Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 3
Posted: 8/12/2012 3:03:38 PM EDT
I,ll make it a poll.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:04:25 PM EDT
[#1]
Single - $40k
Family - $60k
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:04:51 PM EDT
[#2]



Quoted:


Single - $40k

Family - $60k


sounds about right



 
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:05:02 PM EDT
[#3]
In before the poll.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:05:31 PM EDT
[#4]

Shouldn't it be a range?


Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:06:08 PM EDT
[#5]
Quoted:
Single - $40k
Family - $60k


Really?

What do you consider the next tier?
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:06:36 PM EDT
[#6]
lower middle 20k-35k

true middle class 35k-70k

upper middle class 70k-100k
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:07:51 PM EDT
[#7]
I think that a lot of people are confused about what "middle class" means.  They think that it means you have three cars, and a boat in the driveway.

There's poor, middle-class, and rich.  If you aren't poor, and you aren't rich, you're middle class.  But a lot of people think they're poor, when they aren't.  Sorry, but I just can't call you poor when you have a car, cell phone, flat-screen TV, video game console, etc..
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:08:14 PM EDT
[#8]
How could anyone honestly not think 50k is middle class ? Go look up national averages, its pretty clear that would be in the middle or likely slightly above it.

Honestly it would depend on where you live and family size but as I rule I would say about 35-40k for a small family of 4 or less. Less than that would be poor. That is lower middle class as there is definitely a lower and upper end.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:08:28 PM EDT
[#9]
Are these numbers gross or net pay?

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:08:31 PM EDT
[#10]
Depends on where you live.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:09:13 PM EDT
[#11]
You should clarify whether single or couple for the salary to be considered middle class.

$60k & Single = is living very very very well.

$60k & a wife with 3 kids.... not middle class.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:09:44 PM EDT
[#12]
Quoted:
I think that a lot of people are confused about what "middle class" means.  They think that it means you have three cars, and a boat in the driveway.

There's poor, middle-class, and rich.  If you aren't poor, and you aren't rich, you're middle class.  But a lot of people think they're poor, when they aren't.  Sorry, but I just can't call you poor when you have a car, cell phone, flat-screen TV, video game console, etc..


Agreed. There is different levels of rich and poor though.

I would say 20k and 30k could both be poor depending on area and family size but there will obviously be a difference in quality of life between 20k and 30k.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:10:29 PM EDT
[#13]
Quoted:
Depends on where you live.


This. It's all relevant.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:10:46 PM EDT
[#14]
$75k per person in the metro area of a large city like mine. (Even more if you have a family)
I wouldn't even consider my income "middle class", and it's in the low 40k range depending on how much OT I work.

 
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:11:04 PM EDT
[#15]
Depends on where you live.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:11:27 PM EDT
[#16]
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:11:38 PM EDT
[#17]
Quoted:
Depends on where you live.


This is a big factor. $50K may be average and afford you a decent life in many places, but in many major metro areas that would barely scrape you by, let alone a family.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:11:40 PM EDT
[#18]
Location, location, location.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:16:17 PM EDT
[#19]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Single - $40k
Family - $60k

sounds about right
 


Agreed
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:20:08 PM EDT
[#20]
I went with 75k and that's for a household. In most areas of the continental US away from a major city. I think with that amount of income as long as your a little frugal you can live without wanting anything even with a small family (2-3 kids).

My thought process for dividing the different classes:

Lower class: 40k household- No money to spare, living paycheck to paycheck.

Middle class: 75k household- Some money to spare. Can save for toys/retirement/etc.

Upper class: 110k+ household- Plenty of money to get by as long as they don't have too many crazy toys. Can afford pretty much anything they want within reason.

Now take this with a grain of salt if trying to live in an urban area.. That shit is crazy expensive from my experience.. Probably double my figures if not a little more.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:21:48 PM EDT
[#21]
It's not just salary, it's debt too IMO.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:22:20 PM EDT
[#22]
Are we talking individual or household?
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:23:31 PM EDT
[#23]
Quoted:
Depends on where you live.


I agree. My property taxes are $14,000 a year for a 75x100 with a 3 bedroom 2 bathroom split level.
Family of 4 here needs at least 125-150 a year.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:24:24 PM EDT
[#24]
Quoted:
It's not just salary, it's debt too IMO.


If you are going to look at it that way, then lots of 1%ers are poor.



Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:25:13 PM EDT
[#25]
I live like I am poor.  I could support my lifestyle on $10/hr.  I make what the poll would consider middle class though.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:25:18 PM EDT
[#26]
Class distinctions have little to do with salary.

Upper class has NOTHING to do with salary.

Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:25:51 PM EDT
[#27]
Did I make it in before military members start getting mad people concider them lower class based on thier salary?
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:26:48 PM EDT
[#28]
I'm not sure, which salary level allows the OP to buy the correct vowel to spell salary?

Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:28:28 PM EDT
[#29]
Depends on where you live.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:28:42 PM EDT
[#30]
Quoted:
lower middle 20k-35k

true middle class 35k-70k

upper middle class 70k-100k


with todays cost of living, i would say that 25k-50k is lower class
and 50-125k is middle class.
you dont get a hell of alot for a 50k salary anymore.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:29:56 PM EDT
[#31]
Totally depends on where you live. $100k/yr in NYC is poor
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:30:46 PM EDT
[#32]
Quoted:
lower middle 20k-35k

true middle class 35k-70k

upper middle class 70k-100k


This is a pretty good representation of what I have seen...but of course it really depends on where you live.
$100k in Spruce Knob, WV is going to go a lot further than in a NYC.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:31:32 PM EDT
[#33]
Quoted:
Class distinctions have little to do with salary.

Upper class has NOTHING to do with salary.



That all depends on what definitions one chooses to employ.

It would be willfully ignorant to deny that in America income is generally the most popular determinant of social class.

That essay you posted in previous thread about social classes was a good read, too.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:31:42 PM EDT
[#34]
Quoted:
Did I make it in before military members start getting mad people concider them lower class based on thier salary?


Generally, I would say enlisted military jobs have traditionally been considered working class, and officers are considered middle class.



Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:31:53 PM EDT
[#35]



Quoted:


Depends on where you live.


This x1000.



$50,000 a year in WV is like making $225k a year in Baltimore, or like making $500,000 a year in Silicon Valley.



 
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:32:19 PM EDT
[#36]
Quoted:
Did I make it in before military members start getting mad people concider them lower class based on thier salary?


It's because we are lower class based on our salaries

An E-1 only pulls down $18k a year..
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:32:50 PM EDT
[#37]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Class distinctions have little to do with salary.

Upper class has NOTHING to do with salary.



That all depends on what definitions one chooses to employ.

It would be willfully ignorant to deny that in America income is generally the most popular determinant of social class.

That essay you posted in previous thread about social classes was a good read, too.


Link?
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:35:18 PM EDT
[#38]
Quoted:
Class distinctions have little to do with salary.

Upper class has NOTHING to do with salary.



To an economist, your economic class is determined by your income.  It might be salary, wages, interest from treasury bonds purchased in the last century, rents/royalties received, dividends from investments or capital gains from same.

None of which has any thing to do with social class, or style, or whatever you want to call it.

Not a very sensible system, but a useful one for looking at large numbers of peoples, not individuals.


Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:36:20 PM EDT
[#39]
Welcome to Fairfield county, CT

The median income for a household in the county was $65,249, and the median income for a family was $77,690.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:36:41 PM EDT
[#40]



Quoted:


Class distinctions have little to do with salary.



Upper class has NOTHING to do with salary.





this. six figures doesnt mean as much if your student loan payment is $1800/ month

 
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:39:29 PM EDT
[#41]
I make about $42,000, and have four kids and a wife.



We sure aren't rich, but, no one is going hungry either.




What has taken a hit, is my ability to save money. Increased fuel and food costs have increased weekly costs, and there is less to save.




I pray that the wife finds work after nursing school, and our situation will surely improve.




Until then, I work as much as it takes. I currently am on a 13 day run.....not much I know.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:50:21 PM EDT
[#42]
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:51:04 PM EDT
[#43]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Class distinctions have little to do with salary.

Upper class has NOTHING to do with salary.



That all depends on what definitions one chooses to employ.

It would be willfully ignorant to deny that in America income is generally the most popular determinant of social class.

That essay you posted in previous thread about social classes was a good read, too.


Link?




Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:51:35 PM EDT
[#44]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Class distinctions have little to do with salary.

Upper class has NOTHING to do with salary.



That all depends on what definitions one chooses to employ.

It would be willfully ignorant to deny that in America income is generally the most popular determinant of social class.

That essay you posted in previous thread about social classes was a good read, too.


Was JFK Jr. ever middle or a lower class, even as an unemployed schmuck who couldn't pass the bar?

I would argue that one's social class is actually a better predictor of income / earnings potential than the other way around.  I wouldn't call anyone upper class if they actually needed to work - those in the upper classes have properties and interests to such extent that they generate plenty of cash flow.

The middle class, or bourgeoisie, that historically made up the merchants and professionals of a society have historically been self-employed, employers themselves, or - at the very least - salaried professionals.  The idea that the middle class even included hourly wage earners is a very recent concept.  One key aspect of middle class people was connections to property - usually at least home ownership and/or small business ownership, and access to education.  This, of course, can mean a wide range of actual incomes or assets values, varying greatly based on region.

Much of the "middle class" rhetoric in politics is actually about working class people getting paid enough to live on par with traditional middle class people.  This was the "achievement" of unions, etc. in the 20th century.  Whether this is sustainable or not is a different story entirely.  That, combined with free flowing credit, has caused a lot of people to think themselves middle class despite actually owning nothing, and owing more to a bank than they own in assets.  The sustainability of this kind of lifestyle is also questionable.

Much of the politics of America has been based on the idea that nearly all of us think of ourselves as middle class - from the wealthiest executives to the most meager wage earner.  Then we have the welfare rates that seem to live better than the latter, but I digress.

I don't know what I did with that essay I used to have, and can't find it online now - but that guy has pretty solid insights.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:52:37 PM EDT
[#45]
Quoted:
lower middle 20k-35k

true middle class 35k-70k

upper middle class 70k-100k


dis right cheer.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:53:29 PM EDT
[#46]
depends on where you live, me and my wife make over 150K a year and I would be no means consider us upper class, we do ok but don't live in a big house,  have new cars, or go on lavish vacations.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:54:02 PM EDT
[#47]
Before or after taxes ?

Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:55:41 PM EDT
[#48]
Quoted:
lower middle 20k-35k

true middle class 35k-70k

upper middle class 70k-100k


This.
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:56:23 PM EDT
[#49]
Quoted:
Single - $40k
Family - $60k


This is close, but it depends on where you live.  

Also, "salary."
Link Posted: 8/12/2012 3:57:12 PM EDT
[#50]
Quoted:
lower middle 20k-35k

true middle class 35k-70k

upper middle class 70k-100k


In this area this is about right. Its sad when teachers are making the low end of lower middle class...
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 3
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top