[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Pfizer CEO says current COVID shots 'don't have the safety profile' they once hoped for... (Page 1 of 2)
Posted: 1/10/2022 6:02:15 PM EDT
|
Bourla also said 2 shots "offer very limited protection, if any," against COVID-19. During an interview on CNBC Monday, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla unleashed several truth bombs on an unsuspecting corporate press audience, sowing doubt into the idea that his mRNA shots are “safe and effective.” Most notably, in a comment that has largely escaped notice, he revealed that the current COVID-19 mRNA vaccines “don’t have the safety profile” that they once hoped for. Yes, you read that correctly. CNBC noticeably did not publish these earth shattering remarks on their social media pages, but it seems pretty clear when you read the transcript and watch the video that Bourla dropped some shocking admissions that has since gone unnoticed or rather, unreported by the press. The Pfizer chief appeared on Squawk Box this morning after the company announced several agreements in the fields of gene editing, with the hopes to use these technologies to bolster the mRNA platform for their COVID shots. Yes, Pfizer is seeking partners in order to explore ways to actively change people’s DNA. This idea, if you recall, was once dismissed by the corporate press as an unhinged conspiracy theory. But that wasn’t even the big story. Bourla delivered one bombshell after another on his prized mRNA vaccines. “We have a very strong belief that mRNA is a very powerful technology,” Bourla started, explaining that they are trying to “harness this technology for the best for mankind.” “Now we are going with a third target,” Bourla added. “We believe that we carefully selected. We believe that there is a high probability to deliver a solution to an imminent need, not because the current doses of vaccines are not effective, but they are, they don’t have the safety profile that we hoped we can achieve with this technology.” Bourla wasn’t done. Seemingly hooked to a truth serum device, the Pfizer CEO then said in a Yahoo finance interview that two Pfizer mRNA shots — which he once claimed were 100% effective at preventing the disease — now only “offers very limited protection, if any.” He said this in the context of pushing for a new round of shots for the Omicron variant. Truly, unbelievable stuff. In one interview, Bourla acknowledged that both sides of the “safe and effective” line may very well be untruthful. https://dossier.substack.com/p/shock-video-pfizer-ceo-says-current?r=6a3x3 https://www.cnbc.com/video/2022/01/10/watch-cnbcs-full-interview-with-pfizer-ceo-albert-bourla.html |
|
Bourla wasn’t done. Seemingly hooked to a truth serum device, the Pfizer CEO then said in a Yahoo finance interview that two Pfizer mRNA shots — which he once claimed were 100% effective at preventing the disease — now only “offers very limited protection, if any.” He said this in the context of pushing for a new round of shots for the Omicron variant. "There is no point using a vaccine against a rapidly mutating respiratory virus" - Skillshot, 2020. |
| Sounds like he is growing a conscience and suspects the government is getting ready to throw him under the bus. The Biden regime can't continue this charade much longer when people see that what is going on in their own, real lives are contradicting everything the government is saying. |
|
Quoted: Well this is kinda telling after they have been ordered to turn over the trials at 55,000 pages per month Vs the 500 they requested....  Getting ahead of the news before it comes out, alright. Waiting for the MSM to start acting shocked that people, even a single one, died from the vaccine. |
|
They have changed the update to this substack a few times, but I clipped the audio and ran it through Otter.ai - Here is what Pfizer Albert said: "Well, I think its going to be a driver of finding solutions to unmet medical needs. And we have a very strong belief that mRNA is a very powerful technology or we do it is trying to harness this technology for for, for the best of mankind. This is very strategical selected on these agreements. As you have seen one hand we are expanding even further our collaboration with BionTech. This is a collaboration that I wish I had many by default. They are fantastic partners, both in the scientific and on the personal level, are we are going with a third target, we believe that was very carefully selected, we believe that has very high probability of delivering a solution to an unmet need not because the current <<unclear if he says Pfizer or roster of" vaccines are not effective, but they are don't have the safety profile that we hope we can achieve with this technology. But it is not only the infectious diseases that matter and there are other applications that they can help. So there are three more deals that we have announced. Very important one was beam..." |
|
Quoted: So why are they still advocating pumping this shit into people's bodies? Quoted: Quoted: Because they are designed to fight against the original strain. The virus has mutated so far from that that the vaccines are ineffective. So why are they still advocating pumping this shit into people's bodies?  |
|
Wait until they come up with the "Omicron" vaccine. That will take a harmless virus and result in countless mutations to bypass said harmless virus vis-a-vis mutations that will develop in the virus to evade the vaccine. Many mutations, of which some may be more lethal. It's all part of the MRNA vaccine "subscription service." It has its "own mind." |
|
I am not defending him but it sounds more like he is referring to the vaccines not being as effective as they hoped, and used poor wording, not admitting they are not safe. Edit to add: I am not pro-vaccine at all and have my concerns about long-term effects as well as some short-term safety issues we have already seen. |
| That article reads like a 5 year old wrote it. Truth bombs? It's like a Tim Pool podcast there they took one line and write 15 about it. Yes, he said people who got the 2 shots have waning immunity by this point and he suggests a 3rd. That's been stated for months. There's no truth "bomb" here. Just more dramatic garbage. |
|
Quoted: That article reads like a 5 year old wrote it. Truth bombs? It's like a Tim Pool podcast there they took one line and write 15 about it. Yes, he said people who got the 2 shots have waning immunity by this point and he suggests a 3rd. That's been stated for months. There's no truth "bomb" here. Just more dramatic garbage. They have had to change it a few times, trying to fix the narrative...from another poster above here is the direct transcript from the video that CNBC failed to put up on their website: Here is what Pfizer Albert said: "Well, I think its going to be a driver of finding solutions to unmet medical needs. And we have a very strong belief that mRNA is a very powerful technology or we do it is trying to harness this technology for for, for the best of mankind. This is very strategical selected on these agreements. As you have seen one hand we are expanding even further our collaboration with BionTech. This is a collaboration that I wish I had many by default. They are fantastic partners, both in the scientific and on the personal level, are we are going with a third target, we believe that was very carefully selected, we believe that has very high probability of delivering a solution to an unmet need not because the current <<unclear if he says Pfizer or roster of" vaccines are not effective, but they are don't have the safety profile that we hope we can achieve with this technology. But it is not only the infectious diseases that matter and there are other applications that they can help. So there are three more deals that we have announced. Very important one was beam..." Its amazing when they "mis-spoke" on something recently but it turns that the original statement was true. Like Fauci with the "communists" taken back mid word. |
|
You should read the article again. Their is an update in bold print that says: An earlier version of this post misinterpreted Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla’s English. It seemed like he was sowing doubt about the safety of his own COVID shots. Instead, he was alluding to a “safety profile” issue regarding his competitor’s current shingles vaccination (Shingrix is made by Pfizer competitor GSK and it has 90% market share), which he claimed can be solved with mRNA.] Shingrix is a two dose vaccine for shingles. Shingles is the result of the dormant chickenpox virus waking up from your childhood bout with chickenpox. |
|
Quoted: like Wine of the Month Club Quoted: Quoted: He's already talking about a 4th. like Wine of the Month Club Every two months or five months according to an email from Medicare - Get the booster when you're fully eligible. Everyone 18 years and older should get a booster shot 2 months after their Johnson & Johnson vaccine, or 5 months after completing their primary COVID-19 vaccination series of Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna. Adolescents and teens ages 12 to 17 should also get a booster of Pfizer-BioNTech 5 months after their primary series. |
|
Quoted: I am not defending him but it sounds more like he is referring to the vaccines not being as effective as they hoped, and used poor wording, not admitting they are not safe. Edit to add: I am not pro-vaccine at all and have my concerns about long-term effects as well as some short-term safety issues we have already seen. "Safety profile" has a very specific meaning when talking about a drug or vaccine. It has nothing to do with efficacy. I will assume that the CEO of Phizer knows the definition and didn't just use some cool lingo incorrectly...  Admitting that the vaccine doesn't have the safety profile that the hoped for means that it does not have an acceptable safety profile as has been reported for over a year now. He knows that the info will come out with the FOIA request that the FDA unsuccessful tried to stall for 75 years in court and is trying to get ahead of it. |
|
Quoted: You should read the article again. Their is an update in bold print that says: Shingrix is a two dose vaccine for shingles. Shingles is the result of the dormant chickenpox virus waking up from your childhood bout with chickenpox. Quoted: You should read the article again. Their is an update in bold print that says: An earlier version of this post misinterpreted Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla’s English. It seemed like he was sowing doubt about the safety of his own COVID shots. Instead, he was alluding to a “safety profile” issue regarding his competitor’s current shingles vaccination (Shingrix is made by Pfizer competitor GSK and it has 90% market share), which he claimed can be solved with mRNA.] Shingrix is a two dose vaccine for shingles. Shingles is the result of the dormant chickenpox virus waking up from your childhood bout with chickenpox. Is shingles an infectious disease? Maybe a viral infection but so far have yet to see anyone get shingles directly from anyone else...aka chickenpox is not shingles BTW. From a transcript of the interview that got removed to protect the narrative...... "vaccines are not effective, but they are don't have the safety profile that we hope we can achieve with this technology. But it is not only the infectious diseases that matter and there are other applications that they can help. " |
|
Quoted: Gentlemen....I feel that the great pendulum is beginning to swing in the other direction. Every day I'm hearing more and more about how the fear narrative is imploding. The fallout is going to be epic. Prepare to be disappointed. Few actually care about the truth. Fear is the narrative, and that must continue at all costs. Without fear, they lose control. |
|
Quoted: Would expect to see this on CNN mid-2023 given their current rate of 18 months between a) facts surfacing and b) being reported. It will be blamed on Trump first ...then will come out "2 weeks" later. I admit I would like to see the interview from CNBC but I can't get to it yet, looks like you need a paid account. Probably doctor the video before I could see it anyway. The other website updated it a few times to fix the "issue." |
|
Quoted: Is shingles an infectious disease? Maybe a viral infection but so far have yet to see anyone get shingles directly from anyone else...aka chickenpox is not shingles BTW. From a transcript of the interview that got removed to protect the narrative...... "vaccines are not effective, but they are don't have the safety profile that we hope we can achieve with this technology. But it is not only the infectious diseases that matter and there are other applications that they can help. " Quoted: Quoted: You should read the article again. Their is an update in bold print that says: An earlier version of this post misinterpreted Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla’s English. It seemed like he was sowing doubt about the safety of his own COVID shots. Instead, he was alluding to a “safety profile” issue regarding his competitor’s current shingles vaccination (Shingrix is made by Pfizer competitor GSK and it has 90% market share), which he claimed can be solved with mRNA.] Shingrix is a two dose vaccine for shingles. Shingles is the result of the dormant chickenpox virus waking up from your childhood bout with chickenpox. Is shingles an infectious disease? Maybe a viral infection but so far have yet to see anyone get shingles directly from anyone else...aka chickenpox is not shingles BTW. From a transcript of the interview that got removed to protect the narrative...... "vaccines are not effective, but they are don't have the safety profile that we hope we can achieve with this technology. But it is not only the infectious diseases that matter and there are other applications that they can help. " The quote is from the original article cited. The vaccine he is talking about is Shingrix, not their vaccine. There appears to be a misunderstanding and the publication corrected the error. |
|
Quoted: They have changed the update to this substack a few times, but I clipped the audio and ran it through Otter.ai - Here is what Pfizer Albert said: "Well, I think its going to be a driver of finding solutions to unmet medical needs. And we have a very strong belief that mRNA is a very powerful technology or we do it is trying to harness this technology for for, for the best of mankind. This is very strategical selected on these agreements. As you have seen one hand we are expanding even further our collaboration with BionTech. This is a collaboration that I wish I had many by default. They are fantastic partners, both in the scientific and on the personal level, are we are going with a third target, we believe that was very carefully selected, we believe that has very high probability of delivering a solution to an unmet need not because the current <<unclear if he says Pfizer or roster of" vaccines are not effective, but they are don't have the safety profile that we hope we can achieve with this technology. But it is not only the infectious diseases that matter and there are other applications that they can help. So there are three more deals that we have announced. Very important one was beam..." @Lovetheduns Do you happen to have a copy of the video where this transcript came from? |