User Panel
Quoted: Leftist media and deep state actors have been setting up TDS for years. Years of propaganda. Ironic how they try to make a big deal of Russian election influence. The biggest influence is by our own lying government. FBI actually lying to get FISA warrants to spy on Trump, and engaging in info campaign after info campaign. Even the indictments of Russian entities was used by the Mueller investigation as a info campaign to reinforce the Russia collusion narrative. The amount of propaganda is massive and everyone with TDS has been infected with it. Those infected can't think clearly, don't know which way is up. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: To “fix” this trial would require a lot of folks to act together. Leftist media and deep state actors have been setting up TDS for years. Years of propaganda. Ironic how they try to make a big deal of Russian election influence. The biggest influence is by our own lying government. FBI actually lying to get FISA warrants to spy on Trump, and engaging in info campaign after info campaign. Even the indictments of Russian entities was used by the Mueller investigation as a info campaign to reinforce the Russia collusion narrative. The amount of propaganda is massive and everyone with TDS has been infected with it. Those infected can't think clearly, don't know which way is up. I think most of our "news" and media are curated by the intelligence agencies in some form or fashion and has been for some time... not much question about it at this point IMO.. |
|
Quoted: I think most of our "news" and media are curated by the intelligence agencies in some form or fashion and has been for some time... not much question about it at this point IMO.. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: To “fix” this trial would require a lot of folks to act together. Leftist media and deep state actors have been setting up TDS for years. Years of propaganda. Ironic how they try to make a big deal of Russian election influence. The biggest influence is by our own lying government. FBI actually lying to get FISA warrants to spy on Trump, and engaging in info campaign after info campaign. Even the indictments of Russian entities was used by the Mueller investigation as a info campaign to reinforce the Russia collusion narrative. The amount of propaganda is massive and everyone with TDS has been infected with it. Those infected can't think clearly, don't know which way is up. I think most of our "news" and media are curated by the intelligence agencies in some form or fashion and has been for some time... not much question about it at this point IMO.. Add another conspiracy to the pile. |
|
Quoted: Imagine a world where's it's defamation/slander to call your accuser a liar or "crazy" - which that bitch obviously is. As though it's believable that a man who, at the time, was fucking the most beautiful women in the world, would give her even a second glance. It's absurd on its face. View Quote The funny part of this At his deposition when shown a picture of her he said it was his wife and had to be corrected by his own attorney This is a perfect example of not being fully aware of the facts in evidence and forming “truths” when the actual evidence says trump thought she looked just like his wife. His words under oath. |
|
Quoted: The funny part of this At his deposition when shown a picture of her he said it was his wife and had to be corrected by his own attorney This is a perfect example of not being fully aware of the facts in evidence and forming “truths” when the actual evidence says trump thought she looked just like his wife. His words under oath. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Imagine a world where's it's defamation/slander to call your accuser a liar or "crazy" - which that bitch obviously is. As though it's believable that a man who, at the time, was fucking the most beautiful women in the world, would give her even a second glance. It's absurd on its face. The funny part of this At his deposition when shown a picture of her he said it was his wife and had to be corrected by his own attorney This is a perfect example of not being fully aware of the facts in evidence and forming “truths” when the actual evidence says trump thought she looked just like his wife. His words under oath. There is another lady in the picture. Stop the lies. |
|
Quoted: There is another lady in the picture. Stop the lies. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes LOL.... Trump reiterated that Carroll was "not my type", and told the lawyer, "You would not be a choice of mine either ... under any circumstances." Trump was shown the photograph he had characterized as a reception line at a charity event, but proceeded to mistakenly identify the image of Carroll as his second wife, Marla Maples, despite his first wife Ivana Trump also being in the picture;[3] upon recognizing his mistake, he protested that the photo was "very blurry". He then confirmed that all of his wives were his "type", and that by type he primarily meant physical type.[51] |
|
Quoted: There is another lady in the picture. Stop the lies. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Imagine a world where's it's defamation/slander to call your accuser a liar or "crazy" - which that bitch obviously is. As though it's believable that a man who, at the time, was fucking the most beautiful women in the world, would give her even a second glance. It's absurd on its face. The funny part of this At his deposition when shown a picture of her he said it was his wife and had to be corrected by his own attorney This is a perfect example of not being fully aware of the facts in evidence and forming "truths" when the actual evidence says trump thought she looked just like his wife. His words under oath. There is another lady in the picture. Stop the lies. |
|
|
Quoted: I think most of our "news" and media are curated by the intelligence agencies in some form or fashion and has been for some time... not much question about it at this point IMO.. View Quote Three letter agencies > DNC > MSM should share office space , maybe they do ?, they did at Twitter . |
|
The courts are going to continue to rape Trump until he lies stinking in the earth.
|
|
Quoted: You’re dodging again. Answer the question. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Answer the question- is there evidence of defamation in this case? Yes, no, or “I don’t know”? Defaming her for making fake rape claims? She defamed him. You’re dodging again. Answer the question. That is the answer and anybody with no ax to grind can see it clearly. She was making unsubstantiated rape claims about a sitting POTUS. Hell, she couldn't even be specific on the date and they had to change the fucking law to even allow her to bring this ancient load of horseshit to court. If that cunt was defamed, what exactly were her damages? |
|
|
Quoted: Another disingenuous rant. Do you really think he should've given everyone there a blanket pardon? I don't even see the most ardent of trump supporters saying that so where does this criticism come from ? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Remember, Trump believed that these people were far more deserving of a pardon/clemency than his most faithful from January 6th. Scammers, spies, thieves, drug dealers, etc.... but not the people who were at the Capitol on his behalf. Charles Kushner Jared Kushner’s father, Charles Kushner, a real estate investor, pleaded guilty in 2004 to a raft of crimes that included 18 counts of making false statements the Federal Election Commission, tax evasion and witness tampering. He arranged an assignation with a prostitute for his sister’s husband, recorded the encounter and sent the tape to his sister, who he believed was cooperating with investigators. He was prosecuted by then-U.S. Attorney Chris Christie, who after abandoning his own presidential campaign in 2016 became a Trump supporter and surrogate. Kushner served 18 months behind bars. Aviem Sella President Trump granted a full pardon to Aviem Sella. Mr. Sella is an Israeli citizen who was indicted in 1986 for espionage in relation to the Jonathan Pollard case. Mr. Sella’s request for clemency is supported by the Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli Ambassador to the United States Ron Dermer, the United States Ambassador to Israel David Friedman, and Miriam Adelson. The State of Israel has issued a full and unequivocal apology, and has requested the pardon in order to close this unfortunate chapter in U.S.-Israel relations Mark Siljander Siljander was sentenced to a year in jail after pleading guilty to obstruction of justice and working as a foreign agent for an Islamic charity that was seeking to be removed from a list of organizations that supported terrorism. Michael Milken A financier who pioneered the issuance of junk bonds, Milken was convicted in 1990 of securities fraud, mail fraud, tax fraud, filing false SEC reports and conspiracy. He received a prison sentence of two years and was fined $200 million. Rudy Giuliani and Sheldon Adelson reportedly asked Trump to pardon Milken. Conrad Black A billionaire media mogul and Trump’s biographer and friend, Black was sentenced to 42 months in prison after being convicted of mail fraud and obstruction of justice in 2007. Bernard Kerik Former New York City Police Commissioner Kerik, a protégé of Rudy Giuliani, pleaded guilty to tax fraud and other charges in 2010 and was sentenced to four years behind bars. Rod Blagojevich The former governor of Illinois, a Democrat, was convicted in 2009 and sentenced to 14 years in prison for attempting to solicit bribes in exchange for filling the vacant U.S. Senate seat left by then-President Barack Obama. Trump commuted his sentence in February, saying he “seemed like a very nice person” during an appearance on Trump’s reality TV show “The Apprentice.” Alice Marie Johnson In 1997, Johnson, a single mother, was given a mandatory life sentence for her participation in a cocaine-trafficking ring. Her appeals for clemency were taken up by the ACLU and other civil liberties organizations who viewed her as an example of the disproportionate effect of the war on drugs on Black defendants. After an appeal to Trump by Kim Kardashian, her sentence was commuted in 2018 and she was freed from prison. Angela Stanton A motivational speaker, Stanton was convicted in 2007 and served six months in home confinement for her role in a stolen-car ring. Prior to her pardon she praised Trump in a series of interviews. Paul Pogue Pogue, a Texas business owner, was pardoned for a 2010 conviction for filing false income tax statements. (The White House statement said he underpaid his taxes by “approximately 10 percent;” the amount was almost $500,000.) Pogue’s family donated some $200,000 to Trump’s reelection campaign. Ariel Friedler The former CEO of Symplicity pleaded guilty in 2014 to conspiracy to hack into computer systems of two of his competitors and was sentenced to two months in prison. Chris Christie asked Trump to pardon Friedler. Michael Todesco Convicted in 1990 of drug trafficking and fraud, Todesco was originally pardoned by former President Barack Obama in 2017, but Trump’s order fixed a clerical error in the initial pardon. Roy McKeever Arrested in 1989 and charged at the age of 19 with transporting marijuana from Mexico to Oklahoma, McKeever served a year in prison. Chalmer Williams Convicted in the Eastern District of Kentucky of conspiracy to steal firearms and theft of firearms shipped in interstate commerce, Williams received a four-month prison term in 1995. Jon Ponder In 2005, Ponder pleaded guilty to bank robbery and was sentenced to more than 20 years in prison. While incarcerated, he founded Hope for Prisoners, a reentry program. Crystal Munoz After being brought to Trump’s attention by Kim Kardashian, Munoz was granted clemency by the president for marijuana charges. She had spent more than 12 years behind bars in a federal prison in Fort Worth, Texas. Tynice Nichole Hall Convicted on federal drug charges in 2006, Hall served the next 14 years in prison. Trump granted her clemency in February. Judith Negron Convicted in 2011 for charges including conspiracy, fraud, paying kickbacks and money laundering in a $200 million scheme to bilk Medicare, Negron was sentenced to 35 years in prison. Trump commuted that sentence in February. Joseph Stephens Stephens served 18 months in prison after pleading guilty in 2008 of felony possession of a firearm. That charge came after a second felony offense in 1991. Weldon Angelos Convicted in 2004 of selling marijuana and carrying a handgun while dealing, Angelos was sentenced to a mandatory minimum of 55 years behind bars. After serving 13 years of that sentence, he became involved in criminal justice reform efforts, eventually participating in a Prison Reform Summit at the White House in 2018, the White House said in a statement. Alfonso Costa Convicted of fraudulently billing insurance companies for dental work he never did, Costa pleaded guilty to health care fraud spanning 1996 to 2001. HUD secretary Ben Carson had lobbied Trump for Costa’s pardon. “Al Costa is my best friend,” Carson told WPIX news. Philip Esformes Once known as the king of Medicare fraud, Esformes was sentenced in 2019 to 20 years in prison after being charged three years earlier for his role in a $1.3 billion scheme to defraud Medicare and Medicaid for services never rendered. The New York Times reported that clemency for Esformes was promoted by the Aleph Institute, a criminal-justice organization founded by the Lubavitcher sect of ultra-Orthodox Jews, with connections to Jared Kushner and legal scholar Alan Dershowitz, a high-profile Trump defender. “While in prison, Mr. Esformes, who is 52, has been devoted to prayer and repentance and is in declining health,” the White House said in a statement about the commutation of his sentence after less than two years. Otis Gordon In 1993, Gordon was sentenced to just over 7 years in prison after being convicted of selling, distributing and dispensing cocaine. Theodore Suhl Convicted in 2016 of Medicaid fraud and bribery charges, Suhl was sentenced to seven years in prison. Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee approached Trump about pardoning him. Robert Coughlin Coughlin, a mid-level Justice Department official, pleaded guilty in 2008 to accepting bribes in exchange for doing favors for a politically connected law firm. He was sentenced to 30 days in a halfway house and “wishes to put his mistakes behind him,” according to the White House statement Sholom Rubashkin After being convicted for bank fraud, wire fraud and mail fraud, Rubashkin, the former CEO of a kosher slaughterhouse and meat packing plant, was sentenced in 2010 to 27 years in prison and ordered to pay $26.9 million in restitution. Seven years later, Trump commuted his sentence. Ronen Nahmani Sentenced to 20 years in prison for his role in a conspiracy to distribute synthetic drugs purchased from suppliers in China, Israeli-born Nahami was aided in his plea for clemency by U.S. lawyer and Trump confidant Alan Dershowitz. When Trump’s pardon came, Nahami had served four years of his sentence Rashella Reed Convicted in 2013 for her role in a scheme to launder $8 million from the federal food stamp program. Reed had served seven of her 14-year sentence when Trump commuted her sentence in October. Curtis McDonald In 1996, McDonald was convicted on drug trafficking and money laundering charges and sentenced to life in prison. The White House said in a statement describing Trump’s decision to grant McDonald clemency that he “made productive use of his time” while in prison. Daniela Gozes-Wagner Convicted in 2019 of money laundering and conspiring to commit $50 million in health care fraud, Gozers-Wagner was sentenced to serve 240 months in prison and ordered to pay $15.2 million in restitution. The White House described that penalty as too high in explaining Trump’s decision to wipe it clean. Irving Stitsky Sentenced to serve an 85-year jail term after being convicted of defrauding more than 250 people in a real estate scam worth $23 million, Stitsky was called “an inveterate con man” by the judge in his case. “Mr. Stitsky has reflected on the victims of his crime and the remorse that he now has,” the White House said in a statement explaining Trump’s pardon. Mark Shapiro The founder of the Cobalt Companies, Shapiro was sentenced to 85 years in jail in a $23 million real estate fraud scheme along with two other men. In a statement explaining why Trump had pardoned Shapiro, the White House said he had “renewed his faith in Judaism and taught fellow inmates the dangers of dishonesty.” Another disingenuous rant. Do you really think he should've given everyone there a blanket pardon? I don't even see the most ardent of trump supporters saying that so where does this criticism come from ? The disaffected former Trump supporters are the ones who think he should have pardoned the unguided tour group. It's you guys who are making excuses for why he could find the time for Rod Blagojevic but not the people who showed up for him. Odd, since we know he'd leave us to twist. It's you guys who seem to think it'd be different next time |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: "I just know this judge, jury, Caroll and lawyers are telling the truth about Trump" That was not something I said nor was it even implied. I DO know that you don’t own any guns though. /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/tenor-132.gif Sure it was. And lol I thought it was tragic, not funny. Do you not open guns because you're prohibited, or because you're underaged? |
|
Quoted: The other lady was his wife Ivana. He mistook Carroll for Marla View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Imagine a world where's it's defamation/slander to call your accuser a liar or "crazy" - which that bitch obviously is. As though it's believable that a man who, at the time, was fucking the most beautiful women in the world, would give her even a second glance. It's absurd on its face. The funny part of this At his deposition when shown a picture of her he said it was his wife and had to be corrected by his own attorney This is a perfect example of not being fully aware of the facts in evidence and forming "truths" when the actual evidence says trump thought she looked just like his wife. His words under oath. There is another lady in the picture. Stop the lies. Wrong |
|
Quoted: LOL Jesus At his deposition they showed him a picture of Carrol And asked him who it was. He said his wife. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: There is another lady in the picture. Stop the lies. LOL Jesus At his deposition they showed him a picture of Carrol And asked him who it was. He said his wife. The picture was of both carroll and his wife at the time. |
|
|
Quoted: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/14563/IMG_8016-2946225.jpg https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/14563/IMG_8007-2945927.jpg You're claiming he can't tell one of his wives from the next? That's not bad lol View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Wrong https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/14563/IMG_8007-2945927.jpg You're claiming he can't tell one of his wives from the next? That's not bad lol That's more accurate than saying he mistook Carroll for his wife. |
|
Quoted: I thought it was tragic, not funny. Do you not open guns because you're prohibited, or because you're underaged? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: "I just know this judge, jury, Caroll and lawyers are telling the truth about Trump" That was not something I said nor was it even implied. I DO know that you don’t own any guns though. /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/tenor-132.gif Sure it was. And lol I thought it was tragic, not funny. Do you not open guns because you're prohibited, or because you're underaged? They're making shit up and I laugh. Im sorry you take them seriously. |
|
Quoted: She said it wasn't a physical thing in her interview with Anderson Cooper. She said otherwise in other interviews. So she's lied about it and has zero evidence other than her word, which we already know is not trustworthy. I hope you guys don't have any sons. They'd be terrified to know your opinions. If you do have sons please let them know that you think they'll deserve punishment for claiming they didn't rape someone who has said they did and didn't rape them. Let us know how that goes. What you post is meaningless if you aren't willing to make your beliefs known to those close to you. View Quote Huh? She told Anderson that "he threw her down a raped her." |
|
Quoted: That's more accurate than saying he mistook Carroll for his wife. View Quote okay to be fair you're doing better than Trump's lawyers edit If Trump's lawyer had been on the ball she would have laughed and said "No Mr. Trump that's Ivana." and played it like he meant the other woman, not Carroll. |
|
Quoted: That is the answer and anybody with no ax to grind can see it clearly. She was making unsubstantiated rape claims about a sitting POTUS. Hell, she couldn't even be specific on the date and they had to change the fucking law to even allow her to bring this ancient load of horseshit to court. If that cunt was defamed, what exactly were her damages? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Answer the question- is there evidence of defamation in this case? Yes, no, or “I don’t know”? Defaming her for making fake rape claims? She defamed him. You’re dodging again. Answer the question. That is the answer and anybody with no ax to grind can see it clearly. She was making unsubstantiated rape claims about a sitting POTUS. Hell, she couldn't even be specific on the date and they had to change the fucking law to even allow her to bring this ancient load of horseshit to court. If that cunt was defamed, what exactly were her damages? What she said or didn’t say is irrelevant in this case. She’s not on trial here. Is there evidence that trump was involved in defamation? Yes or no? That’s the trial we’re talking about. |
|
Did he lose it, or did he “loose” it? I think this is twice in the last week I have seen this error.
|
|
|
Quoted: okay to be fair you're doing better than Trump's lawyers edit If Trump's lawyer had been on the ball she would have laughed and said "No Mr. Trump that's Ivana." and played it like he meant the other woman, not Carroll. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: That's more accurate than saying he mistook Carroll for his wife. okay to be fair you're doing better than Trump's lawyers edit If Trump's lawyer had been on the ball she would have laughed and said "No Mr. Trump that's Ivana." and played it like he meant the other woman, not Carroll. The point is that he was in no way equating Carroll to one of his wives. If you want to make the rape accusation stick, you will need a more suspicious picture. Maybe try one without a crowd of people and without his wife standing right there. |
|
Quoted: What she said or didn’t say is irrelevant in this case. She’s not on trial here. Is there evidence that trump was involved in defamation? Yes or no? That’s the trial we’re talking about. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Answer the question- is there evidence of defamation in this case? Yes, no, or “I don’t know”? Defaming her for making fake rape claims? She defamed him. You’re dodging again. Answer the question. That is the answer and anybody with no ax to grind can see it clearly. She was making unsubstantiated rape claims about a sitting POTUS. Hell, she couldn't even be specific on the date and they had to change the fucking law to even allow her to bring this ancient load of horseshit to court. If that cunt was defamed, what exactly were her damages? What she said or didn’t say is irrelevant in this case. She’s not on trial here. Is there evidence that trump was involved in defamation? Yes or no? That’s the trial we’re talking about. Defamation of a woman made famous defaming a president with a rape accusation? Is that the trial we're talking about? |
|
Quoted: You mean Trump's inability to keep his mouth shut has caused him legal peril? I'm shocked. View Quote |
|
Quoted: The point is that he was in no way equating Carroll to one of his wives. If you want to make the rape accusation stick, you will need a more suspicious picture. Maybe try one without a crowd of people and without his wife standing right there. View Quote Civil cases don't always go they way they should, particularly when you don't bother to show up. He's not obligated to go but what do you think the jury thought of that? |
|
Quoted: She said he did it. Two other women came to court and said he grabbed or kissed them against their will, he didn't show up for court. It was a civil case. He lost. He called her a liar again. He's going to keep writing her checks every time he calls her a lair. Civil cases don't always go they way they should, particularly when you don't bother to show up. He's not obligated to go but what do you think the jury thought of that? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The point is that he was in no way equating Carroll to one of his wives. If you want to make the rape accusation stick, you will need a more suspicious picture. Maybe try one without a crowd of people and without his wife standing right there. Civil cases don't always go they way they should, particularly when you don't bother to show up. He's not obligated to go but what do you think the jury thought of that? You actually believe those women? I think the jury thought they were going to stop Trump from running for office and it didn't matter whether he showed or not. That courtroom was going to be like a Trump roast on comedy central. They even rejected the rape accusation themselves in the verdict because it is so obviously absurd and didnt want the consequences of that hanging over them. |
|
Quoted: You actually believe those women? I think the jury thought they were going to stop Trump from running for office and it didn't matter whether he showed or not. That courtroom was going to be like a Trump roast on comedy central. They even rejected the rape accusation themselves in the verdict because it is so obviously absurd and didnt want the consequences of that hanging over them. View Quote Is reading a foreign concept to you? Where in that post you quoted does it say he believes those women? |
|
Quoted: Defamation of a woman made famous defaming a president with a rape accusation? Is that the trial we're talking about? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Answer the question- is there evidence of defamation in this case? Yes, no, or “I don’t know”? Defaming her for making fake rape claims? She defamed him. You’re dodging again. Answer the question. That is the answer and anybody with no ax to grind can see it clearly. She was making unsubstantiated rape claims about a sitting POTUS. Hell, she couldn't even be specific on the date and they had to change the fucking law to even allow her to bring this ancient load of horseshit to court. If that cunt was defamed, what exactly were her damages? What she said or didn’t say is irrelevant in this case. She’s not on trial here. Is there evidence that trump was involved in defamation? Yes or no? That’s the trial we’re talking about. Defamation of a woman made famous defaming a president with a rape accusation? Is that the trial we're talking about? So sue her for defamation. That’s a separate case all together. You’re still not answering the question… why? It’s a simple yes/no question. |
|
Anti Trump demo shills stirring up trouble again to advance the reelection of Biden and the commies.
|
|
|
Quoted: Is reading a foreign concept to you? Where in that post you quoted does it say he believes those women? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: You actually believe those women? I think the jury thought they were going to stop Trump from running for office and it didn't matter whether he showed or not. That courtroom was going to be like a Trump roast on comedy central. They even rejected the rape accusation themselves in the verdict because it is so obviously absurd and didnt want the consequences of that hanging over them. Is reading a foreign concept to you? Where in that post you quoted does it say he believes those women? If he doesn't believe it then he knows the case should be thrown out of a courtroom and dismissed. If he won't say what he believes then he is dishonest and everyone should ignore his opinion. |
|
Quoted: So sue her for defamation. That’s a separate case all together. You’re still not answering the question… why? It’s a simple yes/no question. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Answer the question- is there evidence of defamation in this case? Yes, no, or “I don’t know”? Defaming her for making fake rape claims? She defamed him. You’re dodging again. Answer the question. That is the answer and anybody with no ax to grind can see it clearly. She was making unsubstantiated rape claims about a sitting POTUS. Hell, she couldn't even be specific on the date and they had to change the fucking law to even allow her to bring this ancient load of horseshit to court. If that cunt was defamed, what exactly were her damages? What she said or didn’t say is irrelevant in this case. She’s not on trial here. Is there evidence that trump was involved in defamation? Yes or no? That’s the trial we’re talking about. Defamation of a woman made famous defaming a president with a rape accusation? Is that the trial we're talking about? So sue her for defamation. That’s a separate case all together. You’re still not answering the question… why? It’s a simple yes/no question. He should sue her but not in NYC. She accused him of rape. She defamed him. If she can't prove her rape accusation then she shouldn't be allowed in a courtroom to sue the guy she accused for defamation. This falls on the judge. |
|
Quoted: He should sue her but not in NYC. She accused him of rape. She defamed him. If she can't prove her rape accusation then she shouldn't be allowed in a courtroom to sue the guy she accused for defamation. This falls on the judge. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: He should sue her but not in NYC. She accused him of rape. She defamed him. If she can't prove her rape accusation then she shouldn't be allowed in a courtroom to sue the guy she accused for defamation. This falls on the judge. She DID prove it in a court of law. The jury unanimously said so. The jury reached a unanimous decision on May 9, after deliberating for less than three hours.[120] Considering the preponderance of the evidence, the jury delivered a verdict that first stated that Carroll had not proven that Trump raped her, and next stated that Carroll did prove that Trump had sexually abused her, and also stated that Trump defamed Carroll with false statements made with actual malice in the October 2022 Truth Social post; thus the jury awarded Carroll a total of $5 million in damages from Trump. ETA: Sexual assault, not rape. I should have clarified that earlier. |
|
Quoted: She DID prove it in a court of law. The jury unanimously said so. ETA: Sexual assault, not rape. I should have clarified that earlier. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: He should sue her but not in NYC. She accused him of rape. She defamed him. If she can't prove her rape accusation then she shouldn't be allowed in a courtroom to sue the guy she accused for defamation. This falls on the judge. She DID prove it in a court of law. The jury unanimously said so. The jury reached a unanimous decision on May 9, after deliberating for less than three hours.[120] Considering the preponderance of the evidence, the jury delivered a verdict that first stated that Carroll had not proven that Trump raped her, and next stated that Carroll did prove that Trump had sexually abused her, and also stated that Trump defamed Carroll with false statements made with actual malice in the October 2022 Truth Social post; thus the jury awarded Carroll a total of $5 million in damages from Trump. ETA: Sexual assault, not rape. I should have clarified that earlier. Lol She said she was raped...who is lying? Carroll or the jury? Both is my answer. Eta: she said she was raped. |
|
Quoted: Lol She said she was raped...who is lying? Carroll or the jury? Both is my answer. Eta: she said she was raped. View Quote Anyway here's the missing witness charge. https://www.nycourts.gov/JUDGES/evidence/6-WITNESSES/6.10.1_Missing_Witness.pdf Sorry I couldn't find the preponderance of the evidence charge, I'm on my phone, but it's basically a "more likely than not." You can call all these women liars on the internet, but Trump didn't even show up for his trial. He was lucky to dodge the rape charge and only get sexual assault, so his lawyers planted some skepticism in the jurors' minds |
|
|
Hey siri, who was trump talking about when he said he loves the poorly educated?
Siri: Quoted: If he doesn't believe it then he knows the case should be thrown out of a courtroom and dismissed. If he won't say what he believes then he is dishonest and everyone should ignore his opinion. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted: When Trump misidentified Carroll as his ex wife and was corrected he didn't say "no, I meant her" pointing out his wife he said "well the photo's blurry" Anyway here's the missing witness charge. https://www.nycourts.gov/JUDGES/evidence/6-WITNESSES/6.10.1_Missing_Witness.pdf Sorry I couldn't find the preponderance of the evidence charge, I'm on my phone, but it's basically a "more likely than not." You can call all these women liars on the internet, but Trump didn't even show up for his trial. He was lucky to dodge the rape charge and only get sexual assault, so his lawyers planted some skepticism in the jurors' minds View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Lol She said she was raped...who is lying? Carroll or the jury? Both is my answer. Eta: she said she was raped. Anyway here's the missing witness charge. https://www.nycourts.gov/JUDGES/evidence/6-WITNESSES/6.10.1_Missing_Witness.pdf Sorry I couldn't find the preponderance of the evidence charge, I'm on my phone, but it's basically a "more likely than not." You can call all these women liars on the internet, but Trump didn't even show up for his trial. He was lucky to dodge the rape charge and only get sexual assault, so his lawyers planted some skepticism in the jurors' minds Well, those women are liars. And she said she was raped. She also said rape is sexy. That judge and those jurors have no shame. |
|
Quoted: IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT I BELIEVE. The jury unanimously believed her after hearing testimony from all concerned. That's all that matters. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Lol and you believe that? IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT I BELIEVE. The jury unanimously believed her after hearing testimony from all concerned. That's all that matters. So you want us to accept the outcome and trust that the system did its job when you can't even say you believe these women and their accusations? That's a lot of faith you have in the strategy to destroy Trump. |
|
We are at the place where they are actually beginning to jail people for wrong think, and some of you fuckers are cheering it on.
|
|
Here is the position of anti trumpers currently:
I don't really believe these women or their accusations but Trump should be punished for running for president. The jury did their job. That's it in a nutshell. They'll say the same thing when the next biased jury hands out their verdict. |
|
Quoted: Here is the position of anti trumpers currently: I don't really believe these women or their accusations but Trump should be punished for running for president. The jury did their job. That's it in a nutshell. They'll say the same thing when the next biased jury hands out their verdict. View Quote Not only a dumb post, but (intentionally) inaccurate and dumb. |
|
Quoted: Not only a dumb post, but (intentionally) inaccurate and dumb. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Here is the position of anti trumpers currently: I don't really believe these women or their accusations but Trump should be punished for running for president. The jury did their job. That's it in a nutshell. They'll say the same thing when the next biased jury hands out their verdict. Not only a dumb post, but (intentionally) inaccurate and dumb. Ok, i think it's the truth and you're trying to hide your intentions. |
|
The system is the system. Trumps lawyers failed to refute the evidence. The jury was convinced by the plaintiffs lawyers to pass the verdict in her favor.
Trumps lawyers helped select those jurors with the rules set forth by the system. Trump lost because he hires shitty lawyers. |
|
|
I haven’t kept up on the details around the case but sexual assault was proven according to a jury but rape wasn’t?
I’m guessing now we have to throw out the whole jury system because obviously they were rigged against Trump. Is that what I’m gathering from this thread? |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.