Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 152
Link Posted: 2/8/2013 2:39:57 PM EST
[#1]



Quoted:



Quoted:




Quoted:


Quoted:

Batteries, tires, parts, meds, food, fuel,...



That's when They have us where they want us. Most of us will give up the Constitution for a hit of what we're addicted to.



Oh, wait, many already have...






Electricity.

"Under my plan prices will necessarily skyrocket"

(paraphrased)





One of the reasons I think the solar power break-even calculations might be off.   Sure, if power cost rise at a modest level break-even might be 10-20 years off, but wonder if inflation actually does raise it's ugly head?  It wouldn't take too many years of 5-10% average inflation to push these break-even numbers down.  If we get hyper-inflation the guys who look "stupid" buying solar systems will come out looking like geniuses.  



...and that's assuming the infrastructure doesn't get worse.   Wonder if power delivery starts to decline?  

 







Can't say this thought isn't crossing my mind.  At the current economic state and inflation it seems stupid to invest in something that only repays itself in 15 years.  But if the SHTF... maybe my wages can keep up with inflation (big maybe), but what a world of peace it would bring me without having to pay that 500% larger electric bill

It would be wiser to invest in LED light bulbs...the best bang for the buck.

Then there's Solar Hot Water, Tankless Water Heaters & then do Solar PV.

Solar PV was enticing because of the RECs, Renewable Energy Credits.

Some states Pay big bucks per credit, but in other states the prices have collapsed.





 
Link Posted: 2/8/2013 4:00:25 PM EST
[#2]







Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:






Quoted:



Batteries, tires, parts, meds, food, fuel,...
That's when They have us where they want us. Most of us will give up the Constitution for a hit of what we're addicted to.
Oh, wait, many already have...

Electricity.



"Under my plan prices will necessarily skyrocket"



(paraphrased)




One of the reasons I think the solar power break-even calculations might be off.   Sure, if power cost rise at a modest level break-even might be 10-20 years off, but wonder if inflation actually does raise it's ugly head?  It wouldn't take too many years of 5-10% average inflation to push these break-even numbers down.  If we get hyper-inflation the guys who look "stupid" buying solar systems will come out looking like geniuses.  









...and that's assuming the infrastructure doesn't get worse.   Wonder if power delivery starts to decline?  



 

















Can't say this thought isn't crossing my mind.  At the current economic state and inflation it seems stupid to invest in something that only repays itself in 15 years.  But if the SHTF... maybe my wages can keep up with inflation (big maybe), but what a world of peace it would bring me without having to pay that 500% larger electric bill







..not to mention the fact that IF some are right, and we actually have a monetary collapse.  Having all the power you need might come in handy.  Worst case, you pay up front for your power.  Moderately higher inflation, you make a lot more money and look brilliant.  SHTF, and you'll have reliable consistent power.  Honestly it looks like decent insurance.



But as mentioned above there are probably other things that can be done first.  One being "owning" your home.   No sense in having an awesome system but losing your home because you default on your mortgage.  
Link Posted: 2/8/2013 4:10:01 PM EST
[#3]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Can't say this thought isn't crossing my mind.  At the current economic state and inflation it seems stupid to invest in something that only repays itself in 15 years.  But if the SHTF... maybe my wages can keep up with inflation (big maybe), but what a world of peace it would bring me without having to pay that 500% larger electric bill

..not to mention the fact that IF some are right, and we actually have a monetary collapse.  Having all the power you need might come in handy.  Worst case, you pay up front for your power.  Moderately higher inflation, you make a lot more money and look brilliant.  SHTF, and you'll have reliable consistent power a big fat target on your back.  


FIFY


Link Posted: 2/8/2013 7:29:12 PM EST
[#4]

Farage Demolishes Europe's "Troll Patrol"


'Banana Republic' used to describe Europe, but could also describes Our current Political Pimps; Lawlessness = Treason













Link Posted: 2/8/2013 10:32:17 PM EST
[#5]
Quoted:
Pro tip - Mrs. L  told me the Duck Commander (?) said car tires were gonna become the common man's shtf currency.



Tires are worth more than silver. 285/75-17s just cost me $1400 for Cooper STTs.  Don't let them throw away your old tires.  They've probably got 5000 more miles on them.....Easy.
Link Posted: 2/8/2013 11:20:33 PM EST
[#6]
Yup!
Link Posted: 2/9/2013 2:29:58 AM EST
[#7]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:
Batteries, tires, parts, meds, food, fuel,...

That's when They have us where they want us. Most of us will give up the Constitution for a hit of what we're addicted to.

Oh, wait, many already have...






Electricity.
"Under my plan prices will necessarily skyrocket"
(paraphrased)


One of the reasons I think the solar power break-even calculations might be off.   Sure, if power cost rise at a modest level break-even might be 10-20 years off, but wonder if inflation actually does raise it's ugly head?  It wouldn't take too many years of 5-10% average inflation to push these break-even numbers down.  If we get hyper-inflation the guys who look "stupid" buying solar systems will come out looking like geniuses.  

...and that's assuming the infrastructure doesn't get worse.   Wonder if power delivery starts to decline?  
 



Can't say this thought isn't crossing my mind.  At the current economic state and inflation it seems stupid to invest in something that only repays itself in 15 years.  But if the SHTF... maybe my wages can keep up with inflation (big maybe), but what a world of peace it would bring me without having to pay that 500% larger electric bill

..not to mention the fact that IF some are right, and we actually have a monetary collapse.  Having all the power you need might come in handy.  Worst case, you pay up front for your power.  Moderately higher inflation, you make a lot more money and look brilliant.  SHTF, and you'll have reliable consistent power.  Honestly it looks like decent insurance.

But as mentioned above there are probably other things that can be done first.  One being "owning" your home.   No sense in having an awesome system but losing your home because you default on your mortgage.  


If you had a couple smaller DIY type systems you could potentially take them with you. Also in the event of any massive economic collapse I doubt evictions would be very high on any banks priority list.

Link Posted: 2/9/2013 7:29:11 AM EST
[#8]
Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:
Batteries, tires, parts, meds, food, fuel,...

That's when They have us where they want us. Most of us will give up the Constitution for a hit of what we're addicted to.

Oh, wait, many already have...






Electricity.
"Under my plan prices will necessarily skyrocket"
(paraphrased)


One of the reasons I think the solar power break-even calculations might be off.   Sure, if power cost rise at a modest level break-even might be 10-20 years off, but wonder if inflation actually does raise it's ugly head?  It wouldn't take too many years of 5-10% average inflation to push these break-even numbers down.  If we get hyper-inflation the guys who look "stupid" buying solar systems will come out looking like geniuses.  

...and that's assuming the infrastructure doesn't get worse.   Wonder if power delivery starts to decline?  
 



Can't say this thought isn't crossing my mind.  At the current economic state and inflation it seems stupid to invest in something that only repays itself in 15 years.  But if the SHTF... maybe my wages can keep up with inflation (big maybe), but what a world of peace it would bring me without having to pay that 500% larger electric bill

..not to mention the fact that IF some are right, and we actually have a monetary collapse.  Having all the power you need might come in handy.  Worst case, you pay up front for your power.  Moderately higher inflation, you make a lot more money and look brilliant.  SHTF, and you'll have reliable consistent power.  Honestly it looks like decent insurance.

But as mentioned above there are probably other things that can be done first.  One being "owning" your home.   No sense in having an awesome system but losing your home because you default on your mortgage.  


If you had a couple smaller DIY type systems you could potentially take them with you. Also in the event of any massive economic collapse I doubt evictions would be very high on any banks priority list.



That was my thought too...
Link Posted: 2/9/2013 3:19:26 PM EST
[#9]
Quoted:
Currency Wars might be a 'comin
Even CNBC cheerleaders are publishing it

...What not even this presentation addresses is what happens if Japan is, in the end, successful in reflating, in the process beggaring all its neighbors, radically shifting the economic lay of the globe, and launching full blown currency war - far worse than anything seen to date, including the dark days of the 1930s.

  • In sum, aggressive actions by the BOJ could escalate into a full-fledged currency war. Investors should be monitoring these events closely




There is no way Bernanke will submit to superior Japanese inkjets.  



Aaaaaaaand Chavez drops a nuclear bomb.......

While the rest of the developed world is scrambling here and there, politely prodding its central bankers to destroy their relative currencies, all the while naming said devaluation assorted names, "quantitative easing" being the most popular, here comes Venezuela and shows the banana republics of the developed world what lobbing a nuclear bomb into a currency war knife fight looks like:

VENEZUELA DEVALUES FROM 4.30 TO 6.30 BOLIVARS
VENEZUELA NEW CURRENCY BODY TO MANAGE DOLLAR INFLOWS
CARACAS CONSUMER PRICES ROSE 3.3% IN JAN.
And that, ladies and gents of Caracas, is how you just lost 46% of your purchasing power, unless of course your fiat was in gold and silver, which just jumped by about 46%. And, in case there is confusion, this is in process, and coming soon to every "developed world" banana republic near you.



stupid commie
Link Posted: 2/9/2013 3:22:48 PM EST
[#10]
Link Posted: 2/10/2013 5:30:10 AM EST
[#11]

Quoted:










WE 'broke the buck' that day...how it was explained to me.


Example: People have money in a 'Safe' Money Market Account.


Expectations are small interest gains, but their principal would always be returned; $1=$1


The 'electronic run on the banks' led to that 'safe' $1 returning less than a $1; Banks basically were/are Bankrupt.


Everything would have Frozen, No ATMs, No CC, No Checks, No Account withdrawals, No Pension Payments, etc. because they would have to Re-Organize their Debts and WE would have to get in line for a portion of OUR money.


Banks leveraged those 'safe' dollars, along other 'Investments', to the point of no return...Betting with other peoples money; Kind of a Systemic Madoff Scam


They conveniently define his crimes as Fraud, but the Publicly Traded Banks are defined as 'Too Big to Fail'





Not one Bankster goes to Jail for fraud, and WE the People are used as new leverage to fund the Bailouts





Why do you think they are pushing US to a Cashless Society...Right, I forgot WE get Points each time that Credit Card gets used; How convenient.


Banks/Credit Card Companies, Treasury, the FED have become 'One'; Consolidation to give US Zero Options, only 'Legal' Monopolies.


Cash or PMs are Limited, Physical Items accepted as a means to Barter, that's the problem Central Banks face; They've allowed those Limited, Physical Items leverage into Imaginary Wealth.





The Central Planners, All Branches of Government, haven't changed a thing, but have joined in this continued Fraud; High-Treason?
       






While what you say about the credit markets is true


The big problem was the short term credit that all


Delivery of goods relies on. That came to a halt. Goods


Deliveries were about to stop nation wide, meaning bare shields.





That is what they meant by credit markets. TPTB don't care


About your ATM or buying a car, when they say


The credit markets froze they are talking about


The movement of zero balance accounts needed for


Payroll and the movement of goods.





All of that stopped, until the fed dumped 8 trillion dollars into


Private accounts to get everything moving again.
 
Link Posted: 2/10/2013 7:50:05 PM EST
[#12]
Do you remember this guy?  He was the top American accountant, Comptroller of the GAO back until 2008.   He did this piece when he still has his job back in the Summer of 2007, before the "financial Crisis".   He tried to get the political class to take action, they wouldn't, so he went to the press.












Ultimately he resigned his position at the GAO to try to get the American people to wake-up.   We've still not taken his warning serious.   If anything we sped up advancement to his warnings.   THIS SHIT WILL NOT END WELL.  Enjoy the market but don't kid yourself into believing this will last.  













I think its worth a second look. Remembered this was in the summer of 2007 (almost $7 trillion ago), a year before the financial crisis happened which didn't become obvious to the American people until the fall of 2008.   Pay heed, get FREE.  WAKE-UP.

























 
Link Posted: 2/10/2013 8:59:17 PM EST
[#13]
Quoted:
Do you remember this guy?  He was the top American accountant, Comptroller of the GAO back until 2008.   He did this piece when he still has his job back in the Summer of 2007, before the "financial Crisis".   He tried to get the political class to take action, they wouldn't, so he went to the press.

Ultimately he resigned his position at the GAO to try to get the American people to wake-up.   We've still not taken his warning serious.   If anything we sped up advancement to his warnings.   THIS SHIT WILL NOT END WELL.  Enjoy the market but don't kid yourself into believing this will last.  

I think its worth a second look. Remembered this was in the summer of 2007 (almost $7 trillion ago), a year before the financial crisis happened which didn't become obvious to the American people until the fall of 2008.   Pay heed, get FREE.  WAKE-UP.


 


The problem I have with these stories, and with a lot of the people who (correctly) decry the problem we face is that they get the biggest part of the solution totally wrong. The Government does not have a "revenue problem". The Government has a spending problem. This is what burns me about so many idiot Republicans in DC who don't shout this into every camera they see. Just so we're clear:

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DOES NOT HAVE A REVENUE PROBLEM! THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS A SPENDING PROBLEM!!!

Raising taxes, as the stupids did as part of the fiscal cliff deal, will not solve the problem, only depress the already over-burdened economy (and, ultimately, exacerbate the problem by causing less economic output to be taxed hence <reducing> revenues). No, what MUST happen, whether the libcommies like it or not, is that mis-named "entitlements" must be cut or eliminated altogether. The size, scope, and intrusiveness of the Federal, state, and local governments MUST be reduced. It isn't a matter of want, or even of ideology. It's a matter of mathematics and freedom. We cannot cheat mathematics and we fundamentally will not give up our freedoms. Ergo, the size, scope, and intrusiveness of government WILL be reduced. It will either be reduced because "we the people" demand it, or it will be reduced because the .gov goes broke and is forced to reset. I am hoping, frankly, for the former.

Link Posted: 2/10/2013 9:06:10 PM EST
[#14]
Link Posted: 2/10/2013 9:59:15 PM EST
[#15]





Quoted:








Without looking at it - I can still hear his voice.



The thing that gets me is how anyone who can do basic math can delude themselves into believing this will end well.  It's not even complex math.  


 
Link Posted: 2/11/2013 3:50:56 AM EST
[#16]
This is interesting...

"Putin Turns Black Gold Into Bullion as Russia Out-Buys World"

"Not only has Putin made Russia the world’s largest oil producer, he’s also made it the biggest gold buyer. His central bank has added 570 metric tons of the metal in the past decade, a quarter more than runner-up China, according to IMF data compiled by Bloomberg. The added gold is also almost triple the weight of the Statue of Liberty."


OMGBBQ!!!!!!

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-10/putin-turns-black-gold-into-bullion-as-russia-out-buys-world.html




Link Posted: 2/11/2013 3:54:26 AM EST
[#17]
Quoted:

Quoted:


Without looking at it - I can still hear his voice.

The thing that gets me is how anyone who can do basic math can delude themselves into believing this will end well.  It's not even complex math.    



HA!

I've been preaching this for YEARS here [going back to at least 2008 IIRC] and most have ignored my rantings until more recently...





Link Posted: 2/11/2013 7:07:19 AM EST
[#18]
Link Posted: 2/11/2013 9:49:44 AM EST
[#19]


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-02-11/chart-day-households-foodstamps-rise-new-record

total number of foodstamp recipients as of November: 47.7 million


Let's see...  310 million Americans including children...  maybe 160 million of those actually employed (full or part-time), and almost 50million on supplimental food assistance?    

Good thing we're not running trillion-dollar annual operating deficits too.   Oh, um...  
Link Posted: 2/11/2013 10:39:27 AM EST
[#20]



Quoted:







Let's see...  310 million Americans including children...  maybe 160 million of those actually employed (full or part-time), and almost 50million on supplimental food assistance?    



Good thing we're not running trillion-dollar annual operating deficits too.   Oh, um...  


It's much worse then you imagine.  That's 47.7 million HOUSEHOLDS on food stamps.  There are only about 117 million households in the U.S.  So your looking at 40% of all U.S. households on the program.      
Link Posted: 2/11/2013 3:22:05 PM EST
[#21]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:


Without looking at it - I can still hear his voice.

The thing that gets me is how anyone who can do basic math can delude themselves into believing this will end well.  It's not even complex math.    



HA!

I've been preaching this for YEARS here [going back to at least 2008 IIRC] and most have ignored my rantings until more recently...




Speaking of beer math - where did you come up with your "most" number ?




Tea leaves...




Link Posted: 2/11/2013 4:00:20 PM EST
[#22]



Quoted:



Quoted:


Quoted:


Quoted:




Quoted:





Without looking at it - I can still hear his voice.


The thing that gets me is how anyone who can do basic math can delude themselves into believing this will end well.  It's not even complex math.    






HA!



I've been preaching this for YEARS here [going back to at least 2008 IIRC] and most have ignored my rantings until more recently...









Speaking of beer math - where did you come up with your "most" number ?









Tea leaves...











What was the "most" number?

 
Link Posted: 2/11/2013 4:55:44 PM EST
[#23]
Quoted:
Do you remember this guy?  He was the top American accountant, Comptroller of the GAO back until 2008.   He did this piece when he still has his job back in the Summer of 2007, before the "financial Crisis".   He tried to get the political class to take action, they wouldn't, so he went to the press.

Ultimately he resigned his position at the GAO to try to get the American people to wake-up.   We've still not taken his warning serious.   If anything we sped up advancement to his warnings.   THIS SHIT WILL NOT END WELL.  Enjoy the market but don't kid yourself into believing this will last.  

I think its worth a second look. Remembered this was in the summer of 2007 (almost $7 trillion ago), a year before the financial crisis happened which didn't become obvious to the American people until the fall of 2008.   Pay heed, get FREE.  WAKE-UP.


 




I'd be very curious to see his evaluation on Obamacare.
Link Posted: 2/11/2013 6:12:54 PM EST
[#24]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:


Without looking at it - I can still hear his voice.

The thing that gets me is how anyone who can do basic math can delude themselves into believing this will end well.  It's not even complex math.    



HA!

I've been preaching this for YEARS here [going back to at least 2008 IIRC] and most have ignored my rantings until more recently...




Speaking of beer math - where did you come up with your "most" number ?




Tea leaves...





What was the "most" number?  



2376.73


Link Posted: 2/11/2013 7:12:36 PM EST
[#25]



Quoted:



Quoted:



What was the "most" number?  


2376.73






Link Posted: 2/12/2013 5:38:10 AM EST
[#26]

Quoted:



Quoted:














What was the "most" number?  

2376.73






I thought you said it was 2377.73.  Now you're just going to change it up on us?
 
Link Posted: 2/12/2013 7:15:54 AM EST
[#27]
Quoted:

Quoted:


Let's see...  310 million Americans including children...  maybe 160 million of those actually employed (full or part-time), and almost 50million on supplimental food assistance?    

Good thing we're not running trillion-dollar annual operating deficits too.   Oh, um...  

It's much worse then you imagine.  That's 47.7 million HOUSEHOLDS on food stamps.  There are only about 117 million households in the U.S.  So your looking at 40% of all U.S. households on the program.      


I think you misread the link - both figures are cited (and graphed), with "households" being about half of the total individuals receiving assistance stated as:

total US households on foodstamps just hit an all time record of 23,017,768


Or about 20% of all households receiving supplimental food assistance.   Of course, if you factor in all the other various Federal programs like medicare, medicaid, etc -  then yes, the total number of households receiving any kind of Federal assistance is approximately 48%.
Link Posted: 2/12/2013 8:16:12 AM EST
[#28]



Quoted:



I think you misread the link - both figures are cited (and graphed), with "households" being about half of the total individuals receiving assistance stated as:





I stand corrected.  Yes, I made a mistake.  Thanks for correcting my error.  

 
Link Posted: 2/12/2013 8:23:02 AM EST
[#29]
Link Posted: 2/12/2013 9:20:06 AM EST
[#30]





Interesting presentation.



With the massive increases in national debt,  and now the Federal Reserves currency debasement program, how can anyone say with a straight face that we've had ANY healthy growth?  GDP has barely grown, and it's cost trillions in monopoly money to achieve it, even this modest growth.  




The fact is, it's running off stimulus.  The stimulus is the ONLY thing that's keeping it running.  If they stop juicing, the economy will shut down, but if they keep juicing it, it will eventually break down.




Despite all the "positive" talk, I think there is real concern behind the scenes.    

 
Link Posted: 2/12/2013 11:17:53 AM EST
[#31]
What I see a lot of are home re-fi's at ultra low rates with a bit of home equity lines for this new "phantom" increase in the homes value due to simply, inflation so people are putting in new cabinetry and flooring.
Link Posted: 2/12/2013 4:21:09 PM EST
[#32]
Dow up 1000 in just over a month.  Should i jump in now?
Link Posted: 2/12/2013 4:26:36 PM EST
[#33]




Quoted:

Dow up 1000 in just over a month. Should i jump in now?




The DOW companies will still be around 10 years from now. It is as good a place as any.





It would be better to wait for the next dip though to maximize your return.





One thing about securities. They usually inflate in value during inflationary periods.





I am still liking high dividend yield items myself.



Link Posted: 2/13/2013 6:05:26 AM EST
[#34]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Dow up 1000 in just over a month. Should i jump in now?


The DOW companies will still be around 10 years from now. It is as good a place as any.


It would be better to wait for the next dip though to maximize your return.


One thing about securities. They usually inflate in value during inflationary periods.


I am still liking high dividend yield items myself.




What he did there, you did not see it.
Link Posted: 2/13/2013 6:32:05 AM EST
[#35]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Dow up 1000 in just over a month. Should i jump in now?


The DOW companies will still be around 10 years from now. It is as good a place as any.


It would be better to wait for the next dip though to maximize your return.


One thing about securities. They usually inflate in value during inflationary periods.


I am still liking high dividend yield items myself.



Go back ten, twenty, fifty years and look at the Dow component companies.  Notice anything?
Link Posted: 2/13/2013 10:50:25 AM EST
[#36]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:




Dow up 1000 in just over a month. Should i jump in now?

The DOW companies will still be around 10 years from now. It is as good a place as any.
It would be better to wait for the next dip though to maximize your return.
One thing about securities. They usually inflate in value during inflationary periods.
I am still liking high dividend yield items myself.

Go back ten, twenty, fifty years and look at the Dow component companies.  Notice anything?





It's odd that we even consider the DJIA over long-term time periods.  Over the last 20 years, 19 of the 30 companies comprising the DJIA have been dropped and replaced by other companies.  Think about it, if it was a marathon, 63% of the competitors have dropped out somewhere in the race and been replaced by others.  Which if you think about it isn't a very accurate race, now is it.
























 






 


 

 
Link Posted: 2/13/2013 8:15:40 PM EST
[#37]
Got IRA?  Well, worry then.  

A growing number of European nations have seized private and public old-age funds that retirees assumed were off-limits to confiscation. In March 2009, the government of Ireland took 4 billion euros out of their National Pensions Reserve Fund (NPRF) in order to prop up their insolvent banks during the financial crisis. In March of the following year, government officials stole the remaining 2.5 billion euros to bail out the rest of the country [Christian Science Monitor]. In May of 2011, the government began raiding the private pensions, with a special tax [Business Insider].

In November 2010, the French parliament decided to pay off debts in their massive welfare system – specifically, the social debt sinking fund Cades – using the 36 billion euros in the Fonds de Réserve pour les Retraites (FRR), their reserve pension fund [Financial News].

Also during that November, the government of Hungary decided to reverse the pension reform it wisely initiated in 1997, by forcing the private pension funds back into the national pay-as-you-go system, effectively taking 2.7 trillion forints ($13.5 billion) owned by 3 million people who had counted upon that money being available when they retired [Wall Street Journal]. Less than two years later, the Hungarian Cabinet had spent about 1.5 trillion forint of the assets buying back government debt. The remaining assets declined in value to 591 billion forint ($2.6 billion), another reminder of governments' abilities to manage assets [Bloomberg].

The Bulgarian government tried to pull off something similar, when they attempted to transfer $300 million of private early retirement savings into the state pension system, but snagged only 20 percent of the money because of protests by trade unions [Christian Science Monitor].

That Christian Science Monitor article points out that the United Kingdom appears to be moving in a similar direction, in the form of a minimum pension for up to 11 million workers, with automatic enrollment.

That same source also notes that the government of Poland nationalized one third of future contributions to individual retirement accounts, moving the funds over to the national social security system. That government scheme has no assets; consequently, the money will disappear into the state treasury, and savers will lose about $2.3 billion per year. Earlier, the government tapped their Retirement Reserve Account for current funding in 2010 [Zero Hedge]. Another article indicates that the confiscated amounts were much higher, at 5.6 billion euros [Zero Hedge].

In southern Europe, the insolvent government of Greece decided to freeze pensions, cut public bonuses, and raise several taxes, to comply with demands from the EU as part of their bailout deal [RFI].

Many of these government officials may have gotten the idea from Argentina, which in 2008 nationalized $30 billion in private pension funds [New York Times]. Other sources suggest that the value of the assets had dropped to $24 billion, by the time President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner euphemistically termed the takeover as a "recovery of the administration of the workers' resources" [Bloomberg].

In several African nations, such as Uganda, instances of government officials raiding public pension funds, are so numerous as to be almost expected from each administration that takes what it can while in office.

Pension funds can even disappear as a result of the actions of other countries. For instance, the Palestinian Authority lost two-thirds of its entire revenues when Israel froze the money in bank accounts [IMEMC News].



I put nothing beyond the Imposter in Chief, Occupier of the Whine Haus.  


http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/02.13/accounts.html
Link Posted: 2/13/2013 10:46:28 PM EST
[#38]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
Dow up 1000 in just over a month. Should i jump in now?


The DOW companies will still be around 10 years from now. It is as good a place as any.


It would be better to wait for the next dip though to maximize your return.


One thing about securities. They usually inflate in value during inflationary periods.


I am still liking high dividend yield items myself.



Go back ten, twenty, fifty years and look at the Dow component companies.  Notice anything?

It's odd that we even consider the DJIA over long-term time periods.  Over the last 20 years, 19 of the 30 companies comprising the DJIA have been dropped and replaced by other companies.  Think about it, if it was a marathon, 63% of the competitors have dropped out somewhere in the race and been replaced by others.  Which if you think about it isn't a very accurate race, now is it.



 
   
 
 


It's easy to find excuses to stay out...cherry-pick DJIA components that  haven't performed, or take every cynical doomer article on Zerohedge as gospel. But Bernanke has a printing press on the reserve currency of the world, and is essentially pushing investors into stocks. Everything else has shit return, or negative return (counting real inflation). Regardless of if that pisses you off, if true it means the giant horde of zombie investors will soon feel Bernanke's boot in their ass. Ease in now ahead of the herd, or get destroyed in bonds when that bubble bursts, or lose slowly in cash.

Hate to say it, but I agree w/sherrick (and Jim Puplava, with Ulli Niemann providing technical confirmation). High-dividend stocks are a good choice ATM.
Link Posted: 2/13/2013 10:57:31 PM EST
[#39]



Quoted:


Well, somebody is making a huge bet against the banks.



traders buzzing






According to Barron's columnist Steven Sears, someone made a big bet against the financials ETF yesterday (ticker symbol XLF), and it has everybody buzzing.

The trader bought 100,000 put options on the ETF (a put option increases in value when the price of the underlying asset, in this case, the ETF, goes down).

To put that number in perspective, Sears writes, "Few investors ever trade more than 500 contracts, so a 100,000 order tends to stop traffic and prompt all sorts of speculation about what's motivating the trade." According to Sears, the trade "has sparked conversations across the market."







Whomever made the bet, could fulfill their own prophecy. News like this could scare a lot of folks into betting with him.


All depends on the option strike price, wonder how much they are



 
Link Posted: 2/14/2013 12:01:44 AM EST
[#40]

-you don't bet like that unless you know...

When you know it's not a bet.

Link Posted: 2/14/2013 6:46:42 AM EST
[#41]
Quoted:
It's easy to find excuses to stay out...cherry-pick DJIA components that  haven't performed, or take every cynical doomer article on Zerohedge as gospel. But Bernanke has a printing press on the reserve currency of the world, and is essentially pushing investors into stocks. Everything else has shit return, or negative return (counting real inflation). Regardless of if that pisses you off, if true it means the giant horde of zombie investors will soon feel Bernanke's boot in their ass. Ease in now ahead of the herd, or get destroyed in bonds when that bubble bursts, or lose slowly in cash.

Hate to say it, but I agree w/sherrick (and Jim Puplava, with Ulli Niemann providing technical confirmation). High-dividend stocks are a good choice ATM.



There is truth to this - the best vehicle in the world is the one the Central Bank chooses to support:  big equities and government securities.   Safer than picking individual stocks is a broad index fund or managed fund; costs you more in fees but probably weighted better long term.

Of course, all that paper has a tendency to be volatile "at the end" - Zimbabwe is the fastest growing equities market with the highest returns in the world; but of course all that money buys you 3 eggs.   There is a place for metals, IMHO more than 5% but still not the majority.  Everything is volatile depending on the point in the timeline you choose to examine; overall...  markets tend to inflate with inflation and we know the Bernanke is definitely using the S&P as a wealth-effect vehicle....   might as well ride the Money Train.   You'll still lose - just not as badly as other venues.

Oh, and inflation-adjusted housing:   back to 1894 levels?   BTFD.  






Link Posted: 2/15/2013 2:36:26 PM EST
[#42]
Link Posted: 2/15/2013 3:02:14 PM EST
[#43]
Link Posted: 2/15/2013 7:43:01 PM EST
[#44]
Maybe the drop  in McDonalds is due to the news they have horse meat in their burgers.

And Walmart, well just fuck walmart

Link Posted: 2/15/2013 9:34:41 PM EST
[#45]
Quoted:
Maybe the drop  in McDonalds is due to the news they have horse meat in their burgers.

And Walmart, well just fuck walmart



That was BK wasn't it?  Not that it matters.  Horse/beef/sheep/pig.....Meat is meat.

And yes, fuck Walmart.  Too bad we are short of options out here in BFE.
Link Posted: 2/15/2013 9:51:57 PM EST
[#46]
Link Posted: 2/15/2013 9:57:59 PM EST
[#47]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Maybe the drop  in McDonalds is due to the news they have horse meat in their burgers.

And Walmart, well just fuck walmart



That was BK wasn't it?  Not that it matters.  Horse/beef/sheep/pig.....Meat is meat.

And yes, fuck Walmart.  Too bad we are short of options out here in BFE.


Meat is meat ... when I was a kid, I fried-up and ate a big mess of field larks ... they eat just like doves.   Horses are perfect for hauling an emergency lunch around in.  


We prefer ribeye, but I'd eat a cat if it came to it.  The Philippines left a lot of meaty questions unanswered. Thailand didn't help either.
Link Posted: 2/15/2013 9:59:07 PM EST
[#48]
Link Posted: 2/15/2013 10:53:05 PM EST
[#49]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Maybe the drop  in McDonalds is due to the news they have horse meat in their burgers.

And Walmart, well just fuck walmart



That was BK wasn't it?  Not that it matters.  Horse/beef/sheep/pig.....Meat is meat.

And yes, fuck Walmart.  Too bad we are short of options out here in BFE.


Meat is meat ... when I was a kid, I fried-up and ate a big mess of field larks ... they eat just like doves.   Horses are perfect for hauling an emergency lunch around in.  


We prefer ribeye, but I'd eat a cat if it came to it.  The Philippines left a lot of meaty questions unanswered. Thailand didn't help either.


The only way I'd eat a fried cat .... is if the grill was broke.    


Link Posted: 2/15/2013 11:07:19 PM EST
[#50]



Is the Dollar Dying? Why US Currency Is in Danger




"Generally speaking, it is not believed by the vast majority that the American dollar will be overthrown," Dick Bove, vice president of equity research at Rafferty Capital Markets, said in a note. "But it will be, and this defrocking may occur in as short a period as five to 10 years."



For a country with a budget deficit in excess of $1 trillion a year, the consequences of losing standing as the world's reserve currency would be dire.










Read the article on CNBC here:  http://www.cnbc.com/id/100461159


















"We've already told them what we'll do when we hit our real lending ceiling....we'll default.  We will either do that in an upfront way, and go through an actual default, or we'll do it the dishonest way and just print the money to pay them off.  Either way its the same, whether we don't pay it, or pay it with near worthless money its all the same"  There's no doubt we'll debase the money.




Once countries start to consider this reality, they're not going to feel real comfortable buying our debt.   That's the begin, and it may have already begun.  We'll just buy our own debt, like we're already doing, which IS currency debasement, don't be fooled by the street name "Quantitative easing" which is used to white wash it.  It's currency debasement.  The result is less valuable currency.  Any way you look at it the end move is hyper-inflation.  












 
Page / 152
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top