Originally Posted By tads:



Can they send pics? I think everyone needs to be made aware.  



Post Election Violence, The Bake-sale 2.0 Scenario:

Revelations from the laptop from hell have endangered the entire subversive structure. Their state assets, the DNC, and the economic interests that control them, are now threatened. Social media faces regulation, and the FBI with several foreign leaders have been compromised.

None of these actors have anything to lose and they may react like cornered animals to a Trump win. Their most logical response is to deny trump a second term by the outright use of force. They have all the elements in place and all they need is a detonating event.

The danger lies in the collective left wing emotional reaction that will occur after a trump victory, as it could trigger a horizontal event. In 2016, this reaction confined to a collective out pouring of emotion. Today, the riots have given these collective reactions a more destructive outlet, and the media can amplify this reaction by several orders of magnitude.

The opposing force has organized riot crews on the ground ready to steer and manipulate such a reaction. Street violence has been normalized and public has been desensitized to such an extent that post election violence is actually expected. Worse, Police power has been systematically eroded, indicating that the previous actions have been part of a preparatory stage, designed to use a democrat loss to function as the detonating event.

The attack narrative they will use to justify a violent insurrection will be centered on delegitimizing a trump victory, portraying it as an election fraud. MSM is already establishing this narrative, and “voter suppression” is the catch phrase of the day. And people will be encouraged to take the streets in a “noble struggle” to defeat a “dictatorship.”

This is how the scenario would unfold:

1.- Attack Narrative

The fraud narrative has already been established. The MSM’s skewed polls are intended to establish narrative credibility and a subjective state of reality for their followers.

2.- Controversy

a.- Social media has announced that candidates will not be able to claim a victory and the MSN outlets will be the only ones allowed to report the results.
In a tight and disputed race, the MSM may declare Biden the winner before any real controversies are actually resolved.

This would be done to create confusion, establish his legitimacy and to demoralize the right. A recount would determine the election outcome, and if trump wins, the narrative has been established and the population has been programmed to take the streets to defend the announced Biden win.

b.- In an outright win where the margin is so great that the left cannot contest the results, the fraud narrative will claim a systematic fraud has occurred and these collective emotions will be expressed on the street.

3.- Horizontal Reaction

Once a reaction occurs, the media will escalate and legitimize the conflict, whilst the kinetic element simultaneously provokes a military intervention. With the police neutralized in most cities, the National Guard becomes the only actor that can re-establish public order.

The systematic erosion of police power is clear evidence that the previous violence was a preparatory stage for a larger operation. The fact that these riots occurred in democrat strongholds, indicates that these are the populations that they intend to mobilize. Everyone wondered why they were destroying their own cities and police forces, and now it is clear that these actions have set the groundwork for a larger insurrection.

4.- With guardsmen on the streets, they will seek to cross the “violence threshold”*, to neutralize state military power. This is where their IW cohort will be used to stage a Kent state massacre so they can cry “dictatorship” and use their martyrs to enrage the population.

*State violence works as a deterrent until the state actually starts killing people. The “violence threshold”, is the point in the escalation where each person killed, creates 1000 new dissenters. At this point, the state’s deterrence capability is removed from the equation and additional deaths begin to fuel the protests. In cities where Police capability has been neutralized, reaching this threshold can occur very rapidly.

5.- Manufactured crisis.

A situational crisis is the perception or actual experience of an event that upsets the existing emotional equilibrium of a population, because the perceived threat exceeds their psychological coping mechanisms and response resources.

To achieve this, the illusion of mass uncontrollable violence will be created by collusive media actors with specific attack narratives and psychological operations. They intend to terrorize decision makers with a massive simultaneous insurrection in all if their stronghold cities, aimed to mobilize 3.5% of the population to overwhelm the system’s capability to maintain public order.

The effectiveness of this operation will depend on:

a.- The acceptance of the real election results and the credibility of the initial attack narrative.

b.- The speed and surprise in which the crisis event unfolds.

d.- The intensity and nature of the violence.

e.- The level of fear and panic that can be caused by the media amplification of these events.

f.- The willingness of the target population to engage in street violence.

7.- Collusion and Treason

Subverted elements inside the
government at all levels will actively hinder the state response. Dem Governors, AGs, and security elements have already assisted and colluded with these operations.

8.- System Failure

A crisis is a compression of time during which multiple events occur. Crises in complex systems escalate rapidly, requiring real time decisions from leadership to correct the interruption.

The true cause of the dysfunction will not be immediately visible to all the system actors. The opposing force specifically intends to create a multiple event situation where it will be impossible for state leadership to make coordinated decisions.
Interruptions to basic services and attacks to critical infrastructure may be used to induce this panic, given that the system error must be overwhelming.

9.- Exit Point.

The provoked system failure will be intended to terrorize elements in government to cut their support for the president elect. If enough violence is created, congress, his political allies and elements in the military and security apparatus will join the opposing force out of fear, treason or self preservation. The system will be taken to the point of collapse and its leadership will be given a way out. The message will be clear, get Trump to resign, or we start a civil war.

10.-Civil War.

The main threat and coercive tool the opposing force will use to coerce all levels of the state is the possibility that the crisis may culminate in a civil war. This is the coercive mechanism that has been used against all the governments that have fallen to these types of revolutions. It is therefore imperative for patriots to prepare their communities for confrontation and that they avoid armed conflict at all costs.

the opposing force will seek to provoke several civilian skirmishes to establish the civil war narrative. Worse, the forces involved in these actions may be trained IW folks or military contractors.

People don’t realize that the laptop has changed the entire equation. The communists are cornered, and there is a financial blue print that leads to the force that manipulates them. The situation is so serious, that big media is resorting to brute force to silence the story.

This is a worst case scenario and it may not happen at all, but all the indicators are there and its better to be prepared, than to allow surprise to amplify its effects. Trump’s IW boys have been quietly observing the insurrection’s movements, and they are ready to interrupt their leadership, comms and finance structure. They know whats coming, and the reaction will be very interesting.