Oh I understand the game. I worked for Halifax for almost five years. When they first put up no guns signs my supervisor and I spent a couple hours writing emails to our bosses and the legal department pointing out we could be violating 790.33. I even talked to my old boss today, and he said all of this is coming from the legal department.
However I also know how Baker Act patients at the port orange facility are treated. Specifically they are not given any psychiatric treatment, only medical treatment. Typically a BA patient will receive medical clearance in the ED. This involves checking for head injuries , metabolic abnormalities, or anything thing else that would cause altered mental status. Lots of crazy little old ladies turn out to have urinary tract infections that are causing their altered mental ststus.
After all medical issues are ruled out the patient is placed in a security squad car (with a cage) and transported to daytona where they are first seen by a psychiatric RN for an initial interview, and then by an actual psychiatrist or psychologist. No psychiatric screening is done at Port Orange.
They could try to argue that a violent patient getting sedated is psychiatric treatment, but I would counter that sedation for violence is a medical treatment because a medical Dr writes the order and sedation is used for other violent patients besides psychiatric.
I would also argue that sedation actually delays psych screening based on personal observations. They RN or Dr cannot ask questions if the patient is unconscious and tied to a bed.