Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 3
Posted: 1/24/2020 12:22:04 PM EST


aka why Trump won in the Rust Belt

aka why the British working class rejected Labour

@FoxNews_FTW
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 12:31:43 PM EST
[#1]
Because we don’t see gov’t as our own personal money dispenser. Because we understand that what’s best for the country might not give us the greatest immediate benefit but almost always will benefit everyone in the long term.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 12:34:11 PM EST
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Because we don’t see gov’t as our own personal money dispenser. Because we understand that what’s best for the country might not give us the greatest immediate benefit but almost always will benefit everyone in the long term.
View Quote
And here is the great fallacy that perpetuates the myth.

Trillions in debt yet people think there is a path out that will benefit the taxpayers if we just sacrifice a little more.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 12:34:17 PM EST
[#3]
We realize that the more "government we vote for," less of the of the money we earn stays in our pockets.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 12:35:36 PM EST
[#4]
I just want to be left alone. That includes my paycheck. I'll decide what goods and services I need and buy them myself.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 12:43:33 PM EST
[#5]
I think it's in my best interest not to be sent to a gulaug.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 12:45:42 PM EST
[#6]
Because someone has to pay for the all free stuff and somehow it always ends up being the middle class.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 12:47:35 PM EST
[#7]
Freedom and individual rights are worth more than paychecks and government handouts.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 12:47:37 PM EST
[#8]
Because we're not so dumb to believe the shell game lie that we're voting "against" our own interests.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 12:50:14 PM EST
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Because we're not so dumb to believe the shell game lie that we're voting "against" our own interests.
View Quote
This, also.

I don't want to be, I refuse to be dependent on the government in that way.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 12:51:03 PM EST
[#10]
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 12:52:34 PM EST
[#11]
The canadian accent diminishes credibility more than it should.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 12:57:29 PM EST
[#12]
Yeah, who is telling me what MY economic interest is, exactly??
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 1:03:09 PM EST
[#13]
The working class is outnumbered by the non-working class...
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 1:04:31 PM EST
[#14]
Quoted:
I think it's in my best interest not to be sent to a gulaug.
View Quote
Quoted:
Freedom and individual rights are worth more than paychecks and government handouts.
View Quote
Attachment Attached File
...
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 1:18:02 PM EST
[#15]
The media is nothing but propaganda distributors, then there's unions and the dems. They all promote divisiveness based on lies. Rich against the poor, employees against employers, gender against gender, race against race and so on. This people are all misinformed , they get the propaganda from the same people, the same sources. You can hear it when they all say the same things, literally word for word. It's damn near a whole nation of willing imbeciles.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 1:29:43 PM EST
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Because we're not so dumb to believe the shell game lie that we're voting "against" our own interests.
View Quote
If your interests (as a working class person) is to promote massive wealth disparity, then you're doing great.  If you're "not so dumb" then you also realize that government allows for wealth accumulation.  And that there is no "free market".  So you'll happily allow what's basically an upward redistribution of wealth through legislation, but then balk at downward redistribution.





By the way, do you know what stat best predicts violence in society?  It isn't poverty.  It's the gini coefficient (which measures wealth disparity).

Link Posted: 1/24/2020 3:36:54 PM EST
[#17]
“Why won’t you dumb, cousin-humping rednecks vote for us?!”

Get fucked, commies.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 4:06:51 PM EST
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
If your interests (as a working class person) is to promote massive wealth disparity, then you're doing great.  If you're "not so dumb" then you also realize that government allows for wealth accumulation.  And that there is no "free market".  So you'll happily allow what's basically an upward redistribution of wealth through legislation, but then balk at downward redistribution.

https://anticap.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/wealth-inequality.jpg

http://realkm.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States.jpg

By the way, do you know what stat best predicts violence in society?  It isn't poverty.  It's the gini coefficient (which measures wealth disparity).

https://globalinequalityandhealth.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/screen-shot-2015-04-11-at-11-48-13-pm.png
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Because we're not so dumb to believe the shell game lie that we're voting "against" our own interests.
If your interests (as a working class person) is to promote massive wealth disparity, then you're doing great.  If you're "not so dumb" then you also realize that government allows for wealth accumulation.  And that there is no "free market".  So you'll happily allow what's basically an upward redistribution of wealth through legislation, but then balk at downward redistribution.

https://anticap.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/wealth-inequality.jpg

http://realkm.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States.jpg

By the way, do you know what stat best predicts violence in society?  It isn't poverty.  It's the gini coefficient (which measures wealth disparity).

https://globalinequalityandhealth.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/screen-shot-2015-04-11-at-11-48-13-pm.png
It's not wealth redistribution downwards.  It the gov taking money and giving it to their own cronies. More equality comes when there is less government involvement in the markets.

Rich people aren't stealing money from people.  The government does that.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 4:10:41 PM EST
[#19]
Promise to bring in migrants from all over the world in massive numbers inflating the labor pool, driving down wages while simultaneously offering them Healthcare driving up the cost of medical service.
Promise crushing regulation on business forcing companies to keep huge amounts of capital locked up in order to weather the abuse, or outright make it impossible to compete with other countries that don't have half of the red tape to navigate, forcing manufacture overseas removing even more of the already thinning jobs, devaluing labor even further since you are lucky to even have a job because there are more people than jobs.
Promise aggressive taxation on top earners placing a wall between those who already have money and those trying to move upward, upward mobility is crippled further stratifying the haves from the have-nots, while also forcing employers to put away even more money to cover ever growing expenses, further limiting the ability to hire people or invest in future innovation.

But yeah voting against my best interests.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 4:10:48 PM EST
[#20]
because conservative policy is actually in favor of their economic interests?  Just a fuckin hunch here

_ETA:
@Media_Noche
how is disparity relevant or even inherently bad?  Wealth is not a zero sum game and Democrat policy to reduce/eliminate disparity actually causes financial injury to all.  And there is no "working class".  The fucking CEO works just like the guy in the mail room.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 4:17:54 PM EST
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
If your interests (as a working class person) is to promote massive wealth disparity, then you're doing great.  If you're "not so dumb" then you also realize that government allows for wealth accumulation.  And that there is no "free market".  So you'll happily allow what's basically an upward redistribution of wealth through legislation, but then balk at downward redistribution.

https://anticap.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/wealth-inequality.jpg

http://realkm.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States.jpg

By the way, do you know what stat best predicts violence in society?  It isn't poverty.  It's the gini coefficient (which measures wealth disparity).

https://globalinequalityandhealth.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/screen-shot-2015-04-11-at-11-48-13-pm.png
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Because we're not so dumb to believe the shell game lie that we're voting "against" our own interests.
If your interests (as a working class person) is to promote massive wealth disparity, then you're doing great.  If you're "not so dumb" then you also realize that government allows for wealth accumulation.  And that there is no "free market".  So you'll happily allow what's basically an upward redistribution of wealth through legislation, but then balk at downward redistribution.

https://anticap.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/wealth-inequality.jpg

http://realkm.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States.jpg

By the way, do you know what stat best predicts violence in society?  It isn't poverty.  It's the gini coefficient (which measures wealth disparity).

https://globalinequalityandhealth.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/screen-shot-2015-04-11-at-11-48-13-pm.png
You a commie, bud?
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 4:22:24 PM EST
[#22]
As others have pointed out ITT...

The working class is voting against the coastal/urban progressives' interests.

I'd rather be freer (more liberty) than slightly better off financially, than earning 6-figures a year.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 4:26:03 PM EST
[#23]
@HappyLife_NoWife @Neotopiaman

The boomer generation chose prosperity, or the illusion of prosperity, over freedom and a strong nation.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 4:31:38 PM EST
[#24]
I don't wish to work 60 hours a week for the luxury of living in some shitbox 80 year old house on 1/8 acre of land.

Everyone acts as if leftist ideas are new and untested. The left took control of American cities that are built on centuries of wealth and absolutely ravaged them. With the money that flows through these placed you'd think the streets would be paved with gold instead of feces and potholes. But do tell me how someone like Cuomo can help me economically.

Both parties are corporatist wretches, at least the right has a chance of being salvaged.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 4:33:30 PM EST
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

And here is the great fallacy that perpetuates the myth.

Trillions in debt yet people think there is a path out that will benefit the taxpayers if we just sacrifice a little more.
View Quote
What is the myth and what is the fallacy?
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 4:36:40 PM EST
[#26]
Hows about because I already had a mommy and daddy and didn't need any more?   Also, "Sanders Claus 2020!"....yay.....
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 4:37:47 PM EST
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
If your interests (as a working class person) is to promote massive wealth disparity, then you're doing great.  If you're "not so dumb" then you also realize that government allows for wealth accumulation.  And that there is no "free market".  So you'll happily allow what's basically an upward redistribution of wealth through legislation, but then balk at downward redistribution.

https://anticap.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/wealth-inequality.jpg

http://realkm.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States.jpg

By the way, do you know what stat best predicts violence in society?  It isn't poverty.  It's the gini coefficient (which measures wealth disparity).

https://globalinequalityandhealth.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/screen-shot-2015-04-11-at-11-48-13-pm.png
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Because we're not so dumb to believe the shell game lie that we're voting "against" our own interests.
If your interests (as a working class person) is to promote massive wealth disparity, then you're doing great.  If you're "not so dumb" then you also realize that government allows for wealth accumulation.  And that there is no "free market".  So you'll happily allow what's basically an upward redistribution of wealth through legislation, but then balk at downward redistribution.

https://anticap.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/wealth-inequality.jpg

http://realkm.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States.jpg

By the way, do you know what stat best predicts violence in society?  It isn't poverty.  It's the gini coefficient (which measures wealth disparity).

https://globalinequalityandhealth.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/screen-shot-2015-04-11-at-11-48-13-pm.png
It amazes me that people worry so much about .1% of the population.  How does their prosperity affect you in any way, shape or form?  Is your quality of life somehow diminished because they have a bigger house than you or they can afford a nicer car than you?  Their wealth does not affect your quality of life in the slightest.

If people spent half as much time focused on improving their own situation as they do gawking over how rich people lived, they would be able to improve their quality of life far more than any number of socialist programs.  Unless you are a freeloader of course, in which case the more government cheese you can weasel out of productive citizens the better.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 4:38:09 PM EST
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
If your interests (as a working class person) is to promote massive wealth disparity, then you're doing great.  If you're "not so dumb" then you also realize that government allows for wealth accumulation.  And that there is no "free market".  So you'll happily allow what's basically an upward redistribution of wealth through legislation, but then balk at downward redistribution.  
View Quote
You can see the growth in disparity in places like CA, where the middle class is leaving and being replaced by a lower class that is largely illegal.

Leftism everywhere creates a powerful wealthy elite and a mass of poor.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 4:41:03 PM EST
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

It amazes me that people worry so much about .1% of the population.  How does their prosperity affect you in any way, shape or form?  Is your quality of life somehow diminished because they have a bigger house than you or they can afford a nicer car than you?  Their wealth does not affect your quality of life in the slightest.

If people spent half as much time focused on improving their own situation as they do gawking over how rich people lived, they would be able to improve their quality of life far more than any number of socialist programs.  Unless you are a freeloader of course, in which case the more government cheese you can weasel out of productive citizens the better.
View Quote
True for those who earned their wealth, but the likes of the Clintons and others who gained wealth by selling out the interests of the US, that is a different matter.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 4:44:20 PM EST
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
What is the myth and what is the fallacy?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

And here is the great fallacy that perpetuates the myth.

Trillions in debt yet people think there is a path out that will benefit the taxpayers if we just sacrifice a little more.
What is the myth and what is the fallacy?
And what have we sacrificed?  Our debt continues to spiral out of control because we refuse to sacrifice anything.  Virtually every facet of government spending is in dire need of an overhaul but we refuse to do it because change is painful.  So we make a tiny cut here and there to pretend like we are doing something when in reality we are still deficit spending like drunk sailors.

There is a path out of debt.  However it would be excruciatingly painful, require real sacrifices, and the people who actually have power to fix it have no financial or political motivation to do so.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 4:48:33 PM EST
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

It amazes me that people worry so much about .1% of the population.  How does their prosperity affect you in any way, shape or form?  Is your quality of life somehow diminished because they have a bigger house than you or they can afford a nicer car than you?  Their wealth does not affect your quality of life in the slightest.

If people spent half as much time focused on improving their own situation as they do gawking over how rich people lived, they would be able to improve their quality of life far more than any number of socialist programs.  Unless you are a freeloader of course, in which case the more government cheese you can weasel out of productive citizens the better.
View Quote
It's nothing more than an opportunity to form a lynch mob while maintaining an illusion of nobility.

Welcome to identity politics 101, here we learn how to weaken others instead of how to strengthen ourselves.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 4:48:51 PM EST
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
If your interests (as a working class person) is to promote massive wealth disparity, then you're doing great.  If you're "not so dumb" then you also realize that government allows for wealth accumulation.  And that there is no "free market".  So you'll happily allow what's basically an upward redistribution of wealth through legislation, but then balk at downward redistribution.

https://anticap.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/wealth-inequality.jpg

http://realkm.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States.jpg

By the way, do you know what stat best predicts violence in society?  It isn't poverty.  It's the gini coefficient (which measures wealth disparity).

https://globalinequalityandhealth.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/screen-shot-2015-04-11-at-11-48-13-pm.png
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Because we're not so dumb to believe the shell game lie that we're voting "against" our own interests.
If your interests (as a working class person) is to promote massive wealth disparity, then you're doing great.  If you're "not so dumb" then you also realize that government allows for wealth accumulation.  And that there is no "free market".  So you'll happily allow what's basically an upward redistribution of wealth through legislation, but then balk at downward redistribution.

https://anticap.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/wealth-inequality.jpg

http://realkm.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States.jpg

By the way, do you know what stat best predicts violence in society?  It isn't poverty.  It's the gini coefficient (which measures wealth disparity).

https://globalinequalityandhealth.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/screen-shot-2015-04-11-at-11-48-13-pm.png
Hawaii is nice. You should probably stay there.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 4:57:00 PM EST
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It amazes me that people worry so much about .1% of the population.  How does their prosperity affect you in any way, shape or form?  Is your quality of life somehow diminished because they have a bigger house than you or they can afford a nicer car than you?  Their wealth does not affect your quality of life in the slightest.
View Quote
Poor people don't buy off politicians to import Mexicans and Indians to depress labor costs.

We all agree economic power disparity doesn't matter in a theoretical libertopia.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 5:43:26 PM EST
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Hawaii is nice. You should probably stay there.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Because we're not so dumb to believe the shell game lie that we're voting "against" our own interests.
If your interests (as a working class person) is to promote massive wealth disparity, then you're doing great.  If you're "not so dumb" then you also realize that government allows for wealth accumulation.  And that there is no "free market".  So you'll happily allow what's basically an upward redistribution of wealth through legislation, but then balk at downward redistribution.

https://anticap.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/wealth-inequality.jpg

http://realkm.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States.jpg

By the way, do you know what stat best predicts violence in society?  It isn't poverty.  It's the gini coefficient (which measures wealth disparity).

https://globalinequalityandhealth.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/screen-shot-2015-04-11-at-11-48-13-pm.png
Hawaii is nice. You should probably stay there.
Look at his join date, post count and the source of the first chart...
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 5:59:30 PM EST
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Because we're not so dumb to believe the shell game lie that we're voting "against" our own interests.
View Quote
This.  That is a favorite false supposition by leftist.

Thomas Frank (?) wrote a book after George Bush beat John Kerry called "What's the matter with Kansas?"

His supposition was that people in Kansas had voted against their own economic best interest by chosing Bush over Kerry because Kerry would have given them things that Bush would not.  But he failed to understand people in that part of he country did not want or need what Kerry had to offer.

And that is the problem with all Democrats. They cannot comprehend that some people would rather do for themselves and have government stay out of the way instead of having government do it all.

Especially considering most people realize that a government which can do anything for you is also powerful enough to do anything to you.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 6:05:42 PM EST
[#36]
receiving handouts =/= working class economic interests

the progressives are so used to pandering to the gibs that they can't understand that many people don't want to be generational welfare recipients
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 6:09:08 PM EST
[#37]
Blah blah something something about how it is somehow in my economic interest to export my job to Japan or China and then import millions of low rent shit-holers to suppress wages in every type of work I could do in between real jobs.

El-Oh-El.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 6:10:07 PM EST
[#38]
Voting yourself into slavery is in NOBODY’s economic self interest.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 6:11:40 PM EST
[#39]
Yeah they keep voting republican which is the party of immigration for cheap labor. Also newsflash wage growth is not keeping up with inflation. One more economic down turn like 2008 and America is gonna be lit
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 6:13:57 PM EST
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
You a commie, bud?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Because we're not so dumb to believe the shell game lie that we're voting "against" our own interests.
If your interests (as a working class person) is to promote massive wealth disparity, then you're doing great.  If you're "not so dumb" then you also realize that government allows for wealth accumulation.  And that there is no "free market".  So you'll happily allow what's basically an upward redistribution of wealth through legislation, but then balk at downward redistribution.

https://anticap.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/wealth-inequality.jpg

http://realkm.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States.jpg

By the way, do you know what stat best predicts violence in society?  It isn't poverty.  It's the gini coefficient (which measures wealth disparity).

https://globalinequalityandhealth.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/screen-shot-2015-04-11-at-11-48-13-pm.png
You a commie, bud?
Ten bucks says he's a union member.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 6:14:43 PM EST
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It amazes me that people worry so much about .1% of the population.  How does their prosperity affect you in any way, shape or form?  Is your quality of life somehow diminished because they have a bigger house than you or they can afford a nicer car than you?  Their wealth does not affect your quality of life in the slightest.

If people spent half as much time focused on improving their own situation as they do gawking over how rich people lived, they would be able to improve their quality of life far more than any number of socialist programs.  Unless you are a freeloader of course, in which case the more government cheese you can weasel out of productive citizens the better.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Because we're not so dumb to believe the shell game lie that we're voting "against" our own interests.
If your interests (as a working class person) is to promote massive wealth disparity, then you're doing great.  If you're "not so dumb" then you also realize that government allows for wealth accumulation.  And that there is no "free market".  So you'll happily allow what's basically an upward redistribution of wealth through legislation, but then balk at downward redistribution.

https://anticap.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/wealth-inequality.jpg

http://realkm.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States.jpg

By the way, do you know what stat best predicts violence in society?  It isn't poverty.  It's the gini coefficient (which measures wealth disparity).

https://globalinequalityandhealth.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/screen-shot-2015-04-11-at-11-48-13-pm.png
It amazes me that people worry so much about .1% of the population.  How does their prosperity affect you in any way, shape or form?  Is your quality of life somehow diminished because they have a bigger house than you or they can afford a nicer car than you?  Their wealth does not affect your quality of life in the slightest.

If people spent half as much time focused on improving their own situation as they do gawking over how rich people lived, they would be able to improve their quality of life far more than any number of socialist programs.  Unless you are a freeloader of course, in which case the more government cheese you can weasel out of productive citizens the better.
Plus I've never seen a poor person pay a salary...
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 6:18:17 PM EST
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

If your interests (as a working class person) is to promote massive wealth disparity, then you're doing great.  If you're "not so dumb" then you also realize that government allows for wealth accumulation.  And that there is no "free market".  So you'll happily allow what's basically an upward redistribution of wealth through legislation, but then balk at downward redistribution.

https://anticap.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/wealth-inequality.jpg

http://realkm.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States.jpg

By the way, do you know what stat best predicts violence in society?  It isn't poverty.  It's the gini coefficient (which measures wealth disparity).

https://globalinequalityandhealth.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/screen-shot-2015-04-11-at-11-48-13-pm.png
View Quote
And what you're saying is poor people don't really see the point in robbing (acting violent) towards other poor people?

So someone shouldn't have more as to prevent jealousy?

That's some real commie shit right there...
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 6:20:14 PM EST
[#43]
Muh wealths disparity
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 6:21:59 PM EST
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

It's not wealth redistribution downwards.  It the gov taking money and giving it to their own cronies. More equality comes when there is less government involvement in the markets.

Rich people aren't stealing money from people.  The government does that.  
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

It's not wealth redistribution downwards.  It the gov taking money and giving it to their own cronies. More equality comes when there is less government involvement in the markets.

Rich people aren't stealing money from people.  The government does that.  
Not sure I follow.  Are you talking about corporate subsidies?  If so, that's both parties.  For example (from 2018).

https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/01/29/leaked-trump-infrastructure-plan-is-a-plan-for-corporate-subsidies/

The Trump administration’s plans to rebuild infrastructure in the United States have been leaked, and it appears to be as bad as feared. At least three-quarters of intended funding will go toward corporate subsidies, not actual projects. It is possible that no funding will go directly toward projects.
As for "More equality comes when there is less government involvement in the markets.", that's not necessarily true.  If you take away all the downward redistribution on the part of government you'd have less government and far more inequality.  This is because you'd be left with only the mechanisms that promote upward redistribution (patents, copyrights, property rights, etc.).
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 6:23:19 PM EST
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

You a commie, bud?
View Quote
Nope.  Just not totally uneducated on the subject and living in some fantasy bubble where government doesn't exist.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 6:24:50 PM EST
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

It amazes me that people worry so much about .1% of the population.  How does their prosperity affect you in any way, shape or form?  Is your quality of life somehow diminished because they have a bigger house than you or they can afford a nicer car than you?  Their wealth does not affect your quality of life in the slightest.

If people spent half as much time focused on improving their own situation as they do gawking over how rich people lived, they would be able to improve their quality of life far more than any number of socialist programs.  Unless you are a freeloader of course, in which case the more government cheese you can weasel out of productive citizens the better.
View Quote
It's like you didn't comprehend a thing I posted.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 6:26:25 PM EST
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

By the way, do you know what stat best predicts violence in society?  It isn't poverty.  It's the gini coefficient (which measures wealth disparity).

https://globalinequalityandhealth.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/screen-shot-2015-04-11-at-11-48-13-pm.png
View Quote
"Wealth disparity". LMAO.





Link Posted: 1/24/2020 6:27:01 PM EST
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Nope.  Just not totally uneducated on the subject and living in some fantasy bubble where government doesn't exist.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

You a commie, bud?
Nope.  Just not totally uneducated on the subject and living in some fantasy bubble where government doesn't exist.
Link Posted: 1/24/2020 6:27:56 PM EST
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
If your interests (as a working class person) is to promote massive wealth disparity, then you're doing great.  If you're "not so dumb" then you also realize that government allows for wealth accumulation.  And that there is no "free market".  So you'll happily allow what's basically an upward redistribution of wealth through legislation, but then balk at downward redistribution.

https://anticap.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/wealth-inequality.jpg

http://realkm.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States.jpg

By the way, do you know what stat best predicts violence in society?  It isn't poverty.  It's the gini coefficient (which measures wealth disparity).

https://globalinequalityandhealth.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/screen-shot-2015-04-11-at-11-48-13-pm.png
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Because we're not so dumb to believe the shell game lie that we're voting "against" our own interests.
If your interests (as a working class person) is to promote massive wealth disparity, then you're doing great.  If you're "not so dumb" then you also realize that government allows for wealth accumulation.  And that there is no "free market".  So you'll happily allow what's basically an upward redistribution of wealth through legislation, but then balk at downward redistribution.

https://anticap.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/wealth-inequality.jpg

http://realkm.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States.jpg

By the way, do you know what stat best predicts violence in society?  It isn't poverty.  It's the gini coefficient (which measures wealth disparity).

https://globalinequalityandhealth.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/screen-shot-2015-04-11-at-11-48-13-pm.png
And yet, during the period where wealth inequality increased, violent crime plummeted.

How come you didn't show that graph?

Here, look at that correlation!



Link Posted: 1/24/2020 6:29:49 PM EST
[#50]
socialism is NOT in the working class best interest.

#fakenews
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 3
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top