User Panel
|
|
|
Failed To Load Title |
|
|
abort
|
|
|
Launch hold to clean the camera lens (wipe it dry).
Actually is probability of landing failure. |
|
|
scrubbed due to probability of landing failure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Chokey: a bit rough out there https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FupPq9ZWAAIoKm_?format=jpg&name=medium View Quote That makes sense. I came in after start-up. It means that their weather GO comment earlier may have been bad as well as the Launch Director Go for Launch at T-40 seconds. |
|
|
Mission: Falcon Heavy, ViaSat 3 Americas
1) Background info: Source "A SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket will launch the ViaSat 3 Americas broadband communications satellite. ViaSat 3 Americas is the first of at least three new-generation Boeing-built geostationary satellites for ViaSat. A small communications satellite named Arcturus will launch as a secondary payload for Astranis." 2) Launch window: 7:29 - 8:26 PM EDT (30 April 2023). 3) Launch site: LC-39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida 4) Launch direction: Easterly 5) Webcast viewing options: a. SpaceX webcast (Starts about 15 minutes before liftoff) b. YouTube: ViaSat-3 Americas Mission 6) Observation comments: Launch site sunset is at 7:56 PM. Civil twilight at 8:21 PM. Launch near the end of the launch window could result in jellyfish sightings. 7) Launch preparations: a. Boats heading out. Gav Cornwell@SpaceOffshore. 21 April 2022. Departure! Doug is heading back to sea to recover the fairing halves from the Falcon Heavy ViaSat-3 mission. The ship departed previously but was later recalled back to Port Canaveral after the mission was delayed. Gav Cornwell@SpaceOffshore. 25 April 2023. SpaceX recovery ship Doug is almost 1700km downrange (and still going) from LC-39A to recover the fairing halves for the upcoming Falcon Heavy ViaSat-3 mission. If successful, the recovered farings would hold the record for the furthest downrange distance. b. Satellites: The ViaSat 3 Americas satellite inside Boeing’s factory in El Segundo, California. Credit: Boeing Render of the ViaSat-3 Americas satellite (Credit: ViaSat) The Arcturus satellite during testing (Credit: Astranis Space Technologies) Credit: Space Inventor. Info on this cubesat. SpaceX’s payload fairing, containing the ViaSat 3 Americas satellite, moves from SpaceX’a payload processing facility to the Falcon Heavy hangar during the final phase of launch preparations. Credit: SpaceX c. Ready for launch: See post by Chokey on page 113, post #48. Copied here. Credit: SpaceX d. Navigation warning: Raul@Raul74Cz. Launch Hazard Areas for #FalconHeavy #ViaSat-3.1 mission from KSC LC-39A NET 26 Apr 23:29 UTC, altern. 27 Apr to 02 May according NOTAM/NOTMARs. Expendable flight for CC-B1068.1, NY-B1052.8, PY-B1053.3 boosters. Estimated fairing recovery ~1950km downrange. 8) First stage return/ocean recovery/disposal: All three boosters will be expended (disposed of in the ocean). 9) Launch to deployment events/timeline: Hours:Minutes:Seconds after lift-off. Times approximate. 00:03:05 Side booster engine cutoff (BECO) 00:03:08 Side boosters separate 00:04:13 1st stage main engine cutoff (MECO) 00:04:17 1st and 2nd stages separate 00:04:23 2nd stage engine starts (SES-1) 00:04:51 Fairing deployment 00:08:06 2nd stage engine cutoff (SECO-1) 00:29:42 2nd stage engine starts (SES-2) 00:31:46 2nd stage engine cutoff (SECO-2) 04:22:19 2nd stage engine starts (SES-3) 04:23:14 2nd stage engine cutoff (SECO-3) 04:32:15 ViaSat-3 Americas deploys 04:38:46 Gravity Space’s GS-1 deploys 04:45:17 Astranis's first MicroGEO satellite deploys 10) Orbit destination: Near-Geosynchronous Earth orbit |
|
|
Kind of ironic SpaceX lunching Viasat's latest sat since Starlink is going to put them out of business. The thought of Viasat going bankrupt makes me smile, I HATE them.
|
|
But he sure found out the hard way
That dreams don't always come true |
|
@AJE |
|
|
Originally Posted By AmericanPeople: Thunderbird fly by around 14 April 2023 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FtrnmO-WAAArccw?format=jpg&name=900x900 View Quote We always get a free airshow when they come to town Attached File |
|
|
Originally Posted By Chokey:
@AJE View Quote Tomorrow is just fine |
|
“Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a 10mm at your side, kid.”
|
It's a strange, strange world we live in, Master Jack
|
Webcast is live.
|
|
|
It’s always so foggy at Vandenberg lol. It makes for good Pinot Noir grapes though!
|
|
|
F9H launch is now 20% go for tonight.
|
|
It's a strange, strange world we live in, Master Jack
|
The fog doesn't stop Falcon 9.
And another happy landing. |
|
NRA Benefactor Life
|
I just never get tired of those landings.
|
|
|
“Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a 10mm at your side, kid.”
|
Their 187th landing of an orbital class rocket.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By AJE: @Dagger41 where can I see these probabilities? The Mission Launch Execution Forecast still shows 50% but hasn't updated since last night. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By AJE: Originally Posted By Dagger41: F9H launch is now 20% go for tonight. @Dagger41 where can I see these probabilities? The Mission Launch Execution Forecast still shows 50% but hasn't updated since last night. under "Launch Support" https://www.patrick.spaceforce.mil/About-Us/Weather/ |
|
|
Looks like the rocket was a little gassy after its in-flight meal.
|
|
|
|
|
"Your boos mean nothing. I've seen what makes you cheer."
|
Originally Posted By Chokey: under "Launch Support" https://www.patrick.spaceforce.mil/About-Us/Weather/ View Quote It was just on Fox35 news (local) We are in for the same crud today that we got yesterday. Plus Patrick Space Force weather just updated the POV to 80% |
|
It's a strange, strange world we live in, Master Jack
|
Originally Posted By Dagger41: It was just on Fox35 news (local) We are in for the same crud today that we got yesterday. Plus Patrick Space Force weather just updated the POV to 80% View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Dagger41: Originally Posted By Chokey: under "Launch Support" https://www.patrick.spaceforce.mil/About-Us/Weather/ It was just on Fox35 news (local) We are in for the same crud today that we got yesterday. Plus Patrick Space Force weather just updated the POV to 80% Thanks guys, bookmarked. |
|
“Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a 10mm at your side, kid.”
|
Why are they not planning on recovering the rockets for the Falcon Heavy launch?
|
|
EP429: Today's lesson - Don't provoke ARFCOM. People will see your butthole.
|
Originally Posted By fox2008: Why are they not planning on recovering the rockets for the Falcon Heavy launch? View Quote Probably because it’s a heavy payload going to a difficult to get to orbit. I admit that I don’t understand orbital dynamics as well as I should but the concept of geostationary orbit always gave me a headache. It’s kinda funny the way things have turned out with FH. It’s at its most useful when they use up the rocket, even with expending the rocket it’s still cheaper than its contemporaries. I should look up the price difference between a FH and Delta IV launch. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Hesperus: Probably because it’s a heavy payload going to a difficult to get to orbit. I admit that I don’t understand orbital dynamics as well as I should but the concept of geostationary orbit always gave me a headache. It’s kinda funny the way things have turned out with FH. It’s at its most useful when they use up the rocket, even with expending the rocket it’s still cheaper than its contemporaries. I should look up the price difference between a FH and Delta IV launch. View Quote Correct, they are going to a near-geosynchronous orbit, not a more common elliptical transfer orbit. They need all the propellant to do that. Look at the third set of second stage burns over four hours after launch. That is the one that ideally will circularize the orbit and remove most of the inclination. After they launch it and element sets show up I will post some numbers to show what happened. |
|
|
Originally Posted By KonamiCode: Looks like the rocket was a little gassy after its in-flight meal.
View Quote Thanks for that. I saw the flare up at landing but did not know why. Notice the venting of a gas just above the landing legs. It is directed downward and when it reaches the engine area is ignited. |
|
|
Originally Posted By AmericanPeople: Correct, they are going to a near-geosynchronous orbit, not a more common elliptical transfer orbit. They need all the propellant to do that. Look at the third set of second stage burns over four hours after launch. That is the one that ideally will circularize the orbit and remove most of the inclination. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By AmericanPeople: Originally Posted By Hesperus: Probably because it’s a heavy payload going to a difficult to get to orbit. I admit that I don’t understand orbital dynamics as well as I should but the concept of geostationary orbit always gave me a headache. It’s kinda funny the way things have turned out with FH. It’s at its most useful when they use up the rocket, even with expending the rocket it’s still cheaper than its contemporaries. I should look up the price difference between a FH and Delta IV launch. Correct, they are going to a near-geosynchronous orbit, not a more common elliptical transfer orbit. They need all the propellant to do that. Look at the third set of second stage burns over four hours after launch. That is the one that ideally will circularize the orbit and remove most of the inclination. Makes sense.....but still sucks we don't get to see 2 boosters landing at the same time. |
|
EP429: Today's lesson - Don't provoke ARFCOM. People will see your butthole.
|
Originally Posted By Hesperus: Probably because it’s a heavy payload going to a difficult to get to orbit. I admit that I don’t understand orbital dynamics as well as I should but the concept of geostationary orbit always gave me a headache. It’s kinda funny the way things have turned out with FH. It’s at its most useful when they use up the rocket, even with expending the rocket it’s still cheaper than its contemporaries. I should look up the price difference between a FH and Delta IV launch. View Quote FH expendable shows $90-$150 million for 59,000 lbs to GTO. Delta IV heavy is $440 million for 29,500 lbs to GTO. |
|
Seriously... unTex the Mex..
|
|
Originally Posted By fox2008: Makes sense.....but still sucks we don't get to see 2 boosters landing at the same time. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By fox2008: Originally Posted By AmericanPeople: Originally Posted By Hesperus: Probably because it’s a heavy payload going to a difficult to get to orbit. I admit that I don’t understand orbital dynamics as well as I should but the concept of geostationary orbit always gave me a headache. It’s kinda funny the way things have turned out with FH. It’s at its most useful when they use up the rocket, even with expending the rocket it’s still cheaper than its contemporaries. I should look up the price difference between a FH and Delta IV launch. Correct, they are going to a near-geosynchronous orbit, not a more common elliptical transfer orbit. They need all the propellant to do that. Look at the third set of second stage burns over four hours after launch. That is the one that ideally will circularize the orbit and remove most of the inclination. Makes sense.....but still sucks we don't get to see 2 boosters landing at the same time. As someone hoping to watch this one in person, I whole heatedly agree. |
|
“Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a 10mm at your side, kid.”
|
Originally Posted By AJE: As someone hoping to watch this one in person, I whole heatedly agree. View Quote The only thing that SpaceX hopes to recover is the payload fairings, which has become routine but this time it's a bit different. This mission will be the farthest out they have gone to fetch them.
|
|
It's a strange, strange world we live in, Master Jack
|
|
It's windy AF in St Augustine
|
|
“Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a 10mm at your side, kid.”
|
|
|
|
ETA fixed
|
|
“Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a 10mm at your side, kid.”
|
|
|
|
|
we might see a tornado on NSF's stream
ARCHIVE: Space Coast Live |
|
|
scrubbed
|
|
|
“Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a 10mm at your side, kid.”
|
Reportedly there are some changes to something on SLC-39A to change between Falcon Heavy and CRS/Dragon missions. It just reinforces the fact that 39A is a single point failure for ISS supply and manned flights. I believe that SLC-40 is going to be modified to handle those missions.
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Chokey: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fuwnix9WwAEMURz?format=jpg&name=large View Quote Does a strike like that require checking the rocket and payloads for damage? |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.