User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 10:53:41 AM EDT
[#1]
I think a new meme lower would be cool. I think I could get them to put it in the schedule. Any good ideas?
Thanks! Josiah |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 11:02:49 AM EDT
[Last Edit: beitodesstrafe]
[#2]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PalmettoStateArmory: I think a new meme lower would be cool. I think I could get them to put it in the schedule. Any good ideas? Thanks! Josiah Definitely something with an anime girl. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 11:03:41 AM EDT
[#3]
 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 11:32:50 AM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By beitodesstrafe: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/138374/543dda274ca554e7dd5ba5e88a8bf257-1425373-1426036.jpg 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 11:34:04 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PalmettoStateArmory: I think a new meme lower would be cool. I think I could get them to put it in the schedule. Any good ideas? Thanks! Josiah 
|
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 11:50:16 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Pomyluy]
[#6]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 12:47:45 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryOriginally Posted By d16man: Originally Posted By beitodesstrafe: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/138374/543dda274ca554e7dd5ba5e88a8bf257-1425373-1426036.jpg https://thumbs.gfycat.com/ImprobableFarflungHapuka.webp You know you want it!
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 12:51:14 PM EDT
[#8]
If Musk ends up acquiring Twitter an Elon Musk lower would be cool.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 4:09:50 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By beitodesstrafe: You know you want it! That's what she said. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 4:13:30 PM EDT
[#10]
Think that the list is on top of page 550....
Lots of one still in the hopper - seem that we let a few jump the line. Red |
|
|
|
GA, USA
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 4:17:09 PM EDT
[#11]
The bird that shat on biden needs its own lower.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 4:42:23 PM EDT
[#12]
How about a ghost gun 80% lower....
Easy and quick and cheap and I bet it would sell a bunch... I will sign up for two or three right now... Red |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 5:46:07 PM EDT
[Last Edit: d16man]
[#13]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By giantpune: The bird that shat on biden needs its own lower. https://www.instagram.com/p/CcSqG97O8Hs/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y= |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 7:38:50 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryThat's pretty awesome. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 9:04:49 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By beitodesstrafe: Definitely something with an anime girl. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By beitodesstrafe: Originally Posted By PalmettoStateArmory: I think a new meme lower would be cool. I think I could get them to put it in the schedule. Any good ideas? Thanks! Josiah Definitely something with an anime girl. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 9:07:48 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By badredfish: Think that the list is on top of page 550.... Lots of one still in the hopper - seem that we let a few jump the line. Red Valid point. They could also run some more of the Boating Accident lowers so that I could fill that hole in my collection. Hint hint hint... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 9:12:29 PM EDT
[#17]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 9:15:04 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Global_Cooling: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/241636/49920030451_0b8fdd64cf_k_jpg-2349335.JPG Obviously we need this one now I like. Also needs to be an 80%. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 9:15:42 PM EDT
[#19]
Just bought another PSA lower.
 |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 9:22:29 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Global_Cooling: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/241636/49920030451_0b8fdd64cf_k_jpg-2349335.JPG Obviously we need this one now If they let that one loose, I'll be happier than a busload of retards headed for Chucky Cheese! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 9:40:29 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Global_Cooling: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/241636/49920030451_0b8fdd64cf_k_jpg-2349335.JPG Obviously we need this one now I’m not interested in this one, but the timing is perfect and I think it would sell well. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2022 12:05:12 AM EDT
[#22]
Let's do a Dog Faced ghost clip pony AR47 barrel shoulder shroud soldier thingy lower.
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 4/15/2022 1:23:28 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PalmettoStateArmory: I think a new meme lower would be cool. I think I could get them to put it in the schedule. Any good ideas? Thanks! Josiah |
|
|
NJ, USA
|
Posted: 4/15/2022 2:14:00 AM EDT
[#24]
eagle shitting on biden
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2022 9:37:25 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By eyesoffire0: eagle shitting on biden A Cleetus McFarland-esque Bald Eagle, you say?  Attached File |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2022 10:06:41 AM EDT
[#26]
Guano-15
not sure what a good rollmark would be. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2022 10:20:27 AM EDT
[#27]
jstark-15
Become ungovernable Become ungovernable Become ungovernable |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2022 12:40:34 PM EDT
[#28]
Based on a prior selected design which had not been made.
Seems to fit better now than before, maybe now is the time.   @Gripen In reference to your post on roll marking. First, thanks for the compliment, it is appreciated. Josiah may be able to chime in here with a better explanation, my opinion and thoughts are more speculation than fact. The earlier run lower in your photo looks to have been serialized at the same time as the roll mark. The newer design may have been serialized as a second burn. However, with the exception of the MFG mark (which could be based on which one of PSA machining companies did the job, they have multiple sites), the roll mark appears to match. A bit wider, not quite as "sharp", but this could be due to laser settings. The differences could be laser burn time, power setting, height of mount, age of focal lenses, even aluminum molecular structure post forging (it does change). Or, even how long the forgings rolled in the tumbler prior to anodizing, or the anodizing process itself (which is an extremely fickle science from my understanding). Not offering excuses, only a few examples for reasons for possible differences. About the only time I see lowers that match more exactly, is when they are close together in production number runs. The farther apart the serial numbers stretch, or from different ano batches, or from cutting sites (DC Machine, STS), some subtle differences can be found. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2022 7:29:51 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By BrickWurX: Based on a prior selected design which had not been made. Seems to fit better now than before, maybe now is the time. https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52006436398_dfce16719d_c.jpg https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52006378291_bce3a607ac_c.jpg @Gripen In reference to your post on roll marking. First, thanks for the compliment, it is appreciated. Josiah may be able to chime in here with a better explanation, my opinion and thoughts are more speculation than fact. The earlier run lower in your photo looks to have been serialized at the same time as the roll mark. The newer design may have been serialized as a second burn. However, with the exception of the MFG mark (which could be based on which one of PSA machining companies did the job, they have multiple sites), the roll mark appears to match. A bit wider, not quite as "sharp", but this could be due to laser settings. The differences could be laser burn time, power setting, height of mount, age of focal lenses, even aluminum molecular structure post forging (it does change). Or, even how long the forgings rolled in the tumbler prior to anodizing, or the anodizing process itself (which is an extremely fickle science from my understanding). Not offering excuses, only a few examples for reasons for possible differences. About the only time I see lowers that match more exactly, is when they are close together in production number runs. The farther apart the serial numbers stretch, or from different ano batches, or from cutting sites (DC Machine, STS), some subtle differences can be found. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2022 7:31:11 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PalmettoStateArmory: I think a new meme lower would be cool. I think I could get them to put it in the schedule. Any good ideas? Thanks! Josiah |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2022 7:35:46 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MoonDancer: I'd be down for one or two of the lower designs here. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MoonDancer: Originally Posted By BrickWurX: Based on a prior selected design which had not been made. Seems to fit better now than before, maybe now is the time. https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52006436398_dfce16719d_c.jpg https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52006378291_bce3a607ac_c.jpg @Gripen In reference to your post on roll marking. First, thanks for the compliment, it is appreciated. Josiah may be able to chime in here with a better explanation, my opinion and thoughts are more speculation than fact. The earlier run lower in your photo looks to have been serialized at the same time as the roll mark. The newer design may have been serialized as a second burn. However, with the exception of the MFG mark (which could be based on which one of PSA machining companies did the job, they have multiple sites), the roll mark appears to match. A bit wider, not quite as "sharp", but this could be due to laser settings. The differences could be laser burn time, power setting, height of mount, age of focal lenses, even aluminum molecular structure post forging (it does change). Or, even how long the forgings rolled in the tumbler prior to anodizing, or the anodizing process itself (which is an extremely fickle science from my understanding). Not offering excuses, only a few examples for reasons for possible differences. About the only time I see lowers that match more exactly, is when they are close together in production number runs. The farther apart the serial numbers stretch, or from different ano batches, or from cutting sites (DC Machine, STS), some subtle differences can be found. I'd told myself No More Lowers!, but...  Attached File |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2022 8:01:18 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By BrickWurX: Based on a prior selected design which had not been made. Seems to fit better now than before, maybe now is the time. https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52006436398_dfce16719d_c.jpg https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52006378291_bce3a607ac_c.jpg @Gripen In reference to your post on roll marking. First, thanks for the compliment, it is appreciated. Josiah may be able to chime in here with a better explanation, my opinion and thoughts are more speculation than fact. The earlier run lower in your photo looks to have been serialized at the same time as the roll mark. The newer design may have been serialized as a second burn. However, with the exception of the MFG mark (which could be based on which one of PSA machining companies did the job, they have multiple sites), the roll mark appears to match. A bit wider, not quite as "sharp", but this could be due to laser settings. The differences could be laser burn time, power setting, height of mount, age of focal lenses, even aluminum molecular structure post forging (it does change). Or, even how long the forgings rolled in the tumbler prior to anodizing, or the anodizing process itself (which is an extremely fickle science from my understanding). Not offering excuses, only a few examples for reasons for possible differences. About the only time I see lowers that match more exactly, is when they are close together in production number runs. The farther apart the serial numbers stretch, or from different ano batches, or from cutting sites (DC Machine, STS), some subtle differences can be found. YESSSS i was one of the ones wanting this in the beginning. i haven't bought any meme lowers in a while but I'd be down for several of the bottom ones. I'd rather leave off the curse words for rifles i'm gonna build my children. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2022 8:05:17 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Rumrunner358: Patiently waiting for the Odessa Ass Bandit This |
|
|
|
TN, USA
|
Posted: 4/16/2022 7:34:45 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Gripen: Serial number ranges: W1903xxx for the M4s, W026xxx for the M4A1s. Yeah, after seeing these I'm gonna have to encourage you to hold out for the H&R retros. These look like total crap.  Here's one of the originals from about three years ago: https://i.imgur.com/9kw334u.jpg It's about as good as you can get with a laser engraving instead of an actual rollstamp. @Brickwurx did a fantastic job on this design. And here's one of the current ones: https://i.imgur.com/unf9bod.jpg First of all, it's not even the same design. No, they didn't bump the laser and accidentally shrink the output size or something, this is not the same design as the original PSA M4A1s. Proof? There aren't any periods in "SC". Not to mention that when you look closer, the fonts are all wrong. It looks like shit. @PalmettoStateArmory what happened? You had a great product once. Maybe this is just a sneaky way to steer people towards H&R's significantly more expensive lowers. If so, it's working fantastically well. No more PSA clone lowers for me. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Gripen: Originally Posted By A-10:Nice, yeah pricing did not make sense but you got a good deal. Let us know the ser #range when they come in. Serial number ranges: W1903xxx for the M4s, W026xxx for the M4A1s. Originally Posted By A-10:I should grab a few more lol but holding out for retro. Yeah, after seeing these I'm gonna have to encourage you to hold out for the H&R retros. These look like total crap. Here's one of the originals from about three years ago: https://i.imgur.com/9kw334u.jpg It's about as good as you can get with a laser engraving instead of an actual rollstamp. @Brickwurx did a fantastic job on this design. And here's one of the current ones: https://i.imgur.com/unf9bod.jpg First of all, it's not even the same design. No, they didn't bump the laser and accidentally shrink the output size or something, this is not the same design as the original PSA M4A1s. Proof? There aren't any periods in "SC". Not to mention that when you look closer, the fonts are all wrong. It looks like shit. @PalmettoStateArmory what happened? You had a great product once. Maybe this is just a sneaky way to steer people towards H&R's significantly more expensive lowers. If so, it's working fantastically well. No more PSA clone lowers for me. Thank you for the update! 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2022 11:01:51 AM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Global_Cooling: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/241636/49920030451_0b8fdd64cf_k_jpg-2349335.JPG Obviously we need this one now We will be doing this one!! The variance has already been approved. It will be on the website shortly. Thanks, Josiah |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2022 11:12:50 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PalmettoStateArmory: We will be doing this one!! The variance has already been approved. It will be on the website shortly. Thanks, Josiah God damn you guys lol
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2022 11:49:00 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PalmettoStateArmory: We will be doing this one!! The variance has already been approved. It will be on the website shortly. Thanks, Josiah @PalmettoStateArmory Hey Josiah Please pretty please - do it as a 80 percent - that would be sooooo sweet! Red |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2022 2:06:49 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PalmettoStateArmory: We will be doing this one!! The variance has already been approved. It will be on the website shortly. Thanks, Josiah Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PalmettoStateArmory: Originally Posted By Global_Cooling: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/241636/49920030451_0b8fdd64cf_k_jpg-2349335.JPG Obviously we need this one now We will be doing this one!! The variance has already been approved. It will be on the website shortly. Thanks, Josiah 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2022 2:32:28 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By badredfish: @PalmettoStateArmory Hey Josiah Please pretty please - do it as a 80 percent - that would be sooooo sweet! Red +1 For it being an 80% lower. Not really fitting to have it on a regular finished lower. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2022 3:55:16 PM EDT
[#40]
|
|
|
|
GA, USA
|
Posted: 4/26/2022 4:42:56 PM EDT
[#41]
I got my order in for a couple ghostgun-15. The thread lives on.
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 4/26/2022 4:46:20 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By BrickWurX: Based on a prior selected design which had not been made. Seems to fit better now than before, maybe now is the time. https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52006436398_dfce16719d_c.jpg https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52006378291_bce3a607ac_c.jpg @Gripen In reference to your post on roll marking. First, thanks for the compliment, it is appreciated. Josiah may be able to chime in here with a better explanation, my opinion and thoughts are more speculation than fact. The earlier run lower in your photo looks to have been serialized at the same time as the roll mark. The newer design may have been serialized as a second burn. However, with the exception of the MFG mark (which could be based on which one of PSA machining companies did the job, they have multiple sites), the roll mark appears to match. A bit wider, not quite as "sharp", but this could be due to laser settings. The differences could be laser burn time, power setting, height of mount, age of focal lenses, even aluminum molecular structure post forging (it does change). Or, even how long the forgings rolled in the tumbler prior to anodizing, or the anodizing process itself (which is an extremely fickle science from my understanding). Not offering excuses, only a few examples for reasons for possible differences. About the only time I see lowers that match more exactly, is when they are close together in production number runs. The farther apart the serial numbers stretch, or from different ano batches, or from cutting sites (DC Machine, STS), some subtle differences can be found. Are those receivers even M16 Cut? All that tough guy word posturing but PSA still afraid to make it easy to convert by customer having to Dremel out the receiver themselves to add M16 lower parts and drill third hole. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2022 5:48:27 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Machinegunrenny: Are those receivers even M16 Cut? All that tough guy word posturing but PSA still afraid to make it easy to convert by customer having to Dremel out the receiver themselves to add M16 lower parts and drill third hole. Thanks for your input mr atf guy. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2022 6:39:01 PM EDT
[#44]
Damn! Free shipping and everything. You guys ain't making it easy.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2022 6:40:43 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TheOTHERmaninblack: Damn! Free shipping and everything. You guys ain't making it easy. I bought two! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2022 6:44:55 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Machinegunrenny: Are those receivers even M16 Cut? All that tough guy word posturing but PSA still afraid to make it easy to convert by customer having to Dremel out the receiver themselves to add M16 lower parts and drill third hole. Username…join date… |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2022 9:37:41 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Machinegunrenny: Are those receivers even M16 Cut? All that tough guy word posturing but PSA still afraid to make it easy to convert by customer having to Dremel out the receiver themselves to add M16 lower parts and drill third hole. How many of PSA's customers need an m16 cut??? |
|
|
|
TN, USA
|
Posted: 4/26/2022 9:41:48 PM EDT
[Last Edit: tnaaron81]
[#48]
I’m still waiting on a Bigfoot lower. Hide, Seek, Legend selector markings. BFG serial numbers.
@PalmettoStateArmory |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2022 10:19:51 PM EDT
[#49]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2022 10:30:04 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Machinegunrenny: Are those receivers even M16 Cut? All that tough guy word posturing but PSA still afraid to make it easy to convert by customer having to Dremel out the receiver themselves to add M16 lower parts and drill third hole. |
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
Attached File
