Originally Posted By Hollywood_Shooter:

Is that patricia arquette?   no thank you.

Originally Posted By Doodles:
Good night all!

Hold the fort.

Originally Posted By Hollywood_Shooter:

Oldie?  Oldie?? Why you little mother fucker ----  

Originally Posted By Strykewolf:


This is old?  Shit me a biscuit and call me Gladys.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTAOLmEba4I

Originally Posted By Doodles:

From my experience.....no.

Originally Posted By Cecenrse:

BOMBSHELL ALLEGATION: Man Claims To Be Robinhood Employee & Says The White House Pressured Halt of GameStop Tradinghttps://t.co/Hf84fpAM33 pic.twitter.com/Q8zON7x993

Breaking911  (@Breaking911) January 28, 2021

Criminal defendants can be compelled to unlock their encrypted cell phones using a search
warrant, the Oregon Supreme Court ruled.

The authorities can legally order criminal defendants to swipe the pattern or punch in the
passcode needed to unlock their cell phone, the Oregon Supreme Court has ruled.
In an unanimous opinion written by Chief Justice Martha L. Walters, Oregon's top court
found that police may only order a phone unlocked after receiving a search warrant and
proving, beyond a reasonable doubt, that they already know what will be found inside the
digital trove.

"When the state has obtained a warrant that permits it to search a cell phone, the state will
have been required to describe, with reasonable particularity, the evidence that it believes is
on the phone and its relevance to the state's investigation," according to the 37-page opinion
published Jan. 28.

The ruling in question centers on the case of Catrice Cherelle Pittman, a 32-year-old Portland
woman who was arrested in Marion County after she crashed her car, injuring several
passengers, while allegedly intoxicated on June 4, 2016. Hospital staff allegedly found a large
amount of cash, methamphetamine and small plastic baggies on her person, leading Salem
police officers to seek access to her Apple iPhone in order to prove drug dealing charges
against her.

The trial court ordered Pittman to unlock the phone, but she twice entered the wrong
passcode — 123456 — and was subsequently sentenced to 30 days in jail for contempt of
court.

Lawyers for Pittman argued the order violated the Oregon Constitution and the Fifth
Amendment, which protects people from being forced to incriminate themselves. The
argument was buoyed by a number of prominent supporters, including the American Civil
Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

"Encryption may impose obstacles to law enforcement in particular cases. So do window
shades. It is sometimes true that constitutional protections interfere with law enforcement
investigations," the organizations wrote in a friend of the court brief. "Constitutional
protections must be maintained, if not strengthened, in the digital age."

But the Supreme Court noted in their ruling that certain incriminating actions, such as
revealing a distinctive tattoo or trying on a piece of clothing, can already be ordered by a
judge. Justice Walters determined that in all future cases the act of unlocking cannot be used
against the defendant, though the contents of the phone can.

Also at play was the legal principal known as a "foregone
conclusion" — in essence, whether the cops had already proven
they knew the cellphone was Pittman's because it had been found
in her purse. She had never admitted as such at the time of the
trial.

The Oregon Supreme Court determined that, in Pittman's case,
the lower court had not done the necessary factfinding to prove
that Pittman owned the phone; consequently, the high court has
reversed the holding of contempt.

The drug charges were dropped from Pittman's case during the
trial, but she was convicted of second- and third-degree assault. She remains behind bars at
Coffee Creek prison at this time.

Originally Posted By Hollywood_Shooter:

@ParamountPics is Michael B. Jordon in WHITE FACE for role in Without Remorse? Jordan a white man playing a black man playing a white man?  Seems a little racist for a supposed block buster Clancy movie.  Shame on Paramount and Jordan for their cultural appropriation.  Racists!

General Disruption  (@GeneralDisrupt1) January 29, 2021

Originally Posted By Hollywood_Shooter:

@ParamountPics is Michael B. Jordon in WHITE FACE for role in Without Remorse? Jordan a white man playing a black man playing a white man?  Seems a little racist for a supposed block buster Clancy movie.  Shame on Paramount and Jordan for their cultural appropriation.  Racists!

General Disruption  (@GeneralDisrupt1) January 29, 2021

Originally Posted By Strykewolf:
Vivid dreams...

Anyone else get them?

Sort of curious, on that.

First, tell me the difference between a dream, and a vivid dream.

Originally Posted By Strykewolf:
Jest sittin' here on top of my stuck CUCV (4x4 Blazer)...I hear the diesel engine coming closer...'That's not a humvee' I think...I'm already moving...  

Off the top of the CUCV and running towards the lights and engines, arms waving...'Stop...Stop...STOOOOP'....

The big truck stops...

'Back up!  Back up!  Back up!'

The engine dies...shut off from inside.

A fucking deuce and a half wrecker....to get a stuck CUCV out...told the specialist to grab a humvee....but noooooo....gotta do things by the book.

The wrecker starts to shift, I shout back up again, and again.  Driver and TC just look at me as their wrecker starts moving to the side as the road collapses beneath them.  The wrecker lands on its side, disgusted I head back to my stuck CUCV.

JFC.

Originally Posted By Strykewolf:
Riot Squad theme song?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KC0DNLDXJW8