[ARCHIVED THREAD] - SIG Banned!! (Page 3 of 3)
|
Quoted: Glock is probably paying CLEOs to do things like this. Thats funny. I have been at the range multiple times with gun manufacturer sales account reps. There is nobody more cringy than Sig. They bring a circus. Glock is just like……. We make Glocks. Feel free to buy that, or not. You know where to find us, please take one of the lanyards we have been handing out since 1992. |
|
Quoted: I know that's the fuddlore, but it's not true. They do in fact have a duty to act, just not a duty to any particular individual. Quoted: Quoted: They don't have a duty to act if they are on duty. I know that's the fuddlore, but it's not true. They do in fact have a duty to act, just not a duty to any particular individual. |
|
Quoted: When's the last time the mil dropped something because it didn't perform as expected? Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: It's slow, but the dominoes are starting to fall. When will the military stop rising it, seeing as how it isn't reliable in adverse conditions and all? When's the last time the mil dropped something because it didn't perform as expected? One can hope. |
|
Quoted: One can hope. Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: It's slow, but the dominoes are starting to fall. When will the military stop rising it, seeing as how it isn't reliable in adverse conditions and all? When's the last time the mil dropped something because it didn't perform as expected? One can hope. Oh Im sure something was dropped. But when it comes to the military, Sig doesn't have to worry about getting blamed. That's what Pvt. Snuffy is for. |
|
Quoted: My Sheriff just banned the Sig P320 from off duty carry and from the range. It's a good size agency. Over 600 officers. Then I asked GROK , How big is the largest sheriff's department in the US? The largest sheriff's department in the United States is the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LASD). It has approximately 18,000 employees, including around 9,915 sworn deputies and 9,244 non-sworn professional staff. |
|
Quoted: Holy shit... I thought that was a bit of an exaggeration of the amount of officers... I knew there were much bigger than my county having like 12 or so deputies, but dang... We are the second largest agency in the county. The City is the largest with over 900. Then us, then some suburban agencies with 30-60 officers, then the small cities and villages with 10-20 officers. We are a pretty big county with over somewhere between 800k and 900k residents. |
|
Quoted: How the hell can an employer ban you from carrying something while OFF Duty? Thru policy....if you are carrying under agency badge then you need to carry authorized weapons. If you are carrying under your ccw then you won't be acting under agency authority.. So if you do good then you are a hero and if it goes sideways the agency will say you used an unauthorized weapon, you're on your own. |
|
Quoted: So... it ended today?  Quoted: Quoted: My Sheriff just banned the Sig P320 from off duty carry and from the range. It’s a good size agency. Over 600 officers. So... it ended today? That's really clever.  Attached File |
|
Quoted: How else are they going to shoot to slide lock and get away with it? I actually support police, but the whole “let’s empty our pistols every time is kind of ridiculous. Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: How the hell can an employer ban you from carrying something while OFF Duty? They can't law wise. You're free to do what you want. But if you're involved in an off duty OIS and things don't go right they may withhold indemnification and or bring you up on departmental charges for the rule violation subjection you to personal liability. My local LEA has an authorized list of off duties in its Ops guide. That’s BS. An off duty cop shouldn’t ever have ANY additional indemnification that a private citizen doesn’t anyways. Likewise, the department should not be held liable for actions of officers outside the line of duty. How else are they going to shoot to slide lock and get away with it? I actually support police, but the whole “let’s empty our pistols every time is kind of ridiculous. If its a good shoot i dont have a problem with it. Pistols arent good at stopping people. If lethal force is called for then shoot till they dont twitch. |
|
Quoted: Very easy. Police work is a paramilitary structure, it’s not like working at McDonald's. Quoted: Quoted: How the hell can an employer ban you from carrying something while OFF Duty? Very easy. Police work is a paramilitary structure, it’s not like working at McDonald's. This. It’s way different. You have to be able to hit a bun with cheese and a meat patty… so McDonald’s actually has marksmanship standards. |
|
Quoted: The SIG P320 looks great and I have never had an issue. Would you mind doing this test?  Testing two P320's for Uncommanded Discharge: One PASS, one FAIL |
|
Quoted: Ohio really doesn't like SIG. The training academy's that have banned it - Ohio. Your PD that just banned it - Ohio. Quoted: Quoted: My Sheriff just banned the Sig P320 from off duty carry and from the range. It’s a good size agency. Over 600 officers. Ohio really doesn't like SIG. The training academy's that have banned it - Ohio. Your PD that just banned it - Ohio. Meanwhile, OSHP carries the P320 |
|
Quoted: So, let's consider a VP9, PDP, Echelon, or Glock compared to the P320. What does the P320 do better than any of those (besides maybe more "aftermarket customization")? I imagine that the P320 shoots well enough, but it just seems heavy compared to a lot of otherwise comparable products at that price point. It shoots itself. 
|
[ARCHIVED THREAD] - SIG Banned!! (Page 3 of 3)
Join the Community
Your next conversation starts here.
Create your free account to join discussions, share your experience, save topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.
- Join discussions
- Follow topics and replies
- Connect with fellow enthusiasts
Already a member? Sign in
Stay informed by subscribing to our Newsletter