Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 13
Link Posted: 8/23/2017 12:22:03 PM EST
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


The video I posted above FF to 2:18.
View Quote


I doubt they only have one lookout during a strait transit.  They should be at sea and anchor detail.
Blue water ops, sure.

If Lippold only had one lookout posted during a SOM transit, he should have been fired.

Either way.
Lookout doctrine and WQSB is up to the Ship's Captain, not 7th Fleet.
Link Posted: 8/23/2017 12:25:57 PM EST
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Cool, more shit you found on twitter that has nothing to do with the fake news you posted earlier.

Good job, buddy.
Link Posted: 8/23/2017 12:44:36 PM EST
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Gotcha.

My ship does a pretty good job with nav rules.  OODs get grilled virtually every watch by CO, XO, or OPS. Night orders almost always have a rule or section of a rule that the watch section must read aloud and discuss (even if we've been over that one 10 times before) and our CO requires OODs to take the closed book DWO exam annually.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
My version of "adequate" is the one I was held to for my 3/M license - memorized every Rule word for word in order to score 100% on the exam. 
Gotcha.

My ship does a pretty good job with nav rules.  OODs get grilled virtually every watch by CO, XO, or OPS. Night orders almost always have a rule or section of a rule that the watch section must read aloud and discuss (even if we've been over that one 10 times before) and our CO requires OODs to take the closed book DWO exam annually.
I took my 1600 Master/3rd mate at the same time, I found the 3rd mate exam to be easier IMO, aside from the navigation module. 11 modules, I took the 3rd mate version in the morning and 1600 master in the afternoon.
Link Posted: 8/23/2017 12:48:35 PM EST
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Down to only one lookout now.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Does the Navy still post lookout? Talked with my dad who said many years ago they had four lookouts on watch.
Down to only one lookout now.
No way.  Especially not during sea and anchor.
Link Posted: 8/23/2017 12:56:41 PM EST
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Cool, more shit you found on twitter that has nothing to do with the fake news you posted earlier.

Good job, buddy.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Cool, more shit you found on twitter that has nothing to do with the fake news you posted earlier.

Good job, buddy.
You know, if ya'll don't quote him the rest of us don't have to read his tripe.
Link Posted: 8/23/2017 2:11:29 PM EST
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


So history repeated itself of the Andrea Doria collision in the 1950's. I'm sure that wasn't even the first collision or mishap due to radar scale errors.

After all this time, haven't they made it super obvious what radar or map scale you're on?
View Quote
It was correct on one map scale but incorrect on another map scale.
Link Posted: 8/23/2017 2:29:30 PM EST
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Cool, more shit you found on twitter that has nothing to do with the fake news you posted earlier.

Good job, buddy.
View Quote
Get back to us when you can find 10 fatalities from a Navy ship collision in the past fifty years besides the ones in 2017, broseph. You reading comprehension is terrible. 1) Navy ship collisions are rare 2) Fatalities from ship collisions are rarer. To have so many happen in such a short period of time is historically uncommon.
Link Posted: 8/23/2017 3:07:32 PM EST
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


You know, if ya'll don't quote him the rest of us don't have to read his tripe.
View Quote
You make an excellent point.  I'll stop helping him derail the thread with his fake news from twatter so we can hear from folks who know what the hell theyre talking about.  Sorry for helping him screw up an otherwise informative thread.
Link Posted: 8/23/2017 3:54:48 PM EST
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Get back to us when you can find 10 fatalities from a Navy ship collision in the past fifty years besides the ones in 2017, broseph. You reading comprehension is terrible. 1) Navy ship collisions are rare 2) Fatalities from ship collisions are rarer. To have so many happen in such a short period of time is historically uncommon.
View Quote
Even more rare than a Navy ship collision or fatalities from ship collisions is evidence of a successful cyber attack against a Navy ship. Get back to us when there is evidence, not just idle unsupported speculation.
Link Posted: 8/23/2017 4:59:41 PM EST
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Get back to us when you can find 10 fatalities from a Navy ship collision in the past fifty years besides the ones in 2017, broseph. You reading comprehension is terrible. 1) Navy ship collisions are rare 2) Fatalities from ship collisions are rarer. To have so many happen in such a short period of time is historically uncommon.
View Quote
USS Frank E Evans, June 3, 1969.  74 dead.  At the time, there was a big shake-up in the surface warfare community.  Surface Warfare qualifications, and the pin, came in.  Unfortunately, some ships handed the SWO pins out without proof of competency, or even a reasonable time at sea.    I earned my SWO pin during my second deployment.

On USS Waddell (DDG-24), in the mid-1980's, you had to earn the SWO pin.  Our CO was one of the best, Ed Kristensen.
Link Posted: 8/23/2017 5:30:39 PM EST
[#11]
My dad was Navy and a commercial fisherman captain. I've spent my entire life on and in the water. Seeing these recent events with our Navy is really disheartening.  I know as well as anyone that shit happens (I've sunk a boat - no fatalities). I think a lot of the discussion is because we expect better. I want to know that if I'm vaporized because of an icbm that my Navy is out there kicking ass.
Link Posted: 8/23/2017 5:45:57 PM EST
[#12]
There were earlier comments concerning the amount of maintenance being performed while underway and how it increased availability. That's a double edged sword that can create it's own problems with incomplete testing and inspection as well as crew fatigue. No idea yet if that was a contributing factor, but it does raise some questions.

Bottom line is that there are 10 dead Americans and a compromised U.S. warship. The families, friends, shipmates, and loved ones of every one of them deserve honest answers.
Link Posted: 8/23/2017 6:26:31 PM EST
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
There were earlier comments concerning the amount of maintenance being performed while underway and how it increased availability. That's a double edged sword that can create it's own problems with incomplete testing and inspection as well as crew fatigue. No idea yet if that was a contributing factor, but it does raise some questions.

Bottom line is that there are 10 dead Americans and a compromised U.S. warship. The families, friends, shipmates, and loved ones of every one of them deserve honest answers.
View Quote
17 dead and two warships.
Link Posted: 8/23/2017 6:33:22 PM EST
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
17 dead and two warships.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
There were earlier comments concerning the amount of maintenance being performed while underway and how it increased availability. That's a double edged sword that can create it's own problems with incomplete testing and inspection as well as crew fatigue. No idea yet if that was a contributing factor, but it does raise some questions.

Bottom line is that there are 10 dead Americans and a compromised U.S. warship. The families, friends, shipmates, and loved ones of every one of them deserve honest answers.
17 dead and two warships.
You're right.
Link Posted: 8/24/2017 1:54:09 AM EST
[#15]
I saw this picture posted on pg 1.  A question, I didn't see answered. Looked like some thought it was a photo of ships underway in the Straits of Malacca.



I see one wake/wheelwash. This looks like an anchorage to me, not a shit ton of ships making way. I've been through Houston and Mississippi/South West Pass Anchorages and seen this many, many times.

As far as stopping a vessel underway goes, at 20:45:30, collision with a reef. Speed goes from 16kt to 7kts in seconds. Dead ship, engineering spaces flooded. Momentum carries the ship to 21:12:00. Ship comes to a stop, rotating broadside to the wind. Wind has it. Making .7kt, .8kt, 'till it wasn't.

Grounding of Costa Concordia - video made by Automatic Identification System (AIS)


I've heard they tried to steer with thrusters, but they didn't do anything momentum and the wind didn't want them to.

Attachment Attached File



34 years in the wheelhouse. Just started looking at this thread.
Link Posted: 8/24/2017 2:11:42 AM EST
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I saw this picture posted on pg 1.  A question, I didn't see answered. Looked like some thought it was a photo of ships underway in the Straits of Malacca.

http://a9.vietbao.vn/images/vn999/165/2015/05/20150518-tq-thai-lan-hop-tac-xay-kenh-dao-de-khong-phai-di-qua-eo-malacca-2.jpg

I see one wake/wheelwash. This looks like an anchorage to me, not a shit ton of ships making way. I've been through Houston and Mississippi/South West Pass Anchorages and seen this many, many times.
<snip>
View Quote
I had the same thought... most don't look to be underway.  Even given that the speed limit in the Strait is a stately 12 kts, you'd think you'd see at least some screw wash.  But even if that's not the case, if everyone is holding course and running at the same speed... yeah it's a bit crowded, but nothing to sweat the load over.
Link Posted: 8/24/2017 6:55:06 AM EST
[#17]
This is an interesting piece relative to this discussion.

https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2017-08/collisions-part-i%E2%80%94what-are-root-causes
Link Posted: 8/24/2017 10:01:56 AM EST
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
This is an interesting piece relative to this discussion.

https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2017-08/collisions-part-i%E2%80%94what-are-root-causes
View Quote
Warriors vs.politicians and social progressives.
Link Posted: 8/24/2017 10:08:10 AM EST
[#19]
Another  This Is What the Navy Doesn't Want You to Know about Its Deadly Ship Crashes

Reputable commentators point out that the U.S. Navy fleet is overworked. The United States has taken on countless foreign commitments over the years while shedding ships, planes and armaments to save the taxpayers money. In short, the nation is living beyond its naval means.

Generational change is also at work in today’s navy. We oldtimers stood aghast in the early 2000s when the navy in its wisdom decided to shut down training for junior officers—also known as division officers—en route to their first ships. These are officers to whom skippers entrust the operation of vital systems. In yesteryear, division officers spent months at the Surface Warfare Officers School sites in Newport or Coronado, which is where they learned everything from the rudiments of navigation and piloting to the intricacies of engineering and weapons. After the training shutdown, though, division officers were issued a stack of CD-ROMs containing instructional materials, sent to sea, and told to learn it themselves under the tutelage of extraordinarily busy skippers.

No passenger wants to board an airliner flown by a self-taught pilot—but in effect the navy expected newcomers to surface warfare to school themselves on topics of like technical sophistication.  Guess where that generation of officers now stands in the naval hierarchy: they’re ship executive officers—in other words, commanding officers in waiting. It’s doubtful the reports on the USS Fitzgerald or USS McCain disasters will trace human problems back to those officers’ earliest days in uniform. Still, you have to wonder whether bad decisions back then are rippling into naval operations today.
View Quote
Link Posted: 8/24/2017 10:44:35 AM EST
[#20]
http://www.c7f.navy.mil/Media/News/Display/Article/1287947/us-navy-identifies-1-dead-and-9-missing-uss-john-s-mccain-sailors-as-search-and/
Link Posted: 8/24/2017 2:28:05 PM EST
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
@Josh

Are Port and Starboard lookouts still posted?

I assume they still have aft lookout during normal operations?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
@Josh

Are Port and Starboard lookouts still posted?

I assume they still have aft lookout during normal operations?
On a Burke you have fwd and aft typically with the fwd hanging out on the bridge wing.

Quoted:
http://www.c7f.navy.mil/Media/News/Display/Article/1287947/us-navy-identifies-1-dead-and-9-missing-uss-john-s-mccain-sailors-as-search-and/
Lots of CE guys on that list, makes me wonder if Aft IC flooded out. Shitty.
Link Posted: 8/24/2017 2:50:39 PM EST
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


On a Burke you have fwd and aft typically with the fwd hanging out on the bridge wing.



Lots of CE guys on that list, makes me wonder if Aft IC flooded out. Shitty.
View Quote
Did that pretty much wipe out the whole geek squad?
Link Posted: 8/24/2017 3:03:50 PM EST
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Why do you care so much? Just let it go.
View Quote
For all his faults, McCain's involvement in the Forrestal fire was that he was there.  He didn't start it.  Hell, I think all of it is on film - there is no disputing it.

If one wishes to be mad about it, be mad about the navy forcing the ship to take old, improperly stored, and unstable ordnance.
Link Posted: 8/24/2017 3:56:18 PM EST
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Hell, I think all of it is on film - there is no disputing it.
View Quote
So is the moonwalk.
Link Posted: 8/24/2017 3:57:28 PM EST
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


So history repeated itself of the Andrea Doria collision in the 1950's. I'm sure that wasn't even the first collision or mishap due to radar scale errors.

After all this time, haven't they made it super obvious what radar or map scale you're on?
View Quote
The book about the collision between the Andrea Doria and the Stockholm was a good read in the day.
Link Posted: 8/24/2017 4:12:13 PM EST
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Did that pretty much wipe out the whole geek squad?
View Quote
Maybe half of the CE guys, most of the ITs (CC Div) are in radio. Makes me more curious about the alleged steering failure. They're all male names so it's also conceivable that they were all in that berthing next to Aft IC (4 I think). Too early to tell at this point.
Link Posted: 8/24/2017 5:58:28 PM EST
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Lots of CE guys on that list, makes me wonder if Aft IC flooded out. Shitty.
View Quote
It sure looks like that was CE Division's berthing space.
Link Posted: 8/24/2017 9:11:41 PM EST
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It sure looks like that was CE Division's berthing space.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Lots of CE guys on that list, makes me wonder if Aft IC flooded out. Shitty.
It sure looks like that was CE Division's berthing space.
Probably both.
Link Posted: 8/26/2017 5:35:33 AM EST
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It sure looks like that was CE Division's berthing space.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Lots of CE guys on that list, makes me wonder if Aft IC flooded out. Shitty.
It sure looks like that was CE Division's berthing space.
That would be a nightmare 
Link Posted: 8/26/2017 7:58:17 PM EST
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It sure looks like that was CE Division's berthing space.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Lots of CE guys on that list, makes me wonder if Aft IC flooded out. Shitty.
It sure looks like that was CE Division's berthing space.
If aft IC is flooded, the ship took a massive hit or somebody left the water tight door open.  It is possible that berthing 5 was CE Div berthing. That berthing is tiny and cramped compared to some of the other berthing.
Link Posted: 8/26/2017 8:53:29 PM EST
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Maybe half of the CE guys, most of the ITs (CC Div) are in radio. Makes me more curious about the alleged steering failure. They're all male names so it's also conceivable that they were all in that berthing next to Aft IC (4 I think). Too early to tell at this point.
View Quote
JSM is an all male ship, with the exception of a few female officers.
Link Posted: 8/26/2017 10:57:51 PM EST
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


JSM is an all male ship, with the exception of a few female officers.
View Quote
It had to be the berthing.

When would ETs' or ICs' be found below the main deck?

When they are sleeping.
Link Posted: 8/26/2017 11:06:59 PM EST
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It had to be the berthing.

When would ETs' or ICs' be found below the main deck?

When they are sleeping.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


JSM is an all male ship, with the exception of a few female officers.
It had to be the berthing.

When would ETs' or ICs' be found below the main deck?

When they are sleeping.
Or in Aft IC.
Link Posted: 8/26/2017 11:13:34 PM EST
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Or in Aft IC.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:


JSM is an all male ship, with the exception of a few female officers.
It had to be the berthing.

When would ETs' or ICs' be found below the main deck?

When they are sleeping.
Or in Aft IC.
Yeah, think berthing or aft IC.  Most guys would be on watch during sea and anchor (assuming sea and anchor was set), not just lounging in berthing though.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 2:23:50 PM EST
[#35]
Sounds like they have finally recovered the remains of all crew members.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 2:27:22 PM EST
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Sounds like they have finally recovered the remains of all crew members.
View Quote
Saw that on the news  this morning. 
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 2:52:43 PM EST
[#37]
One thing for sure if this was terrorism we will know ten years from now. Also maybe the Chinese or Russians have a new weapon
than can distort GPS signals and weapon guidance systems. Clearly the quietness on latest events says alot
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 3:00:10 PM EST
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Sounds like they have finally recovered the remains of all crew members.
View Quote
RIP Sailors.  
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 3:01:09 PM EST
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
One thing for sure if this was terrorism we will know ten years from now. Also maybe the Chinese or Russians have a new weapon
than can distort GPS signals and weapon guidance systems. Clearly the quietness on latest events says alot
View Quote
Because the bridge crews weren't supposed to also be looking out the windows for incoming ships?

The collision alarm is supposed to sound before the collision, not afterward.

Kharn
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 3:02:34 PM EST
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
One thing for sure if this was terrorism we will know ten years from now. Also maybe the Chinese or Russians have a new weapon
than can distort GPS signals and weapon guidance systems. Clearly the quietness on latest events says alot
View Quote
They don't even need to use it on our ships. Easier to use it on the container ships. Look at whats being deployed in Cuba with that sonic weapon that's putting our people at the embassy in the hospital.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 3:09:22 PM EST
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
That right there is a great example of the shit sandwich that's very easy to happen in crowded areas.

IIRC, the Beks Halil was overtaking the other ship, got way too close, and the water being displaced by the Beks Halil forced the stern of the smaller ship to starboard (which would push the bow to port)

The Beks Halil can't turn to port, they are in a head on situation with another ship.  The smaller ship can't turn too hard to starboard, thier stern can get sucked in to the Beks Halil.  Ultimately they decided to do (almost) nothing and they took the hit.  The smaller ship could have tried a very (very) shallow turn to starboard, but that could put them in front of the ship the video is being taken from.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:



Here, same area, almost the same strike too. This is why you don't cross in front of ships.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmDybTIxrJc
That right there is a great example of the shit sandwich that's very easy to happen in crowded areas.

IIRC, the Beks Halil was overtaking the other ship, got way too close, and the water being displaced by the Beks Halil forced the stern of the smaller ship to starboard (which would push the bow to port)

The Beks Halil can't turn to port, they are in a head on situation with another ship.  The smaller ship can't turn too hard to starboard, thier stern can get sucked in to the Beks Halil.  Ultimately they decided to do (almost) nothing and they took the hit.  The smaller ship could have tried a very (very) shallow turn to starboard, but that could put them in front of the ship the video is being taken from.
That was ego that led to the impact. 
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 3:19:38 PM EST
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
That was ego that led to the impact. 
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:



Here, same area, almost the same strike too. This is why you don't cross in front of ships.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmDybTIxrJc
That right there is a great example of the shit sandwich that's very easy to happen in crowded areas.

IIRC, the Beks Halil was overtaking the other ship, got way too close, and the water being displaced by the Beks Halil forced the stern of the smaller ship to starboard (which would push the bow to port)

The Beks Halil can't turn to port, they are in a head on situation with another ship.  The smaller ship can't turn too hard to starboard, thier stern can get sucked in to the Beks Halil.  Ultimately they decided to do (almost) nothing and they took the hit.  The smaller ship could have tried a very (very) shallow turn to starboard, but that could put them in front of the ship the video is being taken from.
That was ego that led to the impact. 
Well then.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 3:29:53 PM EST
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
One thing for sure if this was terrorism we will know ten years from now. Also maybe the Chinese or Russians have a new weapon
than can distort GPS signals and weapon guidance systems. Clearly the quietness on latest events says alot
View Quote
Just stop.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 3:38:31 PM EST
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
One thing for sure if this was terrorism we will know ten years from now. Also maybe the Chinese or Russians have a new weapon
than can distort GPS signals and weapon guidance systems. Clearly the quietness on latest events says alot
View Quote
Are they hacking watchstanders and making them not see huge, CBDR ships?  
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 5:26:09 PM EST
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Are they hacking watchstanders and making them not see huge, CBDR ships?  
View Quote
I heard they ran a honeypot on the OOD and it's all his fault.
Link Posted: 8/30/2017 6:22:07 PM EST
[#46]
So just got back from meeting with some DESRON1 officers. Their opinion is that the current pace of deployment is unsustainable; they are stretched too thin and have to many requirements for training that is not relevant to surface operations. PC BS. Crews are over deployed, too thin, too new, and training for the wrong things.

Thanks Obama.
Link Posted: 8/30/2017 6:41:50 PM EST
[#47]
Not meaning to derail the thread, but the Navy made a video, detailing the disaster mentioned above.  A fascinating watch.

I Relieve you Sir (1975 training film about the USS Frank E. Evans DD754 Collision)
Link Posted: 8/30/2017 10:36:46 PM EST
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So just got back from meeting with some DESRON1 officers. Their opinion is that the current pace of deployment is unsustainable; they are stretched too thin and have to many requirements for training that is not relevant to surface operations. Crews are over deployed, too thin, too new, and training for the wrong things.
View Quote
Similar takeaways from the meetings I was in (different region).
Link Posted: 9/4/2017 6:33:54 PM EST
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
One thing for sure if this was terrorism we will know ten years from now. Also maybe the Chinese or Russians have a new weapon
than can distort GPS signals and weapon guidance systems. Clearly the quietness on latest events says alot
View Quote
Interestingly enough, I just found this article.

http://maritime-executive.com/editorials/mass-gps-spoofing-attack-in-black-sea
Link Posted: 9/4/2017 7:28:13 PM EST
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So just got back from meeting with some DESRON1 officers. Their opinion is that the current pace of deployment is unsustainable; they are stretched too thin and have to many requirements for training that is not relevant to surface operations. PC BS. Crews are over deployed, too thin, too new, and training for the wrong things.

Thanks Obama.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So just got back from meeting with some DESRON1 officers. Their opinion is that the current pace of deployment is unsustainable; they are stretched too thin and have to many requirements for training that is not relevant to surface operations. PC BS. Crews are over deployed, too thin, too new, and training for the wrong things.

Thanks Obama.
Do you mean building a ship with exactly the minimum number of personnel required to keep it functioning, and then losing personnel to real world events, political good idea fairies, recruiting cut-backs, draw-downs, etc, means it's hard to keep running at anywhere near the expected op tempo?

Quoted:
Quoted:
Are they hacking watchstanders and making them not see huge, CBDR ships?  
I heard they ran a honeypot on the OOD and it's all his fault.
But his USMC uniform was soooo convincing and he could do 30 pull-ups.

Kharn
Page / 13
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top