User Panel
intPostwhore := intPostwhore + 1;
|
fudge em.
|
|
|
That's LVI%, buster!
|
|
|
Do you even OODA loop?
|
Originally Posted By ARmory04: I, for one, did not experience that. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By ARmory04: Originally Posted By maxima2: Peak America has passed and it was good. I, for one, did not experience that. We had a good run. Though all societies run pretty much the same course. We are heading into the bad part of that course. |
|
My ports are firewalled
|
Stupid folks are too clueless to hide their ignorance and in some cases parade it around because it triggers others. Therein you end up with a perception of more ignorance than actually exists. Some folks know what they don't know.
|
|
Live your life as you would wish to have lived, when you come to die. Confucius
When words lose their meaning, a people can move neither hand nor foot. Confucius |
Not fly enough to be halal....
|
Originally Posted By TxRabbitBane: It’s a greenhouse gas. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By TxRabbitBane: Originally Posted By TARFUN: While they are at it, they should ban DiHydrogen Monoxide. That shit destroys billions of dollars worth of material and kills thousands of people each year. It’s a greenhouse gas. That's why I bought a yeller house! |
|
I will not compromise!
Ne Desit Virtus (Let Valor Not Fail) - Rakkasan! "Life is fucking hard. Either get used to taking a few lumps like the rest of us, or buy a fucking helmet and crawl into a corner somewhere." -Me |
There’s no way I’m gonna read the whole thread, but Americans are even dumber than you think they are. Arabic numerals were actually created an India by the Hindus, co-opted by the Arabs, and introduced to the Europeans, who called them Arabic Because Europeans were first exposed to them through the Arabs. So actually, by calling Indian/Hindu numerals Arabic, we are being Eurocentric and Perpetuating white supremacy.
Hey I’m pretty good at this woke bullshit! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GD is acting all high and mighty over this but come back in a few days with the same poll here and I'd bet you'd end up with the same percentage.
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By akrado: Maybe because Arabian anything is usually shitty and dangerous? Algebra? Licks rocks too. View Quote Originally Posted By Firearmsenthusiast: Ah yes, Algebra and the Arabic number system. A reminder of a once great civilization before it was destroyed by Islam. View Quote I don't know if you're joking or stupid but 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 are the Arabic numerals. @akrado @Firearmsenthusiast |
|
I wonder if some of these edge lords ever give thought to what judgement will be passed on them when their day comes? Probably won't be, "Well that guy was an asshole but he sure could vote so that excuses everything". - Bluedsteel
|
Originally Posted By grambosc: Real Arabic numerals, or the modern India-developed version? https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/481717/Seiko-5-Arabic-Dial-SNK063J5-4_jpg-3306183.JPG View Quote Both are from India originally, it's just that the ones we're most familiar with were in wide use in the North Africa when North Africa was also in Europe. |
|
"This deeply secularist, post-modern society knows who its enemy is. They’re naming it. And we should believe them. They’re telling us who they are. We should believe them."
|
Originally Posted By JAD762: I mean, Carlin was a comedian so he isn’t going for accuracy, but if you don’t see how that statement is mathematically problematic you might be on the lower side of the spectrum. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By JAD762: Originally Posted By AR4U: Originally Posted By BB: Originally Posted By mooreshawnm: Yes. Yes they are. Wearing this one out LOL https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSjoHcEN-TIO5Y7CzlK3PBj8y-kBScD0a0S0Q&s I mean, Carlin was a comedian so he isn’t going for accuracy, but if you don’t see how that statement is mathematically problematic you might be on the lower side of the spectrum. The only way I see this as problematic, is that you have X % of people all at the median, which would reduce either side of the curve by 0.5X%. So, if you have 10% at the median then only 45% would be dumber than median. But, it's been a few decades since taking a stats class. |
|
|
Clown world
|
|
We don't come alone; we are fire, we are stone.
|
Originally Posted By Antisocial1: The only way I see this as problematic, is that you have X % of people all at the median, which would reduce either side of the curve by 0.5X%. So, if you have 10% at the median then only 45% would be dumber than median. But, it's been a few decades since taking a stats class. View Quote IQ is a BELL fucking curve. Median = Mean = Mode by definition. So yes, 1/2 of the people are in fact stupider than the MATHEMATICAL average. To get IQ specific though, 68% of the people's IQs are from 85 - 105, but yes, Carlin is 100% correct. "Below" average starts at 99.9 IQ and goes down from there which is 50% of the people. Attached File |
|
Certified Forklift Operator
|
Originally Posted By Andr0id: IQ is a BELL fucking curve. Median = Mean = Mode by definition. So yes, 1/2 of the people are in fact stupider than the MATHEMATICAL average. To get IQ specific though, 68% of the people's IQs are from 85 - 105, but yes, Carlin is 100% correct. "Below" average starts at 99.9 IQ and goes down from there which is 50% of the people. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/231998/iq-test-range-score-bell-curve-wecapable-3306385.JPG View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Andr0id: Originally Posted By Antisocial1: The only way I see this as problematic, is that you have X % of people all at the median, which would reduce either side of the curve by 0.5X%. So, if you have 10% at the median then only 45% would be dumber than median. But, it's been a few decades since taking a stats class. IQ is a BELL fucking curve. Median = Mean = Mode by definition. So yes, 1/2 of the people are in fact stupider than the MATHEMATICAL average. To get IQ specific though, 68% of the people's IQs are from 85 - 105, but yes, Carlin is 100% correct. "Below" average starts at 99.9 IQ and goes down from there which is 50% of the people. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/231998/iq-test-range-score-bell-curve-wecapable-3306385.JPG So, lets say you have a population of 1,000,000 people with a median IQ of 100. Let's also assume 100,000 people have a 100 IQ. That leaves 900,000 people to fill in both sides of the distribution...equally. That would be 450,000 on either side of the mean. Or said another way...45% of the population has an IQ lower than the mean. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Andr0id: IQ is a BELL fucking curve. Median = Mean = Mode by definition. So yes, 1/2 of the people are in fact stupider than the MATHEMATICAL average. To get IQ specific though, 68% of the people's IQs are from 85 - 105, but yes, Carlin is 100% correct. "Below" average starts at 99.9 IQ and goes down from there which is 50% of the people. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/231998/iq-test-range-score-bell-curve-wecapable-3306385.JPG View Quote IQ doesn't mean what people think it means. The human mind is not a computer but analogies can be drawn. In this model "IQ" is how fast someone's processor is, how many cores it has, how much memory the PC has, and the speed and capacity of the hard drive. People with a high IQ learn faster and easier. They can remember more of what they learn. They have an easier time of integrating what they have learned into an overall understanding of things. And, as learning is easier for high IQ people, they often spend more time doing it. At the human BIOS level you have various other mental conditions such as ADHD, schizophrenia, depression, etc. These are largely hard coded things in someone's brain, perhaps set in early childhood, which the person has to work through. You then have the OS level which is essentially a person's culture. What languages they speak, what values have they been taught, things like that. And then you have their education and experience which is the equivalent of the applications which have been installed in their brains. Naturally some of the more advanced software (like theoretical physics) won't run very well, or at all, on low end hardware. And much of what is taught today is actually malware, which reduces the person's ability to think. As it relates to Arabic numerals, this is not an IQ issue. You can take a person with a 75 IQ and teach him that the numbers he has managed to learn came from the Arabs (I know, it was India) and are called Arabic numerals. Or you can take someone with a 125 IQ and never give him that information and he won't know what Arabic numerals are. In short, this is an educational failure. |
|
There are 100 kinds of people, those who can both understand binary and extrapolate from incomplete information…
|
Might want to let people know that the number system is called Arabic numbers, is pre Islam. The Islamists claim it, but it existed centuries before Islam took hold.
I like to call it, Pre Islamic Arab number system. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Antisocial1: The only way I see this as problematic, is that you have X % of people all at the median, which would reduce either side of the curve by 0.5X%. So, if you have 10% at the median then only 45% would be dumber than median. But, it's been a few decades since taking a stats class. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Antisocial1: Originally Posted By JAD762: Originally Posted By AR4U: Originally Posted By BB: Originally Posted By mooreshawnm: Yes. Yes they are. Wearing this one out LOL https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSjoHcEN-TIO5Y7CzlK3PBj8y-kBScD0a0S0Q&s I mean, Carlin was a comedian so he isn’t going for accuracy, but if you don’t see how that statement is mathematically problematic you might be on the lower side of the spectrum. The only way I see this as problematic, is that you have X % of people all at the median, which would reduce either side of the curve by 0.5X%. So, if you have 10% at the median then only 45% would be dumber than median. But, it's been a few decades since taking a stats class. Perfectly valid problem as well. But on a simpler level, IQ scores aren’t evenly distributed so you’d have to find their central tendency with a median as opposed to an average. But if carlins joke was “Think of how stupid the median person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.” His joke would have fallen flat because: A - median intelligence in the US isn’t really that low. And 2 - he would have lost the lower half of the bell curve that doesn’t know what a median is. Admittedly, IQ tests are normalized so that this isn’t such an huge issue, but still. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.