User Panel
|
|
|
|
Quoted: MGTOW thread or just sad someone's having sex that's not with you thread? Like guys don't sport fuck either? I have no idea whats going on here here. But I already banged my wife back to sleep this morning so now i'm having coffee and about to take a dump. View Quote Of course we do, but we are honest about it. |
|
Quoted: uh he is an alpha sex-haver and you are but a mgtow-nerd-beta. or something. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Uh what now…? uh he is an alpha sex-haver and you are but a mgtow-nerd-beta. or something. I just was curious if he realized how that reads. Like he put the wife to sleep by having sex with her. I mean maybe not. But even when I haven’t been great, I know - for a fact - I have never put the wife to sleep. |
|
Quoted: Comparing populations with similar access to sex (gay men and straight women) shows that’s not really true. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Most women like to fuck just as much as most men. Comparing populations with similar access to sex (gay men and straight women) shows that’s not really true. There seems to be a strong desire to believe and propagate the myth of the hyper-sexualized woman. It's as if it serves as justification for various other unsavory views about human relationships. Oh, sure I'm an incel. But it's not my fault. The problem is all those sluts out there. |
|
|
Can’t say my number would be much different if hunted/hunter swapped roles.
And, this is the kind of action girls are capable of turning when they’re reasonably fit. Sure, chonky can put up a decent scorecard as well, but she’s gonna have “last call” closing in on the night’s opportunities |
|
Quoted: Comparing populations with similar access to sex (gay men and straight women) shows that’s not really true. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Most women like to fuck just as much as most men. Comparing populations with similar access to sex (gay men and straight women) shows that’s not really true. I don't want to speak to the rest of the gentlemen's opinions, but he's bought into the new fad of men/women being basically interchangeable and all differences arbitrary and socialized. In a few long posts I replied clearly why I believe that's wrong |
|
Quoted:
View Quote Poor girl is mentally ill. She needs a therapist and possibly meds, not internet thumbsie-uppies |
|
Quoted: “Damn those women and their…*flip, flip, flip*…FREEDOM!” Are those societies actually filling the void? I posit that they aren’t. They are squalid wastelands full of people living in squalor or escaping to become dependent on societies that are better than their own. Without those better societies, everything is a squalid wasteland. They cannot fill the void. They can only overburden. Prior to contraception, even western societies had squalor and filth. They chose to jettison their human refuse to their colonies, but those colonies are no longer a thing. Inability to dispose of human refuse doomed western society more than anything else. View Quote Thanks for your feedback. I wouldn't want to change back to before WR; but neither will I ignore the consequence. Open your eyes and see the void; and see it being filled. That Western populations are being replaced by 'foreigners' is self-evident. But don't be distracted by the claim that whoring women is on the rise. Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. I'm being sincere. For 100s of years, Western women have enjoyed the privilege ('right' if that's what one wants to call it--and it's just as important to men as to women.) to say no to birthing children out of wedlock. Whoring around would be business as usual if not for the pill, AND, the Western woman's privilege to take it. Now, the pill is only part of what doomed the West. What really killed us was women entering the work force because no one could tell them No. A woman can no more easily have a professional career AND raise children than a man can. See where this is going already? Having the pill, being allowed to partake of it, and having a career. Part of what we used to call whoring around (aka "casual sex") now happens within wedlock. It's the perfect storm. These truths given here is why the commies want abortion. |
|
Quoted: I'm 46 and slept with almost as many women. Wouldn't say I'm "damaged" only that Tinder is my friend. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: "body count" is how many men she's had sex with. The "hookup culture" that is pretty prevalent among young adults today encourages young women to behave like that. Pursue career, don't get into serious relationships, sleep with lots of men, you can just pencil-in a meaningful relationship later in life. And it's damaging both young women and young men. I'm 46 and slept with almost as many women. Wouldn't say I'm "damaged" only that Tinder is my friend. The woman in question here is probably not much older than 25. |
|
|
Quoted: I think she's starting to realize where she has gone wrong. It's not that you have a high body count. It's that you have been dishonest about it until this point. Coming clean now and daring people to judge you is "too little too late" Also that whole... "work trip" Suggests she is either a sex worker or that she lies in order to get into situations like "5 guys in one night" This goes a little beyond the norm I would assume even in the world of MGTOW View Quote An actual sex worker would have a much higher body count. |
|
Quoted: Absolutely correct. However, promiscuity is absolutely on the rise. More for women than men. The percent of men who were sexless in 2021 was higher than women who were sexless. Men have to generally prove themselves to get any. Women generally only need to let it be known that they're available. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Some do, some don't. As always, you choose the company you keep. However, promiscuity is absolutely on the rise. More for women than men. The percent of men who were sexless in 2021 was higher than women who were sexless. Men have to generally prove themselves to get any. Women generally only need to let it be known that they're available. I posted in the Andrew Tate thread one of his quotes (paraphrased): "It takes effort to be a high value man. A high value man has to be tall, good looking, be well educated, hardworking, be established, have money, be well groomed, have a career, be entertaining in conversation. The only requirement to be a high value woman is to be hot." Hookup apps have distorted the sexual marketplace. Pre-hookup apps, a "5" guy would pair off with a "4,5, or 6" woman. Now, those 4 and 5's can occasionally hookup with a 7 or 8, and "occasionally" may be once a week, so it lowers the value of 5's in their eyes...the women start thinking they are 7's or 8's, and so that's what they go after. But the 7's and 8's are just slumming to get laid, they don't ever stay with the 4s and 5s. So the average guy is either being pushed out of the market place, or having to slum at the bottom of the barrel, which is why you see more celibate men than ever these days. |
|
Quoted: Poor girl is mentally ill. She needs a therapist and possibly meds, not internet thumbsie-uppies View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted:
Poor girl is mentally ill. She needs a therapist and possibly meds, not internet thumbsie-uppies |
|
Quoted: Thanks for your feedback. I wouldn't want to change back to before WR; but neither will I ignore the consequence. Open your eyes and see the void; and see it being filled. That Western populations are being replaced by 'foreigners' is self-evident. But don't be distracted by the claim that whoring women is on the rise. Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. I'm being sincere. For 100s of years, Western women have enjoyed the privilege ('right' if that's what one wants to call it--and it's just as important to men as to women.) to say no to birthing children out of wedlock. Whoring around would be business as usual if not for the pill, AND, the Western woman's privilege to take it. Now, the pill is only part of what doomed the West. What really killed us was women entering the work force because no one could tell them No. A woman can no more easily have a professional career AND raise children than a man can. See where this is going already? Having the pill, being allowed to partake of it, and having a career. Part of what we used to call whoring around (aka "casual sex") now happens within wedlock. It's the perfect storm. These truths given here is why the commies want abortion. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: “Damn those women and their…*flip, flip, flip*…FREEDOM!” Are those societies actually filling the void? I posit that they aren’t. They are squalid wastelands full of people living in squalor or escaping to become dependent on societies that are better than their own. Without those better societies, everything is a squalid wasteland. They cannot fill the void. They can only overburden. Prior to contraception, even western societies had squalor and filth. They chose to jettison their human refuse to their colonies, but those colonies are no longer a thing. Inability to dispose of human refuse doomed western society more than anything else. Thanks for your feedback. I wouldn't want to change back to before WR; but neither will I ignore the consequence. Open your eyes and see the void; and see it being filled. That Western populations are being replaced by 'foreigners' is self-evident. But don't be distracted by the claim that whoring women is on the rise. Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. I'm being sincere. For 100s of years, Western women have enjoyed the privilege ('right' if that's what one wants to call it--and it's just as important to men as to women.) to say no to birthing children out of wedlock. Whoring around would be business as usual if not for the pill, AND, the Western woman's privilege to take it. Now, the pill is only part of what doomed the West. What really killed us was women entering the work force because no one could tell them No. A woman can no more easily have a professional career AND raise children than a man can. See where this is going already? Having the pill, being allowed to partake of it, and having a career. Part of what we used to call whoring around (aka "casual sex") now happens within wedlock. It's the perfect storm. These truths given here is why the commies want abortion. Women have always been in the workforce. They really have. I promise. They now have opportunities in fields that were traditionally male-only (and that has also allowed for the logarithmic advance in technology and innovation), but they have always worked. It was only the very wealthy that could afford to have a woman who didn’t work. What has changed? Women have the ability to work in a broader spectrum of careers. Women have a right to their earnings. Women can conduct business in their own names. Women can own property in their own names. What hasn’t changed? Women working. |
|
Quoted: Poor girl is mentally ill. She needs a therapist and possibly meds, not internet thumbsie-uppies View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted:
Poor girl is mentally ill. She needs a therapist and possibly meds, not internet thumbsie-uppies She will never get the same instant satisfaction however. |
|
Quoted: Most women like to fuck just as much as most men. They will just lie about how many people they fucked if they think you are the type that would judge them for it. View Quote I disagree with the first part. The second is likely correct. The girl in the OP isn’t doing it because she likes it, she is doing it because she is a broken person. Possibly molested. It is sad. |
|
Quoted: Women have always been in the workforce. They really have. I promise. They now have opportunities in fields that were traditionally male-only (and that has also allowed for the logarithmic advance in technology and innovation), but they have always worked. It was only the very wealthy that could afford to have a woman who didn’t work. What has changed? Women have the ability to work in a broader spectrum of careers. Women have a right to their earnings. Women can conduct business in their own names. Women can own property in their own names. What hasn’t changed? Women working. View Quote I won't press the point your post suggests to me you're missing. I'll comment on the red. Maybe the South was different. But during my lifetime, in the South, I have lived in a time where nearly no one's mother worked till today, and having already been this way for decades, where nearly everyone's mother works. In my world, many, if not most women switching from baby maker to worker was immediately obvious to the most casual observer. What I didn't notice back then was the effect on the birthrate. |
|
Quoted: The theory is women don't count casual hookups as actual sex partners. She meets some guy at a bar and gives him a blowjob in the parking lot. Doesn't count. She meets some guy at a convention and spends the weekend fucking him. Doesn't count. She meets a guy they date/fuck/live together for 2 years. It counts. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: please explain WTF is going on in that picture The theory is women don't count casual hookups as actual sex partners. She meets some guy at a bar and gives him a blowjob in the parking lot. Doesn't count. She meets some guy at a convention and spends the weekend fucking him. Doesn't count. She meets a guy they date/fuck/live together for 2 years. It counts. That’s completely proposterous and a terrific example of the mental gymnastics women will make to not accept their WHORENESS I believe in GOD not THOT |
|
Quoted: I hope my life has a lot more purpose than that. I like to think so anyway. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The whole point of being a Man, is to deny your essence to sluts Being a human is a separate frame of consciousness along side if you are a man |
|
Quoted: I posted in the Andrew Tate thread one of his quotes (paraphrased): "It takes effort to be a high value man. A high value man has to be tall, good looking, be well educated, hardworking, be established, have money, be well groomed, have a career, be entertaining in conversation. The only requirement to be a high value woman is to be hot." View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Some do, some don't. As always, you choose the company you keep. However, promiscuity is absolutely on the rise. More for women than men. The percent of men who were sexless in 2021 was higher than women who were sexless. Men have to generally prove themselves to get any. Women generally only need to let it be known that they're available. I posted in the Andrew Tate thread one of his quotes (paraphrased): "It takes effort to be a high value man. A high value man has to be tall, good looking, be well educated, hardworking, be established, have money, be well groomed, have a career, be entertaining in conversation. The only requirement to be a high value woman is to be hot." That quote speaks volumes about the discernment if women vs men. If all a man values in a woman is her appearance, he is in for a world of trouble. It is much wiser to value other attributes, attributes the person can control. I would say there are many other requirements for a high value woman, but then again, I am not a man. |
|
Quoted: Women can own property in their own names. View Quote Women were allowed to own property in their own names under common law long before the 20th century. Coverture applied to married women, and made perfect sense. If a man is going to take on the responsibility of a woman, he should have commensurate authority over her. |
|
Another thing to remember young kings
Is that a woman who is Uber promiscuous will undoubtedly have contracted a plethora of STIs and possible STDs. Many of those medical issues may cause her womb to be polluted along side of her copious use of hormonal and chemical methods of controlling or ending pregnancies and births This absolutely is not marriage material |
|
Quoted: Absolutely correct. However, promiscuity is absolutely on the rise. More for women than men. The percent of men who were sexless in 2021 was higher than women who were sexless. Men have to generally prove themselves to get any. Women generally only need to let it be known that they're available. View Quote And there is absolutely nothing new about that. |
|
Thread title is perfect.
It fits the leftist practice of saying or repeating things that sound great on the surface but it could not be farther from the truth. Little things like gender crap where men can be women. No matter how much they repeat it, deep down they know the fundamental truth. Choke it down, repeating it is not going to make any of the regular people accept it. Worse, or is it fpr the better, the more you repeat that shit the more the normies will talk about you behind your back. |
|
I have also lived long enough see when a woman birthing many children had something to do with their status in a positive way. Now we're to laugh at a "clown car vagina."
|
|
Quoted: That quote speaks volumes about the discernment if women vs men. If all a man values in a woman is her appearance, he is in for a world of trouble. It is much wiser to value other attributes, attributes the person can control. I would say there are many other requirements for a high value woman, but then again, I am not a man. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Some do, some don't. As always, you choose the company you keep. However, promiscuity is absolutely on the rise. More for women than men. The percent of men who were sexless in 2021 was higher than women who were sexless. Men have to generally prove themselves to get any. Women generally only need to let it be known that they're available. I posted in the Andrew Tate thread one of his quotes (paraphrased): "It takes effort to be a high value man. A high value man has to be tall, good looking, be well educated, hardworking, be established, have money, be well groomed, have a career, be entertaining in conversation. The only requirement to be a high value woman is to be hot." That quote speaks volumes about the discernment if women vs men. If all a man values in a woman is her appearance, he is in for a world of trouble. It is much wiser to value other attributes, attributes the person can control. I would say there are many other requirements for a high value woman, but then again, I am not a man. On the net I agree with you, but there is a kernel of truth to it, and like all generalizations, there will be a lot of exceptions. |
|
|
Quoted: That quote speaks volumes about the discernment if women vs men. If all a man values in a woman is her appearance, he is in for a world of trouble. It is much wiser to value other attributes, attributes the person can control. I would say there are many other requirements for a high value woman, but then again, I am not a man. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Some do, some don't. As always, you choose the company you keep. However, promiscuity is absolutely on the rise. More for women than men. The percent of men who were sexless in 2021 was higher than women who were sexless. Men have to generally prove themselves to get any. Women generally only need to let it be known that they're available. I posted in the Andrew Tate thread one of his quotes (paraphrased): "It takes effort to be a high value man. A high value man has to be tall, good looking, be well educated, hardworking, be established, have money, be well groomed, have a career, be entertaining in conversation. The only requirement to be a high value woman is to be hot." That quote speaks volumes about the discernment if women vs men. If all a man values in a woman is her appearance, he is in for a world of trouble. It is much wiser to value other attributes, attributes the person can control. I would say there are many other requirements for a high value woman, but then again, I am not a man. I agree. Now you have a man lending legitimacy to your opinion. Just kidding, obviously. But you are 100% correct. While I definitely appreciate that my partner is hot as hell and keeps herself in great shape... the reason I've been with her for 14 years because she is loving, hardworking, honest, trustworthy, dependable, capable, and the smartest person I know (outside of myself ). |
|
Quoted: IMO, it's far more complicated than any succinct statement can capture. Women whoring around to explain the Fall of the West completely misses the mark. Look at it objectively: whom a woman or man would/does bed is circumstantial and biological. There's biological urge going on that I won't mention for fear of being slammed. Again, what's different today from what things were a 100 or 10000 years ago is that the consequence of 'gettin' knocked up' is lifted. Women's Rights and contraception/abortion destroyed the West in less than 100 years. IMO, it's oddly natural that societies still in control of their women are replacing Western populations. There are no more 'whores' today than there were 20 or 20000 years ago. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: You said it more succinctly than I did. IMO, it's far more complicated than any succinct statement can capture. Women whoring around to explain the Fall of the West completely misses the mark. Look at it objectively: whom a woman or man would/does bed is circumstantial and biological. There's biological urge going on that I won't mention for fear of being slammed. Again, what's different today from what things were a 100 or 10000 years ago is that the consequence of 'gettin' knocked up' is lifted. Women's Rights and contraception/abortion destroyed the West in less than 100 years. IMO, it's oddly natural that societies still in control of their women are replacing Western populations. There are no more 'whores' today than there were 20 or 20000 years ago. It's cultural. It's the role reversal. The leveling. Denial of science. And replacing it with scientism. It's all these things that divorced us from reality that is destroying us. Equity. etc. Mediocrity replacing true expertise. Collectivism replacing individualism. Consensus vs. objectivity. It's how the kids are raised. What they are taught. |
|
Quoted: That quote speaks volumes about the discernment if women vs men. If all a man values in a woman is her appearance, he is in for a world of trouble. It is much wiser to value other attributes, attributes the person can control. I would say there are many other requirements for a high value woman, but then again, I am not a man. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Some do, some don't. As always, you choose the company you keep. However, promiscuity is absolutely on the rise. More for women than men. The percent of men who were sexless in 2021 was higher than women who were sexless. Men have to generally prove themselves to get any. Women generally only need to let it be known that they're available. I posted in the Andrew Tate thread one of his quotes (paraphrased): "It takes effort to be a high value man. A high value man has to be tall, good looking, be well educated, hardworking, be established, have money, be well groomed, have a career, be entertaining in conversation. The only requirement to be a high value woman is to be hot." That quote speaks volumes about the discernment if women vs men. If all a man values in a woman is her appearance, he is in for a world of trouble. It is much wiser to value other attributes, attributes the person can control. I would say there are many other requirements for a high value woman, but then again, I am not a man. It is an indication of roles in society. A man knows he has to fend for himself and a woman knows it is easier to hook up with a high value man than it is to work. |
|
Quoted: Thread title is perfect. It fits the leftist practice of saying or repeating things that sound great on the surface but it could not be farther from the truth. Little things like gender crap where men can be women. No matter how much they repeat it, deep down they know the fundamental truth. ...snip... View Quote What can't be farther from the truth is the overrepresentation of these people's existence, making it look like they exist in election-swaying numbers. |
|
Quoted: I won't press the point your post suggests to me you're missing. I'll comment on the red. Maybe the South was different. But during my lifetime, in the South, I have lived in a time where nearly no one's mother worked till today, and having already been this way for decades, where nearly everyone's mother works. In my world, many, if not most women switching from baby maker to worker was immediately obvious to the most casual observer. What I didn't notice back then was the effect on the birthrate. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Women have always been in the workforce. They really have. I promise. They now have opportunities in fields that were traditionally male-only (and that has also allowed for the logarithmic advance in technology and innovation), but they have always worked. It was only the very wealthy that could afford to have a woman who didn’t work. What has changed? Women have the ability to work in a broader spectrum of careers. Women have a right to their earnings. Women can conduct business in their own names. Women can own property in their own names. What hasn’t changed? Women working. I won't press the point your post suggests to me you're missing. I'll comment on the red. Maybe the South was different. But during my lifetime, in the South, I have lived in a time where nearly no one's mother worked till today, and having already been this way for decades, where nearly everyone's mother works. In my world, many, if not most women switching from baby maker to worker was immediately obvious to the most casual observer. What I didn't notice back then was the effect on the birthrate. That was during a (relatively) brief time period of extreme economic prosperity during which many families could afford to have a woman stay at home full time. Even then, there were maids, shop girls, hairdressers, laundresses, seamstresses, secretaries, etc. It’s also interesting to note that those decades were rife with alcoholism and Valium prescriptions. Mother’s Little Helper wasn’t just a Rolling Stones song. |
|
Has she asked where all of the good men have gone yet? Or is that in 5-10 more years?
|
|
Quoted: I posted in the Andrew Tate thread one of his quotes (paraphrased): "It takes effort to be a high value man. A high value man has to be tall, good looking, be well educated, hardworking, be established, have money, be well groomed, have a career, be entertaining in conversation. The only requirement to be a high value woman is to be hot." Hookup apps have distorted the sexual marketplace. Pre-hookup apps, a "5" guy would pair off with a "4,5, or 6" woman. Now, those 4 and 5's can occasionally hookup with a 7 or 8, and "occasionally" may be once a week, so it lowers the value of 5's in their eyes...the women start thinking they are 7's or 8's, and so that's what they go after. But the 7's and 8's are just slumming to get laid, they don't ever stay with the 4s and 5s. So the average guy is either being pushed out of the market place, or having to slum at the bottom of the barrel, which is why you see more celibate men than ever these days. View Quote This is exactly what is going on. Once you understand it, the better off a male will be. |
|
Quoted: It's cultural. It's the role reversal. The leveling. Denial of science. And replacing it with scientism. It's all these things that divorced us from reality that is destroying us. Equity. etc. Mediocrity replacing true expertise. Collectivism replacing individualism. Consensus vs. objectivity. It's how the kids are raised. What they are taught. View Quote Nah. It's election fraud cover. I know very-very few 'democrat households'--my father's being one. At worst, these households are indifferent to what you wrote about. These households are what I would describe as the last remaining yeller dawg dimacrats. They're keeping their eye on the old, rich-man poor-man ball. Yet, I personally know zero people with any pretention that collectivism could possibly work. Not even amongst democrats. |
|
Quoted: That quote speaks volumes about the discernment if women vs men. If all a man values in a woman is her appearance, he is in for a world of trouble. It is much wiser to value other attributes, attributes the person can control. I would say there are many other requirements for a high value woman, but then again, I am not a man. View Quote Men are hardwired to go after the prettiest woman they can get. All the other stuff is a bonus if you are seeking a LTR. |
|
That reminds me of the huge "cock tower" discussion on the MMA Underground many years ago. That discussion was gold for years
|
|
Quoted: “Damn those women and their…*flip, flip, flip*…FREEDOM!” Are those societies actually filling the void? I posit that they aren’t. They are squalid wastelands full of people living in squalor or escaping to become dependent on societies that are better than their own. Without those better societies, everything is a squalid wasteland. They cannot fill the void. They can only overburden. Prior to contraception, even western societies had squalor and filth. They chose to jettison their human refuse to their colonies, but those colonies are no longer a thing. Inability to dispose of human refuse doomed western society more than anything else. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Absolutely correct. However, promiscuity is absolutely on the rise. More for women than men. The percent of men who were sexless in 2021 was higher than women who were sexless. Men have to generally prove themselves to get any. Women generally only need to let it be known that they're available. I don't think so. if not for science, biology would still be stronger than society; and we'd still have a healthy birthrate. Women, and men, having access to abortion and contraception changed what happens when humans are in heat. Contraception and abortion, along with women's rights, doomed the West. Meanwhile, members of societies still in control of women's lives are filling the void. This is the truth. “Damn those women and their…*flip, flip, flip*…FREEDOM!” Are those societies actually filling the void? I posit that they aren’t. They are squalid wastelands full of people living in squalor or escaping to become dependent on societies that are better than their own. Without those better societies, everything is a squalid wasteland. They cannot fill the void. They can only overburden. Prior to contraception, even western societies had squalor and filth. They chose to jettison their human refuse to their colonies, but those colonies are no longer a thing. Inability to dispose of human refuse doomed western society more than anything else. Human refuse (religious) being excluded from the Old World to the New World gave us modernity. It was the ability of people with individuality and liberty built into their system that created the most inventive and advancing social benefiting society than all the others combined. The Old World was still burdened with monarchies and feudalism, until the French Revolution- and they still got it wrong (poorly mimicking the American Revolution). The Old World was locked into its aristocracy and serf mentality. But I totally get the kinda inverse mudsill theory. |
|
Quoted: I agree. Now you have a man lending legitimacy to your opinion. Just kidding, obviously. But you are 100% correct. While I definitely appreciate that my partner is hot as hell and keeps herself in great shape... the reason I've been with her for 14 years because she is loving, hardworking, honest, trustworthy, dependable, capable, and the smartest person I know (outside of myself ). View Quote But none of that would matter if you didn’t also find her hot as hell. You didn’t see her at the bar and was like damnnn she look dependable!!! |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Nah. It's election fraud cover. I know very-very few 'democrat households'--my father's being one. At worst, these households are indifferent to what you wrote about. These households are what I would describe as the last remaining yeller dawg dimacrats. They're keeping their eye on the old, rich-man poor-man ball. Yet, I personally know zero people with any pretention that collectivism could possibly work. Not even amongst democrats. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: It's cultural. It's the role reversal. The leveling. Denial of science. And replacing it with scientism. It's all these things that divorced us from reality that is destroying us. Equity. etc. Mediocrity replacing true expertise. Collectivism replacing individualism. Consensus vs. objectivity. It's how the kids are raised. What they are taught. Nah. It's election fraud cover. I know very-very few 'democrat households'--my father's being one. At worst, these households are indifferent to what you wrote about. These households are what I would describe as the last remaining yeller dawg dimacrats. They're keeping their eye on the old, rich-man poor-man ball. Yet, I personally know zero people with any pretention that collectivism could possibly work. Not even amongst democrats. And yet it is still the presentation made by the Left. The humanity of not having a southern border and allowing all illegals in. Education is completely collectivist in the equity leveling, unity of thought and presentation, those opposed are 'domestic terrorists. The whole of idea of climate change is collectivist. And the government is making the 'threat' of that the justification of a heavy-burden taxpayer responsibility. Naw my friend. We are all being leveled for equity. Collectively. |
|
Quoted: That was during a (relatively) brief time period of extreme economic prosperity during which many families could afford to have a woman stay at home full time. Even then, there were maids, shop girls, hairdressers, laundresses, seamstresses, secretaries, etc. It’s also interesting to note that those decades were rife with alcoholism and Valium prescriptions. Mother’s Little Helper wasn’t just a Rolling Stones song. View Quote You're not wrong except your then-and-now scenarios still ignore that before the pill, people happened when people hooked up. The pill has no effect in societies where women aren't free. These controlled women all are now, have been all along, and will continue to be, baby makers. Period. Also, I suspect that the percentage of the population with the tendency to abuse substances today is no different from Mother's Little Helper days. Different day. Different drugs. Same problem. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.