Waiting for Justice! Antonyuk/GOA/Bruen (Page 61 of 61)
|
I've been following here...sorted by most recent. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65364032/antonyuk-v-hochul/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc |
|
Originally Posted By xd341: I'm missing something. why no updates here? Originally Posted By xd341: Originally Posted By HiramRanger: I personally wouldn't expect updates here. why no updates here? I rather suspect it would be because the are playing cards close to their vest. |
The duty of a patriot is to protect his nation from its government.
"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!"
"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!"
|
@HiramRanger @NoloContendere Maybe you guys can shed some light on the order that was published 2/23? Seems the case was dismissed by Suddaby (without prejudice) due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction? I can't quite make sense of it all. Wondering where this leaves the CCIA challenge. Thanks for any info! https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65364032/antonyuk-v-hochul/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc |
|
Originally Posted By DaveM4P99: @HiramRanger @NoloContendere Maybe you guys can shed some light on the order that was published 2/23? Seems the case was dismissed by Suddaby (without prejudice) due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction? I can't quite make sense of it all. Wondering where this leaves the CCIA challenge. Thanks for any info! https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65364032/antonyuk-v-hochul/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc Looks like one argument, by one plaintiff was dismissed without prejudice at the request of one of the defendants because the church bus does not qualify as public transportation in the meaning of the term and thus the CCIA's prohibition of carrying a firearm in the church bus does not apply. That is my best guess from reading the last couple of pages. You could upload the order into Grok and ask for a summary in layman's terms. |
The duty of a patriot is to protect his nation from its government.
"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!"
"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!"
|
@HiramRanger Sounds like we had a partial win/ agreement on the 16th? Sounds like the antigun judge is giving up on the social media application requirement, as long as we don't further pursue the issue or sue them for damages? Kind of bullshit that it took this long for the judge to concede, because I believe the second circuit already decided that the social media requirement was unconstitutional right? When they also decided the vampire rule/ blanket ban on carry in private properties open to the public, was also unconstitutional. The rest of the CCIA challenge in regards to sensitive places continues... I can't see how we lose, since there are no analogous laws banning carry in arbitrary sensitive places... Especially not places like parks or restaurants that serve alcohol etc. And there's absolutely no analogous laws that require expensive, difficult training just to own or carry a pistol. |
|
Originally Posted By DaveM4P99: @HiramRanger Sounds like we had a partial win/ agreement on the 16th? Sounds like the antigun judge is giving up on the social media application requirement, as long as we don't further pursue the issue or sue them for damages? Kind of bullshit that it took this long for the judge to concede, because I believe the second circuit already decided that the social media requirement was unconstitutional right? When they also decided the vampire rule/ blanket ban on carry in private properties open to the public, was also unconstitutional. The rest of the CCIA challenge in regards to sensitive places continues... I can't see how we lose, since there are no analogous laws banning carry in arbitrary sensitive places... Especially not places like parks or restaurants that serve alcohol etc. And there's absolutely no analogous laws that require expensive, difficult training just to own or carry a pistol. Originally Posted By DaveM4P99: @HiramRanger Sounds like we had a partial win/ agreement on the 16th? Sounds like the antigun judge is giving up on the social media application requirement, as long as we don't further pursue the issue or sue them for damages? Kind of bullshit that it took this long for the judge to concede, because I believe the second circuit already decided that the social media requirement was unconstitutional right? When they also decided the vampire rule/ blanket ban on carry in private properties open to the public, was also unconstitutional. The rest of the CCIA challenge in regards to sensitive places continues... I can't see how we lose, since there are no analogous laws banning carry in arbitrary sensitive places... Especially not places like parks or restaurants that serve alcohol etc. And there's absolutely no analogous laws that require expensive, difficult training just to own or carry a pistol. According to this the state agreed to an injunction - https://www.usacarry.com/federal-court-blocks-new-york-social-media-requirement-for-concealed-carry-permits/ According to court documents filed in the Northern District of New York, the state agreed to a permanent injunction preventing enforcement of the social media disclosure requirement under New York Penal Law § 400.00(1)(o)(iv). The order applies to the case brought by plaintiffs including Lawrence Sloane. https://x.com/GunFoundation/status/2034300051917246617 |
|
Originally Posted By MikeyCNY: According to this the state agreed to an injunction - https://www.usacarry.com/federal-court-blocks-new-york-social-media-requirement-for-concealed-carry-permits/ https://x.com/GunFoundation/status/2034300051917246617 Chipping away bit by bit. |
The duty of a patriot is to protect his nation from its government.
"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!"
"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!"
|
@HiramRanger @Nolocontendere Any insight into what has been happening with this case? Seems like a lot of action in late July. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65364032/antonyuk-v-hochul/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc |
|
So motions have been filed by Rob Romano in other cases that Nolo and he were working on, assume they will be for this case as well. Nolo is going to work for the DOJ on 2A issues. Cat's out of the bag, so I don't think there is an issue saying here. It's been a long time in the works, and while I'm sad to see Nolo leave the Antonyuk Team, he is off to make a huge impact. God speed Steve! |
The duty of a patriot is to protect his nation from its government.
"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!"
"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!"
 This may change things
|
|
Originally Posted By HiramRanger: So motions have been filed by Rob Romano in other cases that Nolo and he were working on, assume they will be for this case as well. Nolo is going to work for the DOJ on 2A issues. Cat's out of the bag, so I don't think there is an issue saying here. It's been a long time in the works, and while I'm sad to see Nolo leave the Antonyuk Team, he is off to make a huge impact. God speed Steve! Amazing news! I trust his position will be in accord with USAO recent efforts advancing 2A... a logical progression in his career-long fight for 2A. Good Luck Nolo! |
Ad Lucem: Towards Light
This information is a general statement of law and procedure and not a substitute for specific legal advice from a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction.
This information is a general statement of law and procedure and not a substitute for specific legal advice from a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction.