AR Sponsor
Posted: 8/16/2007 6:23:08 AM EDT
|
Statement A: "They (5.56mm and 5.45mm) also tend to be very ineffective when shooting through foilage or soft cover." Statement B: "Ex: A 5.56 (or 5.45 I suppose), when working as it's designed (well, technically, NOT working properly.. wink wink), is only tumbling in the same way that a glass jar is still "tumbling" when you throw it at the ground and it shatters. " Correct or incorrect? |
|
I apologize, I took statement B out of context. That statement was explaining what "tumbling" really means after the 5.56x45mm (or 5.45x39mm) round enters a body. (?) Source of the above statements Edit: I believe those statements were found on Pg. 27 of that thread. |
 Love that stuff. Tell ya what, go hide behind a bush and I'll walk 100 yrds away and aim for your face. Let me know how that works out for ya. |
Don't forget that they also track down women and children using halliburton's gps satellites. 
|
Does that mean if they make a higher twist (1x5) it'll turn into a .50 caliber bullet? 
|
|
You are all a bunch of mislead ferrys. The 5.56 does not have the power to break the skin. No one has ever been injured with the 5.56. The mil only uses it to pass the Geneva convention STD test which all mil people need to pass to be able to shoot. My sons airsoft is a better round since it can shoot different colored balls. I hate myself today...where's by beer. 
|
Worse, it would arm the nuclear devise tht is on board all 5.56 rounds |
|
STD tests....different colored balls?!?!? |
AR Sponsor