User Panel
Quoted:
It will just mitigate the damage that is being done. Nothing more. Money is to be made. But the overall economy will remain depressed and we have a major debt crisis coming in 16-20 years that the electorate doesn't give a shit about. It's good to see you're optimistic, again. The correct date is about 5-10 years. |
|
Like normal, those who work in the industry and know what they are talking about are drowned out by NIMBY FUDs.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Sure there's oil in them thar hills. Fracking also pollutes the local water supply. No water, no life. Want a game changer? Univ of Milan demonstrated fusion but the US refused the patent. Provide a link to a peer reviewed study. I'll be waiting. They have been fracking oil wells in the Midwest for decades. |
|
Quoted: i live in fracking central -southwest pa. the real problem with fracking is what is done with the brine after the well has been fracked. a lot of that shit is ending up in the monongahela river the river that supplies all of south west pa with water SWPA here too. That's about the only real thing I've heard about as well. They ordered the companies to dispose of the brine water differently and now the bromide levels have come down... Frack on and get my gas prices lower while pumping some more much needed cash into our local economy Speed |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
i live in fracking central -southwest pa. the real problem with fracking is what is done with the brine after the well has been fracked. a lot of that shit is ending up in the monongahela river the river that supplies all of south west pa with water SWPA here too. That's about the only real thing I've heard about as well. They ordered the companies to dispose of the brine water differently and now the bromide levels have come down... Frack on and get my gas prices lower while pumping some more much needed cash into our local economy Speed Well the best part is they are using the water since it is filled with salt and of course radioactive materials on the roads to melt snow and ice. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Risk comes with all forms of energy production. So how bad do you want it? Not one person posting in this thread knows what chemicals are involved in this process. Humor me. Actually there are several of us posting in this thread who know....and have explained it at length...but don't take our word for it, do your own research: http://fracfocus.org/chemical-use/chemicals-public-disclosure Hydrochloric Acid- Concentrated hydrochloric acid (fuming hydrochloric acid) forms acidic mists. Both the mist and the solution have a corrosive effect on human tissue, with the potential to damage respiratory organs, eyes, skin, and intestines. Upon mixing hydrochloric acid with common oxidizing chemicals, such as sodium hypochlorite (bleach, NaClO) or potassium permanganate (KMnO4), the toxic gas chlorine is produced Glutaraldehyde- As a strong disinfectant, glutaraldehyde is toxic and can cause severe eye, nose, throat, and lung irritation, along with headaches, drowsiness and dizziness. It is a main source of occupational asthma among health care providers Quaternary ammonium cation- Quaternary ammonium compounds can display a range of health effects, amongst which are mild skin and respiratory irritation [11] up to severe caustic burns on skin and gastro-intestinal lining (depending on concentration), gastro-intestinal symptoms (e.g., nausea and vomiting), coma, convulsions, hypotension and death.[12] They are thought to be the chemical group responsible for anaphylactic reactions that occur with use of neuromuscular blocking drugs during general anaesthesia in surgery.[13] Quaternium-15 is the single most often found cause of allergic contact dermatitis of the hands (16.5% in 959 cases)[14] [edit] Reproductive effects of trace amounts Quaternary ammonium-based disinfectants (Virex and Quatricide) were tentatively identified (by researcher Patricia Hunt - who previously uncovered the reproductive system effects of bisphenol A) and were also identified by researchers at other labs, as the most probable cause of jumps in birth defects and fertility problems in caged lab mice OK so by posting that list are you trying to reassure people that this whole process is safe?? the three things I just posted are the first 3 on the LOOOONG list of shit in the fracking chemistry and I don't know about you but I am not reassured. What you need to do is start drinking this stuff on a regular basis and come back and tell me in a couple of years how you feel then you can frack away. I guess my point is really moot though because the fix is in and all the politicians (at least th ones in PA) are bought off and the fracking is here so you win and now we are the health test case. What you seem either unable or unwilling to comprehend is the fact that there is no way for frac fluid to contaminate groundwater, nor has there ever been a documented case of this occuring. It's like you pick and choose little snippets of information without considering the entire picture...and make strawman and post hoc propter hoc arguments. Ever hear of 'falacious logic'? You gots it. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: i live in fracking central -southwest pa. the real problem with fracking is what is done with the brine after the well has been fracked. a lot of that shit is ending up in the monongahela river the river that supplies all of south west pa with water SWPA here too. That's about the only real thing I've heard about as well. They ordered the companies to dispose of the brine water differently and now the bromide levels have come down... Frack on and get my gas prices lower while pumping some more much needed cash into our local economy Speed Well the best part is they are using the water since it is filled with salt and of course radioactive materials on the roads to melt snow and ice. The federal government used to give radioactive waste sludge to rural counties to dump on dirt roads This is nothing Speed |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
i live in fracking central -southwest pa. the real problem with fracking is what is done with the brine after the well has been fracked. a lot of that shit is ending up in the monongahela river the river that supplies all of south west pa with water SWPA here too. That's about the only real thing I've heard about as well. They ordered the companies to dispose of the brine water differently and now the bromide levels have come down... Frack on and get my gas prices lower while pumping some more much needed cash into our local economy Speed Well the best part is they are using the water since it is filled with salt and of course radioactive materials on the roads to melt snow and ice. RADIATION?!! BAN IT> ITS FOR THE LIFE!!!!!!1!! |
|
Has anyone pointed out yet that there is no "k" in fracing????
And by the way, frac on!!! |
|
JIP, what I was getting at yesterday is your fallacious logic that something in X quantity that is bad for you is bad for you in Y quantity.
You probably eat foods that are treated with ammonia. I would like you to drink a glass of ammonia every day and get back to us in two year. Salt in large quantities will kill you, so stop eating salt. Water in large quantities will kill you, so stop drinking water. Also, you claim that chemicals that are extremely diluted are basically useless. So stop eating trace minerals, you body probably doesn't really need them anyway. |
|
Quoted:
JIP, what I was getting at yesterday is your fallacious logic that something in X quantity that is bad for you is bad for you in Y quantity. You probably eat foods that are treated with ammonia. I would like you to drink a glass of ammonia every day and get back to us in two year. Salt in large quantities will kill you, so stop eating salt. Water in large quantities will kill you, so stop drinking water. Also, you claim that chemicals that are extremely diluted are basically useless. So stop eating trace minerals, you body probably doesn't really need them anyway. But if you eat food, you'll eventually die I support banning food so no one ever will die. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Sure there's oil in them thar hills. Fracking also pollutes the local water supply. No water, no life. Want a game changer? Univ of Milan demonstrated fusion but the US refused the patent. Have been 40,000+ frack jobs in Kansas since the first one in 1947, not a single instance of a groundwater aquifer harmed by the fracking process. We have a few plumes from surface spills and poor disposal practices in the 50's & 60's, but nothing caused by the fracking itself. Here we are fracking at 5,000 feet and the aquifer is 700 ft at its deepest. Give around 4,000 feet of shales and limestones as a buffer against the fluids migrating. |
|
Quoted:
JIP, what I was getting at yesterday is your fallacious logic that something in X quantity that is bad for you is bad for you in Y quantity. You probably eat foods that are treated with ammonia. I would like you to drink a glass of ammonia every day and get back to us in two year. Salt in large quantities will kill you, so stop eating salt. Water in large quantities will kill you, so stop drinking water. Also, you claim that chemicals that are extremely diluted are basically useless. So stop eating trace minerals, you body probably doesn't really need them anyway. Drinking oil and gas is bad for you, and it is already in the ground. In fact, the earth below you is full of nasty things that are bad for you. We don't get many poisonous compounds from outer space. |
|
Quoted:
Well the best part is they are using the water since it is filled with salt and of course radioactive materials on the roads to melt snow and ice. I'm convinced you're a nut. A real loony granola. You do know that these "of course radioactive materials" are NORM. Right? Do you protest brickmasons and cement companies because of their NORM as well? I went to your "catskill mountain keeper" site and read the original article from ithaca journal which is based almost exclusively on an interview with a Mr. Walter Hang, the President of "Toxics Targeting". Let me requote Mr. Hang and some of that article of which you base your post from, so that we all have an understanding of Mr. Hang and his company called "Toxics Targeting". Several New York municipalities are using contaminated wastewater from natural gas drilling operations as part of their road and highway maintenance programs according to an Ithaca-based environmental activist.
... The fluid often contains brine, heavy metals and radioactive materials, said Walter Hang, president of Toxics Targeting in Ithaca. ... The attitude is that it's just salty water that comes up with the gas, but people are just going to be shocked that they were being exposed to the contaminated wastewater through DEC-sanctioned dumping programs without any comprehensive health assessment," Hang said. The DEC contends the use of the wastewater is safe for purposes such as keeping dust levels down during road construction and as a de-icer in winter. The wastewater it approves for "beneficial use" comes from non-shale vertical wells that are drilled in New York, which rules out the brine produced in out-of-state wells that have been subjected to high-volume hydraulic fracturing. "We consider the source, the potential use, the characteristics of the water itself, and where it would be applied," said DEC spokesman Michael Bopp. ... Hang has posted to his website, www.toxicstargeting.com, detailed information mapping the roads where the wastewater is used, the municipalities that have applied to the DEC for permission to apply the wastewater to road surfaces –– usually by spraying –– and the DEC's approval of the applications. ... "wastewater brine" lol. Try production water. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
JIP, what I was getting at yesterday is your fallacious logic that something in X quantity that is bad for you is bad for you in Y quantity. You probably eat foods that are treated with ammonia. I would like you to drink a glass of ammonia every day and get back to us in two year. Salt in large quantities will kill you, so stop eating salt. Water in large quantities will kill you, so stop drinking water. Also, you claim that chemicals that are extremely diluted are basically useless. So stop eating trace minerals, you body probably doesn't really need them anyway. Drinking oil and gas is bad for you, and it is already in the ground. In fact, the earth below you is full of nasty things that are bad for you. We don't get many poisonous compounds from outer space. OH MY GAWD YOURE RIGHT. EVERONE WHO LIVES ON EARTH EVENTUALLY DIES!!!!!!! BAN THE EARTH!!!!! ITS FOR THE LIFE!!!!!! |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
JIP, what I was getting at yesterday is your fallacious logic that something in X quantity that is bad for you is bad for you in Y quantity. You probably eat foods that are treated with ammonia. I would like you to drink a glass of ammonia every day and get back to us in two year. Salt in large quantities will kill you, so stop eating salt. Water in large quantities will kill you, so stop drinking water. Also, you claim that chemicals that are extremely diluted are basically useless. So stop eating trace minerals, you body probably doesn't really need them anyway. Drinking oil and gas is bad for you, and it is already in the ground. In fact, the earth below you is full of nasty things that are bad for you. We don't get many poisonous compounds from outer space. OH MY GAWD YOURE RIGHT. EVERONE WHO LIVES ON EARTH EVENTUALLY DIES!!!!!!! BAN THE EARTH!!!!! ITS FOR THE LIFE!!!!!! Life? Everyone who ever lived has died? Ban life for life! ETA: tablet posting is tough with fat fingers. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
JIP, what I was getting at yesterday is your fallacious logic that something in X quantity that is bad for you is bad for you in Y quantity. You probably eat foods that are treated with ammonia. I would like you to drink a glass of ammonia every day and get back to us in two year. Salt in large quantities will kill you, so stop eating salt. Water in large quantities will kill you, so stop drinking water. Also, you claim that chemicals that are extremely diluted are basically useless. So stop eating trace minerals, you body probably doesn't really need them anyway. Drinking oil and gas is bad for you, and it is already in the ground. In fact, the earth below you is full of nasty things that are bad for you. We don't get many poisonous compounds from outer space. OH MY GAWD YOURE RIGHT. EVERONE WHO LIVES ON EARTH EVENTUALLY DIES!!!!!!! BAN THE EARTH!!!!! ITS FOR THE LIFE!!!!!! I guess the only logical solution is to ban life... This site doesn't use the term ninja'd enough. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
JIP, what I was getting at yesterday is your fallacious logic that something in X quantity that is bad for you is bad for you in Y quantity. You probably eat foods that are treated with ammonia. I would like you to drink a glass of ammonia every day and get back to us in two year. Salt in large quantities will kill you, so stop eating salt. Water in large quantities will kill you, so stop drinking water. Also, you claim that chemicals that are extremely diluted are basically useless. So stop eating trace minerals, you body probably doesn't really need them anyway. Drinking oil and gas is bad for you, and it is already in the ground. In fact, the earth below you is full of nasty things that are bad for you. We don't get many poisonous compounds from outer space. OH MY GAWD YOURE RIGHT. EVERONE WHO LIVES ON EARTH EVENTUALLY DIES!!!!!!! BAN THE EARTH!!!!! ITS FOR THE LIFE!!!!!! I think I should stop breathing. My respiration causes cellular oxidation... the leading cause of death. Goodbye arfcom, I shall now start holding my breath. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
JIP, what I was getting at yesterday is your fallacious logic that something in X quantity that is bad for you is bad for you in Y quantity. You probably eat foods that are treated with ammonia. I would like you to drink a glass of ammonia every day and get back to us in two year. Salt in large quantities will kill you, so stop eating salt. Water in large quantities will kill you, so stop drinking water. Also, you claim that chemicals that are extremely diluted are basically useless. So stop eating trace minerals, you body probably doesn't really need them anyway. Drinking oil and gas is bad for you, and it is already in the ground. In fact, the earth below you is full of nasty things that are bad for you. We don't get many poisonous compounds from outer space. OH MY GAWD YOURE RIGHT. EVERONE WHO LIVES ON EARTH EVENTUALLY DIES!!!!!!! BAN THE EARTH!!!!! ITS FOR THE LIFE!!!!!! I think I should stop breathing. My respiration causes cellular oxidation... the leading cause of death. Goodbye arfcom, I shall now start holding my breath. Oh gee... what did I start? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
JIP, what I was getting at yesterday is your fallacious logic that something in X quantity that is bad for you is bad for you in Y quantity. You probably eat foods that are treated with ammonia. I would like you to drink a glass of ammonia every day and get back to us in two year. Salt in large quantities will kill you, so stop eating salt. Water in large quantities will kill you, so stop drinking water. Also, you claim that chemicals that are extremely diluted are basically useless. So stop eating trace minerals, you body probably doesn't really need them anyway. Drinking oil and gas is bad for you, and it is already in the ground. In fact, the earth below you is full of nasty things that are bad for you. We don't get many poisonous compounds from outer space. OH MY GAWD YOURE RIGHT. EVERONE WHO LIVES ON EARTH EVENTUALLY DIES!!!!!!! BAN THE EARTH!!!!! ITS FOR THE LIFE!!!!!! I think I should stop breathing. My respiration causes cellular oxidation... the leading cause of death. Goodbye arfcom, I shall now start holding my breath. Oh gee... what did I start? I don't know, but we should ban it. Naturally, you are also banned as the cause. |
|
Quoted:
I don't know, but we should ban it. Naturally, you are also banned as the cause. Seeing as it led to the death of maleante... you're probably right. We should all go edit our posts... for the life. |
|
Quoted:
The worst thing I see about fracking is they use up the local water supply. Here we are in the 3rd year of the worst drought in 50 years and folks are selling their water to the oil companies. That and farmers are irrigating their fuel source corn crops like there is no tomorrow. Once used it is never recovered. I like cheap energy and a robust economy but we cannot survive without water. I would worry a lot more about all the circles of irrigated corn destined for ethanol. Kansas will have about 2,000 acre-feet used for oil drilling this year, equivalent to about 10 circles irrigating a corn crop. 2,000 AF to drill 100's of wells that will produce for a few years or 2,000 AF for 10 circles going to a government welfare crop? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
JIP, what I was getting at yesterday is your fallacious logic that something in X quantity that is bad for you is bad for you in Y quantity. You probably eat foods that are treated with ammonia. I would like you to drink a glass of ammonia every day and get back to us in two year. Salt in large quantities will kill you, so stop eating salt. Water in large quantities will kill you, so stop drinking water. Also, you claim that chemicals that are extremely diluted are basically useless. So stop eating trace minerals, you body probably doesn't really need them anyway. Drinking oil and gas is bad for you, and it is already in the ground. In fact, the earth below you is full of nasty things that are bad for you. We don't get many poisonous compounds from outer space. OH MY GAWD YOURE RIGHT. EVERONE WHO LIVES ON EARTH EVENTUALLY DIES!!!!!!! BAN THE EARTH!!!!! ITS FOR THE LIFE!!!!!! I think I should stop breathing. My respiration causes cellular oxidation... the leading cause of death. Goodbye arfcom, I shall now start holding my breath. Oh gee... what did I start? I don't know, but we should ban it. Naturally, you are also banned as the cause. But every one who has ever been banned has eventuallly died. Ban banning stuff. Its for life. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
JIP, what I was getting at yesterday is your fallacious logic that something in X quantity that is bad for you is bad for you in Y quantity. You probably eat foods that are treated with ammonia. I would like you to drink a glass of ammonia every day and get back to us in two year. Salt in large quantities will kill you, so stop eating salt. Water in large quantities will kill you, so stop drinking water. Also, you claim that chemicals that are extremely diluted are basically useless. So stop eating trace minerals, you body probably doesn't really need them anyway. Drinking oil and gas is bad for you, and it is already in the ground. In fact, the earth below you is full of nasty things that are bad for you. We don't get many poisonous compounds from outer space. OH MY GAWD YOURE RIGHT. EVERONE WHO LIVES ON EARTH EVENTUALLY DIES!!!!!!! BAN THE EARTH!!!!! ITS FOR THE LIFE!!!!!! I guess the only logical solution is to ban life... This site doesn't use the term ninja'd enough. We just have to move to the Moon. The statistics show it is clearly healthier. Only 12 men have ever walked on the moon. If those still alive all died today, they would have averaged 77 years. That is longer than the average life expectancy of people who have only walked on Earth. The evidence is clear. |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
JIP, what I was getting at yesterday is your fallacious logic that something in X quantity that is bad for you is bad for you in Y quantity. You probably eat foods that are treated with ammonia. I would like you to drink a glass of ammonia every day and get back to us in two year. Salt in large quantities will kill you, so stop eating salt. Water in large quantities will kill you, so stop drinking water. Also, you claim that chemicals that are extremely diluted are basically useless. So stop eating trace minerals, you body probably doesn't really need them anyway. Drinking oil and gas is bad for you, and it is already in the ground. In fact, the earth below you is full of nasty things that are bad for you. We don't get many poisonous compounds from outer space. OH MY GAWD YOURE RIGHT. EVERONE WHO LIVES ON EARTH EVENTUALLY DIES!!!!!!! BAN THE EARTH!!!!! ITS FOR THE LIFE!!!!!! I guess the only logical solution is to ban life... This site doesn't use the term ninja'd enough. We just have to move to the Moon. The statistics show is is clearly healthier. Only 12 men have ever walked on the moon. If those still alive all died today, they would have averaged 77 years. That is longer than the average life expectancy of people who have only walked on Earth. The evidence is clear. GOD DAMN You're RIGHT. I knew I was on to something when I said we needed to ban earth. Packing my bags now. But what if you'd never die on another palnet? Can we send JIP to venus to find out? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
We just have to move to the Moon. The statistics show is is clearly healthier. Only 12 men have ever walked on the moon. If those still alive all died today, they would have averaged 77 years. That is longer than the average life expectancy of people who have only walked on Earth. The evidence is clear. GOD DAMN You're RIGHT. I knew I was on to something when I said we needed to ban earth. Packing my bags now. But what if you'd never die on another palnet? Can we send JIP to venus to find out? It's true, nobody has ever died on the moon. Real estate is going to get very expensive, very quickly when the secret gets out. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
JIP, what I was getting at yesterday is your fallacious logic that something in X quantity that is bad for you is bad for you in Y quantity. You probably eat foods that are treated with ammonia. I would like you to drink a glass of ammonia every day and get back to us in two year. Salt in large quantities will kill you, so stop eating salt. Water in large quantities will kill you, so stop drinking water. Also, you claim that chemicals that are extremely diluted are basically useless. So stop eating trace minerals, you body probably doesn't really need them anyway. Drinking oil and gas is bad for you, and it is already in the ground. In fact, the earth below you is full of nasty things that are bad for you. We don't get many poisonous compounds from outer space. OH MY GAWD YOURE RIGHT. EVERONE WHO LIVES ON EARTH EVENTUALLY DIES!!!!!!! BAN THE EARTH!!!!! ITS FOR THE LIFE!!!!!! I guess the only logical solution is to ban life... This site doesn't use the term ninja'd enough. We just have to move to the Moon. The statistics show is is clearly healthier. Only 12 men have ever walked on the moon. If those still alive all died today, they would have averaged 77 years. That is longer than the average life expectancy of people who have only walked on Earth. The evidence is clear. GOD DAMN You're RIGHT. I knew I was on to something when I said we needed to ban earth. Packing my bags now. But what if you'd never die on another palnet? Can we send JIP to venus to find out? i think he'd prefer uranus |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
We just have to move to the Moon. The statistics show is is clearly healthier. Only 12 men have ever walked on the moon. If those still alive all died today, they would have averaged 77 years. That is longer than the average life expectancy of people who have only walked on Earth. The evidence is clear. GOD DAMN You're RIGHT. I knew I was on to something when I said we needed to ban earth. Packing my bags now. But what if you'd never die on another palnet? Can we send JIP to venus to find out? It's true, nobody has ever died on the moon. Real estate is going to get very expensive, very quickly when the secret gets out. Mars is better. No one has lived on it, therefore no one has died. It has no liquid water to overdose on or contaminate with fracing juice. It has a negligible amount of oxygen in the atmosphere. This atmosphere is also thin enough to keep global warming at bay. Without clouds, solar energy will be viable, further eliminating the need to frac or utilize combustion for heat. Move to mars, for life, for country, and for the kids. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: JIP, what I was getting at yesterday is your fallacious logic that something in X quantity that is bad for you is bad for you in Y quantity. You probably eat foods that are treated with ammonia. I would like you to drink a glass of ammonia every day and get back to us in two year. Salt in large quantities will kill you, so stop eating salt. Water in large quantities will kill you, so stop drinking water. Also, you claim that chemicals that are extremely diluted are basically useless. So stop eating trace minerals, you body probably doesn't really need them anyway. Drinking oil and gas is bad for you, and it is already in the ground. In fact, the earth below you is full of nasty things that are bad for you. We don't get many poisonous compounds from outer space. OH MY GAWD YOURE RIGHT. EVERONE WHO LIVES ON EARTH EVENTUALLY DIES!!!!!!! BAN THE EARTH!!!!! ITS FOR THE LIFE!!!!!! I think I should stop breathing. My respiration causes cellular oxidation... the leading cause of death. Goodbye arfcom, I shall now start holding my breath. Yer gonna turn blue..... |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Sure there's oil in them thar hills. Fracking also pollutes the local water supply. No water, no life. Want a game changer? Univ of Milan demonstrated fusion but the US refused the patent. Please tell us precisely how fracing pollutes the ground water. This ought to be good. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile I have worked all over Texas/New Mexico installing GPS monitors in fleets of trucks for the oil service industry. We would stay in a town for a day or two and move on to the next. Most of the small towns now have impotable well water. Talking to the local people, they say it became contaminated after they started fraking. The water smells like it has ammonia or something in it, i wouldn't even wash my hands with that shit. |
|
Quoted:
Sure there's oil in them thar hills. Fracking also pollutes the local water supply. No water, no life. Want a game changer? Univ of Milan demonstrated fusion but the US refused the patent. STFU. Due to the constraints of the COC I am not allowed to call you a piss ignorant fuck head. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Of course. They can't lie on the Internet. I read that on the Internet. Clearly didn't click link. Ha. You're correct. Thought you were the previous poster. Thought remains true. I would like to see some peer reviewed literature. I'm confident that studies will show that planned fraking will be safe and a boon for the US. Fracking isn't that bad to be honest. It doesn't pollute the water supply. What DOES pollute the water supply are workers that half ass shit. Leave valves open when they shouldn't, don't fix leaks, not checking seals like they should. Basically cutting corners. That creates a problem and in turn does lead to water supply contamination. A leak or open valve at 8000psi most certainly gets fixed. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile I think he's referring to the general fluid handling activities involved throughout the completion and production processes. Then it appears that there are two of you that have no idea what he is talking about. There is no valve to leave open between the hydrocarbon producing formations where fracking takes place and groundwater aquifers. None. Nor are there leaks, seals to change or neglect, or corners to cut that would cross contaminate these formations seperated by thousands of feet of rock, steel, and concrete. The boreholes passing through the groundwater formations have pipe cemented in place all the way to the bottom of the well....inside of pipe cemented in place for thousands of feet above and below them....inside of pipe cemented in place for hundreds of feet above and below them. Anything spilled on the surface has to be reported to the EPA and remediated to EPA standards. This is a rare occurance and the chances of a surface spill being of sufficent size to penetrate hundreds or thousands of feet down to the groundwater are nearly zero. I work in the industry and I have had a belly full of willfully ignorant useful idiots spouting bullshit about groundwater being polluted by fracking operations. There has not been ONE instance with definative proof of this occuring out of tens of thousands of wells drilled and completed using fracking technology. You can bullshit the fans....but you can't bullshit the fucking players. Well said. Thanks for saving me the time. I'm trying to hunt. |
|
Quoted:
Fracking is the pumping of unknown chemicals and water into the ground. The chemicals are not being released to the public as the companies are saying it's information they don't want to release. Our water comes from the ground from underground reservoirs and rivers. This shit is polluting it. Should be illegal. Find another way to do it safely. Why can't they just use seawater? Why the chemicals and freshwater? http://www.salon.com/2012/07/09/confirmed_fracking_can_pollute/ http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/dec/09/epa-reports-fracking-groundwater-pollution http://www.nrdc.org/energy/fracking-wastewater.asp If we were face to face I would calmly explain what a total and complete dumbass you are. But as we are on the arfcom, and the COC prevents that, l simply say you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Sure there's oil in them thar hills. Fracking also pollutes the local water supply. No water, no life. Want a game changer? Univ of Milan demonstrated fusion but the US refused the patent. Please tell us precisely how fracing pollutes the ground water. This ought to be good. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile I have worked all over Texas/New Mexico installing GPS monitors in fleets of trucks for the oil service industry. We would stay in a town for a day or two and move on to the next. Most of the small towns now have impotable well water. Talking to the local people, they say it became contaminated after they started fraking. The water smells like it has ammonia or something in it, i wouldn't even wash my hands with that shit. I work all over western OK, the TX panhandle, KS and live in the OK panhandle. My well water is just fine and I've never encountered anything different. There are wells all around my house that have been fraced. I spend most of my time fracing in Canadian TX. There are hundreds of wells around Canadian. I've never heard anyone complain, but I'll take your word for it. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
Quoted: Sure there's oil in them thar hills. Fracking also pollutes the local water supply. No water, no life. Want a game changer? Univ of Milan demonstrated fusion but the US refused the patent. Go watch more burning water fauxumenteries hippy |
|
Our water table is anywhere from 10ft to 1500'. The oil wells are being faced a little deeper than 15,000. I am not concerned. Ymmv I have heard about framing shallow natural gas wells elsewhere. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
i live in fracking central -southwest pa. the real problem with fracking is what is done with the brine after the well has been fracked. a lot of that shit is ending up in the monongahela river the river that supplies all of south west pa with water SWPA here too. That's about the only real thing I've heard about as well. They ordered the companies to dispose of the brine water differently and now the bromide levels have come down... Frack on and get my gas prices lower while pumping some more much needed cash into our local economy Speed Well the best part is they are using the water since it is filled with salt and of course radioactive materials on the roads to melt snow and ice. You realize that this has nothing to do with fracing right? NY has had a moratorium on hydraulic fracing. This is production water from plain old vertical wells that have been used all over the U.S. since the 1900s. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Sure there's oil in them thar hills. Fracking also pollutes the local water supply. No water, no life. Want a game changer? Univ of Milan demonstrated fusion but the US refused the patent. Please tell us precisely how fracing pollutes the ground water. This ought to be good. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile I have worked all over Texas/New Mexico installing GPS monitors in fleets of trucks for the oil service industry. We would stay in a town for a day or two and move on to the next. Most of the small towns now have impotable well water. Talking to the local people, they say it became contaminated after they started fraking. The water smells like it has ammonia or something in it, i wouldn't even wash my hands with that shit. Stop it Stop it you are a troll, the only people qualified to comment on this subject are the ones that think it is a great idea the rest are nuts. Those people should be charged for the flavoring in their water and appreciate the gift that the fracKers are giving them. By the way I hope all you geniuses are right about this stuff as I am stuck smack dab in the middle of fracKing country and the money will always win out forget the health of the people. Really though I am inclined to believe the gas people/companies because they have never lied to use before about environmental impacts of their money making ventures tight??. |
|
Quoted:
Has anyone pointed out yet that there is no "k" in fracing???? And by the way, frac on!!! I did on page 4. No idea how the idiots added a K to the term Hydraulic Fracturing |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Has anyone pointed out yet that there is no "k" in fracing???? And by the way, frac on!!! I did on page 4. No idea how the idiots added a K to the term Hydraulic Fracturing Only functional retards with no background in chemistry, physics, geology, hydrology and drilling spell it with the K because they watch too much BSG. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The worst thing I see about fracking is they use up the local water supply. Here we are in the 3rd year of the worst drought in 50 years and folks are selling their water to the oil companies. That and farmers are irrigating their fuel source corn crops like there is no tomorrow. Once used it is never recovered. I like cheap energy and a robust economy but we cannot survive without water. No. Fracking is a few hour job that doesn't take huge volumes of water. It is high pressure but not a lot of flow into the formation. Now actually drilling the hole takes a lot of water but even that is usually only a month or two. They also use water to pump down the well (in places, usually old fields) and dilute the oil to get it to the surface, but that is recovery, not fracking. As Pssutton says, fracking takes place way down hole and is completely isolated from the surface. If the fracking chemicals could get into groundwater, it would have to mean the casing is holed and the gas or oil would leak into the groundwater as well, which obviously cannot be allowed to happen besides which it's to valuable to allow to escape. please somebody get this guy a beer. Like I said, bad timing for draining our ponds and small lakes for energy recovery. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Sure there's oil in them thar hills. Fracking also pollutes the local water supply. No water, no life. Want a game changer? Univ of Milan demonstrated fusion but the US refused the patent. So where's your proof? Show me the fucking evidence where fracing directly pollutes the local water supply. I'll be waiting Link More proof in the video I posted above. Where's the guy saying I'm misinformed now??? Perhaps you need to look into what exactly proof is. Even the researches do not agree with your claim of proof. In an interview, Jackson said that gas was more likely to migrate underground than liquid chemicals. Based on his findings, he doesn’t believe the toxic chemicals pumped into the ground during fracturing are likely to end up in water supplies the same way the methane did. “I’m not ready to use the word impossible,” he said, “but unlikely.” In a white paper the group issued along with the journal article, Jackson and the others acknowledged the uncertainty and called for more research. “Contamination is often stated to be impossible due to the distance between the well and the drinking water,” they wrote. “Although this seems reasonable in most (and possibly all) cases, field and modeling studies should be undertaken to confirm this assumption. ... Understanding any cases where this assumption is incorrect will be important—when, where, and why they occur—to limit problems with hydraulic fracturing operations.” " |
|
***SNIP––SNIP***
Perhaps you need to look into what exactly proof is. Even the researches do not agree with your claim of proof. In an interview, Jackson said that gas was more likely to migrate underground than liquid chemicals. Based on his findings, he doesn’t believe the toxic chemicals pumped into the ground during fracturing are likely to end up in water supplies the same way the methane did. “I’m not ready to use the word impossible,” he said, “but unlikely.” In a white paper the group issued along with the journal article, Jackson and the others acknowledged the uncertainty and called for more research. “Contamination is often stated to be impossible due to the distance between the well and the drinking water,” they wrote. “Although this seems reasonable in most (and possibly all) cases, field and modeling studies should be undertaken to confirm this assumption. ... Understanding any cases where this assumption is incorrect will be important—when, where, and why they occur—to limit problems with hydraulic fracturing operations.” I think since the school in Buffalo shut down it's fracking research department (I know it is called something different and I don't care so don't bother correcting me) as nothing but a propaganda wing for the frackers all research that is pro fracking should come into question. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
***SNIP––SNIP*** Perhaps you need to look into what exactly proof is. Even the researches do not agree with your claim of proof. In an interview, Jackson said that gas was more likely to migrate underground than liquid chemicals. Based on his findings, he doesn’t believe the toxic chemicals pumped into the ground during fracturing are likely to end up in water supplies the same way the methane did. “I’m not ready to use the word impossible,” he said, “but unlikely.” In a white paper the group issued along with the journal article, Jackson and the others acknowledged the uncertainty and called for more research. “Contamination is often stated to be impossible due to the distance between the well and the drinking water,” they wrote. “Although this seems reasonable in most (and possibly all) cases, field and modeling studies should be undertaken to confirm this assumption. ... Understanding any cases where this assumption is incorrect will be important—when, where, and why they occur—to limit problems with hydraulic fracturing operations.” I think since the school in Buffalo shut down it's fracking research department (I know it is called something different and I don't care so don't bother correcting me) as nothing but a propaganda wing for the frackers all research that is pro fracking should come into question. http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f76/larkintulsa/crazyguy.gif I am not sure what that is supposed to mean but OK, either way this did happen and you can look up SUNY Buffalo shutting this down or look up the link I posted earlier in this thread or do nothing I don't really care. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
***SNIP––SNIP*** Perhaps you need to look into what exactly proof is. Even the researches do not agree with your claim of proof. In an interview, Jackson said that gas was more likely to migrate underground than liquid chemicals. Based on his findings, he doesn’t believe the toxic chemicals pumped into the ground during fracturing are likely to end up in water supplies the same way the methane did. “I’m not ready to use the word impossible,” he said, “but unlikely.” In a white paper the group issued along with the journal article, Jackson and the others acknowledged the uncertainty and called for more research. “Contamination is often stated to be impossible due to the distance between the well and the drinking water,” they wrote. “Although this seems reasonable in most (and possibly all) cases, field and modeling studies should be undertaken to confirm this assumption. ... Understanding any cases where this assumption is incorrect will be important—when, where, and why they occur—to limit problems with hydraulic fracturing operations.” I think since the school in Buffalo shut down it's fracking research department (I know it is called something different and I don't care so don't bother correcting me) as nothing but a propaganda wing for the frackers all research that is pro fracking should come into question. http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f76/larkintulsa/crazyguy.gif I am not sure what that is supposed to mean but OK, either way this did happen and you can look up SUNY Buffalo shutting this down or look up the link I posted earlier in this thread or do nothing I don't really care. Do nothing, as in not respond to arguments posted towards you? |
|
Quoted: the same epa that is helping obama push his cap and trade without legislation that classifies CO2 as a deadly pollutant? that epa?Quoted: Quoted: Fracking is the pumping of unknown chemicals and water into the ground. The chemicals are not being released to the public as the companies are saying it's information they don't want to release. Our water comes from the ground from underground reservoirs and rivers. This shit is polluting it. Should be illegal. Jesus man, try educating yourself a little. Honestly I hope this is sarcasm. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Read the link I made hot. It only makes sense when you pump chemicals and shit into the ground that water supplies can be contaminated. The EPA has confirmed it at this location. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
***SNIP––SNIP*** Perhaps you need to look into what exactly proof is. Even the researches do not agree with your claim of proof. In an interview, Jackson said that gas was more likely to migrate underground than liquid chemicals. Based on his findings, he doesn’t believe the toxic chemicals pumped into the ground during fracturing are likely to end up in water supplies the same way the methane did. “I’m not ready to use the word impossible,” he said, “but unlikely.” In a white paper the group issued along with the journal article, Jackson and the others acknowledged the uncertainty and called for more research. “Contamination is often stated to be impossible due to the distance between the well and the drinking water,” they wrote. “Although this seems reasonable in most (and possibly all) cases, field and modeling studies should be undertaken to confirm this assumption. ... Understanding any cases where this assumption is incorrect will be important—when, where, and why they occur—to limit problems with hydraulic fracturing operations.” I think since the school in Buffalo shut down it's fracking research department (I know it is called something different and I don't care so don't bother correcting me) as nothing but a propaganda wing for the frackers all research that is pro fracking should come into question. http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f76/larkintulsa/crazyguy.gif I am not sure what that is supposed to mean but OK, either way this did happen and you can look up SUNY Buffalo shutting this down or look up the link I posted earlier in this thread or do nothing I don't really care. Do nothing, as in not respond to arguments posted towards you? Please clarify this, did I miss something?. |
|
Quoted:
Please clarify this, did I miss something?. Pretty much. You made claims about certain things being dangerous, without regard to concentration levels. I, and others, addressed that with examples like salt and water. Then you counter-intuitively argue that they are so diluted that they probably don't really have an effect anyway. Nor have I seen you actually address the criticism made several times about your source not saying what you claim it said. You always divert when that is brought up. Would you be willing to drink a cup of ammonia every day for two years? |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.