Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 3
You Must Be Logged In To Vote

Posted: 7/19/2024 11:24:34 AM EST
I’ve been carrying a 642 for a couple of decades.  The S&W Bodyguard 2.0 has peaked my interest.  

Which is better for summertime lightweight carry?

38 special or 380?
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 11:31:15 AM EST
[#1]
In a revolver, I'd prefer .38 Spl, in a semi-auto, .380.

This really seems like more of a semi-auto vs revolver question. In which case I prefer revolver for my particular carry needs.

So .38 Special I guess.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 11:32:00 AM EST
[#2]
I've carried both a 340 (scandium .357mag j-frame) and a few different .380s including a Beretta Pico and LCP Max. I don't carry the 340 anymore.

Both .380s are thinner, close enough in weight to not matter, and fit/draw better in normal pants' front pockets. .38spl is more powerful per-shot, but reloading the auto is faster and the capacity of the LCP Max is fully double that of a j-frame.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 11:33:01 AM EST
[#3]
38, especially if it can take +P. That’s putting you into 357mag velocity in a little J frame.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 11:40:37 AM EST
[#4]
For summer carry I would go with a 380. I have a Colt Pony, 6+1, with an aluminum frame and steel slide. The cylinder of revolver can be pretty fat. I do have a S&W 342, aluminum frame and Ti cylinder, quite nice, but the cylinder is kind of fat.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 11:41:19 AM EST
[#5]
I got 12 rounds of 380 in my LCP max that's plenty.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 11:43:28 AM EST
[#6]
I like 38 SPCl+P 158 grain LSWCHP.  It's bigger.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 11:46:06 AM EST
[Last Edit: gotigers] [#7]
38 special is awesome

Pro: more energy

con: to get to the same size of a 380 carry, the 38 is damn snappy


.380 is a good SD round, IMO

Pro: more rounds, easy to get in smaller package, cheaper SD ammo, Ligter (body guard 2.0 is sub 10oz).

con: penetration isn't optimal with some loads


I have a 642, LCP Max, P365-380 and many others
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 11:49:26 AM EST
[#8]
I carried a 642 smith for a decade. I now carry a lcp max with 12 rd mag. Yes 158 grain lead swchp out performs 90 grain jacketed hp, but 12 vs 5 in the gun plus 12 quick reload is comforting to me. 642 empty about 17oz lcp max empty about 11oz for me weight is the contributing factor for pocket carry.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 11:56:22 AM EST
[#9]
There are times when I carry a Ruger LCR.  I would feel almost as comfortable with a modern .380 however.  Both have their pros and cons.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 11:59:25 AM EST
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Scrambler07:
38, especially if it can take +P. That’s putting you into 357mag velocity in a little J frame.
View Quote

I’d love to see the math on that.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 12:00:03 PM EST
[#11]
Just get a marakov
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 12:00:31 PM EST
[#12]
Piqued
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 12:00:40 PM EST
[#13]
Dont discount advantage of revolver in contact distance fights which is a pretty common thing.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 12:06:37 PM EST
[#14]
For pocket carry, I haven't found the lcp to be super reliable on actual use. Anything much larger becomes a pita to actually pocket carry and prints pretty substantially. If the new BG2 were actually pocketable, concealable in the pocket, and actually reliable when carried in the pocket, it seems like a solid choice and I'd pick it over a snubbie. Pay close attention to actual terminal ballistics out of short barrels with both calibers. You will have to be careful about ammo selection to get reliable performance.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 12:07:59 PM EST
[#15]
as a fun fact: modern .380 is similar in bullet weight and superior in velocity to .36 BP loads from a BP muzzle-loading (Colt 1851 and similar) service revolver
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 12:10:18 PM EST
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Ridgerunner9876:
Dont discount advantage of revolver in contact distance fights which is a pretty common thing.
View Quote
Many .380s are fixed-barrel, and those can make contact shots just fine.

The Beretta Pico and LCP series of pistols are both tilting-barrel, however, so they are not immune to having the barrel pushed out of battery.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 12:12:23 PM EST
[#17]
has anyone actually tested those new Hydra-Shok Deep .380 rounds? They seemed to be getting to where 9x19mm was a decade ago, which is rather impressive for pocket rockets.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 12:12:52 PM EST
[#18]
38 can be loaded from anemic wadcutters to some retarded hot stuff eclipsing 9mm ballistics

You prob gunna wanna shoot wadcutters in a 442/642 though
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 12:15:38 PM EST
[Last Edit: chase45] [#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By X-CaptHook:

I’d love to see the math on that.
View Quote


Its a bit of an exaggeration in a snubbie

But yeah some super heavy 38 loads exist that could be called 357 light

38 SPL +P OUTDOORSMAN
158 gr. Hard Cast Keith @ 1,250 fps
20 Round Box




➤  1027 fps -- S&W Mod 642 (pre-dash), 1 & 7/8 inch barrel, 38 SPL
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 12:19:33 PM EST
[#20]
Revolver has some ergonomic advantages. Less likely to fumble the draw in a fight. Reliability not impacted by grip or stance.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 12:20:29 PM EST
[#21]
Been carrying a J frame for over 30 years. Tried a Ruger LCP. Sold it.

Tried a Ruger LCP Max. Sold it.

The guns just don't feel that good in my hand. They are TOO small. Mainly because I have shovels for hands.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 12:23:01 PM EST
[Last Edit: John-in-austin] [#22]
Double tap
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 12:28:36 PM EST
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By StevenH:
Revolver has some ergonomic advantages. Less likely to fumble the draw in a fight. Reliability not impacted by grip or stance.
View Quote


This always amuses me.  You can easily short stroke the long ass trigger pull on a snub if you don’t have a good grip
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 12:29:10 PM EST
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By CFletch:
Many .380s are fixed-barrel, and those can make contact shots just fine.

The Beretta Pico and LCP series of pistols are both tilting-barrel, however, so they are not immune to having the barrel pushed out of battery.
View Quote

When you punch or push fleshy stuff, the fixed barrel may stay but the slide will be pushed back. Same for eye sockets and ear canals.

It isnt the ultimate deciding factor, but is a factor to consider. I carry a 442, often. I realize its limitations. It's a BUG, more or less. Pretty limited.

If things keep going the way they are,  I may change my tune. I have a few 43x and 48 with dots and 15rd mags with trex awic side car rigs.

If it's to the point that I dont think its smart to be out and about with less than that, maybe I should switch to plates, helmet, PDW or carbine, blow out kit, and partners to go to the grocery.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 12:34:18 PM EST
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Scrambler07:
38, especially if it can take +P. That's putting you into 357mag velocity in a little J frame.
View Quote
This was my initial thought too.

.380 out of my LCP sort of says, get the hell away from me
+P .38spl is a much more offensive round that I feel is more capable from a short barrel
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 1:05:37 PM EST
[#26]
Back when it was 6 shots of .380 vs 5 shots of .38spl, there were great arguments for .38spl.

Now, when it's 12+1 shots of .380 vs 5 shots of .38spl, there's basically no argument at all for the .38, especially when the .38 is almost double the price of the .380.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 1:07:25 PM EST
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By GenYRevolverGuy:
Back when it was 6 shots of .380 vs 5 shots of .38spl, there were great arguments for .38spl.

Now, when it's 12+1 shots of .380 vs 5 shots of .38spl, there's basically no argument at all for the .38, especially when the .38 is almost double the price of the .380.
View Quote


Username isnt checkin out here
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 1:09:49 PM EST
[#28]
Get both! Lol, wife carries a little S&W .38, and I carry a .380. The .38 is a little bitey with hot loads I must say.

My .380 is very light recoiling despite it's small size, I run Cor-Bons in it and feel pretty comfortable it would do the job if need be. Found a company that makes replacement baseplates for the mags that extend it about an inch or better, which really helped me as I have size XL hands.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 1:10:21 PM EST
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Circle_R:
This was my initial thought too.

.380 out of my LCP sort of says, get the hell away from me
+P .38spl is a much more offensive round that I feel is more capable from a short barrel
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Circle_R:
Originally Posted By Scrambler07:
38, especially if it can take +P. That's putting you into 357mag velocity in a little J frame.
This was my initial thought too.

.380 out of my LCP sort of says, get the hell away from me
+P .38spl is a much more offensive round that I feel is more capable from a short barrel

Really not all that much difference between the two. .38 may get a little more penetration, depending on the bullet. Both require about the same amount of time for typical handgun incapacitation. Both are just about as instant with CNS hit.

Its anecdotal but a guy I knew took four .38 (158rn) to the chest out of a  COP. Made it to four houses, knocking on doors for help, before dying.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 1:12:36 PM EST
[Last Edit: AndBen] [#30]
I’m new to the revolver game, but recently picked up an older Colt Agent, non+P. I bought some of this.

Thoughts?

Buffalo Bore Standard Pressure Short Barrel Low Flash Heavy .38 Special

https://www.buffalobore.com/index.php?l=product_detail&p=110

ETA: sorry if I hijacked
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 1:15:38 PM EST
[#31]
A ~10 shot .380 revolver would be a dandy little BUG
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 1:41:54 PM EST
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By chase45:


Username isnt checkin out here
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By chase45:
Originally Posted By GenYRevolverGuy:
Back when it was 6 shots of .380 vs 5 shots of .38spl, there were great arguments for .38spl.

Now, when it's 12+1 shots of .380 vs 5 shots of .38spl, there's basically no argument at all for the .38, especially when the .38 is almost double the price of the .380.


Username isnt checkin out here


I almost always have at least one revolver in the bag when I go to the range.

An LCP Max is my carry turd.

If I had millions of dollars, I'd have some pretty sweet cars, too, but I'd still DD a boring truck or SUV.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 1:46:21 PM EST
[#33]
I have a .38 snub nose that I carry on occasion and I specifically bought a .380 bodyguard 1.0 to carry as a pocket pistol.

Because sometime I don't feel like wearing a holster and I want to wear shorts.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 1:47:19 PM EST
[#34]
I carry both of those calibers.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 1:48:04 PM EST
[#35]
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 1:49:49 PM EST
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By CFletch:
has anyone actually tested those new Hydra-Shok Deep .380 rounds? They seemed to be getting to where 9x19mm was a decade ago, which is rather impressive for pocket rockets.
View Quote

That stuff has some VERY impressive gel performance for a .380, and I would very much liken it to B-tier 9mm ammo performance. It and the micro .380’s out now make carrying a .380 a very viable option.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 1:50:11 PM EST
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By CFletch:
as a fun fact: modern .380 is similar in bullet weight and superior in velocity to .36 BP loads from a BP muzzle-loading (Colt 1851 and similar) service revolver
View Quote

I just load the cylinder on my Navy replica. Must be doing it wrong.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 2:00:37 PM EST
[#38]
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 2:04:08 PM EST
[#39]
I sometimes carry .38 special in a j-frame, and sometimes carry .380 in a semi auto.

However, my .380 is a Beretta 84fs, totally too big and too heavy for 2024. I still like it though, it's a neat little gun, and 14 rounds of .380 doesn't make me feel poorly armed.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 2:10:56 PM EST
[Last Edit: Vexed] [#40]
I've owned 3 642s, could never get to where i could shoot them even close to as well as even the smallest semi. I always hit 10-12" low at 10 yds no matter what load i ran through it. No doubt it's a me problem as other people manage to get them to shoot straight but I gave up on the snubbies. Sucks because there are some real advantages to snubbies vs a small semi.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 2:13:23 PM EST
[#41]
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 2:15:20 PM EST
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By AndBen:
I’m new to the revolver game, but recently picked up an older Colt Agent, non+P. I bought some of this.

Thoughts?

Buffalo Bore Standard Pressure Short Barrel Low Flash Heavy .38 Special

https://www.buffalobore.com/index.php?l=product_detail&p=110

ETA: sorry if I hijacked
View Quote


That ammo should be fine and not too snappy but try it out. The low flash will be nice.
I have found the Double Tap wadcutter to be very soft shooting but they are a smokestack. Almost like shooting an old cap and ball gun.
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 2:17:22 PM EST
[#43]
id rather have 11 .380s vs 5 38s
Link Posted: 7/19/2024 2:30:09 PM EST
[#44]
Link Posted: 8/12/2024 7:13:03 PM EST
[#45]
Link Posted: 8/12/2024 7:25:18 PM EST
[#46]
While I do have a J frame loaded with 125 grain jhp +P. It's basically a drawer/wife bump in the night gun. I certainly wouldn't want to get shot with it.

That being said I have a single stack subcompact 9mm for a low profile ccw and my trusty g19 for edc. So I guess my answer is neither lol
Link Posted: 8/12/2024 7:26:38 PM EST
[#47]
I carry both and like .38 wadcutters for carry
Link Posted: 8/12/2024 7:29:55 PM EST
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By MRW:
I'm back to uncle mike grips on the j-frame
this is my around the house gun

https://i.imgur.com/vnNZ2fm.jpg
View Quote


Definitely some of the best grips made for the J frames (functionality, not the most comfortable) as well as one of the best products Uncle Mike's ever made, no idea why they quit making them since they're still popular based on prices on sites like ebay.  

My take, different guns with overlapping usage.  I like the versatility of the revolver, especially around water where I can load a shot shell first, but the pistol beats it for ease of carry, capacity and reload speed.  As always, get both!
Link Posted: 8/12/2024 7:43:05 PM EST
[#49]
Buffalo Bore 380 +P hardcast 100 grain is the way.
Link Posted: 8/12/2024 8:15:57 PM EST
[#50]
.380. Close enough in power. You're not going to want to run those real hot loads in a smaller .38.

.380 is easier conceal, carries more rounds, and is easier to reload if you need to by just inserting another mag.
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 3
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top