Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 4
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 11:01:18 AM EDT
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By MudEagle:
SDBs have been shit for years.

I dropped the first GBU-39 in combat over in Afghanistan and it sucked then, too.

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/470117/IMG_6505_jpg-2333317_JPG-3199391.JPG
View Quote


This is exactly what concerns me.  Lots of new technology doesn't work out.  That's ok, but we need to learn from it and move on.  Spending more time and money on stuff that doesn't work is a dis-service to our nation.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 11:01:30 AM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By fadedsun:

How many patriot batteries has Russia “taken out”, @aaron56 ?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By fadedsun:

How many patriot batteries has Russia “taken out”, @aaron56 ?





This is just ONE video of one being hit but you should be able to get the idea...

(there are several videos like this dude. wake up...)









Seriously doubt that Ukraine can 'buff that shit out'.

Tell us all some more lies about how NO American or NATO troops have been killed in this conflict so far dude and then remind us how we 'trained' the Ukrainians to operate all of our 'state of the art' NATO equipment all by themselves...

(no freaking way any of that hardware is operated by anything other than NATO or American troops dude - that level of training does not happen overnight)  





Take a wild guess what happens to the kids in this picture AFTER their dad gets rounded up / press-ganged into 'service' with the UAF and is promptly sent to the front to be used as cannon fodder in a conflict that they will never 'win'.




Those kids and that family (what remains of it) are screwed for a long, long time. :(

I am trying to remember the last time that we 'helped' any country out with our 'regime change' crap and it somehow actually 'helped' the people living there...

Ronald Reagan once said:
I think you all know that I've always felt the nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the Government, and I'm here to help.


He was not joking there... :(
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 11:02:28 AM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Aaron56:



Sure they have bro...

That is why the LONGEST BRIDGE IN EUROPE is STILL standing and being used every single day and there is not jack or shit that Ukraine can do about it!

https://i.imgur.com/S3yQ3y5.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/Xtb7k8w.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/yAO0vjd.jpg

Seriously dude... The LONGEST FREAKING BRIDGE in Europe connecting Russia to Crimea and Ukraine STILL has not been able to even damage it for more than a few weeks here and there before it is back up and running again???  Shit Shadow cruise missiles for the WIN here for sure!



That is also why when the Russians find out that the Ukrainians are housing foreign troops (or any troops for that matter) in a hotel well behind the front lines and they decide to 'remove' those accommodations from the map entirely due to those reasons - They have absolutely NO PROBLEMS in doing so...


https://i.imgur.com/JXdooxv.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/qMl6wUa.jpg

Before Ukraine started using it for military purposes:
https://i.imgur.com/VaMbkQ1.jpg

After:
https://i.imgur.com/K04pW4G.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/eQSmZjq.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/njEZzA0.jpg

Thank goodness that Ukraine had the finest Western AA defense systems supplied by pretty much ALL of NATO around to help 'protect' all of that!



View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Aaron56:
Originally Posted By BillofRights:


It’s so hard to tell when people are being sarcastic vs. being retarded trolls.  

Patriot/Himars/Storm Shadow have all been highly effective and successful against Russian equipment.    It’s not in dispute.

If you’re trying to push the angle that they’ve failed, it’s only going to succeed in destroying your own credibility.



Sure they have bro...

That is why the LONGEST BRIDGE IN EUROPE is STILL standing and being used every single day and there is not jack or shit that Ukraine can do about it!

https://i.imgur.com/S3yQ3y5.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/Xtb7k8w.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/yAO0vjd.jpg

Seriously dude... The LONGEST FREAKING BRIDGE in Europe connecting Russia to Crimea and Ukraine STILL has not been able to even damage it for more than a few weeks here and there before it is back up and running again???  Shit Shadow cruise missiles for the WIN here for sure!



That is also why when the Russians find out that the Ukrainians are housing foreign troops (or any troops for that matter) in a hotel well behind the front lines and they decide to 'remove' those accommodations from the map entirely due to those reasons - They have absolutely NO PROBLEMS in doing so...


https://i.imgur.com/JXdooxv.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/qMl6wUa.jpg

Before Ukraine started using it for military purposes:
https://i.imgur.com/VaMbkQ1.jpg

After:
https://i.imgur.com/K04pW4G.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/eQSmZjq.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/njEZzA0.jpg

Thank goodness that Ukraine had the finest Western AA defense systems supplied by pretty much ALL of NATO around to help 'protect' all of that!





Wow now I'm convinced that Russia is superior to the West. My whole life is a lie.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 11:20:38 AM EDT
[#4]
The Patriot's effectiveness has long been debated.  It's not a bad system, but has not enjoyed complete operational success:

The attacks devastated Saudi oil fields and the oil-processing plants at Abqaiq.  U.S. officials have described 17 points of impact on the facility, and satellite imagery of the aftermath show regular, accurate points of impact on the facilities in question. (2019)

The truth is that whether the intercepts are successful or not, the cost of defending is massive:
30 US Patriot PAC-3 MSE launch at a cost of $5 million per missile. That’s $150 million gone within 2 mins.

It's okay, American's didn't need the money anyway... the un-elected Federal Reserve will just print more money and America will create new tent cities for those who can't afford a home:



Biden and his Neocon bosses call this "a smart investment"
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 11:29:42 AM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Pallas:
I suppose the only positive out of our involvement with something that is none of our business is that we are getting good intelligence on what does and doesn't work in this sort of battle space.
View Quote


I would speculate that the Russians are even winning on that ground.
Seems like they are adapting and overcoming far more quickly than the West.
For sure all of these lessons are not being wasted...and passed on to the Chinese
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 11:37:35 AM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By crownvic96:
It's basically a kit that adapts a SDB size warhead and glide body to a M26 rocket that can be fired from a MLRS/HIMAARS and turns it into a glider.

I think when the requirement originally came out there was like 500k+ M26 rockets in inventory so it was (in theory) going to be a lower cost way to add some additional precision fires at a decent range to the inventory.

What's interesting is the SAAB site says it has anti-jam features.
https://www.saab.com/products/ground-launched-small-diameter-bomb-glsdb

I'm guessing the TTP's (or lack thereof) are they're probably launching 1 or 2 in a fairly direct route and they're just getting blasted with EMI/Jamming. They really should be launched in a volley with them programmed to attack a target from multiple directions.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By crownvic96:
Originally Posted By Aimless:
How does "dirt" and "doing it on the ground"
affect a glide bomb? Were these intended to be launched from an aircraft? What's dirt got to do with it?
It's basically a kit that adapts a SDB size warhead and glide body to a M26 rocket that can be fired from a MLRS/HIMAARS and turns it into a glider.

I think when the requirement originally came out there was like 500k+ M26 rockets in inventory so it was (in theory) going to be a lower cost way to add some additional precision fires at a decent range to the inventory.

What's interesting is the SAAB site says it has anti-jam features.
https://www.saab.com/products/ground-launched-small-diameter-bomb-glsdb
SDB is a 250-pound class weapon with an Advanced Anti-Jam GPS System-aided Inertial Navigation System, combined with a multipurpose, penetrating blast-and-fragmentation warhead and programmable electronic fuze.

I'm guessing the TTP's (or lack thereof) are they're probably launching 1 or 2 in a fairly direct route and they're just getting blasted with EMI/Jamming. They really should be launched in a volley with them programmed to attack a target from multiple directions.

I never worked on this one but I know guys that have and their accounts all jive with this 100%. It was my impression that it was somewhat cobbled together and more of a prototype level of maturity. Of course I can’t say it wasn’t refined beyond that level at some point, but I’m suspicious it wasn’t.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 11:39:01 AM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By BASE:

I never worked on this one but I know guys that have and their accounts all jive with this 100%. It was my impression that it was somewhat cobbled together and more of a prototype level of maturity. Of course I can’t say it wasn’t refined beyond that level at some point, but I’m suspicious it wasn’t.
View Quote

It was a proposal the US mil previously passed on.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 11:42:04 AM EDT
[#8]
Russia does excel with their electronic warfare.  It’s not so much that the US lacks the technology.  It’s that Russia has no reservation about subjecting their own people to the unhealthy amounts of radiation they produce.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 11:46:09 AM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By lokifox:


Wow now I'm convinced that Russia is superior to the West. My whole life is a lie.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By lokifox:
Originally Posted By Aaron56:
Originally Posted By BillofRights:


It’s so hard to tell when people are being sarcastic vs. being retarded trolls.  

Patriot/Himars/Storm Shadow have all been highly effective and successful against Russian equipment.    It’s not in dispute.

If you’re trying to push the angle that they’ve failed, it’s only going to succeed in destroying your own credibility.



Sure they have bro...

That is why the LONGEST BRIDGE IN EUROPE is STILL standing and being used every single day and there is not jack or shit that Ukraine can do about it!

https://i.imgur.com/S3yQ3y5.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/Xtb7k8w.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/yAO0vjd.jpg

Seriously dude... The LONGEST FREAKING BRIDGE in Europe connecting Russia to Crimea and Ukraine STILL has not been able to even damage it for more than a few weeks here and there before it is back up and running again???  Shit Shadow cruise missiles for the WIN here for sure!



That is also why when the Russians find out that the Ukrainians are housing foreign troops (or any troops for that matter) in a hotel well behind the front lines and they decide to 'remove' those accommodations from the map entirely due to those reasons - They have absolutely NO PROBLEMS in doing so...


https://i.imgur.com/JXdooxv.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/qMl6wUa.jpg

Before Ukraine started using it for military purposes:
https://i.imgur.com/VaMbkQ1.jpg

After:
https://i.imgur.com/K04pW4G.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/eQSmZjq.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/njEZzA0.jpg

Thank goodness that Ukraine had the finest Western AA defense systems supplied by pretty much ALL of NATO around to help 'protect' all of that!





Wow now I'm convinced that Russia is superior to the West. My whole life is a lie.


The argument is very much an oversimplification.  Russia has long been a hot mess held together by authoritarianism, as a democratic process would split it up pretty quickly.  That said the Russians do certain things better that anyone else:

Dr. Phillip Karber on the Russian Way of War


Electronic Warfare and Air Defense for 2.  

With Russia's adversaries heavily invested in technological warfare and airpower, then EW and Air Defense are smart investments.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 11:58:25 AM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By R_S:


The argument is very much an oversimplification.  Russia has long been a hot mess held together by authoritarianism, as a democratic process would split it up pretty quickly.  That said the Russians do certain things better that anyone else:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CMby_WPjk4

Electronic Warfare and Air Defense for 2.  

With Russia's adversaries heavily invested in technological warfare and airpower, then EW and Air Defense are smart investments.
View Quote


Neat. I used to teach RNGW and the associated concepts professionally, in an effort to counter those Russian efforts once we identified they were going to be a problem.

A huge part of the western hubris that is causing us to fail is our inability to change our frame of reference when dealing with problems.  We look at everything in war as tank on tank, causing more casualties = victory.  The new coalition of our competitors have spent their last 10 years pivoting their military capacity and doctrine to address this, as they have no desire to go head to head with the west, and have no ability to come close to parity with tactical force-on-force.  They have found every hole in our methodology and spent significant resources developing asymmetric means to exploit them.

The western lense and our inability to see past it is why we aren't successful in Ukraine. It's on full display every single day on this board.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 12:00:49 PM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By WUPHF:
Seems like a great opportunity to refine that technology for better performance against our adversaries countermeasures.
View Quote


This.  Test and refine until it works.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 12:39:37 PM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By daemon734:


Neat. I used to teach RNGW and the associated concepts professionally, in an effort to counter those Russian efforts once we identified they were going to be a problem.

A huge part of the western hubris that is causing us to fail is our inability to change our frame of reference when dealing with problems.  We look at everything in war as tank on tank, causing more casualties = victory.  The new coalition of our competitors have spent their last 10 years pivoting their military capacity and doctrine to address this, as they have no desire to go head to head with the west, and have no ability to come close to parity with tactical force-on-force.  They have found every hole in our methodology and spent significant resources developing asymmetric means to exploit them.

The western lense and our inability to see past it is why we aren't successful in Ukraine. It's on full display every single day on this board.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By daemon734:
Originally Posted By R_S:


The argument is very much an oversimplification.  Russia has long been a hot mess held together by authoritarianism, as a democratic process would split it up pretty quickly.  That said the Russians do certain things better that anyone else:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CMby_WPjk4

Electronic Warfare and Air Defense for 2.  

With Russia's adversaries heavily invested in technological warfare and airpower, then EW and Air Defense are smart investments.


Neat. I used to teach RNGW and the associated concepts professionally, in an effort to counter those Russian efforts once we identified they were going to be a problem.

A huge part of the western hubris that is causing us to fail is our inability to change our frame of reference when dealing with problems.  We look at everything in war as tank on tank, causing more casualties = victory.  The new coalition of our competitors have spent their last 10 years pivoting their military capacity and doctrine to address this, as they have no desire to go head to head with the west, and have no ability to come close to parity with tactical force-on-force.  They have found every hole in our methodology and spent significant resources developing asymmetric means to exploit them.

The western lense and our inability to see past it is why we aren't successful in Ukraine. It's on full display every single day on this board.


I think the West  would need to have cohesive and specific goals for a meaningful discussion on this.

Failures of specific weapons systems to enable strategic victories in a proxy war certainly aren't a reflection of the quality or effectiveness of other weapons systems.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 12:47:30 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By T1NMAN:


I would speculate that the Russians are even winning on that ground.
Seems like they are adapting and overcoming far more quickly than the West.
For sure all of these lessons are not being wasted...and passed on to the Chinese
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By T1NMAN:
Originally Posted By Pallas:
I suppose the only positive out of our involvement with something that is none of our business is that we are getting good intelligence on what does and doesn't work in this sort of battle space.


I would speculate that the Russians are even winning on that ground.
Seems like they are adapting and overcoming far more quickly than the West.
For sure all of these lessons are not being wasted...and passed on to the Chinese
Perhaps the most ominous part of General Cavoli's recent testimony before Congress  was that the Russian Army was not only larger, but also "...the Russian military in the past year has shown an accelerating ability to learn and adapt to battlefield challenges both tactically and technologically...and has become a learning organization that little resembles the chaotic force that invaded Ukraine two years ago."

So in summary after two years of fighting, massive economic sanctions, and billions of dollars in weapons and cash sent to Ukraine, Russia is now stronger than it was before the war started.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 12:49:29 PM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By lokifox:

Failures of specific weapons systems to enable strategic victories in a proxy war certainly aren't a reflection of the quality or effectiveness of other weapons systems.
View Quote


They aren't, the sidebar was on the macro situation, not a specific weapons system.

With that said, even the employment of a lot of our more successful systems is being mitigated by asymmetric or low technology TTPs and countermeasures which we as a force never applied enough importance towards.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 12:58:40 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By R0N:

It was a proposal the US mil previously passed on.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By R0N:
Originally Posted By BASE:

I never worked on this one but I know guys that have and their accounts all jive with this 100%. It was my impression that it was somewhat cobbled together and more of a prototype level of maturity. Of course I can't say it wasn't refined beyond that level at some point, but I'm suspicious it wasn't.

It was a proposal the US mil previously passed on.
Yeah. I think it was originally a IR&D between Boeing/Saab.i think you can fire a whole mlrs battery of these for the cost of one atacms too which was why it was appealing.

Looks like Russia has a new barrage jammer that's probably causing the issues.
https://www.ocnus.net/article.php?Electronic-Weapons-Russian-GPS-INS-Disruption-in-Ukraine-66596

That can be easily solved with a barrage of glsdbs and a HARM If they can get the harm within range.

The key is the lack or early learning curve of TTPs for this thing in the article. I'm sure they'll get it unfucked. These seem like a pretty solid deal if they can get the gn&c updated or find a way to get some updates into the INS earlier and/or a better INS with lower drift.


Link Posted: 4/28/2024 1:00:28 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By GarandM1:
Perhaps the most ominous part of General Cavoli's recent testimony before Congress  was that the Russian Army was not only larger, but also "...the Russian military in the past year has shown an accelerating ability to learn and adapt to battlefield challenges both tactically and technologically...and has become a learning organization that little resembles the chaotic force that invaded Ukraine two years ago."

So in summary after two years of fighting, massive economic sanctions, and billions of dollars in weapons and cash sent to Ukraine, Russia is now stronger than it was before the war started.
View Quote
Remember what Austin said "our goal is to weaken the Russian military".   Its just like John Mearsheimer said in one of his videos recently   "America has the reverse of the Midas touch".  Basically everything we touch turns to shit.  Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and especially Ukraine.   It never ends.  
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 1:00:47 PM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By daemon734:


Neat. I used to teach RNGW and the associated concepts professionally, in an effort to counter those Russian efforts once we identified they were going to be a problem.

A huge part of the western hubris that is causing us to fail is our inability to change our frame of reference when dealing with problems.  We look at everything in war as tank on tank, causing more casualties = victory.  The new coalition of our competitors have spent their last 10 years pivoting their military capacity and doctrine to address this, as they have no desire to go head to head with the west, and have no ability to come close to parity with tactical force-on-force.  They have found every hole in our methodology and spent significant resources developing asymmetric means to exploit them.

The western lense and our inability to see past it is why we aren't successful in Ukraine. It's on full display every single day on this board.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By daemon734:
Originally Posted By R_S:


The argument is very much an oversimplification.  Russia has long been a hot mess held together by authoritarianism, as a democratic process would split it up pretty quickly.  That said the Russians do certain things better that anyone else:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CMby_WPjk4

Electronic Warfare and Air Defense for 2.  

With Russia's adversaries heavily invested in technological warfare and airpower, then EW and Air Defense are smart investments.


Neat. I used to teach RNGW and the associated concepts professionally, in an effort to counter those Russian efforts once we identified they were going to be a problem.

A huge part of the western hubris that is causing us to fail is our inability to change our frame of reference when dealing with problems.  We look at everything in war as tank on tank, causing more casualties = victory.  The new coalition of our competitors have spent their last 10 years pivoting their military capacity and doctrine to address this, as they have no desire to go head to head with the west, and have no ability to come close to parity with tactical force-on-force.  They have found every hole in our methodology and spent significant resources developing asymmetric means to exploit them.

The western lense and our inability to see past it is why we aren't successful in Ukraine. It's on full display every single day on this board.


One thousand and one thank you's!  Hubris is our greatest problem.  It restores my faith in humanity to hear that there are professionals out there working the reality of the situation.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 1:02:46 PM EDT
[#18]
It's Boeing. I have zero confidence it will get unfucked.

There is a reason Raytheon/LM/General Atomics looked at it and said "nope". Namely: "let's fire an air dropped IRU out of a rocket launcher, it should work"
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 1:03:42 PM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By GarandM1:
Perhaps the most ominous part of General Cavoli's recent testimony before Congress  was that the Russian Army was not only larger, but also "...the Russian military in the past year has shown an accelerating ability to learn and adapt to battlefield challenges both tactically and technologically...and has become a learning organization that little resembles the chaotic force that invaded Ukraine two years ago."

So in summary after two years of fighting, massive economic sanctions, and billions of dollars in weapons and cash sent to Ukraine, Russia is now stronger than it was before the war started.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By GarandM1:
Originally Posted By T1NMAN:
Originally Posted By Pallas:
I suppose the only positive out of our involvement with something that is none of our business is that we are getting good intelligence on what does and doesn't work in this sort of battle space.


I would speculate that the Russians are even winning on that ground.
Seems like they are adapting and overcoming far more quickly than the West.
For sure all of these lessons are not being wasted...and passed on to the Chinese
Perhaps the most ominous part of General Cavoli's recent testimony before Congress  was that the Russian Army was not only larger, but also "...the Russian military in the past year has shown an accelerating ability to learn and adapt to battlefield challenges both tactically and technologically...and has become a learning organization that little resembles the chaotic force that invaded Ukraine two years ago."

So in summary after two years of fighting, massive economic sanctions, and billions of dollars in weapons and cash sent to Ukraine, Russia is now stronger than it was before the war started.


That seems to be pretty typical for Russia.  Russia either succeeds with a massive surprise attack or epically fail, learn from it, and re-double their efforts.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 1:07:13 PM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By daemon734:


They aren't, the sidebar was on the macro situation, not a specific weapons system.

With that said, even the employment of a lot of our more successful systems is being mitigated by asymmetric or low technology TTPs and countermeasures which we as a force never applied enough importance towards.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By daemon734:
Originally Posted By lokifox:

Failures of specific weapons systems to enable strategic victories in a proxy war certainly aren't a reflection of the quality or effectiveness of other weapons systems.


They aren't, the sidebar was on the macro situation, not a specific weapons system.

With that said, even the employment of a lot of our more successful systems is being mitigated by asymmetric or low technology TTPs and countermeasures which we as a force never applied enough importance towards.


Definitely.

As icky as the testbed theory is, and as much as everyone hates to admit it, we are seeing some epic failures being played out in real time (on both sides). How do you breach a two mile thick minefield with defensive lines stacked on the other side without air superiority and ability to flood the ground ahead with mechanized forces? It just isn't possible. Static trench warfare in 2024... What a world.

The question ends up being, can the US fill the gaps in capabilities for both the Pacific pivot and the possibility of a protracted land war in Europe (involving US forces)?
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 1:08:28 PM EDT
[#21]
Measure
Counter-Measure

Store of warfare hasn't changed...

Counter-counter:

Give the first GLSDB of a volley a "Home on GPS Jam" seeker head, problem solved.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 1:10:11 PM EDT
[#22]
So our weapons systems need to be not only teenager Grunt Proof but also Drunken Ukrainian Proof?

Prox fuses have been around since late WW2 and we have White Sands and Eglin AFB for testing these sort of things. Plenty of soft sand at White Sands, and shit ton of mud at Eglin.

If the wet ground/mud not returning a reliable feedback signal to the Prox has been a known quantity, did the contracting officers think it doesn't rain in Afghanistan and Iraq or something?
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 1:11:31 PM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By TheAvatar9265ft:
Measure
Counter-Measure

Store of warfare hasn't changed...

Counter-counter:

Give the first GLSDB of a volley a "Home on GPS Jam" seeker head, problem solved.
View Quote


The targets they're hitting aren't typically going to be the sources of spoofing or jamming.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 1:21:17 PM EDT
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By lokifox:


Definitely.

As icky as the testbed theory is, and as much as everyone hates to admit it, we are seeing some epic failures being played out in real time (on both sides). How do you breach a two mile thick minefield with defensive lines stacked on the other side without air superiority and ability to flood the ground ahead with mechanized forces? It just isn't possible. Static trench warfare in 2024... What a world.

The question ends up being, can the US fill the gaps in capabilities for both the Pacific pivot and the possibility of a protracted land war in Europe (involving US forces)?
View Quote


The problem is we are learning lessons based off Ukraine, not us. A lot of these problems they face would be solved by us in a weekend, versus 2-3 years of stagnation.

GPS denial against 20 year old ordnance? Again, no surprises there.

The ROI here for lessons learned is nowhere remotely near level.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 1:22:38 PM EDT
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By TheAvatar9265ft:
Measure
Counter-Measure

Store of warfare hasn't changed...

Counter-counter

Give the first GLSDB of a volley a "Home on GPS Jam" seeker head, problem solved.
View Quote


Glide bombs arent deviating far enough to become HARM missiles.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 1:36:39 PM EDT
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By daemon734:


Glide bombs arent deviating far enough to become HARM missiles.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By daemon734:
Originally Posted By TheAvatar9265ft:
Measure
Counter-Measure

Store of warfare hasn't changed...

Counter-counter

Give the first GLSDB of a volley a "Home on GPS Jam" seeker head, problem solved.


Glide bombs arent deviating far enough to become HARM missiles.
Would be a nice " surprise, cock fags!" UPGRAYEDD though.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 1:37:18 PM EDT
[Last Edit: TheAvatar9265ft] [#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By daemon734:


Glide bombs arent deviating far enough to become HARM missiles.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By daemon734:
Originally Posted By TheAvatar9265ft:
Measure
Counter-Measure

Store of warfare hasn't changed...

Counter-counter

Give the first GLSDB of a volley a "Home on GPS Jam" seeker head, problem solved.


Glide bombs arent deviating far enough to become HARM missiles.


I'm thinking that these are small local GPS jammers are probably co-located with the GLSDB targets, so minimal deviation required. So make a $50K GPS jammer killing GLSDB.

If it is a high powered jammer, a brigade or division level asset, then that is a target worthy of a $500K HARM.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 1:40:10 PM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By R0N:


Without GPS updates it’s 250lbs class warhead has limited effects against point targets, and it becomes an area fire weapon system

Their FDOs need to take into account they are firing a course correcting munition, but in a GPS degraded environment it’s only good enough for area targets
View Quote


I'm not a rocket surgeon, but what if they make a GLONASS version?
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 1:48:12 PM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By MudEagle:
SDBs have been shit for years.

I dropped the first GBU-39 in combat over in Afghanistan and it sucked then, too.

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/470117/IMG_6505_jpg-2333317_JPG-3199391.JPG
View Quote
How bad or is their level of shittiness so bad that its classified?
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 1:49:53 PM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By R0N:

Radar proximity fuzes will function 1,5-3 times higher than planned for if the ground is wet or snowy,  The lower the angle of fall the higher it will function.
View Quote


So, both factors combining with each other, and being exacerbated by the munition not having the anticipated forward velocity because all of its smash has been converted to lift and minimum airspeed before stall, to maximize glide distance:  all of that means the bomb isn't dudding, but is going off way, way too early and giving the target a shrapnel shower at best.  In some ways, maybe better effects against dug-in troops lacking overhead cover, but those aren't the kinds of targets these sorts of bombs are employed against.

Thanks, TIL...
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 1:55:23 PM EDT
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Rockdiver:
Testing of our current weapons system effectiveness against a near peer adversary is the entire point of our involvement with Ukraine.  This is a proving ground with really intense moulage.
View Quote
You realize our adversaries also get to test their tech against ours.  It's not a one sided affair.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 1:55:46 PM EDT
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By crownvic96:
Yeah. I think it was originally a IR&D between Boeing/Saab.i think you can fire a whole mlrs battery of these for the cost of one atacms too which was why it was appealing.

Looks like Russia has a new barrage jammer that's probably causing the issues.
https://www.ocnus.net/article.php?Electronic-Weapons-Russian-GPS-INS-Disruption-in-Ukraine-66596

That can be easily solved with a barrage of glsdbs and a HARM If they can get the harm within range.

The key is the lack or early learning curve of TTPs for this thing in the article. I'm sure they'll get it unfucked. These seem like a pretty solid deal if they can get the gn&c updated or find a way to get some updates into the INS earlier and/or a better INS with lower drift.


View Quote


Not a problem for NATO forces, at least that part.  If it's broadcasting that heavily, it's visible, and if it's visible, it dies.  F-35 conducting SEAD and other Day 1 elimination of the Red electronic ORBAT is an obvious attack vector; I'm sure there are plenty of others.  

None of which UKE has though.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 1:56:15 PM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Crash_Test_Dhimmi:


I'm not a rocket surgeon, but what if they make a GLONASS version?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Crash_Test_Dhimmi:
Originally Posted By R0N:


Without GPS updates it's 250lbs class warhead has limited effects against point targets, and it becomes an area fire weapon system

Their FDOs need to take into account they are firing a course correcting munition, but in a GPS degraded environment it's only good enough for area targets


I'm not a rocket surgeon, but what if they make a GLONASS version?
I would think most jammers/spoofers probably cover the whole spectrum. All the GNSS constellations are all in similar L-band frequencies. If a mobile phone has a chip to handle almost all of them now it would be a pretty big oversight to just focus on one constellation.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 2:09:01 PM EDT
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By lokifox:


I think the West  would need to have cohesive and specific goals for a meaningful discussion on this.

Failures of specific weapons systems to enable strategic victories in a proxy war certainly aren't a reflection of the quality or effectiveness of other weapons systems.
View Quote

It's enormously frustrating that Russia is at a industrial capacity to make 2-3 million artillery shells a year. And the US's goal is to reach 1million per year in 2025...... . Like, come on guys, this is way more serious then how you are all acting.

If the Western Europe stopped clutching their pearls and actually started getting to work. I can imagine the combined industrial might of the West producing 155 shells; we could reach parity or superiority with shell production. Even if each individual country in of itself is not going gangbusters on artillery ammunition.

To be fair, the US and the West is an air power fighting force. So we're apparently flying by the seat of our pants, in trying to get the stuff Ukraine it needs for the type of fighting they do. but...... IT'S BEEN 2 FUCKING YEARS! Yeah our industrial might wasn't super in 1941; but we we're killing it by 1943.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 2:13:15 PM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By daemon734:


The problem is we are learning lessons based off Ukraine, not us. A lot of these problems they face would be solved by us in a weekend, versus 2-3 years of stagnation.

GPS denial against 20 year old ordnance? Again, no surprises there.

The ROI here for lessons learned is nowhere remotely near level.
View Quote

Preach it. We have to be very careful not to take lessoned learned from the Ukraine war. It'd be like the Royal Navy with all her Dreadnoughts and shit in 1905 watching gunboat battles between two mid-teir powers and being all like "oh shit, we better adjust our tactics to meet this new dynamic!". lol
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 2:32:49 PM EDT
[#36]
Anyone else starting to see a comparison between the Germans testing weapons in Spain before WW2, and the U.S. testing weapons in the Ukraine before going at it with China?
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 2:35:19 PM EDT
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By snuffy19608:
Anyone else starting to see a comparison between the Germans testing weapons in Spain before WW2, and the U.S. testing weapons in the Ukraine before going at it with China?
View Quote


Not until the US starts supplying Ukraine with B21s, F35s, LRASMs, JASSMs, AIM-260s, and laser defensive systems.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 3:21:03 PM EDT
[Last Edit: daemon734] [#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By ArmyInfantryVet:
Yeah our industrial might wasn't super in 1941; but we we're killing it by 1943.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By ArmyInfantryVet:
Yeah our industrial might wasn't super in 1941; but we we're killing it by 1943.


Military manufacturing in 1941 was 2-3 steps removed from factories making toasters and tractors.  That is not the case anymore.

Originally Posted By TheAvatar9265ft:


I'm thinking that these are small local GPS jammers are probably co-located with the GLSDB targets, so minimal deviation required. So make a $50K GPS jammer killing GLSDB.

If it is a high powered jammer, a brigade or division level asset, then that is a target worthy of a $500K HARM.


If any of this were that simple we wouldn't be having this discussion right now.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 3:48:29 PM EDT
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By TheAvatar9265ft:


I'm thinking that these are small local GPS jammers are probably co-located with the GLSDB targets, so minimal deviation required. So make a $50K GPS jammer killing GLSDB.

If it is a high powered jammer, a brigade or division level asset, then that is a target worthy of a $500K HARM.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By TheAvatar9265ft:
Originally Posted By daemon734:
Originally Posted By TheAvatar9265ft:
Measure
Counter-Measure

Store of warfare hasn't changed...

Counter-counter

Give the first GLSDB of a volley a "Home on GPS Jam" seeker head, problem solved.


Glide bombs arent deviating far enough to become HARM missiles.


I'm thinking that these are small local GPS jammers are probably co-located with the GLSDB targets, so minimal deviation required. So make a $50K GPS jammer killing GLSDB.

If it is a high powered jammer, a brigade or division level asset, then that is a target worthy of a $500K HARM.

The effects are pretty wide ranging.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 3:53:36 PM EDT
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Crash_Test_Dhimmi:


I'm not a rocket surgeon, but what if they make a GLONASS version?
View Quote

I am sure anything is possible with enough time and money.
Link Posted: 4/28/2024 4:33:06 PM EDT
[#41]
They should demand a full refund for what they paid for them…oh wait…nevermind
Link Posted: 4/29/2024 12:24:05 AM EDT
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes


Not anymore.

The war in Ukraine has catapulted the Patriot up there and show it is the most effective air defense system in the world.

18 nations operate the Patriot. Compare that to the S400 with 6 current operators. Even the S-300 which is a fairly successful system has less operators than the patriot with 16.

Russians in Ukraine are rocked weekly by strikes deep in areas guarded by S400s and S300 systems.



This is the remains of an S400 battery in Dzhankoi in crimea after a visit by Atacms. The S400 is stated by Russia to be able to take down ballistic missiles.

As you can see it failed. I take that back, it successfully stopped the missile..with the entire battery . Remember, these are the oldest models of Missiles. What's going to happen should Russia ever face off against the PRSM and latest blocks of the Atacms?

Satellite Imagery of Dzhankoi Airbase After ATACMS Strike! S-400 Battery Destroyed


It was last year in May that Russia lost 4 extremely expensive aviation assets to patriot missiles near the border in Bryansk oblast. It was also a Patriot system that took down a Russian Awacs over the sea of Azov earlier this year and damaged the IL22 support plane.

https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2023-05-16/a-black-day-russias-air-force-day-446-war





Originally Posted By R_S:

The truth is that whether the intercepts are successful or not, the cost of defending is massive:
30 US Patriot PAC-3 MSE launch at a cost of $5 million per missile. That’s $150 million gone within 2 mins.


A Pac3 is around 4 million.

The missiles it is shooting down cost:

kh-101/55/555- 13 million
Kalibr-6.5 million
Iskander-3 million
Kinzhal-10 million

And remember, that's not even the most numerous system. Ukraine has 3 patriot batteries with some spare launchers. Most of the patriot systems aren't from America.

I'd run out of room listing all the various systems Ukraine has.

Originally Posted By R_S:
It's okay, American's didn't need the money anyway... the un-elected Federal Reserve will just print more money and America will create new tent cities for those who can't afford a home:


So we need to spend more on entitlements? I thought the problem was excess spending?
Originally Posted By R_S:
Biden and his Neocon bosses call this "a smart investment"


Good

Helping Ukraine is a good investment for us all.

We can break one of the primary threats to America in Europe while we focus on securing peace in Asia





Originally Posted By bgenlvtex:


CIA probably helped them "re-home" them in Africa or South America


Yeah, because SDGLB is such a hot commodity for gangs

Originally Posted By 2JokersWild:
In other words they work well enough but they found a convenient excuse to stop using them and offload them on the black market. 10% paid.


What gang and black market is going to be using a rather specific ground launched munition that allegedly doesn't work?

Originally Posted By JarheadPatriot:
I thought we were only sending them surplus items from the GWOT? Not our latest and greatest?


Yes and no.

Link Posted: 4/29/2024 12:38:02 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 56xdx_Z] [#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Aaron56:





This is just ONE video of one being hit but you should be able to get the idea...

(there are several videos like this dude. wake up...)

https://i.imgur.com/TvQsFwo.png

https://i.imgur.com/aF5gEl7.png

https://i.imgur.com/dSHzww7.png

https://i.imgur.com/vRN7hhl.png

Seriously doubt that Ukraine can 'buff that shit out'.

Tell us all some more lies about how NO American or NATO troops have been killed in this conflict so far dude and then remind us how we 'trained' the Ukrainians to operate all of our 'state of the art' NATO equipment all by themselves...

(no freaking way any of that hardware is operated by anything other than NATO or American troops dude - that level of training does not happen overnight)  





Take a wild guess what happens to the kids in this picture AFTER their dad gets rounded up / press-ganged into 'service' with the UAF and is promptly sent to the front to be used as cannon fodder in a conflict that they will never 'win'.

https://i.imgur.com/UQJd70m.jpg


Those kids and that family (what remains of it) are screwed for a long, long time. :(

I am trying to remember the last time that we 'helped' any country out with our 'regime change' crap and it somehow actually 'helped' the people living there...

Ronald Reagan once said:


He was not joking there... :(
View Quote


Patriot and IRIS-T systems in Kharkov  were supposedly operated by French troops serving in the AFU "foreign legion", many of whom got wiped out in Russian cruise missile strikes. All telegram sources, but this is one possible reason for Macron's meltdown where he was threatening to send thousands of regulars to Ukraine for a bit. They also didn't have great coordination with the air defense operators in that area, who ended up shooting down the IL-76 transport plane loaded with Ukrainian prisoners of war.

Ukraine PR will deny both the foreign operators of missile systems, and the shooting down of their own POWs, but lists  of names are available in both cases. Intel Slava on telegram had a list of 30 french mercenaries who were killed in Kharkov this year (t.me/intelslava/54888). It also makes total sense that complex systems like air defense would have to be operated by foreigners, just look at how the F-16 training program is going, months of delay because the potential ukrainian pilots can't even speak english, etc. Imagine them training operators for a batch of patriot systems all at once.
Link Posted: 4/29/2024 12:45:28 AM EDT
[#44]
Does it use star tracking too?
Link Posted: 4/29/2024 1:15:15 AM EDT
[Last Edit: fadedsun] [#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Aaron56:





This is just ONE video of one being hit but you should be able to get the idea...

(there are several videos like this dude. wake up...)

https://i.imgur.com/TvQsFwo.png

https://i.imgur.com/aF5gEl7.png

https://i.imgur.com/dSHzww7.png

https://i.imgur.com/vRN7hhl.png

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Aaron56:





This is just ONE video of one being hit but you should be able to get the idea...

(there are several videos like this dude. wake up...)

https://i.imgur.com/TvQsFwo.png

https://i.imgur.com/aF5gEl7.png

https://i.imgur.com/dSHzww7.png

https://i.imgur.com/vRN7hhl.png



Can you point out where the command vehicle is? The power generation units? The launchers can be dozens of kilometers (or miles) away from the command vehicle or further with Link16.

2 German supplied truck launchers were destroyed (from the patriot system). Those are one part of the larger patriot battery. You are claiming it's a battery destroyed. That's clearly not the case.



By all means, share the videos. Patriot missile systems are still operating in Ukraine today despite Russian claims to have destroyed them. 2 launchers clearly destroyed and one battery damaged from last May when Russia tried the zerg rush approach at the Kyiv battery. Miraculously the missiles keep firing..almost like the hundreds of millions Russia spent in one failed attack did not work.

Originally Posted By Aaron56:

Seriously doubt that Ukraine can 'buff that shit out'.


The trucks are clearly destroyed.

The Netherlands previously donated 2 extra launchers which means those systems are still fully capable and rounded out.

Speaking of systems being destroyed....

Let's discuss the Russian analog to the Patriot, the S400.

2 55K6A command post for S-400: (1, destroyed) (2, destroyed)

This is a command post for the S400. Destroyed. 2 have been destroyed so far.





This is from January of 2023. It's part of the S-400, a 5P85SM2-01 TEL with 5V55R missiles. First ever documented loss of the system in combat.







This is from September of 2023 when Ukraine struck Yevpatoriya where an S-400 battery was stationed.







From July of 2023. A 5P85SM2-01 TEL and a 92N6A radar were destroyed.





From October 2023



In August of 2023.



A live action video of the Russian S-400 battery in Tarkhankut, occupied Crimea, being hit. What's recording it?

A drone.

Over the s-400 battery

Approximately 3 launchers and a command vehicle destroyed last week in Dzhankoi, occupied Crimea. This was a few days ago.






Notice in the back the command vehicle. It's gone too.

The Dzhankoi battery was hit by Block 1 Atacms missiles. The oldest models that have not been upgraded. The S400 is supposed to be able to stop them.

Supposed to.

As a reminder this is what they look like pre-Western technology encounter



Originally Posted By Aaron56:

Tell us all some more lies about how NO American or NATO troops have been killed in this conflict so far dude and then remind us how we 'trained' the Ukrainians to operate all of our 'state of the art' NATO equipment all by themselves...

(no freaking way any of that hardware is operated by anything other than NATO or American troops dude - that level of training does not happen overnight)  


Correct-it didn't happen overnight. The Ukrainians were trained not far from me at Fort Sill.

Evidently it did happen because an absolutely idiotic Oklahoma State Senator, Nathan Dahm, tried to ban it.



Thankfully the DOD ignored it as they should have.

Here is what the US Army says about initial entry for the 14T MOS (Patriot operator/maintainer)

Sourced from here

REQUIREMENTS
10 weeks of Basic Training
13 weeks of Advanced Individual Training
87 ASVAB Score: Operators & Food

Imagine if you started with people who were already in the military, familiar with aid defense systems, and motivated to stop the eradication of their country.

My entry into the US Army/National guard was relatively simple. I had already been to boot camp (Parris Island, 2008..rah). I didn't need a conversion course or transition. I got uniforms, gear, and went to a 4 week MOSQ (years later) and later the leadership courses. These guys would be the same scenario.

Originally Posted By Aaron56:
Take a wild guess what happens to the kids in this picture AFTER their dad gets rounded up / press-ganged into 'service' with the UAF and is promptly sent to the front to be used as cannon fodder in a conflict that they will never 'win'.

https://i.imgur.com/UQJd70m.jpg

Those kids and that family (what remains of it) are screwed for a long, long time. :(


He has to go serve in the Army.

Should we discuss the children who were kidnapped by Russian soldiers and "adopted" to Russian families? It is a textbook example of Genocide with the intent to destroy Ukrainian heritage, culture, and language.

Should we bring up the mass graves found in liberated areas?

In America people are arrested daily with violence used.

In Russia people are arrested daily with violence used over human rights including suppressing draft riots.

Only in Ukraine is that a problem.

If you look at the clothing that's not someone running from conscription or being drafted. That's a deserter. We write arrest warrants for people doing that here in the USA and they sometimes get picked up violently also..and we aren't at war

How does Russia handle deserters?

Originally Posted By Aaron56:
I am trying to remember the last time that we 'helped' any country out with our 'regime change' crap and it somehow actually 'helped' the people living there...

Ronald Reagan once said:


He was not joking there... :(


Ronaldus Magnus also said this:

Attachment Attached File


Let's ask Reagan about how he broke the USSR and liberated the people of Eastern Europe.

How is the Czech Republic doing?

Estonia?

Latvia?

Lithuania?

Poland?

Romania?

East Germany?




@aaron56
Link Posted: 4/29/2024 1:07:02 PM EDT
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By fadedsun:

So we need to spend more on entitlements? I thought the problem was excess spending?

View Quote



You may not have noticed the problem with inflation, but you would be in the minority:
By a wide margin, Americans view inflation as the top problem facing the country today








Link Posted: 4/29/2024 1:10:09 PM EDT
[#47]
I misread the title and thought it was 'bombs FALL in Ukraine'. I thought, 'damn, the kick backs must not have been in the agreed upon amount'.
Link Posted: 4/29/2024 4:50:59 PM EDT
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By R_S:
The Patriot's effectiveness has long been debated.  It's not a bad system, but has not enjoyed complete operational success:

The attacks devastated Saudi oil fields and the oil-processing plants at Abqaiq.  U.S. officials have described 17 points of impact on the facility, and satellite imagery of the aftermath show regular, accurate points of impact on the facilities in question. (2019)

The truth is that whether the intercepts are successful or not, the cost of defending is massive:
30 US Patriot PAC-3 MSE launch at a cost of $5 million per missile. That’s $150 million gone within 2 mins.

It's okay, American's didn't need the money anyway... the un-elected Federal Reserve will just print more money and America will create new tent cities for those who can't afford a home:

https://www.trbimg.com/img-56bad57a/turbine/la-ed-homelessness-plans-20160210

Biden and his Neocon bosses call this "a smart investment"
View Quote

There isn’t a system better than PATRIOT in its class.
Link Posted: 4/29/2024 4:51:39 PM EDT
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By LS1Auto:
Remember what Austin said "our goal is to weaken the Russian military".   Its just like John Mearsheimer said in one of his videos recently   "America has the reverse of the Midas touch".  Basically everything we touch turns to shit.  Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and especially Ukraine.   It never ends.  
View Quote

Mearsheimer is a socialist piece of shit who is wrong about most things he says. Quoting him just skylines yourself for being poorly informed.
Link Posted: 4/29/2024 5:14:41 PM EDT
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By 56xdx_Z:


Patriot and IRIS-T systems in Kharkov  were supposedly operated by French troops serving in the AFU "foreign legion", many of whom got wiped out in Russian cruise missile strikes. All telegram sources, but this is one possible reason for Macron's meltdown where he was threatening to send thousands of regulars to Ukraine for a bit. They also didn't have great coordination with the air defense operators in that area, who ended up shooting down the IL-76 transport plane loaded with Ukrainian prisoners of war.

Ukraine PR will deny both the foreign operators of missile systems, and the shooting down of their own POWs, but lists  of names are available in both cases. Intel Slava on telegram had a list of 30 french mercenaries who were killed in Kharkov this year (t.me/intelslava/54888). It also makes total sense that complex systems like air defense would have to be operated by foreigners, just look at how the F-16 training program is going, months of delay because the potential ukrainian pilots can't even speak english, etc. Imagine them training operators for a batch of patriot systems all at once.
View Quote

Frenchmen operating Patriots and you got it all from Russian Telegram? Interesting.
Page / 4
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top