Posted: 11/28/2025 2:47:15 PM EDT
[Last Edit: sq40][Edited]
|
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/donald-trump-intensified-alien-interest-set-declassify-uap-data-report-1758343 Donald Trump 'Intensified' Alien Interest, Set To Declassify UAP Data: Report Report claims Donald Trump is ready to declassify secret UAP files, believing Americans have 'a right to know' about alien life. By Kobe Patrick Serinas For decades, the American public has been gripped by a pervasive mystery: has the government been concealing the truth about contact with extraterrestrial life? Now, at a time when congressional hearings, whistleblower claims, and official Pentagon acknowledgements have dragged the topic of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) into the mainstream, a new, explosive report suggests that President Donald Trump is finally ready to unlock the vault. Anonymous sources told RadarOnline that the President has already 'ramped up' his personal interest in these alien-related files and is currently positioned to authorise an unprecedented level of disclosure, setting the stage for a monumental confrontation with decades of institutional secrecy. (More at link) |
“The eye sees only what the mind is prepared to comprehend.” - Henri Bergson
What have the Romans ever done for us?
Joined:
Jul 2008
Posts:
45052
EE: 100% (212)
TN, USA
 The machine must not be happy. |
Panem et Circenses
I have also learned from experience that the greater part of our happiness or misery depends upon our dispositions, and not upon our circumstances.
Kites rise highest against the wind, not with it. - Churchill
I have also learned from experience that the greater part of our happiness or misery depends upon our dispositions, and not upon our circumstances.
Kites rise highest against the wind, not with it. - Churchill
|
Can you imagine “IF” they have a full disclosure and NHI is real, the magnitude of what this means to humanity. It would shake science to its core, pillars of current understanding would cease. I would have to take a few days off work to just sit and process the information. What a time to be alive. |
|
The referenced "report" is another article and that article's "source" is Dan Farah, the director of The Age of Disclosure, and isn't even directly from him, it's just based on his statements to Joe Rogan. Let's not get too excited about clickbait. If you see an article that's too good to be true, always go down the rabbit hole to see what they're actually using for a source. Unfortunately, just talking about somebody's tweet that uses somebody's third cousin's brother's wife's hair dresser as a source qualifies as "breaking news" these days as long as it gets clicks. |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By macman37: Make It HAPPEN He has been semi good about following up campaign promises but that 4 years of the drooling brain dead guy interrupting his 2 terms, so now Trump is 45/47 and trying to catch up but in the 4 years he was blocked out, a lot of rebuilding of the swamp went on. |
The person who complains most, and is the most critical of others has the most to hide.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: The referenced "report" is another article and that article's "source" is Dan Farah, the director of The Age of Disclosure, and isn't even directly from him, it's just based on his statements to Joe Rogan. Let's not get too excited about clickbait. If you see an article that's too good to be true, always go down the rabbit hole to see what they're actually using for a source. Unfortunately, just talking about somebody's tweet that uses somebody's third cousin's brother's wife's hair dresser as a source qualifies as "breaking news" these days as long as it gets clicks. I'm proud of your skepticism. This is the way.  Trust, but verify...that's way too soft. Dig deep instead. Then you see what's going on.
|
Pope Gregorius Billingsgate Callipygian Quimtickler, First of His Name
Chakravartin of the Feculent Multiversal Litterbox
Protodeacon of the Iniquitous
Gurkhan of the Illimitable Feline Hordes
Chakravartin of the Feculent Multiversal Litterbox
Protodeacon of the Iniquitous
Gurkhan of the Illimitable Feline Hordes
Member
Joined:
Aug 2024
Posts:
1723
EE: 0% (0)
TX, USA
|
I hope I'm wrong, but I suspect Trump would only announce Disclosue and make it official if he knew another party or parties with unquestionable reputations were known to announce soon. Trump would jump in and claim credit for Disclosure with the support of the others of high reputation. I'd be very surprised if he gutted-up and made the announcement without the support and backing of very, very high officials. I don't look for it soon. Again, I hope I'm wrong. |
|
Originally Posted By elmanotejas: I hope I'm wrong, but I suspect Trump would only announce Disclosue and make it official if he knew another party or parties with unquestionable reputations were known to announce soon. Trump would jump in and claim credit for Disclosure with the support of the others of high reputation. I'd be very surprised if he gutted-up and made the announcement without the support and backing of very, very high officials. I don't look for it soon. Again, I hope I'm wrong. I have a feeling the 2017 disclosurers or releases (tic tacs, cubes within a sphere, etc) were an effort to destabilize the first Trump administration, but it really didn't work I think Americans are far more conditioned to accepting disclosure than they predicted. |
|
Originally Posted By JQ66: I have a feeling the 2017 disclosurers or releases (tic tacs, cubes within a sphere, etc) were an effort to destabilize the first Trump administration, but it really didn't work I think Americans are far more conditioned to accepting disclosure than they predicted. Originally Posted By JQ66: Originally Posted By elmanotejas: I hope I'm wrong, but I suspect Trump would only announce Disclosue and make it official if he knew another party or parties with unquestionable reputations were known to announce soon. Trump would jump in and claim credit for Disclosure with the support of the others of high reputation. I'd be very surprised if he gutted-up and made the announcement without the support and backing of very, very high officials. I don't look for it soon. Again, I hope I'm wrong. I have a feeling the 2017 disclosurers or releases (tic tacs, cubes within a sphere, etc) were an effort to destabilize the first Trump administration, but it really didn't work I think Americans are far more conditioned to accepting disclosure than they predicted. The interesting bit, to me, is there was no optimism about Biden disclosing shit, but with Trump's win this year, multiple UFO people were saying we had a chance at real disclosure with him in office. It certainly helps that many of Trump's cabinet have spoken publicly about UAP transparency. |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
https://x.com/rosscoulthart/status/1995932330482151876 Attached File |
“The eye sees only what the mind is prepared to comprehend.” - Henri Bergson
|
Only ‘cuz it’s true. 
|
Let's Go Red Wings!
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: I personally don't think the folks behind the disclosure push give a damn who's sitting in the White House, they're gonna keep doing their thing regardless. It has moved fairly consistently since 2017 and didn't change when Biden won. The interesting bit, to me, is there was no optimism about Biden disclosing shit, but with Trump's win this year, multiple UFO people were saying we had a chance at real disclosure with him in office. It certainly helps that many of Trump's cabinet have spoken publicly about UAP transparency. Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By JQ66: Originally Posted By elmanotejas: I hope I'm wrong, but I suspect Trump would only announce Disclosue and make it official if he knew another party or parties with unquestionable reputations were known to announce soon. Trump would jump in and claim credit for Disclosure with the support of the others of high reputation. I'd be very surprised if he gutted-up and made the announcement without the support and backing of very, very high officials. I don't look for it soon. Again, I hope I'm wrong. I have a feeling the 2017 disclosurers or releases (tic tacs, cubes within a sphere, etc) were an effort to destabilize the first Trump administration, but it really didn't work I think Americans are far more conditioned to accepting disclosure than they predicted. The interesting bit, to me, is there was no optimism about Biden disclosing shit, but with Trump's win this year, multiple UFO people were saying we had a chance at real disclosure with him in office. It certainly helps that many of Trump's cabinet have spoken publicly about UAP transparency. Yo! Leionedix, you still got that old saucer? That Earth place you hassled has been saying they're going to talk about you every couple years for the past 80 years. They're still not doing anything. Lets dress your old rig up like a big comet, and I'll take my kid's out and get it running and I'll make it a smaller asteroid shape and we can go buzz their planet. See if we can change their tune about saying we aren't real man. We also need to stop by South America and pick up the latest Columbian delivery while we have their radar blacked out. |
The person who complains most, and is the most critical of others has the most to hide.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
|
Unpopular opinion (perhaps): 1. It will be a nothingburger that a) reiterates what people who already follow the issue already know, or believe they know, and b) contains no real bombshell that will attract the general public’s attention. 2. Even if it did contain a bombshell, we would all be well served to be suspicious because a) the information comes from government agencies, which have earned deep skepticism across the board on every issue, and b) AI has reached a point that visual and audio evidence cannot be trusted. The age of disclosure coincides too closely with the age of AI. Did the JFK files release satisfy anyone? |
