AR Sponsor
Posted: 6/18/2006 1:12:26 PM EDT
| and my friends thought i was "anal" about the details. you pointed out so many things i didnt even know were specifics to the 601/602 series. damn good job man! that must be quite a few bucks in that build. i dont think i have enough time to track down all those parts. where do you find all these things? got any pics of an upper that is not put together. i never knew about the hole for the spring. |
Some have a curve below the FSB ears. |
All mine have been flat, and that is one way I ID FSB's in pictures. Is that an observation based on photographs or part in hand? Reason I ask is that Tantal and I ran into some trouble while doing the AK74 variation guide with the silhouette of the rifle being cut off the background, changing the appearance of the contours. This is especially a problem with the front baffle on the muzzle brakes. |
I thought they were removed from the system because they 1. Rusted, 2. Didn't feed properly. Stainless might make sense, I'll see what I can find. |
Just checked mine, stainless and painted. |
Look on page 754 of the 12th ed. of Small Arms of the World. |
My freaking luck, I only have the 9th and 11th editions, I guess I need to get back to looking for the 10th and 12th editions. Any chance someone could post a pic or scan? Thanks, "Capt Richardson" PS: if anyone has a copy of the 10th or 12th Edition of Small Arms of the World that you want to get rid of please let me know, Thanks. |
This continues to be a nice bit of work. I wonder, Ekie, if you shouldn't change your name to "Epic", given the immensity of the tasks you undertake. I will ask for some evidence of the statement quoted in blue, above. I have never heard that forged AR-15 receivers were ever made in anything but 7075-T6, and certainly that is what most of the manufacturers claim to be using today. |
How about that, never noticed it before. At least one of the rifles in the MOD Pattern room collection is like that too. |
Thanks. In regards to the alloy, check page 61 of TBR. Notice the ArmaLite Harvey forgings pictured are 7075 as Stoner intended. Now go to page 296 of BRII, second paragraph down. |
|
i was looking in Black Rifle I at all the oldies. i noticed on some of the real early serial numbers that the mag catch was different. the catch button had straight serrations like the bolt catch. then later on it changed to the ringed version but had more rings than the current version. i knew about the ringed version but this is the first time i noticed the straight serrations. anyway that would be pretty easy to duplicate on a mill. from a regular one. mill of the rings and mill in some grooves. it also seems that the original push pin would be easy to do, if the dimensions were out there. from the pics of the 601 lowers they had a small counter bore around the front pivot pin hole on the ejection port side. it looks to be just a clean up cut for the pin to sit flat. or was it a precise measurement to line the detent ball up with the upper counter bore. any way does anyone have a measurements of the original pin and the counter bore part on the lower ear? |
The mag button on this 601 clone is the second version, the one with extra rings. ![]()
Agreed, should be able to made the first version, figured it would be easier to flip it around and machine on the flat side. Have thought about having this done, but I typically find the real part at some point (like after having a custom one made). Don't have a 601 pivot pin, can't help you there. |
AR Sponsor
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.

























