being purposely obtuse? https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/102941/2023-08-17_12-22-39_jpg-2922763.JPG Laura Loomer is the individual making that statement in the article she tweeted. I apologize, I forgot you were there. You may go now. Nope. Doesn't work that way in my thread. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 1:16:29 AM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted: By only trumpers I am assuming you mean republicans...we are the majority. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/116375/Screenshot_2023-08-17_153308_png-2923063.JPG congrats. per that polling you're barely the majority, of the minority party. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 7:34:40 AM EDT
[#19]
Par for the course with Trump: Focusing on the wrong enemy forever.
It would impress me if he worked actively with liberals against… Democrats. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 7:54:25 AM EDT
[#20]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 8:12:45 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted: DeSantis sunk his campaign on his own. He signed on with the Swamp, instead of with TRUMP, wherein he would certainly become President at some later date. If a true MAGA Republican runs against DeSantis for the Governorship, his political career will be over. If TRUMP returns to the Presidency I hope he makes a point to destroy DeSantis. I formerly liked DeSantis ALOT. I now resent that disloyal and treasonous piece of shit. He won’t even acknowledge Democrat election crimes. Treason. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 8:51:03 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He signed on with the Swamp, instead of with TRUMP, wherein he would certainly become President at some later date. If a true MAGA Republican runs against DeSantis for the Governorship, his political career will be over. If TRUMP returns to the Presidency I hope he makes a point to destroy DeSantis. I formerly liked DeSantis ALOT. I now resent that disloyal and treasonous piece of shit. He won’t even acknowledge Democrat election crimes. Treason. Oh FFS 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 9:40:13 AM EDT
[#23]
Nothing says conservative like retweeting MSNBC articles by Joy Reid, Maddow, and others. Good job MAGA.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 9:48:42 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He signed on with the Swamp, instead of with TRUMP, wherein he would certainly become President at some later date. If a true MAGA Republican runs against DeSantis for the Governorship, his political career will be over. If TRUMP returns to the Presidency I hope he makes a point to destroy DeSantis. I formerly liked DeSantis ALOT. I now resent that disloyal and treasonous piece of shit. He won’t even acknowledge Democrat election crimes. Treason. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: DeSantis sunk his campaign on his own. He signed on with the Swamp, instead of with TRUMP, wherein he would certainly become President at some later date. If a true MAGA Republican runs against DeSantis for the Governorship, his political career will be over. If TRUMP returns to the Presidency I hope he makes a point to destroy DeSantis. I formerly liked DeSantis ALOT. I now resent that disloyal and treasonous piece of shit. He won’t even acknowledge Democrat election crimes. Treason. Just… wow. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 10:25:56 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I guess I can slide my own thread if I want so... Imagine being such a brainlet that you think there's no oversight of Ukraine despite having the entire world of information at your finger tips! Talk about next level! Right?
US auditors arrive in Ukraine to ensure ‘no aid or weapons are diverted.’ - January 26,2023 https://www.dodig.mil/Ukraine/ https://oig.usaid.gov/our-work/ukraine-oversight https://www.stateoig.gov/ukraine-response-oversight Including a complete Congressional hearing where the current progress of oversight was presented: https://armedservices.house.gov/sites/republicans.armedservices.house.gov/files/02.28.23%20Storch%20Statement.pdf Hey, sorry about the "wall of text" though. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: You do you man. Most the folks on this board support Ukraine's right to protect their territorial integrity but anyone with a brain understands what's actually going on with the $$$ behind the scenes This is another Afghanistan, Iraq, you name it. . . it's a cash grab. Democrats are sending billions of dollars overseas (with no oversight) which is going to everything from private villas for corrupt Ukrainian officials all the way to the war chests for future democratic candidates. But you know, you're honored I'm sure Only a smooth brain doesn't understand that . I guess I can slide my own thread if I want so... Imagine being such a brainlet that you think there's no oversight of Ukraine despite having the entire world of information at your finger tips! Talk about next level! Right?
US auditors arrive in Ukraine to ensure ‘no aid or weapons are diverted.’ - January 26,2023 https://www.dodig.mil/Ukraine/ https://oig.usaid.gov/our-work/ukraine-oversight https://www.stateoig.gov/ukraine-response-oversight Including a complete Congressional hearing where the current progress of oversight was presented: https://armedservices.house.gov/sites/republicans.armedservices.house.gov/files/02.28.23%20Storch%20Statement.pdf Hey, sorry about the "wall of text" though. Your source for no corruption in Ukraine is Victoria Nuland and a sea of government bureaucracy? I’d laugh but believing in that whole concept is just too pathetic to even laugh at. Ironic that you praise the statements a bunch of Leftists who are dead set on destroying the United States, but at the same time, you want to destroy any and all conservatives who happen back Trump. Hell, you even attack members here who dare go against your version of the truth. At least you’re consistent, though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 10:32:26 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistorySo? Ben Shapiro isn't a Lib. You may not prefer his flavor of Conservatism but he definitely isn't a Lib. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 10:33:47 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Your source for no corruption in Ukraine is Victoria Nuland and a sea of government bureaucracy? I’d laugh but believing in that whole concept is just too pathetic to even laugh at. Ironic that you praise the statements a bunch of Leftists who are dead set on destroying the United States, but at the same time, you want to destroy any and all conservatives who happen back Trump. Hell, you even attack members here who dare go against your version of the truth. At least you’re consistent, though. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: You do you man. Most the folks on this board support Ukraine's right to protect their territorial integrity but anyone with a brain understands what's actually going on with the $$$ behind the scenes This is another Afghanistan, Iraq, you name it. . . it's a cash grab. Democrats are sending billions of dollars overseas (with no oversight) which is going to everything from private villas for corrupt Ukrainian officials all the way to the war chests for future democratic candidates. But you know, you're honored I'm sure Only a smooth brain doesn't understand that . I guess I can slide my own thread if I want so... Imagine being such a brainlet that you think there's no oversight of Ukraine despite having the entire world of information at your finger tips! Talk about next level! Right?
US auditors arrive in Ukraine to ensure ‘no aid or weapons are diverted.’ - January 26,2023 https://www.dodig.mil/Ukraine/ https://oig.usaid.gov/our-work/ukraine-oversight https://www.stateoig.gov/ukraine-response-oversight Including a complete Congressional hearing where the current progress of oversight was presented: https://armedservices.house.gov/sites/republicans.armedservices.house.gov/files/02.28.23%20Storch%20Statement.pdf Hey, sorry about the "wall of text" though. Your source for no corruption in Ukraine is Victoria Nuland and a sea of government bureaucracy? I’d laugh but believing in that whole concept is just too pathetic to even laugh at. Ironic that you praise the statements a bunch of Leftists who are dead set on destroying the United States, but at the same time, you want to destroy any and all conservatives who happen back Trump. Hell, you even attack members here who dare go against your version of the truth. At least you’re consistent, though. Go take it up with the various departmental OIGs. Tell us, who would you trust to account for it rather than just fling shit to see what sticks? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 10:33:53 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Just… wow. Yeah man |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 10:57:28 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Go take it up with the various departmental OIGs. Tell us, who would you trust to account for it rather than just fling shit to see what sticks? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: You do you man. Most the folks on this board support Ukraine's right to protect their territorial integrity but anyone with a brain understands what's actually going on with the $$$ behind the scenes This is another Afghanistan, Iraq, you name it. . . it's a cash grab. Democrats are sending billions of dollars overseas (with no oversight) which is going to everything from private villas for corrupt Ukrainian officials all the way to the war chests for future democratic candidates. But you know, you're honored I'm sure Only a smooth brain doesn't understand that . I guess I can slide my own thread if I want so... Imagine being such a brainlet that you think there's no oversight of Ukraine despite having the entire world of information at your finger tips! Talk about next level! Right?
US auditors arrive in Ukraine to ensure ‘no aid or weapons are diverted.’ - January 26,2023 https://www.dodig.mil/Ukraine/ https://oig.usaid.gov/our-work/ukraine-oversight https://www.stateoig.gov/ukraine-response-oversight Including a complete Congressional hearing where the current progress of oversight was presented: https://armedservices.house.gov/sites/republicans.armedservices.house.gov/files/02.28.23%20Storch%20Statement.pdf Hey, sorry about the "wall of text" though. Your source for no corruption in Ukraine is Victoria Nuland and a sea of government bureaucracy? I’d laugh but believing in that whole concept is just too pathetic to even laugh at. Ironic that you praise the statements a bunch of Leftists who are dead set on destroying the United States, but at the same time, you want to destroy any and all conservatives who happen back Trump. Hell, you even attack members here who dare go against your version of the truth. At least you’re consistent, though. Go take it up with the various departmental OIGs. Tell us, who would you trust to account for it rather than just fling shit to see what sticks? Citing Victoria Nuland as a credible source is indeed flinging shit. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 11:27:53 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Citing Victoria Nuland as a credible source is indeed flinging shit. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: You do you man. Most the folks on this board support Ukraine's right to protect their territorial integrity but anyone with a brain understands what's actually going on with the $$$ behind the scenes This is another Afghanistan, Iraq, you name it. . . it's a cash grab. Democrats are sending billions of dollars overseas (with no oversight) which is going to everything from private villas for corrupt Ukrainian officials all the way to the war chests for future democratic candidates. But you know, you're honored I'm sure Only a smooth brain doesn't understand that . I guess I can slide my own thread if I want so... Imagine being such a brainlet that you think there's no oversight of Ukraine despite having the entire world of information at your finger tips! Talk about next level! Right?
US auditors arrive in Ukraine to ensure ‘no aid or weapons are diverted.’ - January 26,2023 https://www.dodig.mil/Ukraine/ https://oig.usaid.gov/our-work/ukraine-oversight https://www.stateoig.gov/ukraine-response-oversight Including a complete Congressional hearing where the current progress of oversight was presented: https://armedservices.house.gov/sites/republicans.armedservices.house.gov/files/02.28.23%20Storch%20Statement.pdf Hey, sorry about the "wall of text" though. Your source for no corruption in Ukraine is Victoria Nuland and a sea of government bureaucracy? I’d laugh but believing in that whole concept is just too pathetic to even laugh at. Ironic that you praise the statements a bunch of Leftists who are dead set on destroying the United States, but at the same time, you want to destroy any and all conservatives who happen back Trump. Hell, you even attack members here who dare go against your version of the truth. At least you’re consistent, though. Go take it up with the various departmental OIGs. Tell us, who would you trust to account for it rather than just fling shit to see what sticks? Citing Victoria Nuland as a credible source is indeed flinging shit. 1) You didn't answer my question. Who exactly would you trust to give an honest accounting, if not the departmental OIGs? 2) Is the very Conservative Hudson Institute in bed with Nuland? 3) I also cited a report from Robert Storch, who is the IG for the DoD, from testimony given to the Republican chaired House Armed Service Committee, who confirms there is a large degree of oversight but you conveniently ignore that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 11:39:33 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: 1) You didn't answer my question. Who exactly would you trust to give an honest accounting, if not the departmental OIGs? 2) Is the very Conservative Hudson Institute in bed with Nuland? 3) I also cited a report from Robert Storch, who is the IG for the DoD, from testimony given to the Republican chaired House Armed Service Committee, who confirms there is a large degree of oversight but you conveniently ignore that. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: You do you man. Most the folks on this board support Ukraine's right to protect their territorial integrity but anyone with a brain understands what's actually going on with the $$$ behind the scenes This is another Afghanistan, Iraq, you name it. . . it's a cash grab. Democrats are sending billions of dollars overseas (with no oversight) which is going to everything from private villas for corrupt Ukrainian officials all the way to the war chests for future democratic candidates. But you know, you're honored I'm sure Only a smooth brain doesn't understand that . I guess I can slide my own thread if I want so... Imagine being such a brainlet that you think there's no oversight of Ukraine despite having the entire world of information at your finger tips! Talk about next level! Right?
US auditors arrive in Ukraine to ensure ‘no aid or weapons are diverted.’ - January 26,2023 https://www.dodig.mil/Ukraine/ https://oig.usaid.gov/our-work/ukraine-oversight https://www.stateoig.gov/ukraine-response-oversight Including a complete Congressional hearing where the current progress of oversight was presented: https://armedservices.house.gov/sites/republicans.armedservices.house.gov/files/02.28.23%20Storch%20Statement.pdf Hey, sorry about the "wall of text" though. Your source for no corruption in Ukraine is Victoria Nuland and a sea of government bureaucracy? I’d laugh but believing in that whole concept is just too pathetic to even laugh at. Ironic that you praise the statements a bunch of Leftists who are dead set on destroying the United States, but at the same time, you want to destroy any and all conservatives who happen back Trump. Hell, you even attack members here who dare go against your version of the truth. At least you’re consistent, though. Go take it up with the various departmental OIGs. Tell us, who would you trust to account for it rather than just fling shit to see what sticks? Citing Victoria Nuland as a credible source is indeed flinging shit. 1) You didn't answer my question. Who exactly would you trust to give an honest accounting, if not the departmental OIGs? 2) Is the very Conservative Hudson Institute in bed with Nuland? 3) I also cited a report from Robert Storch, who is the IG for the DoD, from testimony given to the Republican chaired House Armed Service Committee, who confirms there is a large degree of oversight but you conveniently ignore that. And the Republican Party are a bunch of Conservatives, too, huh? At this point, I trust NO official government organization or entity to release the truth, especially when it comes to subjects as controversial and polarizing as this one is. I do believe that the truth eventually does come out, ironically mostly exposed by those who perpetrated the lies all along at a time when it no longer matters. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 11:45:01 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: And the Republican Party are a bunch of Conservatives, too, huh? At this point, I trust NO official government organization or entity to release the truth, especially when it comes to subjects as controversial and polarizing as this one is. I do believe that the truth eventually does come out, ironically mostly exposed by those who perpetrated the lies all along at a time when it no longer matters. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: You do you man. Most the folks on this board support Ukraine's right to protect their territorial integrity but anyone with a brain understands what's actually going on with the $$$ behind the scenes This is another Afghanistan, Iraq, you name it. . . it's a cash grab. Democrats are sending billions of dollars overseas (with no oversight) which is going to everything from private villas for corrupt Ukrainian officials all the way to the war chests for future democratic candidates. But you know, you're honored I'm sure Only a smooth brain doesn't understand that . I guess I can slide my own thread if I want so... Imagine being such a brainlet that you think there's no oversight of Ukraine despite having the entire world of information at your finger tips! Talk about next level! Right?
US auditors arrive in Ukraine to ensure ‘no aid or weapons are diverted.’ - January 26,2023 https://www.dodig.mil/Ukraine/ https://oig.usaid.gov/our-work/ukraine-oversight https://www.stateoig.gov/ukraine-response-oversight Including a complete Congressional hearing where the current progress of oversight was presented: https://armedservices.house.gov/sites/republicans.armedservices.house.gov/files/02.28.23%20Storch%20Statement.pdf Hey, sorry about the "wall of text" though. Your source for no corruption in Ukraine is Victoria Nuland and a sea of government bureaucracy? I’d laugh but believing in that whole concept is just too pathetic to even laugh at. Ironic that you praise the statements a bunch of Leftists who are dead set on destroying the United States, but at the same time, you want to destroy any and all conservatives who happen back Trump. Hell, you even attack members here who dare go against your version of the truth. At least you’re consistent, though. Go take it up with the various departmental OIGs. Tell us, who would you trust to account for it rather than just fling shit to see what sticks? Citing Victoria Nuland as a credible source is indeed flinging shit. 1) You didn't answer my question. Who exactly would you trust to give an honest accounting, if not the departmental OIGs? 2) Is the very Conservative Hudson Institute in bed with Nuland? 3) I also cited a report from Robert Storch, who is the IG for the DoD, from testimony given to the Republican chaired House Armed Service Committee, who confirms there is a large degree of oversight but you conveniently ignore that. And the Republican Party are a bunch of Conservatives, too, huh? At this point, I trust NO official government organization or entity to release the truth, especially when it comes to subjects as controversial and polarizing as this one is. I do believe that the truth eventually does come out, ironically mostly exposed by those who perpetrated the lies all along at a time when it no longer matters. You're still being evasive. I didn't say it had to be a government organization or entity to release the truth. Hudson isn't a government organization or entity, nor are they exclusively "Republican". Do you not trust them? If not, why not and, again, who would you trust to give an honest accounting of aid? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 11:59:19 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted: By only trumpers I am assuming you mean republicans...we are the majority. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/116375/Screenshot_2023-08-17_153308_png-2923063.JPG So polls are to be believed and followed now??? How 'bout we talk about general polls after all those are the only one's that matter. Perhaps you and I have a different agenda...My intention is to win the White House with someone Conservative Ideologically. Getting the nomination is like foreplay, getting to fingerbang your prom date only to go home with Blue Balls isn't my idea of 'Winning.' |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 11:59:23 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote History
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 12:03:08 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You're still being evasive. I didn't say it had to be a government organization or entity to release the truth. Hudson isn't a government organization or entity, nor are they exclusively "Republican". Do you not trust them? If not, why not and, again, who would you trust to give an honest accounting of aid? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: You do you man. Most the folks on this board support Ukraine's right to protect their territorial integrity but anyone with a brain understands what's actually going on with the $$$ behind the scenes This is another Afghanistan, Iraq, you name it. . . it's a cash grab. Democrats are sending billions of dollars overseas (with no oversight) which is going to everything from private villas for corrupt Ukrainian officials all the way to the war chests for future democratic candidates. But you know, you're honored I'm sure Only a smooth brain doesn't understand that . I guess I can slide my own thread if I want so... Imagine being such a brainlet that you think there's no oversight of Ukraine despite having the entire world of information at your finger tips! Talk about next level! Right?
US auditors arrive in Ukraine to ensure ‘no aid or weapons are diverted.’ - January 26,2023 https://www.dodig.mil/Ukraine/ https://oig.usaid.gov/our-work/ukraine-oversight https://www.stateoig.gov/ukraine-response-oversight Including a complete Congressional hearing where the current progress of oversight was presented: https://armedservices.house.gov/sites/republicans.armedservices.house.gov/files/02.28.23%20Storch%20Statement.pdf Hey, sorry about the "wall of text" though. Your source for no corruption in Ukraine is Victoria Nuland and a sea of government bureaucracy? I’d laugh but believing in that whole concept is just too pathetic to even laugh at. Ironic that you praise the statements a bunch of Leftists who are dead set on destroying the United States, but at the same time, you want to destroy any and all conservatives who happen back Trump. Hell, you even attack members here who dare go against your version of the truth. At least you’re consistent, though. Go take it up with the various departmental OIGs. Tell us, who would you trust to account for it rather than just fling shit to see what sticks? Citing Victoria Nuland as a credible source is indeed flinging shit. 1) You didn't answer my question. Who exactly would you trust to give an honest accounting, if not the departmental OIGs? 2) Is the very Conservative Hudson Institute in bed with Nuland? 3) I also cited a report from Robert Storch, who is the IG for the DoD, from testimony given to the Republican chaired House Armed Service Committee, who confirms there is a large degree of oversight but you conveniently ignore that. And the Republican Party are a bunch of Conservatives, too, huh? At this point, I trust NO official government organization or entity to release the truth, especially when it comes to subjects as controversial and polarizing as this one is. I do believe that the truth eventually does come out, ironically mostly exposed by those who perpetrated the lies all along at a time when it no longer matters. You're still being evasive. I didn't say it had to be a government organization or entity to release the truth. Hudson isn't a government organization or entity, nor are they exclusively "Republican". Do you not trust them? If not, why not and, again, who would you trust to give an honest accounting of aid? No one has access to that kind of information without government support or approval. How is being critical to any report being evasive? I go by past actions and association for now. As I said, the truth will eventually come out. I cannot be any more clearer or to the point on this than that. The simple fact that Victoria Nuland is associated with this destroys any credibility of any wrongdoing, no matter who else may be involved. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 12:14:42 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No one has access to that kind of information without government support or approval. How is being critical to any report being evasive? I go by past actions and association for now. As I said, the truth will eventually come out. I cannot be any more clearer or to the point on this than that. The simple fact that Victoria Nuland is associated with this destroys any credibility of any wrongdoing, no matter who else may be involved. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: You do you man. Most the folks on this board support Ukraine's right to protect their territorial integrity but anyone with a brain understands what's actually going on with the $$$ behind the scenes This is another Afghanistan, Iraq, you name it. . . it's a cash grab. Democrats are sending billions of dollars overseas (with no oversight) which is going to everything from private villas for corrupt Ukrainian officials all the way to the war chests for future democratic candidates. But you know, you're honored I'm sure Only a smooth brain doesn't understand that . I guess I can slide my own thread if I want so... Imagine being such a brainlet that you think there's no oversight of Ukraine despite having the entire world of information at your finger tips! Talk about next level! Right?
US auditors arrive in Ukraine to ensure ‘no aid or weapons are diverted.’ - January 26,2023 https://www.dodig.mil/Ukraine/ https://oig.usaid.gov/our-work/ukraine-oversight https://www.stateoig.gov/ukraine-response-oversight Including a complete Congressional hearing where the current progress of oversight was presented: https://armedservices.house.gov/sites/republicans.armedservices.house.gov/files/02.28.23%20Storch%20Statement.pdf Hey, sorry about the "wall of text" though. Your source for no corruption in Ukraine is Victoria Nuland and a sea of government bureaucracy? I’d laugh but believing in that whole concept is just too pathetic to even laugh at. Ironic that you praise the statements a bunch of Leftists who are dead set on destroying the United States, but at the same time, you want to destroy any and all conservatives who happen back Trump. Hell, you even attack members here who dare go against your version of the truth. At least you’re consistent, though. Go take it up with the various departmental OIGs. Tell us, who would you trust to account for it rather than just fling shit to see what sticks? Citing Victoria Nuland as a credible source is indeed flinging shit. 1) You didn't answer my question. Who exactly would you trust to give an honest accounting, if not the departmental OIGs? 2) Is the very Conservative Hudson Institute in bed with Nuland? 3) I also cited a report from Robert Storch, who is the IG for the DoD, from testimony given to the Republican chaired House Armed Service Committee, who confirms there is a large degree of oversight but you conveniently ignore that. And the Republican Party are a bunch of Conservatives, too, huh? At this point, I trust NO official government organization or entity to release the truth, especially when it comes to subjects as controversial and polarizing as this one is. I do believe that the truth eventually does come out, ironically mostly exposed by those who perpetrated the lies all along at a time when it no longer matters. You're still being evasive. I didn't say it had to be a government organization or entity to release the truth. Hudson isn't a government organization or entity, nor are they exclusively "Republican". Do you not trust them? If not, why not and, again, who would you trust to give an honest accounting of aid? No one has access to that kind of information without government support or approval. How is being critical to any report being evasive? I go by past actions and association for now. As I said, the truth will eventually come out. I cannot be any more clearer or to the point on this than that. The simple fact that Victoria Nuland is associated with this destroys any credibility of any wrongdoing, no matter who else may be involved. Actually they do. The aid is all public and has been openly voted on in Congress. Draw downs of the aid with the individual draw downs' contents are publicly published (except for specifics of certain high value systems being sent, wouldn't want to ruin the surprise for the Commies  ), right on Twitter even. The simple fact is you have a set of preconceived notions and a preconceived narrative/worldview, and you're afraid of anything that may upset that head canon of "reality" you've written versus actual reality. In truth there is no group or entity that could convince you differently from your preconceptions so your protestation over any perceived lack of oversight is an entirely moot point. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 12:19:26 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Actually they do. The aid is all public and has been openly voted on in Congress. Draw downs of the aid with the individual draw downs' contents are publicly published (except for specifics of certain high value systems being sent, wouldn't want to ruin the surprise for the Commies ), right on Twitter even. The simple fact is you have a set of preconceived notions and a preconceived narrative/worldview, and you're afraid of anything that may upset that head canon of "reality" you've written versus actual reality. In truth there is no group or entity that could convince you differently from your preconceptions so your protestation over any perceived lack of oversight is an entirely moot point. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: You do you man. Most the folks on this board support Ukraine's right to protect their territorial integrity but anyone with a brain understands what's actually going on with the $$$ behind the scenes This is another Afghanistan, Iraq, you name it. . . it's a cash grab. Democrats are sending billions of dollars overseas (with no oversight) which is going to everything from private villas for corrupt Ukrainian officials all the way to the war chests for future democratic candidates. But you know, you're honored I'm sure Only a smooth brain doesn't understand that . I guess I can slide my own thread if I want so... Imagine being such a brainlet that you think there's no oversight of Ukraine despite having the entire world of information at your finger tips! Talk about next level! Right?
US auditors arrive in Ukraine to ensure ‘no aid or weapons are diverted.’ - January 26,2023 https://www.dodig.mil/Ukraine/ https://oig.usaid.gov/our-work/ukraine-oversight https://www.stateoig.gov/ukraine-response-oversight Including a complete Congressional hearing where the current progress of oversight was presented: https://armedservices.house.gov/sites/republicans.armedservices.house.gov/files/02.28.23%20Storch%20Statement.pdf Hey, sorry about the "wall of text" though. Your source for no corruption in Ukraine is Victoria Nuland and a sea of government bureaucracy? I’d laugh but believing in that whole concept is just too pathetic to even laugh at. Ironic that you praise the statements a bunch of Leftists who are dead set on destroying the United States, but at the same time, you want to destroy any and all conservatives who happen back Trump. Hell, you even attack members here who dare go against your version of the truth. At least you’re consistent, though. Go take it up with the various departmental OIGs. Tell us, who would you trust to account for it rather than just fling shit to see what sticks? Citing Victoria Nuland as a credible source is indeed flinging shit. 1) You didn't answer my question. Who exactly would you trust to give an honest accounting, if not the departmental OIGs? 2) Is the very Conservative Hudson Institute in bed with Nuland? 3) I also cited a report from Robert Storch, who is the IG for the DoD, from testimony given to the Republican chaired House Armed Service Committee, who confirms there is a large degree of oversight but you conveniently ignore that. And the Republican Party are a bunch of Conservatives, too, huh? At this point, I trust NO official government organization or entity to release the truth, especially when it comes to subjects as controversial and polarizing as this one is. I do believe that the truth eventually does come out, ironically mostly exposed by those who perpetrated the lies all along at a time when it no longer matters. You're still being evasive. I didn't say it had to be a government organization or entity to release the truth. Hudson isn't a government organization or entity, nor are they exclusively "Republican". Do you not trust them? If not, why not and, again, who would you trust to give an honest accounting of aid? No one has access to that kind of information without government support or approval. How is being critical to any report being evasive? I go by past actions and association for now. As I said, the truth will eventually come out. I cannot be any more clearer or to the point on this than that. The simple fact that Victoria Nuland is associated with this destroys any credibility of any wrongdoing, no matter who else may be involved. Actually they do. The aid is all public and has been openly voted on in Congress. Draw downs of the aid with the individual draw downs' contents are publicly published (except for specifics of certain high value systems being sent, wouldn't want to ruin the surprise for the Commies ), right on Twitter even. The simple fact is you have a set of preconceived notions and a preconceived narrative/worldview, and you're afraid of anything that may upset that head canon of "reality" you've written versus actual reality. In truth there is no group or entity that could convince you differently from your preconceptions so your protestation over any perceived lack of oversight is an entirely moot point. And the 2020 election was the most secure election in American history. Just look at the evidence. Right? You keep believing what you want to believe and I’ll do the same. As I said, the truth will eventually come out. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 12:21:13 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted: And the 2020 election was the most secure election in American history. Just look at the evidence. Right? You keep believing what you want to believe and I’ll do the same. As I said, the truth will eventually come out. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: You do you man. Most the folks on this board support Ukraine's right to protect their territorial integrity but anyone with a brain understands what's actually going on with the $$$ behind the scenes This is another Afghanistan, Iraq, you name it. . . it's a cash grab. Democrats are sending billions of dollars overseas (with no oversight) which is going to everything from private villas for corrupt Ukrainian officials all the way to the war chests for future democratic candidates. But you know, you're honored I'm sure Only a smooth brain doesn't understand that . I guess I can slide my own thread if I want so... Imagine being such a brainlet that you think there's no oversight of Ukraine despite having the entire world of information at your finger tips! Talk about next level! Right?
US auditors arrive in Ukraine to ensure ‘no aid or weapons are diverted.’ - January 26,2023 https://www.dodig.mil/Ukraine/ https://oig.usaid.gov/our-work/ukraine-oversight https://www.stateoig.gov/ukraine-response-oversight Including a complete Congressional hearing where the current progress of oversight was presented: https://armedservices.house.gov/sites/republicans.armedservices.house.gov/files/02.28.23%20Storch%20Statement.pdf Hey, sorry about the "wall of text" though. Your source for no corruption in Ukraine is Victoria Nuland and a sea of government bureaucracy? I’d laugh but believing in that whole concept is just too pathetic to even laugh at. Ironic that you praise the statements a bunch of Leftists who are dead set on destroying the United States, but at the same time, you want to destroy any and all conservatives who happen back Trump. Hell, you even attack members here who dare go against your version of the truth. At least you’re consistent, though. Go take it up with the various departmental OIGs. Tell us, who would you trust to account for it rather than just fling shit to see what sticks? Citing Victoria Nuland as a credible source is indeed flinging shit. 1) You didn't answer my question. Who exactly would you trust to give an honest accounting, if not the departmental OIGs? 2) Is the very Conservative Hudson Institute in bed with Nuland? 3) I also cited a report from Robert Storch, who is the IG for the DoD, from testimony given to the Republican chaired House Armed Service Committee, who confirms there is a large degree of oversight but you conveniently ignore that. And the Republican Party are a bunch of Conservatives, too, huh? At this point, I trust NO official government organization or entity to release the truth, especially when it comes to subjects as controversial and polarizing as this one is. I do believe that the truth eventually does come out, ironically mostly exposed by those who perpetrated the lies all along at a time when it no longer matters. You're still being evasive. I didn't say it had to be a government organization or entity to release the truth. Hudson isn't a government organization or entity, nor are they exclusively "Republican". Do you not trust them? If not, why not and, again, who would you trust to give an honest accounting of aid? No one has access to that kind of information without government support or approval. How is being critical to any report being evasive? I go by past actions and association for now. As I said, the truth will eventually come out. I cannot be any more clearer or to the point on this than that. The simple fact that Victoria Nuland is associated with this destroys any credibility of any wrongdoing, no matter who else may be involved. Actually they do. The aid is all public and has been openly voted on in Congress. Draw downs of the aid with the individual draw downs' contents are publicly published (except for specifics of certain high value systems being sent, wouldn't want to ruin the surprise for the Commies ), right on Twitter even. The simple fact is you have a set of preconceived notions and a preconceived narrative/worldview, and you're afraid of anything that may upset that head canon of "reality" you've written versus actual reality. In truth there is no group or entity that could convince you differently from your preconceptions so your protestation over any perceived lack of oversight is an entirely moot point. And the 2020 election was the most secure election in American history. Just look at the evidence. Right? You keep believing what you want to believe and I’ll do the same. As I said, the truth will eventually come out.  Attached File Trump Campaign Manager And Senior Advisor Testify Trump Lost 2020 Election "I think that everybody was made aware that he lost the election but that doesn't mean that that was the only advice he was given."  Donald Trump's Lawyer Alina Habba Admits Trump Lost 2020 Election |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 12:25:53 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So polls are to be believed and followed now??? How 'bout we talk about general polls after all those are the only one's that matter. Perhaps you and I have a different agenda...My intention is to win the White House with someone Conservative Ideologically. Getting the nomination is like foreplay, getting to fingerbang your prom date only to go home with Blue Balls isn't my idea of 'Winning.' Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: By only trumpers I am assuming you mean republicans...we are the majority. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/116375/Screenshot_2023-08-17_153308_png-2923063.JPG So polls are to be believed and followed now??? How 'bout we talk about general polls after all those are the only one's that matter. Perhaps you and I have a different agenda...My intention is to win the White House with someone Conservative Ideologically. Getting the nomination is like foreplay, getting to fingerbang your prom date only to go home with Blue Balls isn't my idea of 'Winning.' Going to be tough when over half the party is committed to moving a certain direction. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 12:34:32 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/102941/2023-08-07_22-40-58_jpg-2912116.JPG  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vh-3ymVJwTs"I think that everybody was made aware that he lost the election but that doesn't mean that that was the only advice he was given." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4o6BZ3uOOhQQuote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: You do you man. Most the folks on this board support Ukraine's right to protect their territorial integrity but anyone with a brain understands what's actually going on with the $$$ behind the scenes This is another Afghanistan, Iraq, you name it. . . it's a cash grab. Democrats are sending billions of dollars overseas (with no oversight) which is going to everything from private villas for corrupt Ukrainian officials all the way to the war chests for future democratic candidates. But you know, you're honored I'm sure Only a smooth brain doesn't understand that . I guess I can slide my own thread if I want so... Imagine being such a brainlet that you think there's no oversight of Ukraine despite having the entire world of information at your finger tips! Talk about next level! Right?
US auditors arrive in Ukraine to ensure ‘no aid or weapons are diverted.’ - January 26,2023 https://www.dodig.mil/Ukraine/ https://oig.usaid.gov/our-work/ukraine-oversight https://www.stateoig.gov/ukraine-response-oversight Including a complete Congressional hearing where the current progress of oversight was presented: https://armedservices.house.gov/sites/republicans.armedservices.house.gov/files/02.28.23%20Storch%20Statement.pdf Hey, sorry about the "wall of text" though. Your source for no corruption in Ukraine is Victoria Nuland and a sea of government bureaucracy? I’d laugh but believing in that whole concept is just too pathetic to even laugh at. Ironic that you praise the statements a bunch of Leftists who are dead set on destroying the United States, but at the same time, you want to destroy any and all conservatives who happen back Trump. Hell, you even attack members here who dare go against your version of the truth. At least you’re consistent, though. Go take it up with the various departmental OIGs. Tell us, who would you trust to account for it rather than just fling shit to see what sticks? Citing Victoria Nuland as a credible source is indeed flinging shit. 1) You didn't answer my question. Who exactly would you trust to give an honest accounting, if not the departmental OIGs? 2) Is the very Conservative Hudson Institute in bed with Nuland? 3) I also cited a report from Robert Storch, who is the IG for the DoD, from testimony given to the Republican chaired House Armed Service Committee, who confirms there is a large degree of oversight but you conveniently ignore that. And the Republican Party are a bunch of Conservatives, too, huh? At this point, I trust NO official government organization or entity to release the truth, especially when it comes to subjects as controversial and polarizing as this one is. I do believe that the truth eventually does come out, ironically mostly exposed by those who perpetrated the lies all along at a time when it no longer matters. You're still being evasive. I didn't say it had to be a government organization or entity to release the truth. Hudson isn't a government organization or entity, nor are they exclusively "Republican". Do you not trust them? If not, why not and, again, who would you trust to give an honest accounting of aid? No one has access to that kind of information without government support or approval. How is being critical to any report being evasive? I go by past actions and association for now. As I said, the truth will eventually come out. I cannot be any more clearer or to the point on this than that. The simple fact that Victoria Nuland is associated with this destroys any credibility of any wrongdoing, no matter who else may be involved. Actually they do. The aid is all public and has been openly voted on in Congress. Draw downs of the aid with the individual draw downs' contents are publicly published (except for specifics of certain high value systems being sent, wouldn't want to ruin the surprise for the Commies ), right on Twitter even. The simple fact is you have a set of preconceived notions and a preconceived narrative/worldview, and you're afraid of anything that may upset that head canon of "reality" you've written versus actual reality. In truth there is no group or entity that could convince you differently from your preconceptions so your protestation over any perceived lack of oversight is an entirely moot point. And the 2020 election was the most secure election in American history. Just look at the evidence. Right? You keep believing what you want to believe and I’ll do the same. As I said, the truth will eventually come out. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/102941/2023-08-07_22-40-58_jpg-2912116.JPG https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vh-3ymVJwTs"I think that everybody was made aware that he lost the election but that doesn't mean that that was the only advice he was given." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4o6BZ3uOOhQWhy didn’t you also include Mike Pence in your examples?  Everyone knew before the election that the mail in ballots would be used to try to defeat Trump, especially the Democrats with their Red Mist explanation. 81 million votes for Biden can’t be wrong!! Only a political hack stands by that statement. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 12:44:09 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He signed on with the Swamp, instead of with TRUMP, wherein he would certainly become President at some later date. If a true MAGA Republican runs against DeSantis for the Governorship, his political career will be over. If TRUMP returns to the Presidency I hope he makes a point to destroy DeSantis. I formerly liked DeSantis ALOT. I now resent that disloyal and treasonous piece of shit. He won’t even acknowledge Democrat election crimes. Treason. fucking this desantis bros don’t like it but it’s the truth shame he didn’t check himself before he wrecked himself I’m going to laugh as he spirals downwards, in fact I have been laughing the last month the Ohio fair escapade was beautiful, the “be likable Ron!”, the trump hecklers, the rino shrill governor trying to quell the crowd while ron ron sat there in little Marco Rubio bootlets he knew better but still went ahead anyway he gets what he gets if you truly hate trump and won’t vote for him ramaswami is your best play desantis is done unless he gets installed and even then he loses |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 12:45:14 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Why didn’t you also include Mike Pence in your examples? Everyone knew before the election that the mail in ballots would be used to try to defeat Trump, especially the Democrats with their Red Mist explanation. 81 million votes for Biden can’t be wrong!! Only a political hack stands by that statement. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: You do you man. Most the folks on this board support Ukraine's right to protect their territorial integrity but anyone with a brain understands what's actually going on with the $$$ behind the scenes This is another Afghanistan, Iraq, you name it. . . it's a cash grab. Democrats are sending billions of dollars overseas (with no oversight) which is going to everything from private villas for corrupt Ukrainian officials all the way to the war chests for future democratic candidates. But you know, you're honored I'm sure Only a smooth brain doesn't understand that . I guess I can slide my own thread if I want so... Imagine being such a brainlet that you think there's no oversight of Ukraine despite having the entire world of information at your finger tips! Talk about next level! Right?
US auditors arrive in Ukraine to ensure ‘no aid or weapons are diverted.’ - January 26,2023 https://www.dodig.mil/Ukraine/ https://oig.usaid.gov/our-work/ukraine-oversight https://www.stateoig.gov/ukraine-response-oversight Including a complete Congressional hearing where the current progress of oversight was presented: https://armedservices.house.gov/sites/republicans.armedservices.house.gov/files/02.28.23%20Storch%20Statement.pdf Hey, sorry about the "wall of text" though. Your source for no corruption in Ukraine is Victoria Nuland and a sea of government bureaucracy? I’d laugh but believing in that whole concept is just too pathetic to even laugh at. Ironic that you praise the statements a bunch of Leftists who are dead set on destroying the United States, but at the same time, you want to destroy any and all conservatives who happen back Trump. Hell, you even attack members here who dare go against your version of the truth. At least you’re consistent, though. Go take it up with the various departmental OIGs. Tell us, who would you trust to account for it rather than just fling shit to see what sticks? Citing Victoria Nuland as a credible source is indeed flinging shit. 1) You didn't answer my question. Who exactly would you trust to give an honest accounting, if not the departmental OIGs? 2) Is the very Conservative Hudson Institute in bed with Nuland? 3) I also cited a report from Robert Storch, who is the IG for the DoD, from testimony given to the Republican chaired House Armed Service Committee, who confirms there is a large degree of oversight but you conveniently ignore that. And the Republican Party are a bunch of Conservatives, too, huh? At this point, I trust NO official government organization or entity to release the truth, especially when it comes to subjects as controversial and polarizing as this one is. I do believe that the truth eventually does come out, ironically mostly exposed by those who perpetrated the lies all along at a time when it no longer matters. You're still being evasive. I didn't say it had to be a government organization or entity to release the truth. Hudson isn't a government organization or entity, nor are they exclusively "Republican". Do you not trust them? If not, why not and, again, who would you trust to give an honest accounting of aid? No one has access to that kind of information without government support or approval. How is being critical to any report being evasive? I go by past actions and association for now. As I said, the truth will eventually come out. I cannot be any more clearer or to the point on this than that. The simple fact that Victoria Nuland is associated with this destroys any credibility of any wrongdoing, no matter who else may be involved. Actually they do. The aid is all public and has been openly voted on in Congress. Draw downs of the aid with the individual draw downs' contents are publicly published (except for specifics of certain high value systems being sent, wouldn't want to ruin the surprise for the Commies ), right on Twitter even. The simple fact is you have a set of preconceived notions and a preconceived narrative/worldview, and you're afraid of anything that may upset that head canon of "reality" you've written versus actual reality. In truth there is no group or entity that could convince you differently from your preconceptions so your protestation over any perceived lack of oversight is an entirely moot point. And the 2020 election was the most secure election in American history. Just look at the evidence. Right? You keep believing what you want to believe and I’ll do the same. As I said, the truth will eventually come out. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/102941/2023-08-07_22-40-58_jpg-2912116.JPG https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vh-3ymVJwTs"I think that everybody was made aware that he lost the election but that doesn't mean that that was the only advice he was given." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4o6BZ3uOOhQWhy didn’t you also include Mike Pence in your examples? Everyone knew before the election that the mail in ballots would be used to try to defeat Trump, especially the Democrats with their Red Mist explanation. 81 million votes for Biden can’t be wrong!! Only a political hack stands by that statement. Some of those people are actively working on Trump's 2024 campaign.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 12:48:03 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I guess I can slide my own thread if I want so... Imagine being such a brainlet that you think there's no oversight of Ukraine despite having the entire world of information at your finger tips! Talk about next level! Right?
US auditors arrive in Ukraine to ensure ‘no aid or weapons are diverted.’ - January 26,2023 https://www.dodig.mil/Ukraine/ https://oig.usaid.gov/our-work/ukraine-oversight https://www.stateoig.gov/ukraine-response-oversight Including a complete Congressional hearing where the current progress of oversight was presented: https://armedservices.house.gov/sites/republicans.armedservices.house.gov/files/02.28.23%20Storch%20Statement.pdf Hey, sorry about the "wall of text" though. Brainlet? A brainlet would think that a tweet from Hudson institute means that there has been proper oversight over the billions of dollars that have been sent overseas to a deepstate proxy war against Russia. You are some kind of special. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 12:48:12 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted: fucking this desantis bros don’t like it but it’s the truth shame he didn’t check himself before he wrecked himself I’m going to laugh as he spirals downwards, in fact I have been laughing the last month the Ohio fair escapade was beautiful, the “be likable Ron!”, the trump hecklers, the rino shrill governor trying to quell the crowd while ron ron sat there in little Marco Rubio bootlets he knew better but still went ahead anyway he gets what he gets if you truly hate trump and won’t vote for him ramaswami is your best play desantis is done unless he gets installed and even then he loses Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: He signed on with the Swamp, instead of with TRUMP, wherein he would certainly become President at some later date. If a true MAGA Republican runs against DeSantis for the Governorship, his political career will be over. If TRUMP returns to the Presidency I hope he makes a point to destroy DeSantis. I formerly liked DeSantis ALOT. I now resent that disloyal and treasonous piece of shit. He won’t even acknowledge Democrat election crimes. Treason. fucking this desantis bros don’t like it but it’s the truth shame he didn’t check himself before he wrecked himself I’m going to laugh as he spirals downwards, in fact I have been laughing the last month the Ohio fair escapade was beautiful, the “be likable Ron!”, the trump hecklers, the rino shrill governor trying to quell the crowd while ron ron sat there in little Marco Rubio bootlets he knew better but still went ahead anyway he gets what he gets if you truly hate trump and won’t vote for him ramaswami is your best play desantis is done unless he gets installed and even then he loses Breaking News! The latest delegate counts in the 2024 Republican nomination have just dropped! It's a real nail biter!  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 12:49:14 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He signed on with the Swamp, instead of with TRUMP, wherein he would certainly become President at some later date. If a true MAGA Republican runs against DeSantis for the Governorship, his political career will be over. If TRUMP returns to the Presidency I hope he makes a point to destroy DeSantis. I formerly liked DeSantis ALOT. I now resent that disloyal and treasonous piece of shit. He won’t even acknowledge Democrat election crimes. Treason.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 12:49:46 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Brainlet? A brainlet would think that a tweet from Hudson institute means that the has been proper oversight over billions of dollars that have been sent overseas to a deepstate proxy war against Russia. You are some kind of special. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I guess I can slide my own thread if I want so... Imagine being such a brainlet that you think there's no oversight of Ukraine despite having the entire world of information at your finger tips! Talk about next level! Right?
US auditors arrive in Ukraine to ensure ‘no aid or weapons are diverted.’ - January 26,2023 https://www.dodig.mil/Ukraine/ https://oig.usaid.gov/our-work/ukraine-oversight https://www.stateoig.gov/ukraine-response-oversight Including a complete Congressional hearing where the current progress of oversight was presented: https://armedservices.house.gov/sites/republicans.armedservices.house.gov/files/02.28.23%20Storch%20Statement.pdf Hey, sorry about the "wall of text" though. Brainlet? A brainlet would think that a tweet from Hudson institute means that the has been proper oversight over billions of dollars that have been sent overseas to a deepstate proxy war against Russia. You are some kind of special. Already addressed. You are dismissed. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 1:03:00 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: I guess I can slide my own thread if I want so... Imagine being such a brainlet that you think there's no oversight of Ukraine despite having the entire world of information at your finger tips! Talk about next level! Right?
US auditors arrive in Ukraine to ensure 'no aid or weapons are diverted.' - January 26,2023 https://www.dodig.mil/Ukraine/ https://oig.usaid.gov/our-work/ukraine-oversight https://www.stateoig.gov/ukraine-response-oversight Including a complete Congressional hearing where the current progress of oversight was presented: https://armedservices.house.gov/sites/republicans.armedservices.house.gov/files/02.28.23%20Storch%20Statement.pdf Hey, sorry about the "wall of text" though. Brainlet? A brainlet would think that a tweet from Hudson institute means that the has been proper oversight over billions of dollars that have been sent overseas to a deepstate proxy war against Russia. You are some kind of special. Already addressed. You are dismissed. https://i.imgur.com/fAhcTIN.gif |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 1:06:47 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted: One thing consistent between both the underscores and liberals is smugness. Keep it up, it seems to be working to influence people!!!!!! Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I guess I can slide my own thread if I want so... Imagine being such a brainlet that you think there's no oversight of Ukraine despite having the entire world of information at your finger tips! Talk about next level! Right?
US auditors arrive in Ukraine to ensure 'no aid or weapons are diverted.' - January 26,2023 https://www.dodig.mil/Ukraine/ https://oig.usaid.gov/our-work/ukraine-oversight https://www.stateoig.gov/ukraine-response-oversight Including a complete Congressional hearing where the current progress of oversight was presented: https://armedservices.house.gov/sites/republicans.armedservices.house.gov/files/02.28.23%20Storch%20Statement.pdf Hey, sorry about the "wall of text" though. Brainlet? A brainlet would think that a tweet from Hudson institute means that the has been proper oversight over billions of dollars that have been sent overseas to a deepstate proxy war against Russia. You are some kind of special. Already addressed. You are dismissed. https://i.imgur.com/fAhcTIN.gif 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 1:06:59 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Some of those people are actively working on Trump's 2024 campaign. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: You do you man. Most the folks on this board support Ukraine's right to protect their territorial integrity but anyone with a brain understands what's actually going on with the $$$ behind the scenes This is another Afghanistan, Iraq, you name it. . . it's a cash grab. Democrats are sending billions of dollars overseas (with no oversight) which is going to everything from private villas for corrupt Ukrainian officials all the way to the war chests for future democratic candidates. But you know, you're honored I'm sure Only a smooth brain doesn't understand that . I guess I can slide my own thread if I want so... Imagine being such a brainlet that you think there's no oversight of Ukraine despite having the entire world of information at your finger tips! Talk about next level! Right?
US auditors arrive in Ukraine to ensure ‘no aid or weapons are diverted.’ - January 26,2023 https://www.dodig.mil/Ukraine/ https://oig.usaid.gov/our-work/ukraine-oversight https://www.stateoig.gov/ukraine-response-oversight Including a complete Congressional hearing where the current progress of oversight was presented: https://armedservices.house.gov/sites/republicans.armedservices.house.gov/files/02.28.23%20Storch%20Statement.pdf Hey, sorry about the "wall of text" though. Your source for no corruption in Ukraine is Victoria Nuland and a sea of government bureaucracy? I’d laugh but believing in that whole concept is just too pathetic to even laugh at. Ironic that you praise the statements a bunch of Leftists who are dead set on destroying the United States, but at the same time, you want to destroy any and all conservatives who happen back Trump. Hell, you even attack members here who dare go against your version of the truth. At least you’re consistent, though. Go take it up with the various departmental OIGs. Tell us, who would you trust to account for it rather than just fling shit to see what sticks? Citing Victoria Nuland as a credible source is indeed flinging shit. 1) You didn't answer my question. Who exactly would you trust to give an honest accounting, if not the departmental OIGs? 2) Is the very Conservative Hudson Institute in bed with Nuland? 3) I also cited a report from Robert Storch, who is the IG for the DoD, from testimony given to the Republican chaired House Armed Service Committee, who confirms there is a large degree of oversight but you conveniently ignore that. And the Republican Party are a bunch of Conservatives, too, huh? At this point, I trust NO official government organization or entity to release the truth, especially when it comes to subjects as controversial and polarizing as this one is. I do believe that the truth eventually does come out, ironically mostly exposed by those who perpetrated the lies all along at a time when it no longer matters. You're still being evasive. I didn't say it had to be a government organization or entity to release the truth. Hudson isn't a government organization or entity, nor are they exclusively "Republican". Do you not trust them? If not, why not and, again, who would you trust to give an honest accounting of aid? No one has access to that kind of information without government support or approval. How is being critical to any report being evasive? I go by past actions and association for now. As I said, the truth will eventually come out. I cannot be any more clearer or to the point on this than that. The simple fact that Victoria Nuland is associated with this destroys any credibility of any wrongdoing, no matter who else may be involved. Actually they do. The aid is all public and has been openly voted on in Congress. Draw downs of the aid with the individual draw downs' contents are publicly published (except for specifics of certain high value systems being sent, wouldn't want to ruin the surprise for the Commies ), right on Twitter even. The simple fact is you have a set of preconceived notions and a preconceived narrative/worldview, and you're afraid of anything that may upset that head canon of "reality" you've written versus actual reality. In truth there is no group or entity that could convince you differently from your preconceptions so your protestation over any perceived lack of oversight is an entirely moot point. And the 2020 election was the most secure election in American history. Just look at the evidence. Right? You keep believing what you want to believe and I’ll do the same. As I said, the truth will eventually come out. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/102941/2023-08-07_22-40-58_jpg-2912116.JPG https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vh-3ymVJwTs"I think that everybody was made aware that he lost the election but that doesn't mean that that was the only advice he was given." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4o6BZ3uOOhQWhy didn’t you also include Mike Pence in your examples? Everyone knew before the election that the mail in ballots would be used to try to defeat Trump, especially the Democrats with their Red Mist explanation. 81 million votes for Biden can’t be wrong!! Only a political hack stands by that statement. Some of those people are actively working on Trump's 2024 campaign. With the witch hunt that’s been going on, especially those with a law background know they have to choose their words carefully. Your support alone of this witch hunt agenda speaks volumes. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2023 1:12:15 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted: With the witch hunt that’s been going on, especially those with a law background know they have to choose their words carefully. Your support alone of this witch hunt agenda speaks volumes. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: You do you man. Most the folks on this board support Ukraine's right to protect their territorial integrity but anyone with a brain understands what's actually going on with the $$$ behind the scenes This is another Afghanistan, Iraq, you name it. . . it's a cash grab. Democrats are sending billions of dollars overseas (with no oversight) which is going to everything from private villas for corrupt Ukrainian officials all the way to the war chests for future democratic candidates. But you know, you're honored I'm sure Only a smooth brain doesn't understand that . I guess I can slide my own thread if I want so... Imagine being such a brainlet that you think there's no oversight of Ukraine despite having the entire world of information at your finger tips! Talk about next level! Right?
US auditors arrive in Ukraine to ensure ‘no aid or weapons are diverted.’ - January 26,2023 https://www.dodig.mil/Ukraine/ https://oig.usaid.gov/our-work/ukraine-oversight https://www.stateoig.gov/ukraine-response-oversight Including a complete Congressional hearing where the current progress of oversight was presented: https://armedservices.house.gov/sites/republicans.armedservices.house.gov/files/02.28.23%20Storch%20Statement.pdf Hey, sorry about the "wall of text" though. Your source for no corruption in Ukraine is Victoria Nuland and a sea of government bureaucracy? I’d laugh but believing in that whole concept is just too pathetic to even laugh at. Ironic that you praise the statements a bunch of Leftists who are dead set on destroying the United States, but at the same time, you want to destroy any and all conservatives who happen back Trump. Hell, you even attack members here who dare go against your version of the truth. At least you’re consistent, though. Go take it up with the various departmental OIGs. Tell us, who would you trust to account for it rather than just fling shit to see what sticks? Citing Victoria Nuland as a credible source is indeed flinging shit. 1) You didn't answer my question. Who exactly would you trust to give an honest accounting, if not the departmental OIGs? 2) Is the very Conservative Hudson Institute in bed with Nuland? 3) I also cited a report from Robert Storch, who is the IG for the DoD, from testimony given to the Republican chaired House Armed Service Committee, who confirms there is a large degree of oversight but you conveniently ignore that. And the Republican Party are a bunch of Conservatives, too, huh? At this point, I trust NO official government organization or entity to release the truth, especially when it comes to subjects as controversial and polarizing as this one is. I do believe that the truth eventually does come out, ironically mostly exposed by those who perpetrated the lies all along at a time when it no longer matters. You're still being evasive. I didn't say it had to be a government organization or entity to release the truth. Hudson isn't a government organization or entity, nor are they exclusively "Republican". Do you not trust them? If not, why not and, again, who would you trust to give an honest accounting of aid? No one has access to that kind of information without government support or approval. How is being critical to any report being evasive? I go by past actions and association for now. As I said, the truth will eventually come out. I cannot be any more clearer or to the point on this than that. The simple fact that Victoria Nuland is associated with this destroys any credibility of any wrongdoing, no matter who else may be involved. Actually they do. The aid is all public and has been openly voted on in Congress. Draw downs of the aid with the individual draw downs' contents are publicly published (except for specifics of certain high value systems being sent, wouldn't want to ruin the surprise for the Commies ), right on Twitter even. The simple fact is you have a set of preconceived notions and a preconceived narrative/worldview, and you're afraid of anything that may upset that head canon of "reality" you've written versus actual reality. In truth there is no group or entity that could convince you differently from your preconceptions so your protestation over any perceived lack of oversight is an entirely moot point. And the 2020 election was the most secure election in American history. Just look at the evidence. Right? You keep believing what you want to believe and I’ll do the same. As I said, the truth will eventually come out. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/102941/2023-08-07_22-40-58_jpg-2912116.JPG https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vh-3ymVJwTs"I think that everybody was made aware that he lost the election but that doesn't mean that that was the only advice he was given." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4o6BZ3uOOhQWhy didn’t you also include Mike Pence in your examples? Everyone knew before the election that the mail in ballots would be used to try to defeat Trump, especially the Democrats with their Red Mist explanation. 81 million votes for Biden can’t be wrong!! Only a political hack stands by that statement. Some of those people are actively working on Trump's 2024 campaign. With the witch hunt that’s been going on, especially those with a law background know they have to choose their words carefully. Your support alone of this witch hunt agenda speaks volumes. So, they're going to save their asses by committing what could be provable perjury under oath since Trump supposedly has "irrefutable" evidence?  Attached FileAnd I have posted repeatedly that what is happening to Trump is a politically motivated witch hunt. He may be being prosecuted for things lots of people should also have been punished for and weren't, in some of these instances, but I think they should all be prosecuted equally. Biden should be prosecuted for mishandling documents just the same as Trump. These are the things you get with a "former" Democrat though. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
Attached File