Computer generated render of woman is most photorealistic one yet - Page 1

Site Notices

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Computer generated render of woman is most photorealistic one yet (Page 1 of 4)

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:18:13 AM EDT

This is actually terrifying, a few more decades and we won't be able to tell apart fake CGI people from the real thing anymore.

https://blenderartists.org/t/newest-photoreal-renders/1290285

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:19:29 AM EDT

[#1]

Will they be liberal douches like the real actors?

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:22:50 AM EDT

[#2]

I’m surprised more hasn’t been developed for re-creating voices.
Of course that would be very, very dangerous in the wrong hands

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:23:55 AM EDT

[#3]

Quote History

Quoted:
I’m surprised more hasn’t been developed for re-creating voices.
Of course that would be very, very dangerous in the wrong hands

View Quote

I'm sure it's out there. Probably in the wrong hands, too.

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:23:56 AM EDT

[#4]

Sooo where would someone acquire one of these?

Asking for a friend.

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:24:30 AM EDT

[#5]

Like all visual media the porn industry will decide the fate of this technology.

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:25:01 AM EDT

[#6]

Idonbeleiveit.gif

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:25:04 AM EDT

[#7]

Quote History

Quoted:

I'm sure it's out there. Probably in the wrong hands, too.

View Quote

Oh, you mean the .gov

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:25:52 AM EDT

[#8]

Whoever made that needs help.

There's a reason the woman appears to be sad and in captivity.

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:26:03 AM EDT

[#9]

The misplaced reflections are hilarious.

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:26:39 AM EDT

[#10]

So, does she b!tch in machine language?

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:27:03 AM EDT

[#11]

not the first fap to imaginary women, won't be the last

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:27:11 AM EDT

[#12]

It's fitting a computer would generate a ginger as they both have no souls.

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:28:34 AM EDT

[#13]

Quote History

Quoted:
Like all visual media the porn industry will decide the fate of this technology.

View Quote

I believe you are correct Sir .

gd

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:28:36 AM EDT

[#14]

That isn't a real girl ?

the pics when she smiles are kinda weird, but the other ones... Not real ?

I'm really fucking confused

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:29:02 AM EDT

[#15]

Why not?

We're half way there.

Democrats living in the deep state dot gov Matrix now.

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:29:18 AM EDT

[#16]

The obvious phallic symbol in the last pic...

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:29:47 AM EDT

[#17]

Quote History

Quoted:
Whoever made that needs help.

There's a reason the woman appears to be sad and in captivity.

View Quote

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:30:20 AM EDT

[#18]

They need to bring in a hair stylist.

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:30:31 AM EDT

[#19]

She's cute.

I'd hit it.

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:30:38 AM EDT

[#20]

This is why I don’t bother to post any pictures of me and Ariana Grande from back when I was dating her. You guys were just accuse me of posting a bunch of deep fakes.

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:31:04 AM EDT

[#21]

Is this the same as Unreal Engines MetaHumans?
Besides needing a metahuman to take my place on company zoom calls, AI technology is getting pretty fucking scary IMO.

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:32:53 AM EDT

[#22]

Joi Virtual Girlfriend Scene (Blade Runner 2049)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqB-gGP6G9I

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:33:27 AM EDT

[#23]

Quote History

Quoted:
She's cute.

I'd hit it.

View Quote

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00GTA542Y/ref=cm_sw_em_r_mt_dp_43WE0CEJ8FAY7WNQ0WXK

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:33:30 AM EDT

[#24]

Did they render her butthole as well?

Asking for a friend...

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:35:25 AM EDT

[#25]

This actually creates a solid reasonable doubt argument for almost all child porn prosecutions. Most of the time, the actual children are not found and therefore cannot testify that they are in fact the people in the images.

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:36:55 AM EDT

[#26]

Shouldn't Rule 34 be in effect here? I mean, there are rules, dammit!

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:37:45 AM EDT

[#27]

We will, absolutely, reach a point of inability to distinguish.

Her hand on face is a bit funky, has the plastic look, but the major issue I see, is actually not the woman, per se, but the inconsistencies in the depth of field. There are things that should be in focus based on the same plane, and things that shouldn't, and that is screwy in a few places.

Shadows and reflections are the next things that need a tweak, but it is definitely scary good, and is only going to get better.

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:39:00 AM EDT

[#28]

Relatively speaking, still images are easy it is the motion that is hard.

The human eye is a very well trained "spot the difference" machine, and most CGI humans can't escape the uncanny valley when in motion.

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:39:15 AM EDT

[#29]

The smiles look fake. Without those pics, she would be 100% convincing.

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:40:01 AM EDT

[#30]

Computer is average at best.

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:40:08 AM EDT

[#31]

How long until it breaks and only makes aryan women

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:41:31 AM EDT

[#32]

Huh.
Guess I’ll stick with, meeting girls in person. ???????

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:42:38 AM EDT

[#33]

There's already some guy, tired of her shit.

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:42:51 AM EDT

[#34]

Quote History

Quoted:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00GTA542Y/ref=cm_sw_em_r_mt_dp_43WE0CEJ8FAY7WNQ0WXK

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:
She's cute.

I'd hit it.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00GTA542Y/ref=cm_sw_em_r_mt_dp_43WE0CEJ8FAY7WNQ0WXK

Eeewww!!!

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:43:26 AM EDT

[#35]

That tractor looks suspicious.

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:43:31 AM EDT

[#36]

2nd photo, the left shoulder is bad,
How are the lady bits?

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:43:40 AM EDT

[#37]

Quote History

Quoted:
The misplaced reflections are hilarious.

View Quote

That and the eyelashes being detached in a couple shots.

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:43:53 AM EDT

[#38]

Quote History

Quoted:

I'm sure it's out there. Probably in the wrong hands, too.

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:
I’m surprised more hasn’t been developed for re-creating voices.
Of course that would be very, very dangerous in the wrong hands

I'm sure it's out there. Probably in the wrong hands, too.

Home Alone 2?

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:47:16 AM EDT

[#39]

Enhance!

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:48:38 AM EDT

[#40]

Quoted:
This actually creates a solid reasonable doubt argument for almost all child porn prosecutions. Most of the time, the actual children are not found and therefore cannot testify that they are in fact the people in the images.

View Quote

The cynical side of me thinks that's a feature and not a bug.

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:48:47 AM EDT

[#41]

Nice but the hair kind of gives it away if you give it more than just a glance.

Posted: 3/16/2021 11:50:01 AM EDT

[#42]

The face is very well done, but there's a couple issues that make it easy to spot as a 'fake':

1) The seam between the CGI-rendered face and the neck/body (which presumably is a real photograph) needs work. Check out the 'shadow line' along her lower jaw... same in all images and doesn't match the lighting/shadows of the photos.

2) The eyes have the same 'expression' in each image. They need to vary a bit more.