User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 12/26/2017 8:53:53 PM EST
[#1]
CBU-100 also known as Rockeye
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/26/2017 8:54:01 PM EST
[#2]
CHUCK NORRIS
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/26/2017 9:04:08 PM EST
[#3]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/26/2017 9:08:03 PM EST
[#4]
M1A1 Tank
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/26/2017 9:10:55 PM EST
[#5]
A-10
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/26/2017 9:23:09 PM EST
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Carl G M2/3/4 84 MM recoiless followed by the M72 series. Sooo nice. Saaaaaaay, I've been following your form 1 re-activation, was yours one of the deacts up for sale at Numrich/gunparts corp? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/26/2017 9:29:29 PM EST
[#7]
Quoted:
Direct fire using eyeballs and sights only (will accept optics as long as glass only; no targeting or tracking tech). Will also allow for mines, command detonated or switch/lever engaged. Mine? (get it?) Panzerfaust. For what it was, huge impact on the battlefield. If I was rich as all get go? M3 90mm towed AT gun... |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/26/2017 9:30:44 PM EST
[#8]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/26/2017 9:33:30 PM EST
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
OK, I will respond in the spirit which the OP wants. The British PIAT, but only if I don't have to fire it, or cock it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/26/2017 9:34:09 PM EST
[#10]
Davy Crockett count? I'm a little iffy on aiming AT weapons and I'd really rather not get too close to an enemy tank.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/26/2017 9:38:56 PM EST
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
M40 106mm Recoilless Rifle.... My original MOS...0351
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/26/2017 9:42:32 PM EST
[#12]
Since it actually can kill modern tanks:
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/26/2017 9:44:56 PM EST
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Whoa brother. You really just dated yourself. Supposedly ours had to be removed because the bakelite that covered the perforations in the cartridge cases deteriorated when they were not kept in temperature/humidity controlled storeage. Kind of suspicious since there were so many people to buy new ammo from off the shelf. And a lot of the new ammo was better. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/26/2017 9:46:00 PM EST
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Since it actually can kill modern tanks: http://modernfirearms.net/userfiles/images/grenade/gl04/rpg-29.jpg |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/26/2017 10:38:58 PM EST
[#15]
Does a Carl Gustaf in 30-06 count?
 Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/26/2017 10:42:54 PM EST
[#16]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/26/2017 10:49:07 PM EST
[#17]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/26/2017 11:55:54 PM EST
[#18]
112 is the best mm.
This thing is a monster compared to most portable AT weapons and while it's classified as a recoilless rifle, recoilless it ain't. Hold it poorly and you get a broken nose and get knocked off your feet. Training tubes made from live shot rounds often have dried blood inside the face shield. Anyone who has actually shot a live round (not a training rocket) out of one is considered kind of a big deal even if ranked a jäger. At 720 mm RHAe penetration the single stage HEAT round with a 5 lbs charge of RDX is comparable to AT missiles, as well as earlier tank cannon KE rounds (better than M829A1 for example). |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2017 1:26:26 PM EST
[#19]
Besides the obvious (i.e. CG) I'd have to go with Stridsvagnsmina 6. As I did my basic as an Army engineer I have a particular fondness for it.
 It can take out any MBT in the World, and it has lots of options when it comes to fuzes and booby traps. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2017 7:06:44 PM EST
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Besides the obvious (i.e. CG) I'd have to go with Stridsvagnsmina 6. As I did my basic as an Army engineer I have a particular fondness for it. http://smhs.com.dinstudio.se/files/IMG_8808.JPG It can take out any MBT in the World, and it has lots of options when it comes to fuzes and booby traps. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2017 7:21:22 PM EST
[#21]
Modern day weapon...I'd want to buddy up with Carl.
Old school-The Polish Wz 35. It fires a 225 grain 8mm bullet at 4180 fps and muzzle energy equal to the .460 Weatherby. It didn't use a hardened penetrator, instead it used a standard lead core and relied on the squash-head principle so beloved by the Brits. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2017 7:47:17 PM EST
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It is a fully functional Carl Gustav M2 (on a Form 1) Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Dude, is that a display piece? I'm jealous. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2017 7:53:17 PM EST
[#23]
If we can use vehicles, I'll take an M50 ONTOS-- six 106mm recoilless rifles-- probably not so effective against modern armor, but a serious kick for me and my pals to run-- also they have a low weight-to-square-foot ratio, in Vietnam they just scooted through the rice paddies when almost anything else would get stuck, and I bet they'd perform well in sand, allowing for upgraded engine aspiration-- an absolute hellraiser crossed with a fireworks show--
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2017 7:55:39 PM EST
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yes, but finding someone to do the welding (and keeping it Form 1 legal) has been a huge pain in the ass. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Carl G M2/3/4 84 MM recoiless followed by the M72 series. Sooo nice. Saaaaaaay, I've been following your form 1 re-activation, was yours one of the deacts up for sale at Numrich/gunparts corp? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2017 7:57:17 PM EST
[#25]
AT 4 seemed cool, LAW looks like a lighter version of it.
TBH As airborne it always bothered me that we didn't have a good go-to for MBT's other than a Javelin. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2017 7:59:10 PM EST
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Modern day weapon...I'd want to buddy up with Carl. Old school-The Polish Wz 35. It fires a 225 grain 8mm bullet at 4180 fps and muzzle energy equal to the .460 Weatherby. It didn't use a hardened penetrator, instead it used a standard lead core and relied on the squash-head principle so beloved by the Brits. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2017 8:01:06 PM EST
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
AT 4 seemed cool, LAW looks like a lighter version of it. TBH As airborne it always bothered me that we didn't have a good go-to for MBT's other than a Javelin. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2017 10:21:45 PM EST
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
https://i.imgur.com/So2Knf0.jpg I'm old school.... Takes a Diamond to cut another Diamond theory.... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2017 11:02:49 PM EST
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Please explain. It was thought to cause spalling inside the crew compartment would be my guess? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Modern day weapon...I'd want to buddy up with Carl. Old school-The Polish Wz 35. It fires a 225 grain 8mm bullet at 4180 fps and muzzle energy equal to the .460 Weatherby. It didn't use a hardened penetrator, instead it used a standard lead core and relied on the squash-head principle so beloved by the Brits. It would defeat 33mm of RHA at 100 meters, 15 mm at 300 meters and it was effective against slightly angled armor as well, but of course armor development quickly made it obsolete. Barrel life was approximately 300 rounds, more than sufficient for a battlefield weapon. Still, it was an interesting early-war solution and actually performed fairly well against thin-skinned vehicles. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2017 11:22:10 PM EST
[#30]
Something I was gonna ask the 11B types here.
Did any of you guys ever fire an M-72 at a hard target and see it "Bounce OFF!?" I jut finished reading "38 North Yankee" for about the forth time in the last 25+ years and it seemed (M72's bouncing off T-55's) to be sort'a bullshit. Not that a 66mm HEAT round was all that and a bag of chips but.... |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2017 11:27:02 PM EST
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's cool that they included the cut out side of the tube with it. You might be costing me some money! Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Carl G M2/3/4 84 MM recoiless followed by the M72 series. Sooo nice. Saaaaaaay, I've been following your form 1 re-activation, was yours one of the deacts up for sale at Numrich/gunparts corp?
The cut out piece of the tube was not included with either of the demilked ones I bought. The guy that did the welding for me had to machine a whole new part (curved and tapered) to fit in the cut-out hole in the tube. Fortunately, I didn’t have to be there for the machining, just the welding. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2017 2:13:57 AM EST
[#32]
My favorite is the SMAW-D. I don’t know how effective it is against armor, but it punched right through the wall of our TOC when one of the LTs accidentally fired it.
Fond memory... |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2017 2:34:41 AM EST
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
120mm APFSDSDU
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2017 3:19:17 AM EST
[#34]
Carl G all day long.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2017 3:26:57 AM EST
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Game, set, match. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
M388 Davy Crockett 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2017 3:56:03 AM EST
[#36]
Pretty partial to the MK153 SMAW myself.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2017 4:08:55 AM EST
[#37]
No love for the awesomeness that was the PIAT?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2017 4:26:15 AM EST
[#38]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2017 7:52:08 AM EST
[#39]
155mm IED
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2017 7:58:58 AM EST
[#40]
Surprised no one has brought this up. British PIAT
 Weaponology - "British PIAT" |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2017 8:21:01 AM EST
[#41]
W85
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2017 8:33:32 AM EST
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
A10 Thunderbolt II |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2017 8:36:05 AM EST
[#43]
Quote HistoryCheck out the thread in Team.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2017 8:38:12 AM EST
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I’m old skool 11boo. We had 90mm RR, and that thing kicked ass. Unless you had to carry it. Then we transitioned to the M72. Half the power, fraction of the weight. Still preferred the 90mm. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2017 8:41:41 AM EST
[#45]
I remember picking anti-tank all the time in Red Orchestra just because of how fun it was to use the rifle against infantry. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2017 8:56:33 AM EST
[#46]
I like off-route AT mines,whether they're EFPs,LAWs,very short barrel 105s nailed to trees...they're just sneaky.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2017 9:33:24 AM EST
[#47]
8.8 cm Flak
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2017 9:41:18 AM EST
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No love for the awesomeness that was the PIAT? http://www.inert-ord.net/atrkts/piat/piatlauncher.jpg |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2017 9:44:24 AM EST
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Since it actually can kill modern tanks: http://modernfirearms.net/userfiles/images/grenade/gl04/rpg-29.jpg Assads T-72's with reactive armor didn't fair well against those RPG-29's live leak RPG-29 vs T72 |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2017 9:49:00 AM EST
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Didn't we buy back a few from someplace like Turkey or South Korea and send them to Afganistan a few years back? South Korea, Norway, Switzerland, and Taiwan still make ammo for it. Supposedly ours had to be removed because the bakelite that covered the perforations in the cartridge cases deteriorated when they were not kept in temperature/humidity controlled storeage. Kind of suspicious since there were so many people to buy new ammo from off the shelf. And a lot of the new ammo was better. I had not heard that we bought them back from overseas allies, but it's possible. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
