User Panel
Honestly nothing out there is going to beat the modularity or parts availability of a AR10 pattern rifle. Pick your manufacturer and enjoy.
In saying that I wish CZ would hurry up and release the Bren 2 in 7.62 |
|
Would love a FAL for nostalgia.
SCAR 17 is it's younger, lighter, more adaptable brother. Can't go wrong with SR25 OR MWS, but to me, those are more DMR and less "battle rifle." |
|
|
Quoted:
Would love a FAL for nostalgia. SCAR 17 is it's younger, lighter, more adaptable brother. Can't go wrong with SR25 OR MWS, but to me, those are more DMR and less "battle rifle." View Quote thats' why I choose the mws because I can swap the barrel if needed. it's standard 16" barrel if fine for a 'battle rifle' but if needed, I can swap out the barrel and turn it into a precision oriented platform |
|
Quoted:
thats' why I choose the mws because I can swap the barrel if needed. it's standard 16" barrel if fine for a 'battle rifle' but if needed, I can swap out the barrel and turn it into a precision oriented rifle View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Would love a FAL for nostalgia. SCAR 17 is it's younger, lighter, more adaptable brother. Can't go wrong with SR25 OR MWS, but to me, those are more DMR and less "battle rifle." thats' why I choose the mws because I can swap the barrel if needed. it's standard 16" barrel if fine for a 'battle rifle' but if needed, I can swap out the barrel and turn it into a precision oriented rifle |
|
I have owned the following
M1A socom M1a scout squad M1a standard Dsa stg58 Ptr91 a3s Ptr91 gi-r Windham 308 Lmt mws cqb 13.5 I currently own the M1a standard and lmt mws Neither rifle has given me any issues, if I could only keep one it would be the LMT ALL the M1A’s I have owned have been 100% the ptr 91 gi-r was 100% as well as the dsa fal. The windham and ptr a3s has occasional issues. |
|
AR-10 or M1A. I have both and they’re awesome. M1’s are wonderful too.
|
|
M1A's. Either with wood, or snythetic. Love 'em. I've had just about everything else. SCAR's are great too, but, I just love the M1A's action.
|
|
Quoted:
The MWS isnt really a 'quick change' barrel. You wont be swapping barrels in the field. Might as well have a different upper with dedicated optic to suit the need. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Would love a FAL for nostalgia. SCAR 17 is it's younger, lighter, more adaptable brother. Can't go wrong with SR25 OR MWS, but to me, those are more DMR and less "battle rifle." thats' why I choose the mws because I can swap the barrel if needed. it's standard 16" barrel if fine for a 'battle rifle' but if needed, I can swap out the barrel and turn it into a precision oriented rifle |
|
Best bang for the buck for size/reliability/mag compatibility is the Galil ACE
|
|
|
Get one of the brownells brn-10s or a fal. Or a modern ar-10 of whatever flavor. Fals are nice to shoot.
|
|
|
|
Probably a KAC or a SCAR17
Outlier is the new POF Revolution DI |
|
|
Virtually any AR10 pattern rifle on the market is vastly superior to FALs, M14s, G3s, etc. in almost every way possible. And a lot cheaper usually, if you're comparing quality to quality.
If you absolutely must have something besides an AR pattern, I guess a SCAR, though it's going to be thousands more and it won't do anything the AR can't. For what the base SCAR costs, you could build one hell of a nice AR10, and probably still have quite a bit left over to put towards some really nice glass. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
None of the above? https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/356105/21126BDA-C2C9-40EC-A772-F400065EF30A_jpeg-1094783.JPG View Quote |
|
Really wish I had the coin for an XCR-M. They handle very nicely.
|
|
May have to change answer to Finn M27 carbine
I know it's a bolt action - but they're proven to work as intended and stunning bits of engineering |
|
Quoted:
FAL, if you like camo shorts and hightop sneakers. AR-10 is the answer maybe a CZ Bren BR if you want to buy something different, if it's even available yet... https://www.gunsweek.com/sites/default/files/styles/mt_slideshow/public/archive/contents/rifles/news/cz-bren-2-br-762x51mm-battle-rifle/CZ-BREN2-BR-Opening.jpg?itok=rQdSXWhC View Quote |
|
This is really good if you have the time to watch all the episodes.
Battle Rifle Time Trials - Episode 1 - "Cold Start" |
|
The inherent accuracy, excellent iron sights, robustness, simplicity, and abundant supply and availability of USGI spare parts, inexpensive quality magazines, and accessories makes the M14 the obvious choice for me.
|
|
Would seriously consider the Windham 308 if I were in the hunt.
|
|
Quoted:
This is really good if you have the time to watch all the episodes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHUpdFh0MUE View Quote |
|
|
I EBR’d my SOCOM16. Love it but can’t lift it LOL. I’ll still never part with it though.
For a rock solid affordable and accurate rifle I recommend DPMS. My GAP10 is more accurate than I will ever be. I won’t shoot my Colt 901 because it is a lettered numbed 6#. So my hillbilly answer is to buy the rifle that you will shoot the most configuration (ergonomics for different folks) and the rifle you won’t worry about shooting prone from a gravel pile. |
|
Quoted:
But what's a Navy SEAL's opinion on one? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
SCARs suck ass. They are a solution looking for a problem. I would have sold it for scrap if it was mine to sell. Breakage issues are worse than the M4's, but that's to be expected with a 308. Bolts last about as long as an M4's, which isn't bad considering it's a bigger cartridge in an undersized bolt, with a reduced firing schedule. The polymer bits tend to break more easily than they should, along with some of the hardware in the receiver, IIRC. Tradeoff for being an 8 pound battle rifle, IMO. Mags suck compared to 308 Pmags. As the MK20, they're reliable, light, and fairly accurate, but nowhere near as much so as a proper SR25 that isn't fucked by specs set by 'tarded Army brass. The M110 could have been so much more... |
|
|
|
from this thread MRP Badness, chapter 3
add a TA31 ACSS Aurora and a RMR = done. @DrDre rifle Attached File @slipjett rifle Attached File |
|
I will stay and hold MLR with my SEI M14SE, my last bandolier of M118 and a Snickers bar.
Steel, wins the day. |
|
Quoted:
This is really good if you have the time to watch all the episodes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHUpdFh0MUE View Quote |
|
I have a 13” FAL in jail right now.
I want: CZ BR Tavor 7 Some kind of 16” DMR’ish AR-10. Budget is blown for this year though. |
|
My Armalite AR-10A has been fantastic thus far. Not ammo picky, adjustable gas block. Takes Pmags, what’s not to love.
Attached File |
|
Quoted:
My Armalite AR-10A has been fantastic thus far. Not ammo picky, adjustable gas block. Takes Pmags, what’s not to love. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/250352/144ED8CC-1178-4A1C-BD50-208BC89C4DFA_jpeg-1095309.JPG View Quote Great pic son !! |
|
Huh, well, I own just about all of them.
I love all of them You cannot go wrong with any of them. FAL HK91 PTR91 AR10 Galil ACE M14 (Just kidding, dont go here) OBR MWS etc etc |
|
Quoted:
<------ FPNI FAL is only about 12 lbs. https://www.dropbox.com/s/d0pf9mskse7o9n2/falopnew.jpg?raw=1 View Quote And I hope that 12lbs includes accessories and a loaded mag. My shorter FAL with empty mag, light, and mount weighs under 10 lbs and it's definitely not a lightweight version (although one day my hiduminium lowers will turn into complete rifles; I'm hoping to get down to around 8lbs with mag before including accessories, at least for a rifle built on the fixed-stock lower). |
|
Quoted:
https://gundigest.com/wp-content/uploads/Daniel-Defense-DD5.jpg Daniel Defense DD5 V4 in 6.5 Creedmoor... It’s 2019 why even bother with .308 anymore if you’re starting from scratch? https://danieldefense.com/dd5-v4-6-5-creedmoor.html View Quote |
|
Quoted:
None. Unless you're a millionaire, the cost will be prohibitive if it's assumed you are going to train hard with it to develop real proficiency across a wide array of shooting scenarios and distances. Everyone says they'll shoot thousands, but this quickly turns into barely a few hundred, and that gets reluctantly spread out over years. Even handloading in these calibers can't come close to the trigger time you'll get with 5.56 or 7.6 TUBA 39 for the same ammunition layout. And then you add on the higher cost of the gun. I went through it, and decided I didn't need one anymore. You might reach the same conclusion. If you are collecting for historical purposes or want a keeper not a shooter, that's a totally different story. View Quote |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.