Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
9/11/2026 2:52:24 PM EDT
We know by now that two stage triggers are better in every way. And they can't seriously be any easier to manufacture. So unless you're selling to a military customer that is required to buy milspec parts per DoD/DoW policy, which Palmetto normally isn't doing, then why does anyone still bother making milspec triggers?

Also why bother still making milspec charging handles? Again, I have a hard time believing they are actually any easier to manufacture than some sort of ambi charging handle design. So why not design a Palmetto ambi charging handle and just make that the standard on everything going forward?
9/11/2026 5:51:12 PM EDT
[#1]
I hate 2 stage triggers.
9/14/2026 9:33:56 AM EDT
[#2]
Originally Posted By Brian01:
We know by now that two stage triggers are better in every way. And they can't seriously be any easier to manufacture. So unless you're selling to a military customer that is required to buy milspec parts per DoD/DoW policy, which Palmetto normally isn't doing, then why does anyone still bother making milspec triggers?

Also why bother still making milspec charging handles? Again, I have a hard time believing they are actually any easier to manufacture than some sort of ambi charging handle design. So why not design a Palmetto ambi charging handle and just make that the standard on everything going forward?
View Quote


I will send the suggestion up the chain of command.

Thanks,

Josiah
Palmetto State Armory
3760 Fernandina Rd
Columbia, SC 29210
Web Sales: 1-803-724-6950
9/14/2026 9:38:23 AM EDT
[#3]
I had a “Gas Buster” charging handle.
It didn’t bust gas.

I had an expensive BRAVO COMPANY charging handle on an AR-10.
It unlatched, and bopped me in the nose on recoil.

Basic triggers interface with speeder-upper gadgets reliably.
---------------
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin, 1775
9/14/2026 10:28:17 AM EDT
[#4]
The clone market disagrees with your premise

Also, cost, simplicity, and durability.
We are living in a Tom Clancy novel

Over 50 and reputed to be a formidable brigand
9/14/2026 11:07:06 AM EDT
[#5]
Marketing in general disagrees with you.

Often manufacturers will make a good, better  and best option. Or the market ends up doing that.

Good function fine, look acceptable and last pretty long.

Better might function slightly better, look better, or last slightly longer.

Best options are made with better materials still, best finishes, take more processes to make or just more material.

It has been that way for decades and in many industries. Cars, Electronics, Houses, Firearms
9/14/2026 11:32:33 AM EDT
[#6]
OP, lots of people still like milspec features and buy them specifically because of that.
9/14/2026 12:01:24 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote History
Originally Posted By PalmettoStateArmory:


I will send the suggestion up the chain of command.

Thanks,

Josiah
View Quote
AKA as the round file.
9/14/2026 12:35:48 PM EDT
[#8]
People just getting into the AR game aren't always going to be comfortable changing out their trigger.
Not everyone wants a 2 stage or even honed single stage. They want to keep their rifle as is.

The people on ARFCOM don't really represent the vast majority of AR owners. So assuming they have the same desires of a trigger isn't realistic. Most just want to buy their rifle and go to the range once or twice a year.

For those that want to change out triggers- go for it. But leave the milspec for the mass public.
9/14/2026 1:30:58 PM EDT
[#9]
On some guns I want a single stage, others I want a two stage.
"Life is Hard, its Harder if You're Stupid" - John Wayne
9/14/2026 4:40:20 PM EDT
[#10]
People in the military like practicing with what they'll be issued?

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In