1983 Fox body station wagon project car. V8/5sp swap (Page 2 of 4)
|
Welp, I'm committed now. At least, committed to swapping some fox body something from an automatic to a manual. Placed a couple orders which should hopefully be 99.87% of the transmission swap. - clutch pedal assembly, with master cylinder - bell housing - flywheel - clutch kit (w/ pressure plate, throwout bearing, pilot bearing) - clutch fork - bolts, bolts, and more bolts - transmission crossmember and mount. - shifter lever and knob - transmission - yoke - speedometer gear and clip - external slave cylinder kit - block plate Off the top of my head, I'll need to grab a starter for a manual car transmission fluid, and brake fluid. Up in the air if the driveshaft will work. Luckily there's a shop here in town that makes them. He's cheaper than online, and its done in a couple hours. I'll figure out what I'm gonna do with the wiring once I get the car up in the air and pull things apart. That's usually the reverse lights and neutral safety switch. |
|
Originally Posted By giantpune: I'm still undecided if this one will get a mustang/aero front end on it. If parts were available, I'd keep the grandpa look. But the front of the fenders, trim, and corner lights are different than a mustang. The corner lights, as far as I can tell, only existed on the LTD and marquis in this little 2 year run. They are close to the $800 SVO corner lights. I'll swap the whole front end to a mustang before I lose any sleep looking for a rare part for it. One of the main goals is for it to be easy to repair with readily available parts. And that pretty much rules out a big block swap. The 302 is cheaper and easier to maintain. I actually took a car with a 429 down with me to FLA to drop off when I picked this one up. Big block is cool to say you have. But less cool to track down parts for or to do things like changing spark plugs. If I ranked all the possible engine swaps that might happen, this one would get an LS before it got a BBF. ![]() I also need to track down a set of the hinges for the back glass. You wouldn't happen to know if those were shared with any more popular cars from the era would you? Originally Posted By giantpune: Originally Posted By M830A1: A 460 will fit, no headers, will still need to dent or notch stut towers, and changing plugs will require lifting engine. Whitey ( guy from back in the day) had a 460 in a full stock 78 Fairmont, chassis was cracked to hell. Asked him when was last time he changed plugs, he said never. Car couldn't hook EVER, but the burnouts were epic. Thought of doing an 85 LTD more aero look , but after 45K plus into the Zypher, it didn't happen. Had a 302 with the throttle body/carburetor contraption. Still would have been nice. We had emission laws to contend with, at the time car need to be 25 years old to be exempt. Couldn't be street legal if modded out. I'm still undecided if this one will get a mustang/aero front end on it. If parts were available, I'd keep the grandpa look. But the front of the fenders, trim, and corner lights are different than a mustang. The corner lights, as far as I can tell, only existed on the LTD and marquis in this little 2 year run. They are close to the $800 SVO corner lights. I'll swap the whole front end to a mustang before I lose any sleep looking for a rare part for it. One of the main goals is for it to be easy to repair with readily available parts. And that pretty much rules out a big block swap. The 302 is cheaper and easier to maintain. I actually took a car with a 429 down with me to FLA to drop off when I picked this one up. Big block is cool to say you have. But less cool to track down parts for or to do things like changing spark plugs. If I ranked all the possible engine swaps that might happen, this one would get an LS before it got a BBF. ![]() I also need to track down a set of the hinges for the back glass. You wouldn't happen to know if those were shared with any more popular cars from the era would you? Cheap small block, lilbitanitrous to stick with the analoge theme |
|
Originally Posted By imq707s: God that's ugly..... When I hear Foxbody...I think of this...... https://cdn.speednik.com/powerautorax55/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2024/04/the-sly-fox-tim-lynchs-coyote-powered-mustang-is-a-boosted-beast-2024-04-19_07-42-24_043702.jpg It's hideous, but like in a good way. |
|
Originally Posted By giantpune: The interior looks about as good as you could ask for in a 42 year old car thats never been restored. Mostly manual stuff. It does have power seats and power locks. The locks just turn into manual locks if the power motors go out. If I have to replace anything in the power seat, it'll get manual seat tracks. Maybe some mustang buckets after I drive it a bit and see how I like these. The little change cubbies attached to the seats have to come off to make room for a floor shifter. I considered an ecoboost swap. But in the interest of simplicity and reliability, I think I would prefer an old pushrod V8. ETA - The image host apparently thinks the pictures of the interior are nudity. AI being shitty AI, I guess. Originally Posted By giantpune: Originally Posted By bmarshall1: I like it! Do something about the nose though. How is the interior? I looked into a 90s Caprice wagon but all the interiors were VERY tired and tracking down all the small parts would be a full time job in itself. Did I read you were looking to install a 5sp? How about some Turbo action for a little bit of extra oomph! The interior looks about as good as you could ask for in a 42 year old car thats never been restored. Mostly manual stuff. It does have power seats and power locks. The locks just turn into manual locks if the power motors go out. If I have to replace anything in the power seat, it'll get manual seat tracks. Maybe some mustang buckets after I drive it a bit and see how I like these. The little change cubbies attached to the seats have to come off to make room for a floor shifter. I considered an ecoboost swap. But in the interest of simplicity and reliability, I think I would prefer an old pushrod V8. ETA - The image host apparently thinks the pictures of the interior are nudity. AI being shitty AI, I guess. Comeon, do something weird om603/722.3 swap it. It's only one wire to hook up, see nice and simple |
|
Originally Posted By turtlemaster: @giantpune I really like where you are going with this. I tried visualizing in my head what one of those wagons would look like with a mustang front end. Evidently people have done it, and I would totally rock one, here’s two I found online https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/530992/IMG_0732_jpeg-3629882.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/530992/IMG_0733_jpeg-3629883.JPG The white one, meh The red one has a vibe I can get into though |
|
Originally Posted By giantpune: Looks like you need to catch up with the thread. I already bought the motor and a bunch of parts. The 351w/TKX is set in stone. Originally Posted By giantpune: Originally Posted By Equestrian: Comeon, do something weird om603/722.3 swap it. It's only one wire to hook up, see nice and simple Looks like you need to catch up with the thread. I already bought the motor and a bunch of parts. The 351w/TKX is set in stone. Yeah it didn't refresh when I clicked, just got up to current. I like where it's going, not everything needs to be a monster. Cool cruiser will get more use and not be a brutal daily. |
|
Originally Posted By Equestrian: Yeah it didn't refresh when I clicked, just got up to current. Edit-just looked at the dates, I'm an idiot lol. I like where it's going, not everything needs to be a fire breathing, parts eating monster. Cool cruiser will get more use and not be a brutal daily. Originally Posted By Equestrian: Originally Posted By giantpune: Originally Posted By Equestrian: Comeon, do something weird om603/722.3 swap it. It's only one wire to hook up, see nice and simple Looks like you need to catch up with the thread. I already bought the motor and a bunch of parts. The 351w/TKX is set in stone. Yeah it didn't refresh when I clicked, just got up to current. Edit-just looked at the dates, I'm an idiot lol. I like where it's going, not everything needs to be a fire breathing, parts eating monster. Cool cruiser will get more use and not be a brutal daily. |
The world's most average shooter, or worse
Joined:
Nov 2010
Posts:
43745
EE: 100% (1)
|
Having once owned a Fox-chassis 2-door Ford Fairmont (2.3L w/4-speed manual) I'm always interested in how flexible this platform was to build stuff...from mild to wild <example- not my car> ![]() |
"The democrats have to decide whether or not to continue defrauding the public with their ridiculous bullshit"
My President, 2019
My President, 2019
|
Originally Posted By sca037: Having once owned a Fox-chassis 2-door Ford Fairmont (2.3L w/4-speed manual) I'm always interested in how flexible this platform was to build stuff...from mild to wild https://i.pinimg.com/originals/8f/0d/a7/8f0da7fcfcea6b5da0dff14452769acf.jpg If you find you a body, I know a place you can get a 3.8L/AOD drivetrain. Its less mild than the 2.3.
|
|
Originally Posted By ScottsGT: Did you remove the pushrod guide plates? I ended up cutting the top half off. Usually I would remove them and replace with washers when using this style of rocker and the factory pushrod. Hardware store was out of appropriately sized washers. So I just cut off the guide plates. The only thing they do now is give the stud something to tighten against. |
|
But those roller tip rockers don’t have the guides like a stock rocker to hold them in place. You need guide plates and hardened pushrods or the rockers will pivot. Edge of the rocker tip will damage the top of the valve. Early 289’s had the guide built into the head. The hole for the pushrod was slotted. They changed over to rocker tips that straddled the tip of the valve after that. |
|
Originally Posted By ScottsGT: But those roller tip rockers don’t have the guides like a stock rocker to hold them in place. You need guide plates and hardened pushrods or the rockers will pivot. Edge of the rocker tip will damage the top of the valve. Early 289’s had the guide built into the head. The hole for the pushrod was slotted. They changed over to rocker tips that straddled the tip of the valve after that. Originally Posted By ScottsGT: But those roller tip rockers don’t have the guides like a stock rocker to hold them in place. You need guide plates and hardened pushrods or the rockers will pivot. Edge of the rocker tip will damage the top of the valve. Early 289’s had the guide built into the head. The hole for the pushrod was slotted. They changed over to rocker tips that straddled the tip of the valve after that. Allow me to introduce you to... the self aligning roller tip rocker. https://www.summitracing.com/parts/CCA-1431-16 Self-Aligning: Yes Notes: Not designed for use with guide plates. |
|
Originally Posted By giantpune: Allow me to introduce you to... the self aligning roller tip rocker. https://www.summitracing.com/parts/CCA-1431-16 Those are nice! Not an option when I built my 5.0 in my ‘66 from what I remember. I went with Harland Sharpe designed for the Trick Flow heads. If memory serves me correctly, I think I used 1.6 and 1.7’s. One on intakes, other on exhaust. |
|
Originally Posted By ScottsGT: Those are nice! Not an option when I built my 5.0 in my ‘66 from what I remember. I went with Harland Sharpe designed for the Trick Flow heads. If memory serves me correctly, I think I used 1.6 and 1.7’s. One on intakes, other on exhaust. Originally Posted By ScottsGT: Those are nice! Not an option when I built my 5.0 in my ‘66 from what I remember. I went with Harland Sharpe designed for the Trick Flow heads. If memory serves me correctly, I think I used 1.6 and 1.7’s. One on intakes, other on exhaust. All the calculators and napkin math I could find on the subject said there wasn't much to be gained for me with 1.7 rockers. With this cam and head combination, It was about 3HP that I wouldn't even see till 4000rpm. I stayed with 1.6 to improve my chances of being able to reuse the stock pushrods and save $125. ![]() Originally Posted By ScottsGT: I also used the Duraspark distributor with a small cap for the old school look. It is wired in to my MSD unit. Just like you mentioned earlier, one year was made for the Duraspark with a roller cam. Got it from O’Reilly’s. If yours was a 5.0, that was a thing. Ford did put a duraspark and a roller cam in a production vehicle with a 5.0, so its a real replacement part that's somewhat common. Ford never did a 351w with a roller cam and duraspark. By the time they put a roller cam in a 351w, they were already on the TFI distributors. There isn't a whole lot of demand for this specific combination, which made it harder to track down. Like with the pushrods and rockers, I wanted to keep the duraspark cause it was cheap. Trying to keep this a "budget build". I did save the TFI that was in this motor. If I ever decide to go with a holley terminator setup, they support that distributor for timing control. |
|
I like it, but then again I’ve always liked wagons, kinda been an oddball in that respect. I had no idea this was possible, this will be great. 93 Cobra front end with matching wheels would look really good. I assume interior is brown? Kinda limits exterior options. |
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
|
Originally Posted By USMC7382: I assume interior is brown? Kinda limits exterior options. The interior is red cloth with a little bit of the fake wood accent. I posted pictures of it on the first page. Then the stupid image hosting site's shitty AI flagged it as "adult content". |
|
Originally Posted By giantpune: The interior is red cloth with a little bit of the fake wood accent. I posted pictures of it on the first page. Then the stupid image hosting site's shitty AI flagged it as "adult content". AI probably thought it was a pic from inside a whorehouse.
|
|
Been slowly ticking off more little things on this car. I had a couple more in front of it on the list. Sister's hoopdie had my lift and time occupied this week while I did all the shocks, brakes, fuel lines, and some stuff under the hood. Got that done today, then my wife's car came on the lift for some basic maintenance. Hopefully soon I can get it out of the way. Then the station wagon can go back on and I can make more progress. I did get a throttle linkage figured out. Jegs makes one that works with the stock ford cable and clears the AVS2 carb. I had to machine it a tad. Probably cause I'm using a V6 throttle cable that is a bit different than a V8. Now when I stomp the gas pedal, the motor goes vroom. I got my motor mount situation figured out. Engine is sitting about where it belongs now. Today, I replaced the PS hoses and rack bushings. I test fitted the new radiator, and ordered up a fan and clutch. |
|
Earlier I went net surfing looking for one of these used out of curiosity. Holy SHIT! $5000 and up for a damned roller. Do these cars have this big of a cult following? If I could find grandmas old wagon still out in the yard for the price of scrap, I’d get one. |
|
Originally Posted By ScottsGT: Earlier I went net surfing looking for one of these used out of curiosity. Holy SHIT! $5000 and up for a damned roller. Do these cars have this big of a cult following? If I could find grandmas old wagon still out in the yard for the price of scrap, I’d get one. I gave $4k for mine back at the start af this thread. Another grand and i was daily driving it for a few weeks. There were a couple rollers in GA for $1200. There one (granada) for sale in ga for like $1500. There's a fairmont around for not much more. The front grill and lights are different on the granada, but its the same car. |
1983 Fox body station wagon project car. V8/5sp swap (Page 2 of 4)
Join the Community
Your next conversation starts here.
Create your free account to join discussions, share your experience, save topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.
- Join discussions
- Follow topics and replies
- Connect with fellow enthusiasts
Already a member? Sign in
Stay informed by subscribing to our Newsletter




)


































AI probably thought it was a pic from inside a whorehouse.



