Posted: 1/12/2013 8:58:22 AM EDT
[Last Edit: bwell][Edited]
| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wx9GxXYKx_8 |
| let's face it we will never know. This is what they want us to believe so they can get their agenda across. It's not a sick person, it's the bad guns. They are moving quickly before the real story gets out. How quickly they have forgot about the families and moved to their agenda? |
|
Any time Govt agencies disseminate multiple stories then do most of the after incident investigation in near total blackout, you will always have "truthers." It's an absolutely guaranteed outcome and has been used many times in the past. Problem is, there have been incidents where the "official" account has not held up well at all and that introduces a level of belief that other incidents have been manipulated.
I wouldn't put it past the Feds to do it, [disseminate false info] they have done it numerous times in the past when they have screwed up. |
I do not have a license to kill, but I do have a learner's permit.
I feel like I'm living the movie "Idiocracy" with this administration.
"Share the Wealth" my arse, HIDE the wealth is more like it.
I feel like I'm living the movie "Idiocracy" with this administration.
"Share the Wealth" my arse, HIDE the wealth is more like it.
|
Originally Posted By fxntime:
Any time Govt agencies disseminate multiple stories then do most of the after incident investigation in near total blackout, you will always have "truthers." It's an absolutely guaranteed outcome and has been used many times in the past. Problem is, there have been incidents where the "official" account has not held up well at all and that introduces a level of belief that other incidents have been manipulated. I wouldn't put it past the Feds to do it, [disseminate false info] they have done it numerous times in the past when they have screwed up. Problem with that theory (at least in this case) is that the majority of information is controlled at the local LEO level. Are we to start believing that local LEOs are involved in a cover up to get across an antigun agenda? I can't make that leap. At least ONE of the local LEOs would leak the story with some real evidence. The only part of Sandy Hook being reported in the mainstream that isn't quite right is the emphasis on GUNS and ASSAULT WEAPONS versus the real cause which is the nutjob. Note it is the emphasis that is skewed not the available data. I have no doubts that a lone gunman with an AR15 and other assorted guns went into that school and killed a bunch of kids. It happened. Tragic and horrible. Let's not walk down a path where we start believing that a government agency is involved in the planning or a cover up of how it went down. It's as bad as the truthers who believed Bush was behind 9/11. |
All Your Post Are Belong To Us
Join the Community
Your next conversation starts here.
Create your free account to join discussions, share your experience, save topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.
- Join discussions
- Follow topics and replies
- Connect with fellow enthusiasts
Already a member? Sign in
Stay informed by subscribing to our Newsletter