User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 11/1/2019 5:18:48 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I agree with the guy you quoted above, but from what I am seeing the "witness" had a part in setting up this thing. He isn't just responding to a subpoena, he helped set things up so he could play a part in this mess. At this point I don't believe what CNN says or what Dems in congress say, or what any entrenched government employee who is critical of Trump says. I expect them to continue attacking POTUS until they are smacked down hard. My starting assumption on any story involving Trump is that those that oppose him are lying about him again. This is because they have been lying nonstop for over three years now. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It seems they're all working together to create the same narrative. No he shouldn't ignore the subpoena. He should've only discussed facts. His job is not about his feelings or concerns or creating a narrative. At this point I don't believe what CNN says or what Dems in congress say, or what any entrenched government employee who is critical of Trump says. I expect them to continue attacking POTUS until they are smacked down hard. My starting assumption on any story involving Trump is that those that oppose him are lying about him again. This is because they have been lying nonstop for over three years now. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/1/2019 5:26:49 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryDo reprimands go on record? Also quoting for visibility..
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/1/2019 5:27:52 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I bet the whistleblower got his info and narrative from the LTC. Like you said, he is part of the setup The fact they changed the rules last minute to allow hearsay information is telling. This isn't some guy who knows facts, it is a well connected group working together to create something. Perhaps more interesting is the NeverTrumps out there posting places like here who don't get it. It would take a lot of mental gymnastics to not get it on purpose. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/1/2019 5:29:42 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Do reprimands go on record? Also quoting for visibility.. Quote HistoryQuoted:
And also if the guy is who he claims to be. If that checks out it would be powerful, even if the claimed interaction can't be verified. He is on twitter: https://twitter.com/Jim_Hickman13 |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/1/2019 5:31:00 PM EDT
[#5]
Trump??=winning
He's got the left and Media right where he wants them???????????? |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/1/2019 5:46:28 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Do reprimands go on record? Also quoting for visibility.. Quote HistoryQuoted:
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/1/2019 5:56:59 PM EDT
[#7]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/2/2019 1:03:17 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Maybe some Ukraine kickbacks Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: The question then is why. What axe does he have to grind? Poroshenko tried to deal with the oligarch problem in Ukraine, which was somewhat difficult for him considering he was one of them. Perhaps Zelansky has better luck. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/3/2019 12:37:17 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Someone should be able to verify that the tweets happened. And also if the guy is who he claims to be. If that checks out it would be powerful, even if the claimed interaction can't be verified. He is on twitter: https://twitter.com/Jim_Hickman13 Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
And also if the guy is who he claims to be. If that checks out it would be powerful, even if the claimed interaction can't be verified. He is on twitter: https://twitter.com/Jim_Hickman13  Attached FileHere's reply to a doubter  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/3/2019 11:48:51 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
All this bullshit is getting really tiresome. Frustrating as hell. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/3/2019 12:32:46 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No doubt the Tweet happened. He's been interacting with a few users the past couple days. There's even a reply from someone else claiming to have witnessed it. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/255759/E896501A-8170-4CAA-8D26-ABEFDDF47AEC_jpeg-1146901.JPG Here's reply to a doubter https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/255759/6841DB82-3C9E-4977-9BD4-D7BED58F78D4_jpeg-1146905.JPG 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/3/2019 1:02:44 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Based on this, Vindman should be charged under UCMJ for conduct unbecoming an officer, at minimum. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
No doubt the Tweet happened. He's been interacting with a few users the past couple days. There's even a reply from someone else claiming to have witnessed it. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/255759/E896501A-8170-4CAA-8D26-ABEFDDF47AEC_jpeg-1146901.JPG Here's reply to a doubter https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/255759/6841DB82-3C9E-4977-9BD4-D7BED58F78D4_jpeg-1146905.JPG |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
