Quote History Quoted:
Bet that didn't happen as often when women didn't work with men or in the military. Don't hear a lot of this on construction sites, coal mines or oil rigs. Mix young men and women with time on their hands and add less discipline, equals more shit like this.
View Quote
I got out in Dec 98 after spending 12.5 years in field artillery, and women weren’t assigned to FA units lower than brigade HQ or equivalent (divarty HQ, corps arty HQ, etc.) However, we did have females in support MOSs assigned/attached during field training and deployments and I don’t recall ever hearing about any sexual misconduct or harassment. In one unit, however, we did have an E7 busted to E5 for sexually harassing an underage female dependent of an an E6 in the unit.
In any case, the problem isn’t male & female soldiers working together, it’s shitty individual soldiers and shitty leadership. I remember an instance when I was a SPC stationed in Korea (89-90) and a bunch of us E1-E4 in the section were talking about women. “If we had females in the unit I’d be trying to fuck one of them!” Our chief spoke up then, saying that we wouldn't because she’s a soldier too. No yelling, no counseling statements or threats of punishment, just straight superior to subordinate talk. So yeah, sometimes young male soldiers will talk like young men instead of young soldiers, but good leaders will be on top of it and good soldiers will learn a lesson. Are things different nowadays? Having enlisted in 86 I had plenty of leaders who’d been around in the post-Viet Nam army so yeah, discipline could absolutely have gone out the window again in some units. Maybe in some units only lip service is being paid to taking care of soldiers’ mental and emotional health after multiple deployments and this kind of stuff is what it leads to. Or maybe leadership schools have cut instruction in army mores and values to cover other subjects. I know we must have spent close to a week on those and related subjects during PLDC in ‘91.