Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 12:46:26 PM EDT
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Very few  of those charged actually assaulted an officer.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Now you just need the Supreme Court to limit the use of "assaulting an officer" charges.


Very few  of those charged actually assaulted an officer.



He doesn't care - the goal is to tell A story, not THE story.
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 12:53:27 PM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



He doesn't care - the goal is to tell A story, not THE story.
View Quote


Link Posted: 6/28/2024 12:56:08 PM EDT
[#3]
Outstanding.  I hope the scotus keeps dunking on the current administration.
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 2:18:07 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Interesting that Jackson-Brown joined the majority and Coney Barrett dissented.
View Quote


I think they do this shit on purpose to appear non-partisan.
Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top