User Panel
Quoted: So drones are aircraft now and fall under full regulation of the FAA? I' Good, they need a phone book sized stack of regulations and operators should have pilots licenses and be required to file flight plans. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: should go high enough to allow property owner to shoot down drones flying above Shooting at aircraft should be considered a terrorist act. So drones are aircraft now and fall under full regulation of the FAA? I' Good, they need a phone book sized stack of regulations and operators should have pilots licenses and be required to file flight plans. However, besides manned CONTROL flight where currently legal I think 50 feet above manned structures should be restricted unless the drone operator has written permission from the owner. If these passenger carrying drones ever become wide spread (I feel it's a flop like when everyone was freaking out about the VLJ and air taxi in the early 2000's) I feel they need to be 500 feet away and when not in forward flight need to be directly over roads. |
|
Quoted: No. Is it any worse than being woken up by some asshole mowing his yard? Or a street crew working on repaving the street? Or a garbage truck? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I take it you have never been woken up at 6am on your day off by some asshole in a crop duster repeatedly buzzing your house. No. Is it any worse than being woken up by some asshole mowing his yard? Or a street crew working on repaving the street? Or a garbage truck? Or police sirens at 3am? |
|
Quoted: Plenty of my trees are taller than that, who owns the canopy and can I sue them if it falls on my house? I like the "Infinity and beyond" idea, that way I would own a million acres somewhere in space if it was far enough away. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted: Sorry, but you are the one that is wrong. I worked in the communication tower design/installation/maintenance industry for over 20 years and I assure you per the FAA any tower 200' or taller AGL must have a beacon light on it. View Quote Yes. But that doesn't mean that 200' AGL is controlled air space. Controlled airspace is Class A, B, C, D and E. Class G airspace is uncontrolled and extends to either 700' AGL or 1,200' AGL. The FAA permits licensed and unlicensed drone operations up to 400' AGL, or up to 400' above above the top of a tower when operating within 400' laterally of that tower. Additionally, the FAA allows certified commercial drone operations within class B-C airspace through the LAANC system which notifies the local ATC of your operational area and gives you a maximum height you are allowed to operate at. |
|
Quoted: Yes. But that doesn't mean that 200' AGL is controlled air space. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Sorry, but you are the one that is wrong. I worked in the communication tower design/installation/maintenance industry for over 20 years and I assure you per the FAA any tower 200' or taller AGL must have a beacon light on it. Yes. But that doesn't mean that 200' AGL is controlled air space. Yes it does. If they are telling you that any tower 200' or above must have a beacon, then they are controlling the space 200' or above. Unless you want to do wordplay and call it "regulating" instead of "controlling." |
|
Quoted: If you have lakefront property, how much of the lake do you own? View Quote Around here, none. They are ACOE lakes and they actually own an easement up into your property. I actually had a property owner tell me while I was walking the lake when it wayyy down a few years ago...to stay off his property. Like, when the lake goes down, his property line moves. I ignored him. |
|
Quoted: Yes it does. If they are telling you that any tower 200' or above must have a beacon, then they are controlling the space 200' or above. Unless you want to do wordplay and call it "regulating" instead of "controlling." View Quote That's not how the FAA defines controlled vs. uncontrolled airspace. Just because a 200' tall tower or other structure has a beacon light on it, doesn't meant that that area is in controlled airspace. There are lots of towers and structures located in Class G airspace. Class G is defined by the FAA as uncontrolled airspace (it falls outside Class A, B, C, D, or E airspace up to either 700' AGL or 1,200' AGL) and is outside the areas where ATC has authority or responsibility to control the air traffic. Most of the land in the United States falls under Class G airspace. |
|
|
|
Quoted: That's not how the FAA defines controlled vs. uncontrolled airspace. Just because a 200' tall tower or other structure has a beacon light on it, doesn't meant that that area is in controlled airspace. There are lots of towers and structures located in Class G airspace. Class G is defined by the FAA as uncontrolled airspace (it falls outside Class A, B, C, D, or E airspace up to either 700' AGL or 1,200' AGL) and is outside the areas where ATC has authority or responsibility to control the air traffic. Most of the land in the United States falls under Class G airspace. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Yes it does. If they are telling you that any tower 200' or above must have a beacon, then they are controlling the space 200' or above. Unless you want to do wordplay and call it "regulating" instead of "controlling." That's not how the FAA defines controlled vs. uncontrolled airspace. Just because a 200' tall tower or other structure has a beacon light on it, doesn't meant that that area is in controlled airspace. There are lots of towers and structures located in Class G airspace. Class G is defined by the FAA as uncontrolled airspace (it falls outside Class A, B, C, D, or E airspace up to either 700' AGL or 1,200' AGL) and is outside the areas where ATC has authority or responsibility to control the air traffic. Most of the land in the United States falls under Class G airspace. Then the FAA is contradicting themselves. They are defining 200' as uncontrolled, while at the same time they are enforcing control over it. That does sound like the typical government agency though. |
|
|
Infinitely. That way, somewhere in the universe, you own your own planet.
|
|
Quoted: Then the FAA is contradicting themselves. They are defining 200' as uncontrolled, while at the same time they are enforcing control over it. That does sound like the typical government agency though. View Quote They are only enforcing control over the structure itself in order to help prevent pilots from running into that structure during night time flight in uncontrolled airspace. 200' AGL is not a definition for any flight level out side of an airport approach path. |
|
|
|
|
Did you buy the air rights to your property when you purchased your property?
|
|
I'm not really certain, however, last week when a helicopter hovered directly over my property for about 15 minutes I was certain there wasn't much I could do without landing in a bunch of hot water.
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: They are only enforcing control over the structure itself in order to help prevent pilots from running into that structure during night time flight in uncontrolled airspace. 200' AGL is not a definition for any flight level out side of an airport approach path. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Then the FAA is contradicting themselves. They are defining 200' as uncontrolled, while at the same time they are enforcing control over it. That does sound like the typical government agency though. They are only enforcing control over the structure itself in order to help prevent pilots from running into that structure during night time flight in uncontrolled airspace. 200' AGL is not a definition for any flight level out side of an airport approach path. Yeah, I know the reasons why they do it, but, I don't see how calling it uncontrolled while at the same time exerting control over a structure extending into it is not a contradiction. |
|
Quoted: I take it you have never been woken up at 6am on your day off by some asshole in a crop duster repeatedly buzzing your house. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: should go high enough to allow property owner to shoot down drones flying above Shooting at aircraft should be considered a terrorist act. I take it you have never been woken up at 6am on your day off by some asshole in a crop duster repeatedly buzzing your house. You would be wrong. |
|
Quoted: Your toy drone is surely equal to piloted helicopters and commercial airplanes....do you wear a flight suit when you "pilot" it? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: should go high enough to allow property owner to shoot down drones flying above Can I shoot down piloted helicopters? How about commercial airplanes? Your toy drone is surely equal to piloted helicopters and commercial airplanes....do you wear a flight suit when you "pilot" it? |
|
|
Can I park a blimp above my neighbor's house? Tie a line to my chimney and let it float downwind?
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: I'm assuming OP is asking the question in relationship to drones, the police or street department or garbage trucks don't really have a choice on where they go and when.....some random guy with his toy does. “Toy” Lol. The ignorance shows The vast majority of drones are toys that have no legitimate reason to be flying around someones property....toy isn't necessarily a negative term (obviously you find offensive lol)....I have plenty of guns that I consider range toys, I have no use for them other than having fun on the range. So....keep your toy on your property. |
|
|
|
Quoted: should go high enough to allow property owner to shoot down drones flying above View Quote How wishful |
|
You can own it as high as you want, but you have to pay to fence it all in, plus jump through all the legal hoops, etc.
|
|
Quoted: The vast majority of drones are toys that have no legitimate reason to be flying around someones property....toy isn't necessarily a negative term (obviously you find offensive lol)....I have plenty of guns that I consider range toys, I have no use for them other than having fun on the range. So....keep your toy on your property. View Quote You don’t own that air above your property. So let’s consider it public and can be used for many reasons On the same way, many public roads out By me lead to nowhere. Many people have no other “legitimate” reason to be on them other than going on a random drive in the country, can we keep those people off the roads too? |
|
Drones flying/spying is an invasion of personal space. Period. Sorry your drone fun is in jeopardy.
Property lines go to infinity. However, FAA ruling come in to muddy the water. In 1940 the altitude was defined as 85 feet. Who Owns The Air Above Your Property +500' is "Navigable" air space. Plenty of muddy water to slosh through. YMMV If you are having problems, maybe you should address it in other avenues than a forum. |
|
It will be whatever Amazon and Google need it to be when they start doing drones all over
|
|
Quoted: You don’t own that air above your property. So let’s consider it public and can be used for many reasons On the same way, many public roads out By me lead to nowhere. Many people have no other “legitimate” reason to be on them other than going on a random drive in the country, can we keep those people off the roads too? View Quote Sounds great....I assume you don't mind if the neighbors on either side of you decide to put a zip line or shooting range across your backyard right? I mean by your logic, as long as they don't touch the ground it's all good. Just out of curiosity, what do you consider your drone? You got pissy about me calling it a toy....what is it? |
|
Quoted: Sounds great....I assume you don't mind if the neighbors on either side of you decide to put a zip line or shooting range across your backyard right? I mean by your logic, as long as they don't touch the ground it's all good. Just out of curiosity, what do you consider your drone? You got pissy about me calling it a toy....what is it? View Quote If you see my earlier post in here, my opinion was your property line should go to either the top of your tallest structure or tree. Maybe make it whichever is the tallest of those two and that’s what your property line goes to. If you want to shoot or zip line only higher than my tallest trees, ok then. Fly the drone above that then good to go. Go below that and it’s not ok. That would be a compromise for all the drone haters. |
|
Zoning can tell you...they probably have a restriction on how high you can build..........
|
|
Quoted: If you see my earlier post in here, my opinion was your property line should go to either the top of your tallest structure or tree. Maybe make it whichever is the tallest of those two and that’s what your property line goes to. If you want to shoot or zip line only higher than my tallest trees, ok then. View Quote lol So what is your drone if it's not a toy, is it a tool, vaginal emotional support vehicle, bird racer....what do you consider your drone? |
|
Quoted: lol So what is your drone if it's not a toy, is it a tool, vaginal emotional support vehicle, bird racer....what do you consider your drone? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: lol So what is your drone if it's not a toy, is it a tool, vaginal emotional support vehicle, bird racer....what do you consider your drone? An unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) (or uncrewed aerial vehicle, commonly known as a drone) is an aircraft without a human pilot on board and a type of unmanned vehicle. Or for the simple minds, it’s a tool for tasks |
|
|
|
|
Sonny Rhodes The Ballad of Serenity with Lyrics (Firefly Opening Theme Song) |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.