User Panel
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: It's somewhat entertaining to me when they put a qualifier on their label. It's not whoring to them, it's nonmonogamy. And it's not just nonmonogamy, it's ethical nonmonogamy. Because, somehow, in their twisted minds, calling it ethical excuses away the heinous criminal nature of it. Adultery should be a crime (because, morally, it *is* a crime, against the spouse who wanted - and thought they were getting - a faithful spouse). Of course, the aggrieved party should be able to plead on the criminal's behalf, and I'm not certain exactly how that should play out, but calling this woman anything other than a dirty whore is being dishonest. Because that's all she is. She likes sex? Great, that's why you have a husband, go sex him. Marriage is a contract. The terms of everybody’s marriage need not be the same. Me? I’m more of a traditionalist, but it doesn’t bother me if others are different. That’s on them, but so are the consequence when trying to run for public office. Marriage is a covenant. Only the bastardized globohomo Satanists have been working hard to secularize you into believing that "it's just a contract, just a piece of paper". And what have been the results of this agenda? Does it appear unwise and counter productive? The traditional terms are the best terms. You don't lower the bar to be "inclusive", because then you get diversity and equity too. No, no. You set the standard high. marriage was always a contract The "turn Texas blue" people must love it when you do their bidding. |
|
Quoted: The "turn Texas blue" people must love it when you do their bidding. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: It's somewhat entertaining to me when they put a qualifier on their label. It's not whoring to them, it's nonmonogamy. And it's not just nonmonogamy, it's ethical nonmonogamy. Because, somehow, in their twisted minds, calling it ethical excuses away the heinous criminal nature of it. Adultery should be a crime (because, morally, it *is* a crime, against the spouse who wanted - and thought they were getting - a faithful spouse). Of course, the aggrieved party should be able to plead on the criminal's behalf, and I'm not certain exactly how that should play out, but calling this woman anything other than a dirty whore is being dishonest. Because that's all she is. She likes sex? Great, that's why you have a husband, go sex him. Marriage is a contract. The terms of everybody’s marriage need not be the same. Me? I’m more of a traditionalist, but it doesn’t bother me if others are different. That’s on them, but so are the consequence when trying to run for public office. Marriage is a covenant. Only the bastardized globohomo Satanists have been working hard to secularize you into believing that "it's just a contract, just a piece of paper". And what have been the results of this agenda? Does it appear unwise and counter productive? The traditional terms are the best terms. You don't lower the bar to be "inclusive", because then you get diversity and equity too. No, no. You set the standard high. marriage was always a contract The "turn Texas blue" people must love it when you do their bidding. How’s that? The history of marriage bother you that much? Moses’ marriage was a contract between himself and Zipporah’s father. Are you saying they were liberal? The only thing that’s different is that women negotiate their own marriage contract now. Like I said- my marriage is very traditional (my voting record too). Not everyone is like that. |
|
Quoted: Those two are not good at sex. Even her blowjobs are basically the bare minimum. She thinks she's good a fucking just because she's mildly attractive and present. There's absolutely no passion to this woman. View Quote It’s like on of those V6 mustache with a dual exhaust and cobra badges. Looks great until you see it in action, then it still looks great while it performs like the budget car nobody actually wants. She is unwanted. |
|
Quoted: It’s like on of those V6 mustache with a dual exhaust and cobra badges. Looks great until you see it in action, then it still looks great while it performs like the budget car nobody actually wants. She is unwanted. View Quote For 40 years old, she's got a body that puts her in the top 5% of women her age. Maybe even top 3%. |
|
Quoted: For 40 years old, she's got a body that puts her in the top 5% of women her age. Maybe even top 3%. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: It’s like on of those V6 mustache with a dual exhaust and cobra badges. Looks great until you see it in action, then it still looks great while it performs like the budget car nobody actually wants. She is unwanted. For 40 years old, she's got a body that puts her in the top 5% of women her age. Maybe even top 3%. yup, would definitely intercourse her |
|
|
Quoted: For 40 years old, she's got a body that puts her in the top 5% of women her age. Maybe even top 3%. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: It’s like on of those V6 mustache with a dual exhaust and cobra badges. Looks great until you see it in action, then it still looks great while it performs like the budget car nobody actually wants. She is unwanted. For 40 years old, she's got a body that puts her in the top 5% of women her age. Maybe even top 3%. I wonder how much of that was paid for |
|
I didn't care about Bill Clinton getting blowjobs.
This doesn't bother me either. It's their policy positions that bother me, not their sexual positions. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: It’s like on of those V6 mustache with a dual exhaust and cobra badges. Looks great until you see it in action, then it still looks great while it performs like the budget car nobody actually wants. She is unwanted. For 40 years old, she's got a body that puts her in the top 5% of women her age. Maybe even top 3%. I wonder how much of that was paid for the tits probably were, the rest of her looks like she doesn't hit golden corral and has a fairly active lifestyle |
|
|
|
Quoted: I didn't care about Bill Clinton getting blowjobs. This doesn't bother me either. It's their policy positions that bother me, not their sexual positions. View Quote Yeah. Lets just ignore that she’s a fucking whack job that brings the internet into her bedroom to perform for people throwing coins. Lets just debate the issues with her like she’s not a loon that belongs nowhere near that debate. |
|
|
|
Quoted: I have no issue with what she did on chaturbate in itself. I do have an issue with her doing that, hiding it, lashing out and calling it "revenge porn," and then being incredibly sanctimonious about telling me how to live my life. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: This will not be a popular post, but I will say it anyway. If we are going to act indignant about this woman acting like a whore, consistency would have demanded that we not support Trump given his drama with stormy Daniels, and various derogatory things he has said about women. I'm not saying that his faults in that area are as extreme as this woman. But they are of the same nature, and we excused it in him, and act indignant about it in her. If we were consistent, we would reject such behavior in all candidates. Everyone here should fully expect the left to overlook her faults, the way we overlooked trumps faults. We are way beyond the point where everyone ought to understand that voting for the lesser evil, motivated by the politics of revenge, leads us to a bad place. Here we are. I have no issue with what she did on chaturbate in itself. I do have an issue with her doing that, hiding it, lashing out and calling it "revenge porn," and then being incredibly sanctimonious about telling me how to live my life. |
|
Quoted: this, but also Trumps slutiness is trashy as well. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: This will not be a popular post, but I will say it anyway. If we are going to act indignant about this woman acting like a whore, consistency would have demanded that we not support Trump given his drama with stormy Daniels, and various derogatory things he has said about women. I'm not saying that his faults in that area are as extreme as this woman. But they are of the same nature, and we excused it in him, and act indignant about it in her. If we were consistent, we would reject such behavior in all candidates. Everyone here should fully expect the left to overlook her faults, the way we overlooked trumps faults. We are way beyond the point where everyone ought to understand that voting for the lesser evil, motivated by the politics of revenge, leads us to a bad place. Here we are. I have no issue with what she did on chaturbate in itself. I do have an issue with her doing that, hiding it, lashing out and calling it "revenge porn," and then being incredibly sanctimonious about telling me how to live my life. funnyly enough, I don't remember T$ having a chaturbate or only fans page. In fact everything about him was 3rd party hearsay or him bullshitting with his homeys like just about every other red blooded male does |
|
Sounds like she understands politics perfectly. She'll take to Washington like a duck to water.
|
|
|
Quoted: funnyly enough, I don't remember T$ having a chaturbate or only fans page. In fact everything about him was 3rd party hearsay or him bullshitting with his homeys like just about every other red blooded male does View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: This will not be a popular post, but I will say it anyway. If we are going to act indignant about this woman acting like a whore, consistency would have demanded that we not support Trump given his drama with stormy Daniels, and various derogatory things he has said about women. I'm not saying that his faults in that area are as extreme as this woman. But they are of the same nature, and we excused it in him, and act indignant about it in her. If we were consistent, we would reject such behavior in all candidates. Everyone here should fully expect the left to overlook her faults, the way we overlooked trumps faults. We are way beyond the point where everyone ought to understand that voting for the lesser evil, motivated by the politics of revenge, leads us to a bad place. Here we are. I have no issue with what she did on chaturbate in itself. I do have an issue with her doing that, hiding it, lashing out and calling it "revenge porn," and then being incredibly sanctimonious about telling me how to live my life. funnyly enough, I don't remember T$ having a chaturbate or only fans page. In fact everything about him was 3rd party hearsay or him bullshitting with his homeys like just about every other red blooded male does I know I pay porn stars to hang out with me all the time. Nothing sexual though - we just talk about literature and current events. Cheating on your wife is no big deal either, I promise. |
|
Quoted: Yeah. Lets just ignore that she’s a fucking whack job that brings the internet into her bedroom to perform for people throwing coins. Lets just debate the issues with her like she’s not a loon that belongs nowhere near that debate. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I didn't care about Bill Clinton getting blowjobs. This doesn't bother me either. It's their policy positions that bother me, not their sexual positions. Yeah. Lets just ignore that she’s a fucking whack job that brings the internet into her bedroom to perform for people throwing coins. Lets just debate the issues with her like she’s not a loon that belongs nowhere near that debate. I don't give a fuck if it's two gay guys videoing themselves giving each other blow jobs so long as the person supports the Constitution as written, small government, less taxes, secure borders, small government spending, secure voting and leaves me the fuck alone. But in this case we know she is dirty commie so her sex life doesn't matter. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
View Quote |
|
|
Welp, she's definitely going to win now.....
.... Hunter Biden saw her on the news, he's putting his team together to get her the victory. Hunter doesn't lose. |
|
Quoted: I don't give a fuck if it's two gay guys videoing themselves giving each other blow jobs so long as the person supports the Constitution as written, small government, less taxes, secure borders, small government spending, secure voting and leaves me the fuck alone. But in this case we know she is dirty commie so her sex life doesn't matter. View Quote What she did and how she has tried to spin it as "illegal revenge porn" legitimately calls into question her judgment, and her fitness to be making laws that I am supposed to follow. Even if being a camwhore generally may not be an issue. |
|
Quoted: What she did and how she has tried to spin it as "illegal revenge porn" legitimately calls into question her judgment, and her fitness to be making laws that I am supposed to follow. Even if being a camwhore generally may not be an issue. View Quote Of course, she is a dirty commie. |
|
Quoted:
View Quote Attached File |
|
Quoted: Quoted: What she did and how she has tried to spin it as "illegal revenge porn" legitimately calls into question her judgment, and her fitness to be making laws that I am supposed to follow. Even if being a camwhore generally may not be an issue. Of course, she is a dirty commie. There's a good argument that she violated state prostitution law. Zero chance the local (female democrat) prosecutor pursues it, but I'm not interested in following any laws she enacts. |
|
Quoted: What she did and how she has tried to spin it as "illegal revenge porn" legitimately calls into question her judgment, and her fitness to be making laws that I am supposed to follow. Even if being a camwhore generally may not be an issue. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I don't give a fuck if it's two gay guys videoing themselves giving each other blow jobs so long as the person supports the Constitution as written, small government, less taxes, secure borders, small government spending, secure voting and leaves me the fuck alone. But in this case we know she is dirty commie so her sex life doesn't matter. What she did and how she has tried to spin it as "illegal revenge porn" legitimately calls into question her judgment, and her fitness to be making laws that I am supposed to follow. Even if being a camwhore generally may not be an issue. It just came out that she was given a heads up by (I forget which major left news website) giving her a chance to delete the videos before the other website published the article. She then turned around and claimed this revenge porn thing. What a great way to make a mockery of every woman who legitimately had their lives ruined. Scum whore will do great as a dem. |
|
Okay so I got to see some of the video.
Oh my god I am laughing my ass off. There is this one point where she stops fuckin and says "naw we wont go further unless we get tips." Might as well be i wont fuck unless you vote for me. The site was even doing some "vote for" screen grabs after she refers to her cream pie. These e'thots have us living in such a fukt world. "Revenge porn!!!!" Dumb bitch. |
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.