Originally Posted By backbencher:
Need the monastery on fire on the shirt.  What's w/ the holes in the sails?

Originally Posted By armoredman:
It's HOW COLD up there? It's 54 down here and this fat old desert rat is wearing a jacket!

Originally Posted By xanadu:
The shirt Dates look like a phone number ... 867-5309

Consider:

793 B.C. - 1006 B.C.

or

793 - 1006 B.C.

or

B.C.E. 793 to  B.C.E. 1006

etc.

Why Have Some People Adopted BCE/CE?
An important reason for adopting BCE/CE is religious neutrality. Since the Gregorian calendar has superseded other calendars to become the international standard, members of non-Christian groups may object to the explicitly Christian origins of BC and AD. Particularly problematic is AD (“in the year of the Lord”), and its unavoidable implication that the Lord in question is Jesus Christ.

Religious neutrality was the main rationale behind Jewish academics’ adoption of BCE/CE over a century ago, and continues to be its most widely cited justification. However, others object to the BC/AD system on the basis that it is objectively inaccurate. It is widely accepted that the actual birth of Jesus occurred at least two years before AD 1, and so some argue that explicitly linking years to an erroneous birthdate for Jesus is arbitrary or even misleading. BCE/CE avoids this inaccuracy since it does not explicitly refer to the birth of Jesus, removing some of the baggage associated with our dating system while also acknowledging that the starting point for 1 CE is essentially a convention.

Pushback
The movement towards BCE/CE has not been universally accepted, and BC/AD is still more widely used, even though BCE/CE has been in the mainstream since the 1980s. There have been backlashes to the adoption of the new system in defence of BC/AD, notably in 2002 when the UK National Curriculum made the transition. In 2011, education authorities in Australia were forced to deny that such a change had been planned for national school textbooks amid a similar controversy triggered by media reports.

Passions are usually highest among those who see the adoption of a new system as an attempt to write Jesus Christ out of history. They argue that the entire Gregorian Calendar is Christian in nature anyway, so why should we attempt to obscure that fact? Others ask why such a well-established and functional system should be replaced, arguing that the existence of two competing abbreviations is likely to cause confusion.

It has also been argued that BCE/CE is, in fact, less religiously inclusive than BC/AD. According to some, BCE/CE elevates the importance of Christ’s birth to the start of an entirely new “common era”, while BC/AD is a simple reference to the event.

Originally Posted By backbencher:
OP, I didn't really understand the plastic sheeting on the dragon, but now the scales are going on it's looking increasingly realistic.

Originally Posted By xanadu:


So... AD [space] date, AND the AD should perhaps be a point or two smaller than the date so it doesn't overpower the numbers


https://i.gyazo.com/463678ca1ef51fe0bb1b0c62ba0e340b.png

(wouldn't want to run afoul of the English department)

Originally Posted By Redbirdxx:
Customink will let you select multiple products/colors for fundraisers as long as the actual art remains the same.

If you want to keep it on the simple side, just select 2-3 colors of the same product and let purchasers chose.