|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: Just putting this here as a timecapsule, might be interesting to look back on in the future. Many have theorized that the COVID era (from lab leaks being called a dangerous kooky conspiracy), to masks, to vaccines, to the walling off of treatment options - isn't a one off. That the industry can and has operated to protect money printers, and that it doesn't stop at COVID. Others insist it was a one off, and the entire vaccine schedule they are 70 shots short of, is sacred and perfect. Placing this here so either way, we can look back in the future. This happened this week. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/1000060189-3629764.jpg https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/1000059570-3629767.jpg https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/1000059553-3629770.jpg A twitter user speculating that this announcement isn't a one off, it is part of a process: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/1000059552-3629771.jpg But Mr Science expert says an infant can handle 10,000 at once.
|
Cancer risk studies ![]() Vaccine cancer risk |
Oh look, there he is with Michael "hide the decline" Mann
|
|
I saw Tucker Carlsen's interview with the founder of Wikipedia the other day, and for some reason decided to look at what they say there now about the origins of Covid-19. You'll be shocked (lol) that no goalposts have been moved on that one. They got their story and they're sticking to it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19#History "The virus is thought to be of natural animal origin, most likely through spillover infection.[105][402][403] A joint-study conducted in early 2021 by the People's Republic of China and the World Health Organization indicated that the virus descended from a coronavirus that infects wild bats, and likely spread to humans through an intermediary wildlife host.[404] There are several theories about where the index case originated and investigations into the origin of the pandemic are ongoing.[405] According to articles published in July 2022 in Science, virus transmission into humans occurred through two spillover events in November 2019 and was likely due to live wildlife trade on the Huanan wet market in the city of Wuhan (Hubei, China).[406][407][408] Doubts about the conclusions have mostly centered on the precise site of spillover.[409] Earlier phylogenetics estimated that SARS-CoV-2 arose in October or November 2019.[105][410][411] A phylogenetic algorithm analysis suggested that the virus may have been circulating in Guangdong before Wuhan.[412] Most scientists believe the virus spilled into human populations through natural zoonosis, similar to the SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV outbreaks, and consistent with other pandemics in human history.[22][23] According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change several social and environmental factors including climate change, natural ecosystem destruction and wildlife trade increased the likelihood of such zoonotic spillover.[24][25] One study made with the support of the European Union found climate change increased the likelihood of the pandemic by influencing distribution of bat species.[26][27] Available evidence suggests that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was originally harboured by bats, and spread to humans multiple times from infected wild animals at the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan in December 2019.[22][23] A minority of scientists and some members of the U.S intelligence community believe the virus may have been unintentionally leaked from a laboratory such as the Wuhan Institute of Virology.[413][414] The US intelligence community has mixed views on the issue,[415][416] but overall agrees with the scientific consensus that the virus was not developed as a biological weapon and is unlikely to have been genetically engineered.[417][418][419][420] There is no evidence SARS-CoV-2 existed in any laboratory prior to the pandemic.[421][422][423]" |
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
I guess we'll never know. I'm glad I didn't get taxed would make the decision again. |
"Can a man who's warm understand one who's freezing?" Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
YEAR 5
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG: But Mr Science expert says an infant can handle 10,000 at once.
Originally Posted By RSG: Originally Posted By Geralt55: Just putting this here as a timecapsule, might be interesting to look back on in the future. Many have theorized that the COVID era (from lab leaks being called a dangerous kooky conspiracy), to masks, to vaccines, to the walling off of treatment options - isn't a one off. That the industry can and has operated to protect money printers, and that it doesn't stop at COVID. Others insist it was a one off, and the entire vaccine schedule they are 70 shots short of, is sacred and perfect. Placing this here so either way, we can look back in the future. This happened this week. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/1000060189-3629764.jpg https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/1000059570-3629767.jpg https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/1000059553-3629770.jpg A twitter user speculating that this announcement isn't a one off, it is part of a process: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/1000059552-3629771.jpg But Mr Science expert says an infant can handle 10,000 at once.
It's one giant card house, and it's absolutely crazy how they've shamed people out of examining it! Surreal |
Here are some good points to follow up on ; ![]() Spike protein body wide harm and mitochondrial damage (update #184) My thought goes to why the spike protein was used inexplicably for the mrna model ; the creators already knew most of the adverse actions . |
|
Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: Here are some good points to follow up on ; My thought goes to why the spike protein was used inexplicably for the mrna model ; the creators already knew most of the adverse actions . It's one of the features.....They knew what it does and it's doing what it was designed to do. They killed my dad with it. |
|
Originally Posted By redleg13a: It's one of the features.....They knew what it does and it's doing what it was designed to do. They killed my dad with it. Originally Posted By redleg13a: Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: Here are some good points to follow up on ; My thought goes to why the spike protein was used inexplicably for the mrna model ; the creators already knew most of the adverse actions . It's one of the features.....They knew what it does and it's doing what it was designed to do. They killed my dad with it. If Hell is real, the people responsible for all this have a seat next to history's other monsters for what they did. |
'But it still prevents serious illness!'
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
IIRC one of the pfizer_bots suspected to be a team of people posting under 1 handle earned a spot on my ignore list for the phrase "Big Ivermectin"
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: Talk about a goalpost! https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/1000078752-3662168.jpg "It is safe and tested. No steps were skipped In 6 months we know everything about this thing longterm cause ScienceTM You're prolonging the pandemic by not getting it It's just so safe and effective they can mandate it" Is now "How could they rule out an autism link to vaccines, when they never actually studied that?" I guess the anti-science people are going to contradict the CDC now? Maybe they should all lose their youtube channels! ![]() BREAKING: CDC quietly rewrites its vaccine–autism guidance "....Political dynamite The political context makes this change even more consequential. Senator Bill Cassidy, who chairs the Senate Health Committee, has been one of the most vocal critics of Kennedy’s vaccine views. Cassidy has repeatedly insisted that the science on autism and vaccination was settled years ago. Now the CDC states that the claim “vaccines do not cause autism” does not meet evidence standards. Remarkably, the CDC states that the headline phrase remains on the page only “due to an agreement with the chair of the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee.” " ![]() [Here is a link where you see the "Vaccines do not cause Autism" header with an asterisk.] ... Old CDC Website ![]() Updated CDC Website ![]() |
|
This isn't something that gets published without various levels of review. https://brownstone.org/articles/the-third-rail-covid-19-vaccines-and-cancer/ The author: Dr. Charlotte Kuperwasser is a distinguished Professor in the Department of Developmental, Molecular, and Chemical Biology at Tufts University School of Medicine and the Director of Tufts Convergence Laboratory at Tufts. Dr. Kuperwasser is internationally recognized for her expertise in mammary gland biology and breast cancer, and prevention. She is a member of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. |
|
Originally Posted By exponentialpi: This isn't something that gets published without various levels of review. https://brownstone.org/articles/the-third-rail-covid-19-vaccines-and-cancer/ The author: Dr. Charlotte Kuperwasser is a distinguished Professor in the Department of Developmental, Molecular, and Chemical Biology at Tufts University School of Medicine and the Director of Tufts Convergence Laboratory at Tufts. Dr. Kuperwasser is internationally recognized for her expertise in mammary gland biology and breast cancer, and prevention. She is a member of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Thanks for that article. The third mechanism is what happened to my dad. |
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
Multiple people catching onto this one. It's ugly. |
|
And this is how the "news" reported this
Bet you can guess who the "experts" are |
|
New study out. Small sample size but quite telling info. Various samples collected from 34 participants, including vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. In samples collected between 100 and 200 days from the last injection, vaccine RNA was detected in 60% of the subjects, while in about half of the women examined, vaccine RNA was still detectable after more than 200 days from the last vaccination. Results from blood and placenta from all vaccinated women were in agreement, namely, that the vaccine was either detected in both blood and placenta or in neither sample. Interestingly, vaccine sequences were detected in both the blood and the placenta of two of the six non-vaccinated women. One non vaccinated woman presented vaccine sequences in blood alone. These findings were validated using two independent concentration assays. https://www.gavinpublishers.com/article/view/detection-of-pfizer-biontech-messenger-rna-covid19-vaccine-in-human-blood-placenta-and-semen |
|
Originally Posted By exponentialpi: New study out. Small sample size but quite telling info. Various samples collected from 34 participants, including vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Let me repeat that: Interestingly, vaccine sequences were detected in both the blood and the placenta of two of the six non-vaccinated women. One non vaccinated woman presented vaccine sequences in blood alone. https://www.gavinpublishers.com/article/view/detection-of-pfizer-biontech-messenger-rna-covid19-vaccine-in-human-blood-placenta-and-semen So where did the non vaccinated get the vaccine sequence? From sex? From breathing the same air as vaccinated people? Ingested? |
"Can a man who's warm understand one who's freezing?" Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
|
Originally Posted By zeekh: So where did the non vaccinated get the vaccine sequence? From sex? From breathing the same air as vaccinated people? Ingested? I recall "shedding" being discussed early in this debacle, but can't recall if it came from: -Science -Conspiracy theory -A sci fi book I may have read years ago The three are beginning to converge, with "science" lagging the other 2 significantly, being mainly driven by politics. |
|
Originally Posted By glock27bill: I recall "shedding" being discussed early in this debacle, but can't recall if it came from: -Science -Conspiracy theory -A sci fi book I may have read years ago The three are beginning to converge, with "science" lagging the other 2 significantly, being mainly driven by politics. Originally Posted By glock27bill: Originally Posted By zeekh: So where did the non vaccinated get the vaccine sequence? From sex? From breathing the same air as vaccinated people? Ingested? I recall "shedding" being discussed early in this debacle, but can't recall if it came from: -Science -Conspiracy theory -A sci fi book I may have read years ago The three are beginning to converge, with "science" lagging the other 2 significantly, being mainly driven by politics. When you search now, the first articles that show up deny that mRNA shots "shed", claiming that only live attenuated vaccines produce shedding* but if you keep searching you find there were multiple cases where individuals who were not vaccinated but lived with people who were showed that was disproved as well as finding it in waste water at treatment plants. *Example of a doctor explaining why mRNA shots don't shed and are safe (he definitely goes out of his to compare shedding theories with homeopathic medicine- almost like he doth protest too much?): https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2024/04/08/yet-another-anti-vax-doctor-claims-vaccines-shed-where-did-this-myth-originate/ The article he's disputing by Kory: https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/shedding-of-covid-mrna-vaccine-components An more recent article by Kory https://imahealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Shedding-of-COVID-mRNA-Vaccines-A-review-of-evidence-2024-02-03.pdf There are other examples, but you have to dig for them, just like trying to find information on mRNA being present in the blood bank supply. |
|
Originally Posted By zeekh: So where did the non vaccinated get the vaccine sequence? From sex? From breathing the same air as vaccinated people? Ingested? Originally Posted By zeekh: Originally Posted By exponentialpi: New study out. Small sample size but quite telling info. Various samples collected from 34 participants, including vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Let me repeat that: Interestingly, vaccine sequences were detected in both the blood and the placenta of two of the six non-vaccinated women. One non vaccinated woman presented vaccine sequences in blood alone. https://www.gavinpublishers.com/article/view/detection-of-pfizer-biontech-messenger-rna-covid19-vaccine-in-human-blood-placenta-and-semen So where did the non vaccinated get the vaccine sequence? From sex? From breathing the same air as vaccinated people? Ingested? From the paper, of the 3 sperm donors that produced sperm, all had mRNA in the sperm. 2 out of 3 had it in seminal fluid as well. It's probable it transferred during the baby making process. |
|
Originally Posted By RSG: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G76ATvaXkAA1G3x?format=jpg&name=small https://archive.md/gJgiJ TownHall has a similar article this morning, along with Twitter/X comments pointing out that this information had been censored from social media when it may have saved lives, and would continue to be censored today had it not been for a certain South African. Turns Out the COVID Vaccine Critics Were Right All Along But of course, the damage has been done (physiological as well as social.) |
|
Originally Posted By RSG: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G76ATvaXkAA1G3x?format=jpg&name=small https://archive.md/gJgiJ ![]() SaFe AnD tEsTeD |
|
|
Originally Posted By sandboxmedic: When you search now, the first articles that show up deny that mRNA shots "shed", claiming that only live attenuated vaccines produce shedding* but if you keep searching you find there were multiple cases where individuals who were not vaccinated but lived with people who were showed that was disproved as well as finding it in waste water at treatment plants. *Example of a doctor explaining why mRNA shots don't shed and are safe (he definitely goes out of his to compare shedding theories with homeopathic medicine- almost like he doth protest too much?): https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2024/04/08/yet-another-anti-vax-doctor-claims-vaccines-shed-where-did-this-myth-originate/ The article he's disputing by Kory: https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/shedding-of-covid-mrna-vaccine-components An more recent article by Kory https://imahealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Shedding-of-COVID-mRNA-Vaccines-A-review-of-evidence-2024-02-03.pdf There are other examples, but you have to dig for them, just like trying to find information on mRNA being present in the blood bank supply. Someone, I believe it was Robert Malone, stated that if they'd been listed as gene therapy products (they are) they would have had to undergo shedding testing. Because no one listed them as such they haven't been tested. Although Moderna did call them that in one of their Security Exchange Commission filings. Nothing submitted to the FDA did though. |
|
...One ardent proponent of masking says that’s the way he’ll spend the rest of his life: “I don’t just, like, go out the way I used to,” says Evan Sachs, who is in his early 30s and lives in New York with his three cats. He always wears a mask outdoors. “Sometimes it’s a bummer.” Not because masking is keeping him from living his life, he adds, “but because other people [selfishly] aren’t doing the ‘wearing your pants’ levels of easy things” to keep everyone safe. He runs a ‘bloc’ in the Washington Heights area of New York which distributes personal protective equipment (PPE) to less well-off communities. “I do not have Long Covid, thank goodness,” Sachs adds. “I am very, very lucky on that front.” He doesn’t want to get it either. “I honestly think I would [mask forever],” he says.’ |
|
|
Originally Posted By APPARITION:
Gov./Dr. Andrew Cuomo forbid pharmacies to prescribe ivermectin during covid. They're tyrants. |
"Can a man who's warm understand one who's freezing?" Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Studies ongoing in Japan and other countries ... ![]() Excess deaths anger |
Ah , as it turns out , the body does not like exogenous dna/rna . ![]() Stanford Study Warns of a Class-Level Issue in mRNA Vaccine Design |
|
Attached File Childhood vaccine schedule now looks like Europe, I'm sure the shitlibs will panic anyway
|
|





















