Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
10/21/2005 7:42:10 PM EDT
If so have you compared it to the m2? is it "better"?

10/21/2005 9:18:29 PM EDT
[#1]
Guess not going by the cricket sounds

Is'nt it mainly just longer batt life?
10/21/2005 9:19:30 PM EDT
[#2]
I believe its a bit more compact too.
10/21/2005 11:58:31 PM EDT
[#3]
I switched from the M2 to the M3. The sight is the same size externally, just the dot is smaller. The dot might be a little sharper also.

I can't tell a lot of difference, the extra battery life was the main reason I tried one. I figure I will put a new battery in it every 5 years whether I need it or not.

Mike
10/22/2005 3:00:05 AM EDT
[#4]
The dot is only smaller if you get the 2MOA version (you have a choice now between 2 MOA and 4 MOA, while the older m2 only has 4MOA).

10/22/2005 7:25:57 AM EDT
[#5]
I switched to the 2moa, I'm very happy with it. I have astigs in both eyes, the small dot really helps me. Plus the extra battery juice is a bonus.
10/22/2005 11:28:47 AM EDT
[#6]
I think the fact that it can be left on #7 for over 200 days is impressive.

If you get deployed you can basically leave it on the whole time

and only have to change the battery once halfway through!

No turning down or off, its always ready! without worrying about changing batteries all the time.

If you or any of your friends are about to go downrange, give them an M3.

I think I'll like the 2MOA
10/22/2005 1:39:33 PM EDT
[#7]
are the NV setting totally useless unless you are using NV?

I want an ML3 but would settle for an M3 if I could actually use the NV setting w/o NV gear. I don't wanna pay for something I can't even use. Any info on how the setting are structured  ML3 vs M3?
10/22/2005 2:02:46 PM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:
I think the fact that it can be left on #7 for over 200 days is impressive.




They have a 50,000hr battery life on setting 7 out of 10, not 200 days.

WIZZO
10/22/2005 4:20:19 PM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:
are the NV setting totally useless unless you are using NV?



Yes, totally useless.  No NV?  Get the ML3.  Lowest setting on the ML versions is practically invisible.  The M versions have settings of even lower brightness.
10/22/2005 9:22:54 PM EDT
[#10]

They have a 50,000hr battery life on setting 7 out of 10, not 200 days.

WIZZO



Yes that is a typo, it is actually over 2000 days. (I punched one too few zeros on the calculator)

Try dividing 50,000hrs by 24hrs/day = 2083 days.

The batteries will last longer than an enlistment!  

Just change the batteries every time you re-enlist.
10/24/2005 2:43:31 PM EDT
[#11]

Quoted:
If so have you compared it to the m2? is it "better"?




I've put 8-10k rds downrange with an M2, and maybe 500 rds with a buddy's M3...  I like the M3 better.  The dot is smaller, but seems more intense, so it sort of blossoms when turned up to the highest setting and appears about the same size as the dot on the M2, but brighter.  

Plus, you can turn it down a click or two and shoot more precisely... plus it's pretty hard to beat 50,000 hour battery life!  



10/24/2005 3:11:03 PM EDT
[#12]
Sorry if this is a hijack,

Anyone have any opinions on how well or not well the M2 or M3 work with NV? I know the FOV is less than with an Eotech but how is the image intensity? Im looking to go with an M3 to run inline with my MUM.

10/24/2005 4:02:30 PM EDT
[#13]
thanks for the info.
AR Sponsor