User Panel
Originally Posted By vahog: Ideal. A B-29 has a range of 2820 miles. "Tinian Island is located in the Northern Mariana Islands, and many cities in China fall within a 2,820-mile radius. Here are some notable ones: Guangzhou Shenzhen Hong Kong (though it’s a Special Administrative Region) Fuzhou Xiamen Shanghai Hangzhou Nanjing Wuhan Chongqing These cities are well within the distance you mentioned and are major urban centers in China12. Is there a specific city you’re interested in learning more about?" View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By vahog: Originally Posted By jwnc: Tinian is 1,700 miles from Taiwan. Ideal. A B-29 has a range of 2820 miles. "Tinian Island is located in the Northern Mariana Islands, and many cities in China fall within a 2,820-mile radius. Here are some notable ones: Guangzhou Shenzhen Hong Kong (though it’s a Special Administrative Region) Fuzhou Xiamen Shanghai Hangzhou Nanjing Wuhan Chongqing These cities are well within the distance you mentioned and are major urban centers in China12. Is there a specific city you’re interested in learning more about?" I don't think we're flying B26's anymore, but China's DF31 ballistic missile has a range of 5K miles... (Yes, I know that the B2 has more than enough range as well...) |
|
|
Originally Posted By ITCHY-FINGER: I assume Trump knows that some of his base believes US aid to Ukraine (and probably staying in NATO, helping Taiwan, Israel etc.) are a waste of tax dollars and he needs these folks for November. It is smart to limit specifics to appeal to the broadest possible base. I do not believe that Trump's gigantic ego will allow him to appear weak next to anyone, especially Putin, or be defeated in Ukraine. Trump didn't supports the wars in the ME but he maintained the corse and approached the situation from strength and patriotism. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By ITCHY-FINGER: Originally Posted By stone-age: The one thing trump has been consistent about is saying his only priority is to stop the war as fast as possible. He has specifically chosen to not say how that will work out for Ukraine. That's what I believe. I assume Trump knows that some of his base believes US aid to Ukraine (and probably staying in NATO, helping Taiwan, Israel etc.) are a waste of tax dollars and he needs these folks for November. It is smart to limit specifics to appeal to the broadest possible base. I do not believe that Trump's gigantic ego will allow him to appear weak next to anyone, especially Putin, or be defeated in Ukraine. Trump didn't supports the wars in the ME but he maintained the corse and approached the situation from strength and patriotism. Pointless wishcasting. First, we just need to get through the election and defeat Democrats. As I said in other threads, Trump WILL be badly wrong on some issues, and it may be that Ukraine is one of them. But a Harris Presidency will be objectively much worse overall in many ways (Chy-nah being one). They are both bad candidates IMO, but Trump individually at least still believes in America. Talk about what Trump may or may not do on Ukraine should wait until he's elected. His prospective action on Ukraine certainly isn't a deciding factor in my vote. |
|
|
This looks like a major operation. Hopefully, it caught the terrorists flat footed and they closed the noose before most could squirt! |
|
|
Originally Posted By stone-age: Is this a new one that got hit? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By stone-age: Originally Posted By HIPPO: Posted < 10 mins ago.
Is this a new one that got hit? Yeah, this is a new one. |
|
It's not stupid, it's advanced!!
|
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: Fun fact. https://orcasia.org/article/620/chinese-rocket-force-strategies-under-bmd-shield View Quote Do we believe that stated inventory is accurate? I don't. I recall reading a similar number well over a decade ago. If you had to bet your life on it, would you bet that this number is true, or that they've quietly built double that number or more? China's opacity and resistance to intelligence penetration is pretty impressive. They have most of what they want from us, but are able to keep almost everything of theirs under wraps. |
|
|
Originally Posted By HIPPO: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GV79crmWAAADuFH?format=jpg&name=large shitting BRICS View Quote Dafuq is wrong with that dude's head on the right? Looks like he was either stung by a swarm of murder hornets or got some of that yellow fear goo from that awful Green Lantern movie. |
|
|
SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS
|
Originally Posted By GBTX01:
This looks like a major operation. Hopefully, it caught the terrorists flat footed and they closed the noose before most could squirt! View Quote Biggest operation in 20 years for the area. They even made t-shirts. Operation Summer Camp. |
|
Don't you tell me about galaxies! I walk them in the timeline.
|
Originally Posted By HIPPO: ~1 min video.
View Quote If there is any champagne there the death toll will be staggering... |
|
|
Originally Posted By Lieh-tzu: Do we believe that stated inventory is accurate? I don't. I recall reading a similar number well over a decade ago. If you had to bet your life on it, would you bet that this number is true, or that they've quietly built double that number or more? China's opacity and resistance to intelligence penetration is pretty impressive. They have most of what they want from us, but are able to keep almost everything of theirs under wraps. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Lieh-tzu: Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: Fun fact. https://orcasia.org/article/620/chinese-rocket-force-strategies-under-bmd-shield Do we believe that stated inventory is accurate? I don't. I recall reading a similar number well over a decade ago. If you had to bet your life on it, would you bet that this number is true, or that they've quietly built double that number or more? China's opacity and resistance to intelligence penetration is pretty impressive. They have most of what they want from us, but are able to keep almost everything of theirs under wraps. How would you know? |
|
Don't you tell me about galaxies! I walk them in the timeline.
|
Originally Posted By Lieh-tzu: Do we believe that stated inventory is accurate? I don't. I recall reading a similar number well over a decade ago. If you had to bet your life on it, would you bet that this number is true, or that they've quietly built double that number or more? China's opacity and resistance to intelligence penetration is pretty impressive. They have most of what they want from us, but are able to keep almost everything of theirs under wraps. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Lieh-tzu: Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: Fun fact. https://orcasia.org/article/620/chinese-rocket-force-strategies-under-bmd-shield Do we believe that stated inventory is accurate? I don't. I recall reading a similar number well over a decade ago. If you had to bet your life on it, would you bet that this number is true, or that they've quietly built double that number or more? China's opacity and resistance to intelligence penetration is pretty impressive. They have most of what they want from us, but are able to keep almost everything of theirs under wraps. Simple answer for you, why do you think we are adding so many new air bases and staging areas in the Pacific? Each one is various ranges from Chinese ballistic missiles. Each one spreads out and pulls various ballistic and cruise missiles from Chinese inventory to hit. Each missile system they make to hit the targets at longer distances gets more costly to produce in larger numbers. The inventory is higher than that claim, I was not asking you to believe the Indian assessment of Chinese missiles in that article. We most likely have a good idea of the numbers in classified sessions and this is just a public example of the U.S. dealing with it. Ballistic missile defense systems really add to the number of Chinese missiles required to hit U.S. airbases at the various ranges, because of the lack of accuracy of Chinese missiles and our EW, but I won't get into that. https://www.defenseone.com/threats/2023/08/air-force-expanding-number-bases-pacific-over-next-decade/389834/ The U.S. Air Force will increase its number of bases across the Pacific over the next decade, in an effort to spread out and become more survivable in conflict. The service’s bases “will grow in increments that are visible through time, across probably two or three [future years defense programs] as we work through that,” said Brig. Gen. Michael Zuhlsdorf, the service’s deputy director of resource integration for engineering, logistics, and force protection. But the total number of bases is dependent on how much funding the Air Force receives, Zuhlsdorf said Tuesday at the Mitchell Institute. “You think about island chains that are either in the first island chain, there are some bases that are already set there, and then the second island chain, which is basically Guam, and all of those regions in there and so there's a number of different airfields that we're working through, and based on the resourcing that number will shift,” Zuhlsdorf said. The Air Force has done analyses to figure out which bases could be used to “generate an air tasking order” based on the number of “spokes” in the area, Zuhlsdorf said. The service uses the term “hub-and-spoke” to describe bases in its Agile Combat Employment concept, or ACE, which was created to make the service more mobile in the Pacific. In the ACE concept, a few airfields serve as central ports, or hubs, while several smaller airfields serve as spokes. The idea is to be able to distribute weapons and assets over a large area and to increase survivability, versus just having a few large airfields throughout the geographically enormous region. |
|
It's not stupid, it's advanced!!
|
Originally Posted By fike: Originally Posted By Lieh-tzu: Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: Fun fact. https://orcasia.org/article/620/chinese-rocket-force-strategies-under-bmd-shield Do we believe that stated inventory is accurate? I don't. I recall reading a similar number well over a decade ago. If you had to bet your life on it, would you bet that this number is true, or that they've quietly built double that number or more? China's opacity and resistance to intelligence penetration is pretty impressive. They have most of what they want from us, but are able to keep almost everything of theirs under wraps. How would you know? He's a pessimist. |
|
It's not stupid, it's advanced!!
|
Originally Posted By spydercomonkey:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GWAlLKJWcAAhVZ1?format=jpg&name=4096x4096 View Quote As a history buff, it would be very cool to explore that island. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By ITCHY-FINGER: As a history buff, it would be very cool to explore that island. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By ITCHY-FINGER: Originally Posted By spydercomonkey:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GWAlLKJWcAAhVZ1?format=jpg&name=4096x4096 As a history buff, it would be very cool to explore that island. As someone with hoarding tendencies. Same. |
|
|
Originally Posted By ITCHY-FINGER: As a history buff, it would be very cool to explore that island. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By ITCHY-FINGER: Originally Posted By spydercomonkey:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GWAlLKJWcAAhVZ1?format=jpg&name=4096x4096 As a history buff, it would be very cool to explore that island. My grandfather was there during WWII. He said it was the first time in his life he had ever seen blacktop asphalt. |
|
It's not stupid, it's advanced!!
|
Originally Posted By HIPPO: Deep dive article linked here. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By HIPPO: Deep dive article linked here. The Finnish OSINT group Black Bird has mapped Ukrainian defenses visible through satellite imagery, helping to visualize the situation. As seen on their map, Russian forces have moved beyond several defensive positions, and with the full control of Novohrodivka, only one defensive line remains before reaching the outskirts of Pokrovsk itself. Satellite imagery analysis of the seized positions shows evidence of artillery shelling and bombing, though not as extensive as in other frontline areas. This likely suggests that Ukrainian troops in the Pokrovsk direction were forced to retreat multiple times, lacking sufficient forces and resources to mount an organized defense. While there have been many discussions and concerns about the lack of fortifications behind Avdiivka, which are entirely valid, the major issue remains the shortage of available manpower and units to defend those positions. No matter how well-constructed or numerous the defenses are, if they are only staffed at 10-20% of the required capacity, it’s unsurprising that Russian forces are able to overrun them so quickly. AFU needs a couple more divisions. The failure of the leadership to move quickly on mobilization when Zaluzhny brought it up is showing results on the ground that strongly favor Russia. Zelensky and the Rada own this. Syrski might get canned for being the guy in charge during major losses, but it's not all his fault. He (and Zaluzhny before him) did not get the full support from the civilian government that they needed. @Easterner - your take on this comment? |
|
|
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: He's a pessimist. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: Originally Posted By fike: Originally Posted By Lieh-tzu: Do we believe that stated inventory is accurate? I don't. I recall reading a similar number well over a decade ago. If you had to bet your life on it, would you bet that this number is true, or that they've quietly built double that number or more? China's opacity and resistance to intelligence penetration is pretty impressive. They have most of what they want from us, but are able to keep almost everything of theirs under wraps. How would you know? He's a pessimist. If you assume the worst, all surprises are good ones. Your prior reply is good, thanks. Obviously, more targets suck up more missiles. Diversify your risk is for more than just investments. I don't even recall when I read numbers similar to that for China's inventory, it might have been 15 years ago, and at the time the context was a continued build-up to overwhelm any defense of Taiwan. Clearly, that has been their strategy. Giving the impression of overwhelming force is something the US has employed. We have much less ability to do that than we used to. |
|
|
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: lol, one or two mine clearing charges breaks though 3 Russian Toblerone candy style dragon's teeth, and the Ukrainians use a bridge layer to cross. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: Originally Posted By HIPPO: dope ~1 min video lol, one or two mine clearing charges breaks though 3 Russian Toblerone candy style dragon's teeth, and the Ukrainians use a bridge layer to cross. Damn it! Now I was some Toblerone... |
|
|
Originally Posted By jwnc: I don't think we're flying B26's anymore, but China's DF31 ballistic missile has a range of 5K miles... (Yes, I know that the B2 has more than enough range as well...) View Quote A B-29 is the only offensive aircraft that has ever used Tinian North Field, AFAIK, although to significant effect. It was closed in 1947. A C-130 landed there a few years ago to, like, prove it could be done or something. Its function is meant to be as a dispersal airfield for Anderson AFB on Guam. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Lieh-tzu: If you assume the worst, all surprises are good ones. Your prior reply is good, thanks. Obviously, more targets suck up more missiles. Diversify your risk is for more than just investments. I don't even recall when I read numbers similar to that for China's inventory, it might have been 15 years ago, and at the time the context was a continued build-up to overwhelm any defense of Taiwan. Clearly, that has been their strategy. Giving the impression of overwhelming force is something the US has employed. We have much less ability to do that than we used to. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Lieh-tzu: Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: Originally Posted By fike: Originally Posted By Lieh-tzu: Do we believe that stated inventory is accurate? I don't. I recall reading a similar number well over a decade ago. If you had to bet your life on it, would you bet that this number is true, or that they've quietly built double that number or more? China's opacity and resistance to intelligence penetration is pretty impressive. They have most of what they want from us, but are able to keep almost everything of theirs under wraps. How would you know? He's a pessimist. If you assume the worst, all surprises are good ones. Your prior reply is good, thanks. Obviously, more targets suck up more missiles. Diversify your risk is for more than just investments. I don't even recall when I read numbers similar to that for China's inventory, it might have been 15 years ago, and at the time the context was a continued build-up to overwhelm any defense of Taiwan. Clearly, that has been their strategy. Giving the impression of overwhelming force is something the US has employed. We have much less ability to do that than we used to. No problem, glad to help visualize a strategy. |
|
It's not stupid, it's advanced!!
|
ISW assessment for August 27th.
https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-august-27-2024 |
|
It's not stupid, it's advanced!!
|
WSJ saying Russia’s moved 90% of their aircraft beyond UA missile range.
https://www.wsj.com/world/ukraine-deploys-f-16s-against-massive-russian-barrage-but-says-it-doesnt-have-enough-of-them-7781b133 Ukrainian F-16s received from the USA the latest version of the anti-aircraft missile defense system of the Russian Federation, even NATO allies do not have it The US Air Force's 350th Spectrum Warfare Wing has upgraded the F-16 of the Ukrainian Air Force to counter Russian air defenses The US Air Force has officially announced that Ukrainian F-16 fighter jets have received a special upgrade of their electronic countermeasures systems. They were introduced to effectively counter Russian air defense systems, taking into account the specifics of their operation. This update was conducted by the 350th Spectrum Warfare Wing, the US Air Force unit responsible for the development, adaptation, and tactical development of EW, as well as updating and generally managing the development of these systems. As reported by the unit's press service, the work was carried out by specialists of the 68th Electronic Warfare Squadron, which is part of the wing. And it was a unique operation due to several factors. First, the work had to be carried out with equipment that is not in service with the US Air Force. On the part of Defense Express, we note that it is obviously an ECIPS/CJS container that was spotted on Ukrainian fighter jets. Secondly, the deadlines that were tied to the date of the transfer of fighter jets to Ukraine are very tight. Therefore, American specialists first had to investigate the real capabilities of the equipment, and then modernize its software part based on the algorithms used by the US Air Force to counter Russian air defense systems. It is worth adding that the very fact of this is already quite interesting. Because it turns out that the Netherlands and Denmark, namely the planes of these countries, as mentioned, received updates, did not have access to American advanced solutions. Although it is possible that it is only a matter of interest and the European partners simply did not show the appropriate initiative. In any case, American specialists worked together with European colleagues, and also successfully tested all updates. Thanks to this, it is possible to be sure that the Ukrainian F-16s really got very interesting opportunities to effectively suppress Russian systems, which means increasing the safety and effectiveness of attacks on Russian air defense systems. But what is more important is that the official message clearly states: the US Air Force will receive information from Ukrainian colleagues regarding the use of these electronic warfare devices in real combat. This will make it possible to make further updates to the operation of the systems, not only for Ukraine, but also for the United States and other NATO members. https://defence-ua.com/weapon_and_tech/ukrajinski_f_16_otrimali_vid_ssha_najnovishu_versiju_reb_proti_ppo_rf_jiji_ne_majut_navit_sojuzniki_po_nato-16428.html |
|
“If by chance you were to ask me which ornaments I would desire above all others in my house, I would reply, without much pause for reflection, arms and books.”
Baldassare Castiglione https://t.me/arfcom_ukebros |
Daily Ukraine map thread for Tuesday 27th August 2024
Highlights: We talked about the rapidly deteriorating situation in the Pokrovsk and Selydove directions, which continues to go rapidly badly for Ukraine, so today will focus on the Novomykhailivka direction. Today Russian forces finally captured Kostyantynivka and raised their flag in the west of the settlement, and were geolocated to have reached the O0532 road near Vodiane. This area has been extremely costly for Russian forces, losing roughly ~450 vehicles in less than a year Map: https://uacontrolmap.com
|
|
“If by chance you were to ask me which ornaments I would desire above all others in my house, I would reply, without much pause for reflection, arms and books.”
Baldassare Castiglione https://t.me/arfcom_ukebros |
"This is Atlas burning again. The explosion was around 3 a.m., It's scary to sleep,"
— a video from the Kamensky District of the Rostov Region, where the Rosrezerv Atlas plant is burning after a UAV attack. https://t.me/astrapress/62907 More footage from the scene of the fire at the Rosrezerv Atlas plant in the Rostov region after the UAV attack https://t.me/astrapress/62908 The Ukrainian Armed Forces attacked an oil depot in the Rostov region. The attack on the oil depot located near the village of Molodezhny in the Kamensky district of the region occurred at about 3 a.m. During the attack, two drones fell on the territory of the oil depot. A fire started. At the moment, three tanks are burning. According to preliminary data, there are no casualties. Two fire trains are currently working at the site of the fire. https://t.me/bazabazon/30716 |
|
“If by chance you were to ask me which ornaments I would desire above all others in my house, I would reply, without much pause for reflection, arms and books.”
Baldassare Castiglione https://t.me/arfcom_ukebros |
This guy makes a good point...
Ukraine has successfully tested a new domestically produced ballistic missile, per Ukrainian president Zelensky. View Quote When these start raining down on Ru tactical/strategic airframe and air defense concentrations my cackling will reach unprecedented levels. It's almost as if invading the part of the former soviet union responsible for avionics and engineering was a bad idea, crazy right? View Quote His avatar is appropriate... |
|
|
Deckard “nobody wants to know the truth, nobody” Cobra Kai Johnny Lawrence “she’s hot and all those other things” Tucker Carlson 1/10/2018 “I used to be a liberatarian until Google”https://mobile.twitter.com/Henry_Gunn
|
Originally Posted By ITCHY-FINGER: That thing looks awesome. It's interesting how S. Africa always has excellent artillery designs. I also liked the SA Denel 556 and 762 ammo when it was available. I forgot the commercial brand name. Too bad they are turning commie/fascist. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By ITCHY-FINGER: Originally Posted By spydercomonkey: They made a really cool prototype that was exactly this: https://ndiastorage.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/ndia/2004/armaments/04_Vickory_105mm_Indirect_Fire.pdf That thing looks awesome. It's interesting how S. Africa always has excellent artillery designs. I also liked the SA Denel 556 and 762 ammo when it was available. I forgot the commercial brand name. Too bad they are turning commie/fascist. I believe its due to their early partnership with Gerald Bull (sort of a John Browning of modern artillery) plus SA being short on aircraft, and having to use artillery very heavily in their past wars. As for commies, weapons are made by the 'minority' of SA, who are quite different then the government. |
|
|
Bummer, was hoping Ukraine would hold it. Russia changes names of locations they seize https://euromaidanpress.com/2024/08/28/what-the-fall-of-pokrovsk-could-mean-for-ukraine/
|
|
Deckard “nobody wants to know the truth, nobody” Cobra Kai Johnny Lawrence “she’s hot and all those other things” Tucker Carlson 1/10/2018 “I used to be a liberatarian until Google”https://mobile.twitter.com/Henry_Gunn
|
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: Fun fact. https://orcasia.org/article/620/chinese-rocket-force-strategies-under-bmd-shield View Quote Seems optimistic to me; if they hit ammo or fuel storage, or parked planes there...much bigger issue. |
|
|
Deckard “nobody wants to know the truth, nobody” Cobra Kai Johnny Lawrence “she’s hot and all those other things” Tucker Carlson 1/10/2018 “I used to be a liberatarian until Google”https://mobile.twitter.com/Henry_Gunn
|
Originally Posted By jwnc: Tinian is 1,700 miles from Taiwan. View Quote What I posted in the Tinian thread: Tyranny of distance still in effect: B21's, B52's, sure. F15EX / F35 going to need JASSM-ER and likely JASSM-XR to reach. / We should really be looking into a 'FB-35 Bomber' similar to the 'FB-22 Strike Raptor' concept; longer range larger payload, but with decent parts compatibility to keep costs slightly less outrageous vs a new bomber: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_FB-22 |
|
|
Originally Posted By HIPPO:
View Quote I hope they budgeted better than summer and votgle. Cost overruns were enormous on the AP1000. |
|
|
Originally Posted By jwnc: I don't think we're flying B26's anymore, but China's DF31 ballistic missile has a range of 5K miles... (Yes, I know that the B2 has more than enough range as well...) View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By jwnc: Originally Posted By vahog: Originally Posted By jwnc: Tinian is 1,700 miles from Taiwan. Ideal. A B-29 has a range of 2820 miles. "Tinian Island is located in the Northern Mariana Islands, and many cities in China fall within a 2,820-mile radius. Here are some notable ones: Guangzhou Shenzhen Hong Kong (though it’s a Special Administrative Region) Fuzhou Xiamen Shanghai Hangzhou Nanjing Wuhan Chongqing These cities are well within the distance you mentioned and are major urban centers in China12. Is there a specific city you’re interested in learning more about?" I don't think we're flying B26's anymore, but China's DF31 ballistic missile has a range of 5K miles... (Yes, I know that the B2 has more than enough range as well...) I honestly think we'll face just as much / more threat from random 'fishing vessels' and 'commercial ships' launching Loitering Munitions at our bases, especially as AI targeting improves. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/chinese-civilian-vessels-could-prove-a-military-menace/articleshow/112824996.cms?from=mdr |
|
|
Deckard “nobody wants to know the truth, nobody” Cobra Kai Johnny Lawrence “she’s hot and all those other things” Tucker Carlson 1/10/2018 “I used to be a liberatarian until Google”https://mobile.twitter.com/Henry_Gunn
|
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: My grandfather was there during WWII. He said it was the first time in his life he had ever seen blacktop asphalt. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: Originally Posted By ITCHY-FINGER: Originally Posted By spydercomonkey:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GWAlLKJWcAAhVZ1?format=jpg&name=4096x4096 As a history buff, it would be very cool to explore that island. My grandfather was there during WWII. He said it was the first time in his life he had ever seen blacktop asphalt. That's pretty weird because my grand uncle was stationed there also during the war. What was the most interesting for him was that he had several Jews in his crew and it was the first time they tried bacon and pork products mainly spam. He went to reunions and as a joke, they had spam and some of those Jews still were excited to try Spam. He said and told me and shared with me pictures of some of the B29's and other planes that landed on the island. |
|
“Liberty and love
These two I must have. For my love, I’ll sacrifice My life. For liberty, I’ll sacrifice My love.” Petofi Sándor |
Deckard “nobody wants to know the truth, nobody” Cobra Kai Johnny Lawrence “she’s hot and all those other things” Tucker Carlson 1/10/2018 “I used to be a liberatarian until Google”https://mobile.twitter.com/Henry_Gunn
|
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: I thought he was asking about indigenous Ukrainian Sam systems that could intercept ballistic missiles. Basically, the reason any ballistic missiles are getting through is because those particular areas just aren't being protected by a Patriot SAMP-T or S-300v system. They might be protecting the city of Kiev, and the airfield holding F-16's for example, but a few miles away the system is set not to engage a ballistic missile that is headed for a small factory or workshop. Rough visual guide, the darker blue area is the area protected against ballistic missiles. The larger lighter blue area is protected against aircraft, cruise missiles and drones. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GV-EvPYXQAAT0wt?format=jpg&name=large View Quote Did anything ever happen to the patriot deal from Israel? |
|
connoisseur of fine Soviet and European armored vehicles since 2007.
https://t.me/arfcom_ukebros Let's go Bran...Kamala. Thank you Subpar for the membership! |
Originally Posted By voyager3: Are the latest Russian T-80 still using turbine engines? Ukraine converted theirs to diesel a while ago. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By voyager3: Originally Posted By fadedsun: The t80 is a turbine tank and kind of expensive for an apc. It’s a major waste. Are the latest Russian T-80 still using turbine engines? Ukraine converted theirs to diesel a while ago. Yep, most have turbines, but they received at least 200 T-80UD with diesel engines too. In late 2023 the Russians even restarted the turbine production because they can't build enough engines. |
|
„From a place you will not hear, comes a sound you will not see.“
Thanks for the membership @ Toaster |
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: The S-300V series is the only one with some chance of hitting a ballistic missile like Iksander-M. I know Ukraine has a few, and they require specialized missiles for better chances of intercept. View Quote The patriots and samp-t have the ability to engage ballistic missiles. I’m not sure Ukraine has any s300V systems? |
|
connoisseur of fine Soviet and European armored vehicles since 2007.
https://t.me/arfcom_ukebros Let's go Bran...Kamala. Thank you Subpar for the membership! |
Ukraine has S-300V. And PT. And others.
|
|
|
connoisseur of fine Soviet and European armored vehicles since 2007.
https://t.me/arfcom_ukebros Let's go Bran...Kamala. Thank you Subpar for the membership! |
connoisseur of fine Soviet and European armored vehicles since 2007.
https://t.me/arfcom_ukebros Let's go Bran...Kamala. Thank you Subpar for the membership! |
Deckard “nobody wants to know the truth, nobody” Cobra Kai Johnny Lawrence “she’s hot and all those other things” Tucker Carlson 1/10/2018 “I used to be a liberatarian until Google”https://mobile.twitter.com/Henry_Gunn
|
Originally Posted By GBTX01: This guy makes a good point...
His avatar is appropriate... https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1585865409504452609/7n20Lptu.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By GBTX01: This guy makes a good point...
Ukraine has successfully tested a new domestically produced ballistic missile, per Ukrainian president Zelensky. When these start raining down on Ru tactical/strategic airframe and air defense concentrations my cackling will reach unprecedented levels. It's almost as if invading the part of the former soviet union responsible for avionics and engineering was a bad idea, crazy right? His avatar is appropriate... https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1585865409504452609/7n20Lptu.jpg lol, following now, thanks. |
|
It's not stupid, it's advanced!!
|
Originally Posted By spydercomonkey: What I posted in the Tinian thread: Tyranny of distance still in effect: https://i.ibb.co/kKNX9Pd/Screen-Shot-2024-08-27-at-7-45-39-PM.png https://i.ibb.co/88WK4pG/Screen-Shot-2024-08-27-at-7-45-54-PM.png B21's, B52's, sure. F15EX / F35 going to need JASSM-ER and likely JASSM-XR to reach. / We should really be looking into a 'FB-35 Bomber' similar to the 'FB-22 Strike Raptor' concept; longer range larger payload, but with decent parts compatibility to keep costs slightly less outrageous vs a new bomber: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_FB-22 https://fullafterburner.weebly.com/uploads/8/4/8/6/84869598/fb-22-p02-1-0001_orig.jpg https://fullafterburner.weebly.com/uploads/8/4/8/6/84869598/fb-22-14_orig.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By spydercomonkey: Originally Posted By jwnc: Tinian is 1,700 miles from Taiwan. What I posted in the Tinian thread: Tyranny of distance still in effect: https://i.ibb.co/kKNX9Pd/Screen-Shot-2024-08-27-at-7-45-39-PM.png https://i.ibb.co/88WK4pG/Screen-Shot-2024-08-27-at-7-45-54-PM.png B21's, B52's, sure. F15EX / F35 going to need JASSM-ER and likely JASSM-XR to reach. / We should really be looking into a 'FB-35 Bomber' similar to the 'FB-22 Strike Raptor' concept; longer range larger payload, but with decent parts compatibility to keep costs slightly less outrageous vs a new bomber: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_FB-22 https://fullafterburner.weebly.com/uploads/8/4/8/6/84869598/fb-22-p02-1-0001_orig.jpg https://fullafterburner.weebly.com/uploads/8/4/8/6/84869598/fb-22-14_orig.jpg Good examples, and this is why you are going to see more bases in the Northern Philippines. Don't forget the bases in Japan we can use, or S.Korea. Multiple Carrier battlegroups also bolster aircraft and air defense in an area where they go. |
|
It's not stupid, it's advanced!!
|
Originally Posted By Jozsi: That's pretty weird because my grand uncle was stationed there also during the war. What was the most interesting for him was that he had several Jews in his crew and it was the first time they tried bacon and pork products mainly spam. He went to reunions and as a joke, they had spam and some of those Jews still were excited to try Spam. He said and told me and shared with me pictures of some of the B29's and other planes that landed on the island. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Jozsi: Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: Originally Posted By ITCHY-FINGER: Originally Posted By spydercomonkey:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GWAlLKJWcAAhVZ1?format=jpg&name=4096x4096 As a history buff, it would be very cool to explore that island. My grandfather was there during WWII. He said it was the first time in his life he had ever seen blacktop asphalt. That's pretty weird because my grand uncle was stationed there also during the war. What was the most interesting for him was that he had several Jews in his crew and it was the first time they tried bacon and pork products mainly spam. He went to reunions and as a joke, they had spam and some of those Jews still were excited to try Spam. He said and told me and shared with me pictures of some of the B29's and other planes that landed on the island. That's pretty awesome. |
|
It's not stupid, it's advanced!!
|
Originally Posted By fadedsun: Did anything ever happen to the patriot deal from Israel? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By fadedsun: Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: I thought he was asking about indigenous Ukrainian Sam systems that could intercept ballistic missiles. Basically, the reason any ballistic missiles are getting through is because those particular areas just aren't being protected by a Patriot SAMP-T or S-300v system. They might be protecting the city of Kiev, and the airfield holding F-16's for example, but a few miles away the system is set not to engage a ballistic missile that is headed for a small factory or workshop. Rough visual guide, the darker blue area is the area protected against ballistic missiles. The larger lighter blue area is protected against aircraft, cruise missiles and drones. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GV-EvPYXQAAT0wt?format=jpg&name=large Did anything ever happen to the patriot deal from Israel? I haven't heard anything yet. They would take some time for any refurbishment and software installation for Ukraine if they were given. |
|
It's not stupid, it's advanced!!
|
Originally Posted By fadedsun: The patriots and samp-t have the ability to engage ballistic missiles. I’m not sure Ukraine has any s300V systems? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By fadedsun: Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: The S-300V series is the only one with some chance of hitting a ballistic missile like Iksander-M. I know Ukraine has a few, and they require specialized missiles for better chances of intercept. The patriots and samp-t have the ability to engage ballistic missiles. I’m not sure Ukraine has any s300V systems? Correct, our and other Western systems are more capable of intercepting ballistic missiles, I was just pointing out as far as Russian made systems, the Ukrainians would only have the S-300V series to have a chance against things like Iksander-M and etc. Ukraine does have S300V. How many I do not know, but I know of at least one. |
|
It's not stupid, it's advanced!!
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.