User Panel
I don’t want this country to split up.
I just want to send all the liberals to a deserted island and nuke it. |
|
Quoted:
It's a bad idea. Ideologies aside, liberals and conservatives need each other. So do capitalism and socialism comes to that. Red America would collapse into feudalism and theocracy in no time, Blue America would align itself with Europe and the pacific rim, maybe separately, left coast and NE, maybe all together. Either way, it wouldn't be long at all until the right was in a position so weak it's own oligarchs would sell it out for a position in a stronger society. View Quote Total government spending in states like MS, AL, and WV is well over 50% of their GDP; similar to Denmark... it's just funded by other states. Mississippi is subsidized by the rest of the United States to the tune of over 20% of their GDP. Balkanization is a stupid fucking idea, pushed by stupid people who can't see further downstream effects. We'd end up closer to South America than Europe. |
|
|
we can do drone zeppelins
partially automated happy steampunk |
|
Quoted:
. A balkanization, with a new country that can allow ." View Quote |
|
500 career politicians and assclowns in Washington D.C. making decisions and ruling over 320,000,000 people. Not ever going to work out in the long game.
|
|
|
Quoted:
But America is largely purple with the "red" and "blue" of a state being a couple of percentage points one way or the other. When the difference is 1-5% how do you cut the 49% folks from the 51%? It's easy to say that California is all liberal except for the 18 million conservatives that live there ... more than the right 22 other states combined. View Quote I don't think the US can go down any sort of balkanization or even two nation's route. Pretty much any way you draw the borders, unless you carve out major metropolitan areas, you would end up with something in danger of sliding back to progressive policies. |
|
|
Quoted:
Amen but that genie ain't going back in the bottle without a fight. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Bingo. I predict that long before a balkanization or big igloo, there will be more and more states challenging the fed, citing states rights as outlined in the constitution. The constitution clearly says the states can govern themselves except for what is enumerated in the constitution to be done by the federal government, not vice versa.
|
|
We don't need Balkanizaiton, we need to stop letting the media turn us all against each other (all according to plan).
|
|
I like the idea in theory, but the problem we have is that it’s not regional, but largely urban vs rural.
That leave us with: A) Millions of Americans move to new free states B) We just build walls around the cities and carve them out of America I vote B |
|
With the demographics of Texans under the age of 30 being what they are Texas itself will be on the road to balkanization soon enough.
|
|
Quoted:
More difficult to get trains to an island, and historically the island thing proved too difficult. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Balkanization is a loosing concept. It is also surrendering our Constitution to the whims of radicals and nut balls. Our enemies would love nothing more of course. I have an oath to defend the Constitution and balkanization doesn't fit into that oath, not one bit.
|
|
Quoted:
America is more strictly divided along political lines than they are Religious ones, but that doesn't mean that the fanaticism is different. There is no way a Conservative who values guns and keeping their money will change their minds or even compromise with a liberal who wants open borders, nationalized healthcare, or free college. And vice versa. A secession, with Texas being a good first state to lead the way due to its size, population, and military assets, would be the best thing to happen to the country moving forward. A founding of a new country with the ability to let states and local government let the voters decide how much they want to spend on a healthcare system, welfare, and college, would be far better for the country than having any of those systems be nationalized. Europe has different countries that each run their own systems for a reason. There are states with larger populations than 3 quarters of the countries in Europe. There is no reason, especially with what we have seen, to believe that a national government running the lives of over 300 million people is beneficial to anyone. The constitution calls for the Federal Government to uphold and protect the general welfare, not the specific welfare of people. Let the states, or hell even cities decide if they want welfare, healthcare, or schoolcare. The federal government needs to protect the country and ensure interstate and international commerce is allowed to happen. That is it. Not whatever the fuck we have already, and not whatever the fuck anyone who is running for president wants. The system we have is too entangled, too large, and too ingrained to ever be voted out. Or to ever be cut by a single president. A balkanization, with a new country that can allow itself to start over on constitutional values, with the ability to start fresh without any of the entitlements that take up more than what we have in our budget, is necessary for the continuation of the American Dream. Even if Trump wins the presidency again, it may be time to start writing a document with the first words being "When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary..." View Quote |
|
Quoted:
America is more strictly divided along political lines than they are Religious ones, but that doesn't mean that the fanaticism is different. There is no way a Conservative who values guns and keeping their money will change their minds or even compromise with a liberal who wants open borders, nationalized healthcare, or free college. And vice versa. A secession, with Texas being a good first state to lead the way due to its size, population, and military assets, would be the best thing to happen to the country moving forward. A founding of a new country with the ability to let states and local government let the voters decide how much they want to spend on a healthcare system, welfare, and college, would be far better for the country than having any of those systems be nationalized. Europe has different countries that each run their own systems for a reason. There are states with larger populations than 3 quarters of the countries in Europe. There is no reason, especially with what we have seen, to believe that a national government running the lives of over 300 million people is beneficial to anyone. The constitution calls for the Federal Government to uphold and protect the general welfare, not the specific welfare of people. Let the states, or hell even cities decide if they want welfare, healthcare, or schoolcare. The federal government needs to protect the country and ensure interstate and international commerce is allowed to happen. That is it. Not whatever the fuck we have already, and not whatever the fuck anyone who is running for president wants. The system we have is too entangled, too large, and too ingrained to ever be voted out. Or to ever be cut by a single president. A balkanization, with a new country that can allow itself to start over on constitutional values, with the ability to start fresh without any of the entitlements that take up more than what we have in our budget, is necessary for the continuation of the American Dream. Even if Trump wins the presidency again, it may be time to start writing a document with the first words being "When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary..." View Quote |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
America is more strictly divided along political lines than they are Religious ones, but that doesn't mean that the fanaticism is different. There is no way a Conservative who values guns and keeping their money will change their minds or even compromise with a liberal who wants open borders, nationalized healthcare, or free college. And vice versa. A secession, with Texas being a good first state to lead the way due to its size, population, and military assets, would be the best thing to happen to the country moving forward. A founding of a new country with the ability to let states and local government let the voters decide how much they want to spend on a healthcare system, welfare, and college, would be far better for the country than having any of those systems be nationalized. Europe has different countries that each run their own systems for a reason. There are states with larger populations than 3 quarters of the countries in Europe. There is no reason, especially with what we have seen, to believe that a national government running the lives of over 300 million people is beneficial to anyone. The constitution calls for the Federal Government to uphold and protect the general welfare, not the specific welfare of people. Let the states, or hell even cities decide if they want welfare, healthcare, or schoolcare. The federal government needs to protect the country and ensure interstate and international commerce is allowed to happen. That is it. Not whatever the fuck we have already, and not whatever the fuck anyone who is running for president wants. The system we have is too entangled, too large, and too ingrained to ever be voted out. Or to ever be cut by a single president. A balkanization, with a new country that can allow itself to start over on constitutional values, with the ability to start fresh without any of the entitlements that take up more than what we have in our budget, is necessary for the continuation of the American Dream. Even if Trump wins the presidency again, it may be time to start writing a document with the first words being "When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary..." View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Foreign governments buying political influence and out right occupation of land becomes easier in 3....2....1... America is America due in large part to geography; let China get a foothold, which they are sure to do if California was its own country and see where this Matt Bracken novel goes. Wanting Balkanization is foolish and short sighted View Quote |
|
Quoted: Yep. Every time I visit Colorado I find myself thinking, "this back country sure would look better with more fencing and a shitload of "No Trespassing" signs. View Quote |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
America is more strictly divided along political lines than they are Religious ones, but that doesn't mean that the fanaticism is different. There is no way a Conservative who values guns and keeping their money will change their minds or even compromise with a liberal who wants open borders, nationalized healthcare, or free college. And vice versa. A secession, with Texas being a good first state to lead the way due to its size, population, and military assets, would be the best thing to happen to the country moving forward. A founding of a new country with the ability to let states and local government let the voters decide how much they want to spend on a healthcare system, welfare, and college, would be far better for the country than having any of those systems be nationalized. Europe has different countries that each run their own systems for a reason. There are states with larger populations than 3 quarters of the countries in Europe. There is no reason, especially with what we have seen, to believe that a national government running the lives of over 300 million people is beneficial to anyone. The constitution calls for the Federal Government to uphold and protect the general welfare, not the specific welfare of people. Let the states, or hell even cities decide if they want welfare, healthcare, or schoolcare. The federal government needs to protect the country and ensure interstate and international commerce is allowed to happen. That is it. Not whatever the fuck we have already, and not whatever the fuck anyone who is running for president wants. The system we have is too entangled, too large, and too ingrained to ever be voted out. Or to ever be cut by a single president. A balkanization, with a new country that can allow itself to start over on constitutional values, with the ability to start fresh without any of the entitlements that take up more than what we have in our budget, is necessary for the continuation of the American Dream. Even if Trump wins the presidency again, it may be time to start writing a document with the first words being "When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary..." View Quote |
|
Quoted:
The problem with this is is doesn't fit neatly with state boundaries....Using Texas as an example, Austin, Dallas, Houston would all fit into one demographic and the 90% of the rest of Texas would fit into another. The problem is rural versus urban and this applies to every single state. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Last time Texas was a country it wouldn't accept help from Murica and in the end became part of murica. All because they couldn't fend off some Mexicans. View Quote Say what you want about Vermont, but when they were an independent country bordering a hostile power, they didn't spend whole time whining. |
|
|
|
Quoted: There is also the uncomfortable truth that a lot of red states get far more $$$ in return from the Fedgov than they pay in. Total government spending in states like MS, AL, and WV is well over 50% of their GDP; similar to Denmark... it's just funded by other states. Mississippi is subsidized by the rest of the United States to the tune of over 20% of their GDP. Balkanization is a stupid fucking idea, pushed by stupid people who can't see further downstream effects. We'd end up closer to South America than Europe. View Quote |
|
I think people need to travel a bit more, get out of their echo chambers, and spend less time on social media and other news sources that cater to their already entrenched beliefs.
This is still the greatest country on earth. That said, I don't take living in MT for granted. |
|
Quoted:
I think people need to travel a bit more, get out of their echo chambers, and spend less time on social media and other news sources that cater to their already entrenched beliefs. This is still the greatest country on earth. That said, I don't take living in MT for granted. View Quote |
|
Oh look, another Texas secession thread.
I can't speak for nobody but myself but I see Texas headed down the same disastrous road as Virginia.....No thanks, I'd rather be run over roughshod by so-called "Virginians" than a "profits at all costs" Texan type government....I can see them carving up our state forests for their cronies gain already. Fuck that noise. A better solution would be for states to have their own version of the Electoral College so that population centers don't hold a whole state hostage to the whims of those that live in those population centers. It's something long overdue. Doing away with "winner take all" in federal elections would be another step to bring our politics back to some level of sanity. |
|
|
Quoted:
Oh look, another Texas secession thread. I can't speak for nobody but myself but I see Texas headed down the same disastrous road as Virginia.....No thanks, I'd rather be run over roughshod by so-called "Virginians" than a "profits at all costs" Texan type government....I can see them carving up our state forests for their cronies gain already. Fuck that noise. A better solution would be for states to have their own version of the Electoral College so that population centers don't hold a whole state hostage to the whims of those that live in those population centers. It's something long overdue. Doing away with "winner take all" in federal elections would be another step to bring our politics back to some level of sanity. View Quote Besides, if you want to war game out how it could go, Kurt Schlichter already did the imagining for you. Balkanization may be inevitable, I think a natural disaster that's an economy killer may do it, but you shouldn't wish for it. |
|
|
You're giving us way too much credit.
Texas is purple and will be blue within 10 years. We've got massive immigration from California into the cities (Dallas, Houston, Austin, etc.) that is shifting the state. I may head back to AZ at some point. I've had several people tell me AZ actually is what TX pretends to be. |
|
Quoted:
You're giving us way too much credit. Texas is purple and will be blue within 10 years. We've got massive immigration from California into the cities (Dallas, Houston, Austin, etc.) that is shifting the state. I may head back to AZ at some point. I've had several people tell me AZ actually is what TX pretends to be. View Quote |
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.